Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 7/2015

01.10.2015

Value of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the pancreatic allograft transplant complications

verfasst von: Yubao Liu, Fatih Akisik, Temel Tirkes, Mark Tann, Kumaresan Sandrasegaran, S. Gregory Jennings, Chen Lin, Bharat Kakarala, Jonathan A. Fridell, John A. Powelson, Changhong Liang

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting complications following pancreas transplant.

Materials and methods

Institutional review board approved this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study and waived informed patient consent. We identified all allograft pancreas transplant patients at our institution from 2001 to January 2014 who had all pertinent post-transplant imaging and clinical data available. Transplant type was documented. Patients were divided into two groups according to post-transplant period (group A; <12 months, group B; ≥12 months). We evaluated the parenchymal enhancement using contrast-enhanced MRI of the allograft and determined the mean percentage of parenchymal enhancement (MPPE) overall and in various abnormalities, the vessel patency, any peripancreatic fluid collection, and the ductal anatomy. We correlated these with clinical results using t test, χ 2, and Fisher’s exact test; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

51 patients (34 male, mean age 43.7 years) were identified, 28 (55%) of whom had abnormal imaging findings; transplant rejection-related necrosis (n = 7), fluid collections (n = 7), vascular stenosis (n = 4), isolated venous thromboses (n = 3), acute pancreatitis (n = 3), pancreatic and peripancreatic abscesses (n = 2), pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), and small-bowel obstruction (n = 1). Pre vs. post-contrast pancreatic MPPE at 1 min was 120% in the normal allografts and 115% in the allografts with pancreatitis and without necrosis (p > 0.05). MPPE at 1 min was only 9% in the allografts rejections with necrosis/infarction. More complications were found in group A than group B (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Contrast-enhanced MRI is useful for the non-invasive assessment of pancreas transplant complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson RP, Sutherland DE, Kendall DM, et al. (1996) Metabolic characterization of long-term successful pancreas transplants in type 1 diabetes. J Invest Med 44:549–555 Robertson RP, Sutherland DE, Kendall DM, et al. (1996) Metabolic characterization of long-term successful pancreas transplants in type 1 diabetes. J Invest Med 44:549–555
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Troppmann C, Gruessner AC, Dunn DL, et al. (1998) Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: a multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era. Ann Surg 227:255–268PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Troppmann C, Gruessner AC, Dunn DL, et al. (1998) Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: a multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era. Ann Surg 227:255–268PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sansalone CV, Maione G, Aseni P, et al. (2005) Surgical complications are the main cause of pancreatic allograft loss in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 37:2651–2653CrossRefPubMed Sansalone CV, Maione G, Aseni P, et al. (2005) Surgical complications are the main cause of pancreatic allograft loss in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 37:2651–2653CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Akisik MF, Sandrasegaran K, Aisen AA, et al. (2006) Dynamic secretin-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiographics 26:665–677CrossRefPubMed Akisik MF, Sandrasegaran K, Aisen AA, et al. (2006) Dynamic secretin-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiographics 26:665–677CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruessner AC (2011) 2011 update on pancreas transplantation: comprehensive trend analysis of 25,000 cases followed up over the course of twenty-four years at the international pancreas transplant registry (IPTR). Rev Diabet Stud 8:6–16PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gruessner AC (2011) 2011 update on pancreas transplantation: comprehensive trend analysis of 25,000 cases followed up over the course of twenty-four years at the international pancreas transplant registry (IPTR). Rev Diabet Stud 8:6–16PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaber AO, Shokouh-Amiri H, Grewal HP, et al. (1993) A technique for portal pancreatic transplantation with enteric drainage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:417–419PubMed Gaber AO, Shokouh-Amiri H, Grewal HP, et al. (1993) A technique for portal pancreatic transplantation with enteric drainage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:417–419PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fridell JA, Rogers J, Stratta RJ (2010) The pancreas allograft donor: current status, controversies, and challenges for the future. Clin Transplant 24:433–449CrossRefPubMed Fridell JA, Rogers J, Stratta RJ (2010) The pancreas allograft donor: current status, controversies, and challenges for the future. Clin Transplant 24:433–449CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong JJ, Krebs TL, Klassen DK, et al. (1996) Sonographic evaluation of acute pancreatic transplant rejection: morphology-Doppler analysis versus guided percutaneous biopsy. AJR 166:803–807CrossRefPubMed Wong JJ, Krebs TL, Klassen DK, et al. (1996) Sonographic evaluation of acute pancreatic transplant rejection: morphology-Doppler analysis versus guided percutaneous biopsy. AJR 166:803–807CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Aideyan OA, Schmidt AJ, Trenkner SW, et al. (1996) CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of pancreas transplants. Radiology 201:825–828CrossRefPubMed Aideyan OA, Schmidt AJ, Trenkner SW, et al. (1996) CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of pancreas transplants. Radiology 201:825–828CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandermeer FQ, Manning MA, Frazier AA, et al. (2012) Imaging of whole-organ pancreas transplants. Radiographics 32:411–435CrossRefPubMed Vandermeer FQ, Manning MA, Frazier AA, et al. (2012) Imaging of whole-organ pancreas transplants. Radiographics 32:411–435CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Krebs TL, Daly B, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, et al. (1999) Acute pancreatic transplant rejection: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging compared with histopathologic analysis. Radiology 210:437–442CrossRefPubMed Krebs TL, Daly B, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, et al. (1999) Acute pancreatic transplant rejection: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging compared with histopathologic analysis. Radiology 210:437–442CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Benz S, Bergt S, Obermaier R, et al. (2001) Impairment of microcirculation in the early reperfusion period predicts the degree of graft pancreatitis in clinical pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 71:759–763CrossRefPubMed Benz S, Bergt S, Obermaier R, et al. (2001) Impairment of microcirculation in the early reperfusion period predicts the degree of graft pancreatitis in clinical pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 71:759–763CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagspiel KD, Nandalur K, Burkholder B, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography after pancreas transplantation: normal appearance and vascular complications. AJR 184:465–473CrossRefPubMed Hagspiel KD, Nandalur K, Burkholder B, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography after pancreas transplantation: normal appearance and vascular complications. AJR 184:465–473CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuh WT, Hunsicker LG, Nghiem DD, et al. (1989) Pancreatic transplants: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 170:171–177CrossRefPubMed Yuh WT, Hunsicker LG, Nghiem DD, et al. (1989) Pancreatic transplants: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 170:171–177CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez MP, Bernadino ME, Neylan JF, et al. (1991) Diagnosis of pancreatic transplant dysfunction: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. AJR 156:1171–1176CrossRefPubMed Fernandez MP, Bernadino ME, Neylan JF, et al. (1991) Diagnosis of pancreatic transplant dysfunction: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. AJR 156:1171–1176CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelcz F, Sollinger HW, Pirsh JD (1991) MRI of the pancreas transplant: lack of correlation between imaging and clinical status. Magn Reson Med 21:30–38CrossRefPubMed Kelcz F, Sollinger HW, Pirsh JD (1991) MRI of the pancreas transplant: lack of correlation between imaging and clinical status. Magn Reson Med 21:30–38CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuh WT, Wiese JA, Abu-Yousef MM, et al. (1988) Pancreatic transplant imaging. Radiology 167:679–683CrossRefPubMed Yuh WT, Wiese JA, Abu-Yousef MM, et al. (1988) Pancreatic transplant imaging. Radiology 167:679–683CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Vahey TN, Glazer GM, Francis IR, et al. (1988) MR diagnosis of pancreatic transplant rejection. AJR 150:557–560CrossRefPubMed Vahey TN, Glazer GM, Francis IR, et al. (1988) MR diagnosis of pancreatic transplant rejection. AJR 150:557–560CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakhleh RE, Sutherland DE (1992) Pancreas rejection. Significance of histopathologic findings with implications for classification of rejection. Am J Surg Pathol 16:1098–1107CrossRefPubMed Nakhleh RE, Sutherland DE (1992) Pancreas rejection. Significance of histopathologic findings with implications for classification of rejection. Am J Surg Pathol 16:1098–1107CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Boeve WJ, Kok T, Tegzess AM, et al. (2001) Comparison of contrast enhanced MR-angiography-MRI and digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of pancreas and/or kidney transplantation patients: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 19:595–607CrossRefPubMed Boeve WJ, Kok T, Tegzess AM, et al. (2001) Comparison of contrast enhanced MR-angiography-MRI and digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of pancreas and/or kidney transplantation patients: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 19:595–607CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Corry RJ, Nghiem DD, Schulak JA, et al. (1986) Surgical treatment of diabetic nephropathy with simultaneous pancreatic duodenal and renal transplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162:547–555PubMed Corry RJ, Nghiem DD, Schulak JA, et al. (1986) Surgical treatment of diabetic nephropathy with simultaneous pancreatic duodenal and renal transplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162:547–555PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobos N, Roberts DA, Insko EK, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for evaluation of vascular complications of the pancreatic transplant. Radiographics 25:687–695CrossRefPubMed Dobos N, Roberts DA, Insko EK, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for evaluation of vascular complications of the pancreatic transplant. Radiographics 25:687–695CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagspiel KD, Nandalur K, Pruett TL, et al. (2007) Evaluation of vascular complications of pancreas transplantation with high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 242:590–599CrossRefPubMed Hagspiel KD, Nandalur K, Pruett TL, et al. (2007) Evaluation of vascular complications of pancreas transplantation with high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 242:590–599CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman J, Becker YT (2009) Pancreas surgical complications. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 14:85–89CrossRefPubMed Goodman J, Becker YT (2009) Pancreas surgical complications. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 14:85–89CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Troppmann C (2010) Complications after pancreas transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 15:112–118CrossRefPubMed Troppmann C (2010) Complications after pancreas transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 15:112–118CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan M, Di Carlo A, Stein LA, et al. (2001) Pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery after pancreas transplantation treated by endovascular stenting. Transplantation 72:336–338CrossRefPubMed Tan M, Di Carlo A, Stein LA, et al. (2001) Pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery after pancreas transplantation treated by endovascular stenting. Transplantation 72:336–338CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan TF, Ciancio G, Burke GW 3rd, et al. (1999) Pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery with an arteriovenous fistula after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 13:277–279CrossRefPubMed Khan TF, Ciancio G, Burke GW 3rd, et al. (1999) Pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery with an arteriovenous fistula after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 13:277–279CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Paduch DA, Conlin M, Dematos A, et al. (2000) Arterial duodenovesical fistula after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. J Urol 164:1296CrossRefPubMed Paduch DA, Conlin M, Dematos A, et al. (2000) Arterial duodenovesical fistula after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. J Urol 164:1296CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Green BT, Tuttle-Newjall J, Suhocki P, et al. (2004) Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to rupture of a donor pancreatic artery pseudoaneurysm in a pancreas transplant patient. Clin Transplant 18:108–111CrossRefPubMed Green BT, Tuttle-Newjall J, Suhocki P, et al. (2004) Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to rupture of a donor pancreatic artery pseudoaneurysm in a pancreas transplant patient. Clin Transplant 18:108–111CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita S, Fujikawa T, Mekeel KL, et al. (2006) Successful endovascular treatment of a leaking pseudoaneurysm without graft loss after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Transplantation 82:717–718CrossRefPubMed Fujita S, Fujikawa T, Mekeel KL, et al. (2006) Successful endovascular treatment of a leaking pseudoaneurysm without graft loss after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Transplantation 82:717–718CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lall CG, Sandrasegaran K, Maglinte DT, et al. (2006) Bowel complications seen on CT after pancreas transplantation with enteric drainage. AJR 187:1288–1295CrossRefPubMed Lall CG, Sandrasegaran K, Maglinte DT, et al. (2006) Bowel complications seen on CT after pancreas transplantation with enteric drainage. AJR 187:1288–1295CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Value of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the pancreatic allograft transplant complications
verfasst von
Yubao Liu
Fatih Akisik
Temel Tirkes
Mark Tann
Kumaresan Sandrasegaran
S. Gregory Jennings
Chen Lin
Bharat Kakarala
Jonathan A. Fridell
John A. Powelson
Changhong Liang
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0408-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

Abdominal Radiology 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “dot–dash” sign

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

08.04.2024 Andrologie Nachrichten

Stark, erfolgreich, allzeit belastbar – das sind Erwartungen, die Jungen und Männer von der Gesellschaft spüren. Das kann sie „toxisch“ werden lassen – und letztlich sogar der Gesundheit schaden, mahnt Dr. Dirk Sander von der Deutschen Aidshilfe.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.