The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors were actively involved in the research project and contributed to all aspects in the preparation of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Although the importance of collaboration is well established as a principle in research and in theory, what it actually means for practitioners to collaborate in practice, to be partners in a collaborative relationship, has thus far been given less attention. The aim of this study was to identify key characteristics of the ways in which mental health practitioners collaborate with service users and their families in practice.
This was a qualitative action research study, with a cooperative inquiry approach that used multi-staged focus group discussions with ten mental health care and social work practitioners in community mental health and substance use care. Thematic analysis was applied to identify common characteristics.
We identified three major themes related to practitioners’ experiences of collaborative practices: (1) walking alongside through negotiated dialogues, (2) maintaining human relationships, and (3) maneuvering relationships and services.
It appears that even with the rich knowledgebase that has developed on the merits of collaborative relationships, it continues to be challenging for practitioners to reorient their practice accordingly. The findings of this study indicate that the practitioners focus on two types of processes as characterizing collaborative practice: one focusing on conversations among practitioners and service users and their families and the other focusing on management and control among health care providers, service sectors, and service users (i.e., inter/intra-system collaboration).
Anderson H: Collaborative practice: a way of being “with”. Psychother Polit Int. 2012, 10: 130-145. 10.1002/ppi.1261. CrossRef
Beresford P, Carr S: Social Care, Service Users and User Involvement. 2012, London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Karlsson B, Borg M: Psykisk Helsearbeid: Humane Og Sosiale Perspektiver Og Praksiser [Mental Health Care: Humane and Social Perspectives and Practices]. 2013, Gyldendal Akademiske: Oslo, Norway
London S, St George S, Wulff D: Guides for collaborating. Int J Collab Pract. 2009, 1: 1-8.
Norcross JC: Psychotherapy Relations That Work: Evidence-Based Responsiveness. 2011, New York, NY: Oxford University Press CrossRef
Strong T: Six orienting ideas for collaborative counsellors. Eur J Psychother Couns. 2000, 3: 25-32. 10.1080/13642530050078547. CrossRef
Strong T, Sutherland O, Ness O: Considerations for a discourse of collaboration in counseling. Asia Pac J Couns Psychother. 2011, 2: 25-40.
Bordin ES: The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy. 1979, 16: 252-260. CrossRef
Norcross JC, Lambert MJ: Evidence-based therapy relationships. Psychotherapy Relations That Work: Evidence-Based Responsiveness. Edited by: Norcross JC. 2011, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 3-21. CrossRef
Norcross JC, Wampold B: Evicence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy Relations That Work: Evidence-Based Responsiveness. Edited by: Norcross JC. 2011, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 423-430. CrossRef
Sweeney A, Fahmy S, Nolan F, Morant N, Fox Z, Lloyd-Evans B, Osborn D, Burgess E, Gilburt H, McCabe R, Johnson S: A mixed-methods study exploring therapeutic relationships and their association with service user satisfaction in acute psychiatric wards and crisis residential alternatives. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014, 2: 1-25. CrossRef
Horvath AO, Greenberg LS: The Working Alliance: Theory, Research, and Practice. 1994, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons
Borg M, Karlsson B, Stenhammer A: Recoveryorienterte Praksiser: En Systematisk Kunnskapssammenstilling [Recovery Oriented Practice: A Systematic Review]. Report 4/2013. 2013, Oslo, Norway: Nasjonalt kompetansesenter for psykisk helsearbeid (NAPHA)
Diamond RJ, Scheifler PL: Treatment Collaboration: Improving the Therapist, Client, Prescriber Relationship. 2007, WW Norton: New York, NY
Davidson L, Andres-Hyman R, Bedregal L, Tondora J, Frey J, Kirk TA: From “double trouble” to “dual recovery”: integrating models of recovery in addiction and mental health. J Dual Diagn. 2008, 4: 273-290. 10.1080/15504260802072396. CrossRef
Borg M, Kristiansen K: Recovery-oriented professionals: helping relationships in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2004, 13: 493-505. 10.1080/09638230400006809. CrossRef
Borg M, Davidson L: The nature of recovery as lived in everyday experience. J Ment Health. 2008, 17: 129-140. 10.1080/09638230701498382. CrossRef
Dreier O: Psychotherapy in Everyday Life. 2007, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Ness O, Borg M, Davidson L: Facilitators and barriers in dual recovery: a literature review of first-person perspectives. Adv Dual Diagn. 2014, 7: 107-117. 10.1108/ADD-02-2014-0007. CrossRef
Behrman AE: First person recovery. J Dual Diagn. 2005, 1: 97-99. CrossRef
Brooks AJ, Malfait AJ, Brooke D, Gallagher SM, Penn PE: Consumer perspectives on co-occurring disorders treatment. J Drug Issues. 2007, 37: 299-320. 10.1177/002204260703700204. CrossRef
Ness O, Karlsson B, Borg M, Biong S, Sundet R, McCormack B, Kim HS: Towards a model for collaborative practice in community mental healthcare. Scand Psychol. 2014, 1: e6- CrossRef
Horvath AO, Symonds BD: Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J Couns Psychol. 1991, 38: 139-149. CrossRef
Heron J: Co-Operative Inquiry. 1996, London, UK: Sage Publishing House
Heron J, Reason P: The practice of co-operative inquiry: research “with” rather than “on” people. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Edited by: Reason P, Bradbury H. 2001, London, UK: Sage Publishing House, 179-188.
Reason P: Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Manage Learn. 1999, 30: 207-227. 10.1177/1350507699302007. CrossRef
Borg M, Karlsson B, Kim HS, McCormack B: Opening up for many voices in knowledge construction. Qual Soc Res. 2012, 13: Art. 1-
Moltu C, Stefansen J, Svisdahl M, Veseth M: How to enhance the quality of mental health research: service users’ experiences of their potential contributions through collaborative methods. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2013, 16: 1-21. 10.1080/15487768.2013.762295. CrossRef
Hummelvoll JK: The multistage focus group interview – a relevant and fruitful method in action research based on a co-operative inquiry perspective. Norsk Tidsskr Sykepleieforskning. 2008, 10: 3-14.
Braun V, Clarke V: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006, 3: 77-101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. CrossRef
Clarke V, Braun V: Teaching thematic analysis: overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist. 2013, 26: 120-123.
Roberts G, Boardman J: Becoming a recovery-oriented practitioner. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2014, 20: 37-47. 10.1192/apt.bp.112.010652. CrossRef
Topor A, Denhov A: Helping relationships and time: inside the black box of the working alliance. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2012, 15: 239-254. 10.1080/15487768.2012.703544. CrossRef
Estroff SE: Commentary on “The experiences of long-stay inpatients returning to the community”. Psychiatry. 1995, 58: 133-135.
Borg M, Sells D, Topor A, Mezzina R, Marin I, Davidson L: What makes a house a home: the role of material resources in recovery from severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2005, 8: 243-256. 10.1080/15487760500339394. CrossRef
Jensen P, Borg M, Topor A: Återhämtning, bedring, at komme sig: recovery revisited – ti år efter [recovery visited – ten years later]. Socialpsykiatri. 2010, 3: 20-23.
Ekeland TJ: Evidensbasert behandling: kvalitetsikring eller instrumentalistisk mistak [evidence based treatment: quality control or an instrumental mistake]. Tidsskr Norsk Psykologforening. 1999, 36: 1036-1047.
Le Boutillier C, Slade M, Lawrence V, Bird VJ, Chandler R, Farkas M, Harding C, Larsen J, Oades LG, Roberts G, Shepherd G, Thornicroft G, Williams J, Leamy M: Competing priorities: staff perspectives on supporting recovery. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014, [Epub ahead of print]
Hermansen Å: Pleie- og omsorgsektoren i de nordiske land [social care sector in the Nordic countries]. [ http://www.fafo.no/pub/rapp/10133/10133.pdf]
Stamsø MA: Velferdsstaten i Endring [The Transformation of the Welfare State]. 2009, Gyldendal Akademisk: Oslo
- “Walking alongside:” collaborative practices in mental health and substance use care
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet