Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Original Article

Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Disability Index

verfasst von: Katsushi Takeshita, Noboru Hosono, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Kyoichi Hasegawa, Tatsuya Isomura, Yasushi Oshima, Takashi Ono, Masahito Oshina, Takenori Oda, So Kato, Kazuo Yonenobu

Erschienen in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is one of the most widely used questionnaires for neck pain. The purpose of this study was to validate the Japanese NDI.

Methods

We performed two surveys with an 8-week interval in 130 patients with neck pain, radiculopathy and myelopathy. We asked patients to answer two versions of the Japanese NDI: the original NDI, which had been completed by a forward–backward translation procedure, and the modified NDI, which has the phrase “because of neck pain” to the phase “because of neck pain or numbness in the arm.” The other parameters examined were the strength of pain and numbness, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Short Form 36. Attending surgeons judged the symptom severity. Patients were asked to report the patient global impression of change (PGIC) at the second survey. The internal consistency, criterion-related and discriminative validity, and reliability were evaluated.

Results

The original NDI and the modified NDI were 26.9 ± 17.1 and 29.9 ± 15.5, respectively. The Cronbach α values of the original NDI and the modified NDI were 0.92 and 0.89, respectively. Both versions of the NDI had good to excellent correlative coefficients with the related domains. The modified NDI had a higher validity for numbness and mental health-related QOL. The symptom severity was significantly correlated with the modified NDI. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the two surveys of the modified and original NDI were comparable. The effect sizes of the modified and the original NDI were 0.64 and 0.55, respectively. Spearman’s ρ between the change of the NDI and the PGIC was 0.47 in the original NDI and 0.59 in the modified NDI.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Japanese NDI. The modified NDI was more strongly correlated with numbness and mental health-related QOL.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409–15.PubMed Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409–15.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271–3.PubMed Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271–3.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991–2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491–502.PubMedCrossRef Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991–2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491–502.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, Seichi A, Shimamura T, Shirado O, Taguchi T, Takahashi K, Takeshita K, Tani T, Toyama Y, Yonenobu K, Wada E, Tanaka T, Hirota Y. JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions April 16, 2007: the Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(3):348–65.PubMedCrossRef Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, Seichi A, Shimamura T, Shirado O, Taguchi T, Takahashi K, Takeshita K, Tani T, Toyama Y, Yonenobu K, Wada E, Tanaka T, Hirota Y. JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions April 16, 2007: the Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(3):348–65.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigmund AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRef Zigmund AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kugaya A, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Okamura H, Uchitomi Y. Screening for psychological distress in Japanese cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28:333–8.PubMedCrossRef Kugaya A, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Okamura H, Uchitomi Y. Screening for psychological distress in Japanese cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28:333–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;51:1037–44.CrossRef Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;51:1037–44.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuhara S, Ware JE, Kosinski M, Wada S, Gandek B. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1045–53.PubMedCrossRef Fukuhara S, Ware JE, Kosinski M, Wada S, Gandek B. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1045–53.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Measur. 2004;64(3):391–418.CrossRef Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Measur. 2004;64(3):391–418.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335–41.PubMedCrossRef Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335–41.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:376–82.PubMedCrossRef Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:376–82.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31:598-6-2. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine. 2006;31:598-6-2.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Koes BW. Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1729–36.PubMedCrossRef Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Koes BW. Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1729–36.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook C, Richardson JK, Braga L, Menezes A, Soler X, Kume P, Zaninelli M, Socolows F, Pietrobon R. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine. 2006;31:1621–7.PubMedCrossRef Cook C, Richardson JK, Braga L, Menezes A, Soler X, Kume P, Zaninelli M, Socolows F, Pietrobon R. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine. 2006;31:1621–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Trouli MN, Vernon HT, Kakavelakis KN, Antonopoulou MD, Paganas AN, Lionis CD. Translation of the Neck Disability Index and validation of the Greek version in a sample of neck pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;22:106.CrossRef Trouli MN, Vernon HT, Kakavelakis KN, Antonopoulou MD, Paganas AN, Lionis CD. Translation of the Neck Disability Index and validation of the Greek version in a sample of neck pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;22:106.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Montazeri A, Mehdian H, Karimi A, Abedi M, Ashtiani AA, Mobini B, Hadian MR. Translation and validation study of the Iranian versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine. 2007;32:E825–31.PubMedCrossRef Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Montazeri A, Mehdian H, Karimi A, Abedi M, Ashtiani AA, Mobini B, Hadian MR. Translation and validation study of the Iranian versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine. 2007;32:E825–31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieto R, Miró J, Huguet A. Disability in subacute whiplash patients: usefulness of the neck disability index. Spine. 2008;33:E630–5.PubMedCrossRef Nieto R, Miró J, Huguet A. Disability in subacute whiplash patients: usefulness of the neck disability index. Spine. 2008;33:E630–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovacs FM, Bagó J, Royuela A, Seco J, Giménez S, Muriel A, Abraira V, Martín JL, Peña JL, Gestoso M, Mufraggi N, Núñez M, Corcoll J, Gómez-Ochoa I, Ramírez MJ, Calvo E, Castillo MD, Martí D, Fuster S, Fernández C, Gimeno N, Carballo A, Milán A, Vázquez D, Cañellas M, Blanco R, Brieva P, Rueda MT, Alvarez L, Del Real MT, Ayerbe J, González L, Ginel L, Ortega M, Bernal M, Bolado G, Vidal A, Ausín A, Ramón D, Mir MA, Tomás M, Zamora J, Cano A. Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:42.PubMedCrossRef Kovacs FM, Bagó J, Royuela A, Seco J, Giménez S, Muriel A, Abraira V, Martín JL, Peña JL, Gestoso M, Mufraggi N, Núñez M, Corcoll J, Gómez-Ochoa I, Ramírez MJ, Calvo E, Castillo MD, Martí D, Fuster S, Fernández C, Gimeno N, Carballo A, Milán A, Vázquez D, Cañellas M, Blanco R, Brieva P, Rueda MT, Alvarez L, Del Real MT, Ayerbe J, González L, Ginel L, Ortega M, Bernal M, Bolado G, Vidal A, Ausín A, Ramón D, Mir MA, Tomás M, Zamora J, Cano A. Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:42.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Telci EA, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE, Yagli N. The cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of Neck Disability Index in patients with neck pain. A Turkish version study. Spine. 2009;34:1732–5.PubMedCrossRef Telci EA, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE, Yagli N. The cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of Neck Disability Index in patients with neck pain. A Turkish version study. Spine. 2009;34:1732–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KJ, Choi BW, Choi BR, Seo GB. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the neck disability index. Spine. 2010;35:E1045–9.PubMedCrossRef Song KJ, Choi BW, Choi BR, Seo GB. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the neck disability index. Spine. 2010;35:E1045–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu S, Ma C, Mai M, Li G. Translation and validation study of Chinese versions of the neck disability index and the neck pain and disability scale. Spine. 2010;35:1575–9.PubMedCrossRef Wu S, Ma C, Mai M, Li G. Translation and validation study of Chinese versions of the neck disability index and the neck pain and disability scale. Spine. 2010;35:1575–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujiwara N, Takeshita K. Neuropathic pain and consultation behavior of patients with the ossification of the spinal ligaments. In: Investigation committee 2010 report on the ossification of the spinal ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare, Tokyo. p. 41–3 (in Japanese). Fujiwara N, Takeshita K. Neuropathic pain and consultation behavior of patients with the ossification of the spinal ligaments. In: Investigation committee 2010 report on the ossification of the spinal ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare, Tokyo. p. 41–3 (in Japanese).
Metadaten
Titel
Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Disability Index
verfasst von
Katsushi Takeshita
Noboru Hosono
Yoshiharu Kawaguchi
Kyoichi Hasegawa
Tatsuya Isomura
Yasushi Oshima
Takashi Ono
Masahito Oshina
Takenori Oda
So Kato
Kazuo Yonenobu
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Orthopaedic Science / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0949-2658
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0304-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Journal of Orthopaedic Science 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

TEP mit Roboterhilfe führt nicht zu größerer Zufriedenheit

15.05.2024 Knie-TEP Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Lever-Sign-Test hilft beim Verdacht auf Kreuzbandriss

15.05.2024 Vordere Kreuzbandruptur Nachrichten

Mit dem Hebelzeichen-Test lässt sich offenbar recht zuverlässig feststellen, ob ein vorderes Kreuzband gerissen ist. In einer Metaanalyse war die Vorhersagekraft vor allem bei positivem Testergebnis hoch.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.