Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Die Folgen des Klimwandels haben einen direkten Einfluss auf die Primärversorgung in Deutschland: Hitzeschutz insbesondere bei älteren Patienten, die Zunahme von Infektionen und die Verlängerung der Allergiesesaison spielen medizinisch eine bedeutsame Rolle. Aber auch in der Prävention und der Aufklärung der Patienten kommt den Hausärztinnen und -ärzten eine besondere Rolle zu. Direkt aus der Praxis berichtet im Live-Webinar am 13. Mai von 18 bis 19 Uhr unser Experte Dr. med. Robin Maitra.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Atherosclerosis Reports
Erschienen in: Current Atherosclerosis Reports 7/2023

13.05.2023

What Is the Optimal Duration of Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease?

verfasst von: Beryl Otieno, Chukwuka Ibecheozor, Marlene S. Williams

Erschienen in: Current Atherosclerosis Reports | Ausgabe 7/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy continues to attract extensive debates and has been progressively adjusted in the setting of advancements in stent design and assessment of patient clinical characteristics. Given the ever-changing landscape of antiplatelet therapy and the multitude of clinical trials that have examined this duration, there are varying scenarios for optimal duration based on patient presentation and risk profile. This review highlights the current concepts and recommendations regarding duration of antiplatelet therapy in coronary heart disease.

Recent Findings

In particular, we review the current data on the use of dual antiplatelet therapy in the different clinical scenarios. Relatively longer dual antiplatelet therapy is perhaps limited to patients with higher risk for cardiovascular events and/or high-risk lesions and shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy have been shown to reduce bleeding complications at the same time as stabilization of ischemic endpoints.

Summary

More recent trials have demonstrated the safety of shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy in appropriate patients with coronary heart disease.
Literatur
1.
Bhatt DL, Lopes RD, Harrington RA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes: a review. Jama. 2022;327(7):662–75.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Anderson HV, Masri SC, Abdallah MS, Chang AM, Cohen MG, Elgendy IY, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for chest pain and acute myocardial infarction. J Am College Cardiol. 2022;80(17):1660–700.CrossRef
3.
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: the task force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2019;41(3):407–77.CrossRef
4.
Bianco M, Careggio A, Destefanis P, Luciano A, Perrelli MG, Quadri G, et al. P2Y12 inhibitors monotherapy after short course of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including 29 089 patients. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020;7(3):196–205.CrossRef
5.
Feng WH, Hsieh IC, Li YH. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: is it safe to abandon aspirin? Acta Cardiol Sin. 2021;37(1):1–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Verheugt FWA, Damman P, Damen SAJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, Woelders ECI, van Geuns RM. P2Y12 blocker monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Neth Heart J. 2021;29(11):566–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
Aggarwal D, Bhatia K, Chunawala ZS, Furtado RHM, Mukherjee D, Dixon SR, et al. P2Y(12) inhibitor versus aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J Open. 2022;2(2):oeac019.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Kang J, Park KW, Lee H, Hwang D, Yang H-M, Rha S-W, et al. Aspirin versus clopidogrel for long-term maintenance monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the HOST-EXAM extended study. Circulation. 2023;147(2):108–17.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Capodanno D, Angiolillo DJ. Antithrombotic therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk mitigation in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2020;142(22):2172–88.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Feres F, Costa RA, Abizaid A, Leon MB, Marin-Neto JA, Botelho RV, et al. Three vs twelve months of dual antiplatelet therapy after zotarolimus-eluting stents: the OPTIMIZE randomized trial. Jama. 2013;310(23):2510–22.PubMed
11.
Kim BK, Hong MK, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG, et al. A new strategy for discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy: the RESET trial (real safety and efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy following endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(15):1340–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.••
Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Heg D, Tijssen J, Jüni P, Vranckx P, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI in patients at high bleeding risk. New Engl J Med. 2021;385(18):1643–55. Among patients who are at high bleeing risk or who require anticogulation who undergo PCI, DAPT abbreviated to 1 month compared to 3 months is noninferior when examining net adverse clinical events. There is also decreased major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding when this option is chosen.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Colombo A, Chieffo A, Frasheri A, Garbo R, Masotti-Centol M, Salvatella N, et al. Second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation followed by 6- versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy: the SECURITY randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(20):2086–97.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Gwon H-C, Hahn J-Y, Park KW, Song YB, Chae I-H, Lim D-S, et al. Six-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents. Circulation. 2012;125(3):505–13.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Gilard M, Barragan P, Noryani AAL, Noor HA, Majwal T, Hovasse T, et al. 6- versus 24-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents in patients nonresistant to aspirin: the randomized, multicenter ITALIC trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(8):777–86.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Schulz-Schüpke S, Byrne RA, ten Berg JM, Neumann F-J, Han Y, Adriaenssens T, et al. ISAR-SAFE: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting. European Heart J. 2015;36(20):1252–63.CrossRef
17.
Bhatt DL, Fox KAA, Hacke W, Berger PB, Black HR, Boden WE, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. New Engl J Med. 2006;354(16):1706–17.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, Driscoll-Shempp P, Cutlip DE, Steg PG, et al. Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. New Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2155–66.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Mauri L, Elmariah S, Yeh RW, Cutlip DE, Steg PG, Windecker S, et al. Causes of late mortality with dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stents. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(4):378–85.PubMed
20.
Palmerini T, Benedetto U, Bacchi-Reggiani L, Della Riva D, Biondi-Zoccai G, Feres F, et al. Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9985):2371–82.PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
Secemsky EA, Yeh RW, Kereiakes DJ, Cutlip DE, Cohen DJ, Steg PG, et al. Mortality following cardiovascular and bleeding events occurring beyond 1 year after coronary stenting: a secondary analysis of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) study. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(5):478–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Hermiller JB, Krucoff MW, Kereiakes DJ, Windecker S, Steg PG, Yeh RW, et al. Benefits and risks of extended dual antiplatelet therapy after everolimus-eluting stents. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(2):138–47.PubMed
24.
Palmerini T, Bruno AG, Gilard M, Morice M-C, Valgimigli M, Montalescot G, et al. Risk-benefit profile of longer-than-1-year dual-antiplatelet therapy duration after drug-eluting stent implantation in relation to clinical presentation. Circ: Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(3):e007541.PubMed
25.
Rapsomaniki E, Thuresson M, Yang E, Blin P, Hunt P, Chung SC, et al. Using big data from health records from four countries to evaluate chronic disease outcomes: a study in 114 364 survivors of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016;2(3):172–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Simon T, Fox K, Mehta SR, Harrington RA, et al. Ticagrelor in patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes. New Engl J Med. 2019;381(14):1309–20.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, Steg PG, Storey RF, Jensen EC, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1791–800.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Mehta SR, Leiter LA, Simon T, Fox K, et al. Ticagrelor in patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease with a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (THEMIS-PCI): a phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1169–80.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Mehran R, Baber U, Sharma SK, Cohen DJ, Angiolillo DJ, Briguori C, et al. Ticagrelor with or without aspirin in high-risk patients after PCI. New Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):2032–42.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Chiarito M, Baber U, Cao D, Sharma SK, Dangas G, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Ticagrelor monotherapy after PCI in high-risk patients With Prior MI: a prespecified TWILIGHT substudy. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(3):282–93.PubMed
31.•
Kim BK, Hong SJ, Cho YH, Yun KH, Kim YH, Suh Y, et al. Effect of ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor with aspirin on major bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the TICO randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2020;323(23):2407–16. This publication demonstrated the superiority of Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT compared to 12 months of DAPT.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Valgimigli M, Campo G, Monti M, Vranckx P, Percoco G, Tumscitz C, et al. Short- versus long-term duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting. Circulation. 2012;125(16):2015–26.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. New Engl J Med. 2001;345(7):494–502.
34.
Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. New Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. New Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045–57.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Jüni P, Hamm C, Steg PG, Heg D, et al. Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10151):940–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Franzone A, McFadden E, Leonardi S, Piccolo R, Vranckx P, Serruys PW, et al. Ticagrelor alone versus dual antiplatelet therapy from 1 month after drug-eluting coronary stenting. J Am College Cardiol. 2019;74(18):2223–34.CrossRef
38.
Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. Bmj. 2008;336(7644):601–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Hróbjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, Tendal B, Hilden J, Boutron I, et al. Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors. CMAJ. 2013;185(4):E201–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, Heg D, Räber L, Feres F, et al. Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet. 2017;389(10073):1025–34.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Yeh RW, Secemsky EA, Kereiakes DJ, Normand S-LT, Gershlick AH, Cohen DJ, et al. Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. Jama. 2016;315(16):1735–49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Chichareon P, Baber U, Modolo R, Chang C-C, Kogame N, Takahashi K, et al. Predictive ability of the PARIS risk score in all-comers patients undergoing pci with drug eluting stents: external validation in the global leaders study. J Am College Cardiol. 2019;73(9_Supplement_1):245.CrossRef
43.
Ueda P, Jernberg T, James S, Alfredsson J, Erlinge D, Omerovic E, et al. External validation of the DAPT score in a nationwide population. J Am College Cardiol. 2018;72(10):1069–78.CrossRef
44.
Sibbing D, Aradi D, Alexopoulos D, Ten Berg J, Bhatt DL, Bonello L, et al. Updated expert consensus statement on platelet function and genetic testing for guiding P2Y(12) receptor inhibitor treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(16):1521–37.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Räber L, Magro M, Stefanini GG, Kalesan B, van Domburg RT, Onuma Y, et al. Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents: a prospective cohort study. Circulation. 2012;125(9):1110–21.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Han J-K, Hwang D, Yang S, Park S-H, Kang J, Yang H-M, et al. Comparison of 3-6 month versus 12 month dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary intervention using the contemporary drug-eluting stents with ultrathin struts: the HOST-IDEA randomized clinical trial. Circulation.0(0).
Metadaten
Titel
What Is the Optimal Duration of Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease?
verfasst von
Beryl Otieno
Chukwuka Ibecheozor
Marlene S. Williams
Publikationsdatum
13.05.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports / Ausgabe 7/2023
Print ISSN: 1523-3804
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6242
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01108-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2023

Current Atherosclerosis Reports 7/2023 Zur Ausgabe

ReviewPaper

Double-Trouble: Atherosclerotic Risk Factors and Congenital Heart Disease

ReviewPaper

Childhood Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk

ReviewPaper

The Role of Cardiac PET in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Ischemic Heart Disease: Optimal Modality Across Different Patient Populations

ReviewPaper

In-Hospital Use of PCSK9 Inhibitors in the Post ACS Patient: What Does the Evidence Show?

ReviewPaper

The Pandemic of Coronary Heart Disease in South Asia: What Clinicians Need to Know

ReviewPaper

Eggs and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Update of Recent Evidence

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Battle of Experts: Sport vs. Spritze bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes

11.05.2024 DDG-Jahrestagung 2024 Kongressbericht

Im Battle of Experts traten zwei Experten auf dem Diabeteskongress gegeneinander an: Die eine vertrat die Auffassung „Sport statt Spritze“ bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes, der andere forderte „Spritze statt Sport!“ Am Ende waren sie sich aber einig: Die Kombination aus beidem erzielt die besten Ergebnisse.

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

10.05.2024 Hypercholesterinämie Nachrichten

Patienten mit Arteriosklerose-bedingten kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, die trotz Statineinnahme zu hohe Triglyzeridspiegel haben, profitieren von einer Behandlung mit Icosapent-Ethyl, und zwar unabhängig vom individuellen Risikoprofil.

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

10.05.2024 Periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit Nachrichten

In den USA ist erstmals eine bioresorbierbare Gefäßstütze – auch Scaffold genannt – zur Rekanalisation infrapoplitealer Arterien bei schwerer PAVK zugelassen worden. Das markiert einen Wendepunkt in der Geschichte dieser speziellen Gefäßstützen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise