nach oben

Abdominal Radiology

Erschienen in:

20.11.2019 | Special Section: Pancreatitis

Value of multidisciplinary collaboration in acute and chronic pancreatitis

verfasst von: Arya Haj-Mirzaian, Bhavik N. Patel, Elliot K. Fishman, Atif Zaheer

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Multidisciplinary collaboration (MDC) has been widely adopted in healthcare to optimize patient care. MDC brings several specialized healthcare providers to the table using several methods, including multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs), multidisciplinary clinics, teleconferences, and online multidisciplinary expert panels, to reach the goal of achieving the best diagnosis and treatment plan for complex diseases. Diagnosis and management of acute/chronic pancreatitis is complex which necessitates the development and utilization of MDC. The key members of pancreatitis MDM include gastroenterologists, radiologists, pathologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, chairperson, and a coordinator. After selection of admitted or referred patients, the availability of required information is reviewed, and then each case is discussed. The final diagnosis and treatment plan is confirmed by consensus, especially for complex cases that require endoscopic intervention or pancreatectomy and patients with the possibility of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. It has been shown that MDMs have improved the clinical outcome of patients with acute/chronic pancreatitis. In addition to MDM, the feasibility of multidisciplinary clinics, teleconferences, and online multidisciplinary expert panels for the management of pancreatic disorders has been investigated. Understanding structure, potential advantages, and limitations of MDC will help clinicians and healthcare systems in developing an optimized MDC to improve the management of acute/chronic pancreatitis. This narrative review summarized prior recommendations and explored the impact of MDC on clinical outcomes of patients with pancreatitis. Our recommendations offer a generalizable method that can be utilized by healthcare systems.

Sepahdari AR, Salehi B (2017) A Story in Black and White: Radiologic Evaluation in the Multidisciplinary Setting. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 50 (4):709-716.PubMed

Bekkali NL, Murray S, Winter L, et al (2017) The role of multidisciplinary meetings for benign pancreatobiliary diseases: a tertiary centre experience. Frontline Gastroenterol. 8 (3):210-213.PubMed

Prades J, Remue E, Van Hoof E, Borras JM (2015) Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes. Health Policy. 119 (4):464-474.PubMed

Basta YL, Bolle S, Fockens P, Tytgat KMJ (2017) The value of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 24 (9):2669-2678.PubMedPubMedCentral

Arnaudova A, Jakubowski E (2005) Eighth futures forum: on governance of patient safety. World Health Organization.

Kane B, Luz SJ (2006) Multidisciplinary medical team meetings: An analysis of collaborative working with special attention to timing and teleconferencing. Comput Support Coop Work. 15 (5-6):501-535.

Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, et al (2006) Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer. 107 (10):2346-2351.PubMed

Siddique O, Yoo ER, Perumpail RB, et al (2017) The importance of a multidisciplinary approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. J Multidiscip Healthc. 10:95.PubMedPubMedCentral

Kirkegård J, Aahlin E, Al‐Saiddi M, et al (2019) Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation. Br J Surg. 106 (6):756-764.PubMed

10.

Rao B, Syed A, Singh S, et al (2019) Performance of a Multidisciplinary Pancreatic Cancer Conference in Predicting and Managing Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas. 48 (1):80-84.PubMed

11.

Chingkoe C, Brook A, Moser A, Mortele K (2018) Subspecialized radiology review at multidisciplinary pancreas conference: impact on patient management. Abdom Radiol (NY). 43 (10):2783-2789.PubMed

12.

Brauer DG, Strand MS, Sanford DE, et al (2017) Utility of a multidisciplinary tumor board in the management of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal diseases: an observational study. HPB (Oxford). 19 (2):133-139.PubMed

13.

Fotoohi M, Traverso LW (2006) Pancreatic necrosis: paradigm of a multidisciplinary team. Adv Surg. 40:107-118.PubMed

14.

Siriwardena A, O'Reilly DA (2017) Improving care for patients with pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 104 (12):1591-1593.PubMed

15.

Spanier BWM, Dijkgraaf MG, Bruno MJ (2008) Trends and forecasts of hospital admissions for acute and chronic pancreatitis in the Netherlands. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 20 (7):653-658.PubMed

16.

Conwell DL, Lee LS, Yadav D, et al (2014) American Pancreatic Association Practice Guidelines in Chronic Pancreatitis: evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines. Pancreas. 43 (8):1143-1162.PubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Witt H, Apte MV, Keim V, Wilson JS (2007) Chronic pancreatitis: challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy. Gastroenterology. 132 (4):1557-1573.PubMed

18.

Greenberg JA, Hsu J, Bawazeer M, et al (2016) Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Can J Surg. 59 (2):128.PubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines (2013) IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology: official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP). 13 (4):1-15.

20.

Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP), Pezzilli R, Zerbi A, Campra D, et al (2015) Consensus guidelines on severe acute pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis. 47 (7):532-543.

21.

Yokoe M, Takada T, Mayumi T, et al (2015) Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 22 (6):405-432.PubMed

22.

Drewes AM, Bouwense SAW, Campbell CM, et al (2017) Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 17 (5):720-731.PubMed

23.

Ito T, Ishiguro H, Ohara H, et al (2016) Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for chronic pancreatitis 2015. J Gastroenterol. 51 (2):85-92.PubMed

24.

O'Reilly D, McPherson S, Sinclair M, Smith N (2017) Lessons from a national audit of acute pancreatitis: A summary of the NCEPOD report ‘Treat the Cause’. Pancreatology. 17 (3):329-333.PubMed

25.

Robertson T, Li J, O’Hara K, Hansen SJ (2010) Collaboration within different settings: A study of co-located and distributed multidisciplinary medical team meetings. Comput Support Coop Work. 19 (5):483-513.

26.

Lamb B, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Green JS (2012) Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDT-QuIC. Ann Surg Oncol. 19 (6):1759-1765.PubMed

27.

Yuan Y, Ye J, Ren Y, et al (2018) The efficiency of electronic list-based multidisciplinary team meetings in management of gastrointestinal malignancy: a single-center experience in Southern China. World J Surg Oncol. 16 (1):146.PubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Basta YL, Baur OL, van Dieren S, et al (2016) Is there a benefit of multidisciplinary cancer team meetings for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies? Ann Surg Oncol. 23 (8):2430-2437.PubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Kane B, Luz S, O'Briain DS, McDermott R (2007) Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments. BMC Med. 5 (1):15.PubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Stairmand J, Signal L, Sarfati D, et al (2015) Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 26 (7):1325-1332.PubMed

31.

Abbasi AN (2011) Cancer management is a multidisciplinary team work. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 21 (5):259-261.PubMed

32.

Rao K, Manya K, Azad A, et al (2014) Uro‐oncology multidisciplinary meetings at an A ustralian tertiary referral centre–impact on clinical decision‐making and implications for patient inclusion. BJU Int. 114 (1):50-54.PubMed

33.

Hudson SR, Little D, Mathew A, et al (2017) Multidisciplinary team and clinical meeting data: JRF national survey of trainees 2105. Br J Radiol. 90 (1080):156.

34.

Trivedi DB (2019) Educational Value of Surgical Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Learning Non-Technical Skills - A Pilot Survey of Trainees From Two UK Deaneries. J Surg Educ. 76 (4):1034-1047.PubMed

35.

Carroll JK, Herrick B, Gipson T, Lee S (2007) Acute pancreatitis: diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 75 (10).

36.

Shah AP, Mourad MM, Bramhall SR (2018) Acute pancreatitis: current perspectives on diagnosis and management. J Inflamm Res. 11:77.PubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Field K, Rosenthal M, Dimou J, et al (2010) Communication in and clinician satisfaction with multidisciplinary team meetings in neuro-oncology. J Clin Neurosci. 17 (9):1130-1135.PubMed

38.

Korman H, Lanni Jr T, Shah C, et al (2013) Impact of a prostate multidisciplinary clinic program on patient treatment decisions and on adherence to NCCN guidelines: the William Beaumont Hospital experience. Am J Clin Oncol. 36 (2):121-125.PubMed

39.

Braganza JM, Lee SH, McCloy RF, McMahon M (2011) Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet . 377 (9772):1184-1197.PubMed

40.

Majumder S, Chari ST(2016) Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet. 387 (10031):1957-1966.PubMed

41.

Baker ME, Nelson RC, Rosen MP, et al (2014) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute pancreatitis. Ultrasound Q. 30 (4):267-273.PubMed

42.

Lamb B, Sevdalis N, Benn J, Vincent C, Green J (2013) Multidisciplinary cancer team meeting structure and treatment decisions: a prospective correlational study. Ann Surg Oncol. 20 (3):715-722.PubMed

43.

Li J, Robertson T, Hansen S, Mansfield T, and Kjeldskov J (2008) Multidisciplinary medical team meetings: a field study of collaboration in health care. in Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat. 73-80.

44.

Luz S (2012) The nonverbal structure of patient case discussions in multidisciplinary medical team meetings. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS). 30 (3):17.

45.

Gerritsen A, Bollen TL, Nio CY, et al (2015) Diagnostic value of a pancreatic mass on computed tomography in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for presumed pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 158 (1):173-182.PubMed

46.

Blazeby J, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, et al (2005) Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol. 17 (3):457-460.PubMed

47.

Wood J, Metcalfe C, Paes A, et al (2008) An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi‐disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis. 10 (8):769-772.PubMed

48.

Kamal A, Singh VK, Akshintala VS, et al (2015) CT and MRI assessment of symptomatic organized pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic duct disruption: an interreader variability study using the revised Atlanta classification 2012. Abdom Imaging. 40 (6):1608-1616.PubMed

49.

Zaheer A, Singh VK, Qureshi RO, Fishman EK (2013) The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: updates in imaging terminology and guidelines. Abdom Imaging. 38 (1):125-136.PubMed

50.

Rijkers AP, Bakker OJ, Ali UA, et al (2017) Risk of pancreatic cancer after a primary episode of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 46 (8):1018-1022.PubMed

51.

Karasawa E, Goldberg HI, Moss AA, Federle M, London SJR (1983) CT pancreatogram in carcinoma of the pancreas and chronic pancreatitis. Radiology. 148 (2):489-493.PubMed

52.

Yin Q, Zou X, Zai X, et al (2015) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic mass-forming pancreatitis: Differentiation with dual-energy MDCT in spectral imaging mode. Eur J Radiol. 84 (12):2470-2476.PubMed

53.

Hafezi-Nejad N, Singh VK, Fung C, Takahashi N, Zaheer A (2018) MR Imaging of Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 26 (3):463-478.PubMed

54.

Coakley FV, Hanley-Knutson K, Mongan J, et al (2012) Pancreatic imaging mimics: part 1, imaging mimics of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199 (2):301-308.PubMed

55.

Gandhi NS, Feldman MK, Le O, Morris-Stiff G (2018) Imaging mimics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 43 (2):273-284.PubMed

56.

Asbun HJ, Conlon K, Fernandez-Cruz L, et al (2014) When to perform a pancreatoduodenectomy in the absence of positive histology? A consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery. 155 (5):887-892.PubMed

57.

Merdrignac A, Sulpice L, Rayar M, et al (2014) Pancreatic head cancer in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 13 (2):192-197.PubMed

58.

Abraham SC, Wilentz RE, Yeo CJ, et al (2003) Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple resections) in patients without malignancy: are they allchronic pancreatitis'? Am J Surg Pathol. 27 (1):110-120.PubMed

59.

Horton KM, Fishman EK (2002) Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: CT imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 40 (6):1263-1272.PubMed

60.

Prokesch RW, Schima W, Chow LC, Jeffrey RB (2003) Multidetector CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnostic advances and therapeutic relevance. Eur Radiol. 13 (9):2147-2154.PubMed

61.

Zaheer A, Singh VK, Akshintala VS, et al (2014) Differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma using dual-phase computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 38 (1):146-152.PubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Hafezi-Nejad N, Singh VK, Johnson SI, et al (2016) Surgical approaches to chronic pancreatitis: indications and imaging findings. Abdom Radiol (NY). 41 (10):1980-1996.PubMed

63.

Haider M, Makary MA, Singh VK, et al (2015) Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation for chronic pancreatitis: spectrum of postoperative CT findings. Abdom Imaging. 40 (7):2411-2423.PubMed

64.

Fogel EL, Shahda S, Sandrasegaran K, et al (2017) A multidisciplinary approach to pancreas cancer in 2016: a review. Am J Gastroenterol. 112 (4):537.PubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Dickerson L, Farooq A, Bano F, et al (2019) Differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer remains challenging. World J Surg. 43 (6):1604-1611.PubMed

66.

Del Chiaro M, Segersvärd R, Mucelli RP, et al (2014) Comparison of preoperative conference-based diagnosis with histology of cystic tumors of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 21 (5):1539-1544.PubMed

67.

Chen Y, Guo C, Zhang Q, et al (2018) Patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms can benefit from management of multidisciplinary team: Experience from a Chinese academic center. Pancreatology. 18 (7):799-804.PubMed

68.

Keating NL, Landrum MB, Lamont EB, et al (2013) Tumor boards and the quality of cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 105 (2):113-121.PubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Boxer MM, Vinod SK, Shafiq J, Duggan KJ (2011) Do multidisciplinary team meetings make a difference in the management of lung cancer? Cancer. 117 (22):5112-5120.PubMed

70.

Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, et al (2010) Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 340: 951.

71.

Simcock R, Heaford A (2012) Costs of multidisciplinary teams in cancer are small in relation to benefits. BMJ. 344:3700.

72.

van Grinsven J, van Brunschot S, van Santvoort HC, et al (2017) The value of a 24/7 online nationwide multidisciplinary expert panel for acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 152 (4):685-688.PubMed

73.

Horvath LE, Yordan E, Malhotra D, et al (2010) Multidisciplinary care in the oncology setting: historical perspective and data from lung and gynecology multidisciplinary clinics. J Oncol Pract. 6 (6):21-26.

74.

Stone CJ, Vaid HM, Selvam R, et al (2018) Multidisciplinary clinics in lung cancer care: A systematic review. Clin Lung Cancer. 19 (4):323-330.PubMed

75.

Pawlik TM, Laheru D, Hruban RH, et al (2008) Evaluating the impact of a single-day multidisciplinary clinic on the management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 15 (8):2081-2088.PubMedPubMedCentral

76.

van Hagen P, Spaander MC, van der Gaast A, et al (2013) Impact of a multidisciplinary tumour board meeting for upper-GI malignancies on clinical decision making: a prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Oncol. 18 (2):214-219.PubMed

77.

Kane B, Luz S, Menezes G, and Hollywood DP (2005) Enabling change in healthcare structures through teleconferencing. 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'05). 76-81.

Titel: Value of multidisciplinary collaboration in acute and chronic pancreatitis
verfasst von: Arya Haj-Mirzaian
Bhavik N. Patel
Elliot K. Fishman
Atif Zaheer
Publikationsdatum: 20.11.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02320-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Value of multidisciplinary collaboration in acute and chronic pancreatitis

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with acute pancreatitis: an audit from a tertiary care referral hospital

Endoscopic intervention in pancreatitis: perspectives from a gastroenterologist

Endoscopic and surgical treatment options for chronic pancreatitis: an imaging perspective

Pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis in chronic pancreatitis: a feasibility and validation study

Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis: an update on the revised Atlanta classification

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie