nach oben

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Erschienen in:

19.07.2022

Work limitations as a moderator of the relationship between job crafting and work performance: results from an SEM analysis of cross-sectional survey data

verfasst von: Vidya Sundar, Debra L. Brucker

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Job crafting is an incremental, employee-initiated job design process used to achieve a better fit between job demands and worker skills. Persons with work limitations face multiple barriers to optimal work performance. Some persons with work limitations may innately use job crafting as a strategy to achieve better alignment with their job tasks and demands, however the extent to which job crafting may be helpful in improving work performance and engagement is unknown. The purpose of this study is (1) to examine the moderating role of work limitations in the relationship between job crafting and work performance and (2) to understand the complex relationship between job crafting, work limitations, work engagement, work performance, readiness to change, and worker characteristics.

Methods

We conducted an online survey of workers with and without disabilities (final N = 742) in 2020–2021. Our sample included workers aged 18 and older. Descriptive statistics, bivariate statistics, and Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) were used to assess the relationships among job crafting, work limitations, work engagement, work performance, readiness to change, and worker characteristics.

Results

Work limitation moderates the relationship between job crafting and work performance by weakening the impact of innate job crafting on work performance. Worker characteristics such as education and years of work experience predict crafting behaviors and work engagement mediates the relationship between job crafting and work performance.

Conclusions

Work limitation weakens the relationship between job crafting and work performance. Workers with limitations may benefit from job crafting interventions to increase work engagement and performance.

Our initial structural model included demographic characteristics such as age, race, and gender. These variables were dropped from the final model because of multicollinearity or because they did not contribute to the overall mode.

This interpretation of moderation (interaction) effects is different from conventional effect sizes such as Cohen’s d. Aguinis and colleagues [74] have established that the average effect size for moderation (interaction) effects is 0.009. Moderation (interaction) effect sizes of 0.005, 0.01, and 0.025 are considered small, medium, and large respectively.

Our hypotheses explored the direct effects on individual work performance and work engagement. Examination of specific indirect effects was beyond the scope of this paper.

Kessler Foundation, University of New Hampshire. nTIDE July 2021 Jobs Report: Employment slows as COVID pandemic restrictions loom [Internet]. New Jersey, USA: Kessler Foundation; 2021 July [cited 2022 March 10]; Available from: https://kesslerfoundation.org/press-release/ntide-july-2021-jobs-report-employment-slows-covid-pandemic-restrictions-loom.

National Council on Disability. 2020 progress report on national disability policy: Increasing disability employment [Internet]. Washington, DC, US: NCD; 2020 July 24 [cited 2021 Sept 14]; Available from: https://ncd.gov/sites/default/files/NCD_Progress_Report_508_0.pdf.

Sundar V, O’Neill J, Houtenville AJ, Phillips KG, Keirns T, Smith A, et al. Striving to work and overcoming barriers: Employment strategies and successes of people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2018 Feb 26;48(1):93–109.

Burkhauser RV, Houtenville AJ, Tennant JR. Capturing the elusive working-age Population with disabilities: Reconciling conflicting social success estimates from the current population survey and American Community Survey. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2014 Mar 1;24(4):195–205.

Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad Manage Rev. 2001 Jan;26(2):179–201.CrossRef

Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2002 Mar;3(1):71–92.CrossRef

Viswesvaran C (Vish), Ones D. Perspectives on models of job performance. Int J Sel Assess. 2002 Dec 16;8:216–26.

Brucker DL, Sundar V. Job crafting among American workers with disabilities. J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Dec;30(4):575–87.

Dash SS, Vohra N. Job crafting: A critical review. South Asian J Manag. 2020 Jan;27(1):122–49.

10.

Schyns B, von Collani G. A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2002 Jun 1;11(2):219–41.

11.

Tims M, Bakker AB, Derks D. Development and validation of the job crafting scale. J Vocat Behav. 2012 Feb 1;80(1):173–86.

12.

Demerouti E, van den Heuvel M, Xanthopoulou D, Dubbelt L, Gordon HJ. Job resources as contributors to wellbeing. In: Cooper CL, Leiter ML, editors. The Routledge companion to wellbeing at work. London, UK: Routledge; 2017 May 18. p. 269–83.

13.

Cenciotti R, Alessandri G, Borgogni L. Psychological capital and career success over time: The mediating role of job crafting. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2017 Aug 1;24(3):372–84.

14.

Lazazzara A, Tims M, De Gennaro D. The process of reinventing a job: A meta–synthesis of qualitative job crafting research. J Vocat Behav. 2020 Feb;1:116:103267.CrossRef

15.

Rudolph CW, Katz IM, Lavigne KN, Zacher H. Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. J Vocat Behav. 2017 Oct;1:102:112–38.CrossRef

16.

Demerouti E, Hewett R, Haun V, De Gieter S, Rodríguez-Sánchez A, Skakon J. From job crafting to home crafting: A daily diary study among six European countries. Hum Relat. 2020 Jul 1;73(7):1010–35.

17.

Gordon HJ, Demerouti E, Le Blanc PM, Bakker AB, Bipp T, Verhagen MAMT. Individual job redesign: Job crafting interventions in healthcare. J Vocat Behav. 2018 Feb;1:104:98–114.CrossRef

18.

Berg JM, Dutton JE, Wrzesniewski A. Job crafting and meaningful work. In: Dik BJ, Byrne ZS, Steger MF, editors. Purpose and meaning in the workplace. 1st edition. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2013. p. 81–104.

19.

Kulkarni M, Gopakumar KV. Career management strategies of people with disabilities. Hum Resour Manage. 2014 April 24;53(3):445–66.

20.

King Z. Career self-management: Its nature, causes and consequences. J Vocat Behav. 2004 Aug;65(1)(1):112–33.CrossRef

21.

Beeson CR. The impact of a narrative informed intervention on career decision self-efficacy and occupational engagement. PhD Thesis. University of Kansas; 2009.

22.

Maroto M, Pettinicchio D. The limitations of disability antidiscrimination legislation: Policymaking and the economic well-being of people with disabilities. Law Policy. 2014 Oct;36(4):370–407.CrossRef

23.

Schur LA, Kruse D, Blasi J, Blanck P. Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Ind Relat. 2009 Apr 1;48(3):381–410.

24.

Schur LA. Barriers or opportunities? The causes of contingent and part-time work among people with disabilities. Ind Relat. 2003 Oct;42(4):589–622.CrossRef

25.

Henly M, Brucker DL. More than just lower wages: intrinsic job quality for college graduates with disabilities. J Educ Work. 2020 Aug 17;33(5–6):410–24.

26.

Ali M, Schur L, Blanck P. What types of jobs do people with disabilities want? J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Jun;21(2):199–210.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Hernandez B, Cometa MJ, Velcoff J, Rosen J, Schober D, Luna RD. Perspectives of people with disabilities on employment, vocational rehabilitation, and the Ticket to Work program. J Vocat Rehabil. 2007 March;27(3):191–201.

28.

van Campen C, Cardol M. When work and satisfaction with life do not go hand in hand: Health barriers and personal resources in the participation of people with chronic physical disabilities. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jul;69(1)(1):56–60.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Brostrand HL. Tilting at windmills: Changing attitudes toward people with disabilities. J Rehabil. 2006 Jan 1;72(1):4–9.

30.

Burkhauser RV and Mary C. Daly. The declining work and welfare of people with disabilities: what went wrong and a strategy for change [Internet]. American Enterprise Institute; 2012 Feb [cited 2021 Sep 20] p. 49-3358-49–3358. Available from: https://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.49-3358.

31.

Fogg NP, Harrington PE, McMahon BT. The impact of the Great Recession upon the unemployment of Americans with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2010 Jan 1;33(3):193–202.

32.

Kaye HS. Impact of the 2007-09 recession on workers with disabilities. Mont Labor Rev. 2010 Oct;133:19–30.

33.

Peck B, Kirkbride LT. Why businesses don’t employ people with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2001 Jan 1;16(2):71–5.

34.

Hill M, Maestas N, Mullen KJ. Employer Accommodation and Labor Supply of Disabled Workers [Internet]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2016 Aug [cited 2021 Oct 27]. Report No.: ID 3183827. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3183827.

35.

Allaire SH, Li W, LaValley MP. Reduction of job loss in persons with rheumatic diseases receiving vocational rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Nov;48(11):3212–8.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Lock S, Jordan * L, Bryan K, Maxim J. Work after stroke: focusing on barriers and enablers. Disabil Soc. 2005 Jan;20(1):33–47.CrossRef

37.

Slemp GR, Vella-Brodrick DA. The Job Crafting Questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. Int J Wellbeing [Internet]. 2013 Oct 7 [cited 2021 Sep 20];3(2). Available from: https://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/index.php/ijow/article/view/217.

38.

Borman W, Motowidlo S. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Pers Sel Organ. 1993 Jan 1;71–98.

39.

Christian MS, Garza AS, Slaughter JE. Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Pers Psychol. 2011 Mar;17(1):89–136. 64(.CrossRef

40.

van Wingerden J, Bakker AB, Derks D. The longitudinal impact of a job crafting intervention. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2017 Jan 2;26(1):107–19.

41.

Tims M, Bakker AB, Derks D. Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2015 Nov;24(6)(2):914–28.CrossRef

42.

Tims MB, Bakker A, Derks D. Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy – performance relationship. J Manag Psychol. 2014 Jul 8;29(5):490–507.

43.

Demerouti E, Peeters MCW. Transmission of reduction-oriented crafting among colleagues: A diary study on the moderating role of working conditions. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2018 Jun;91(2):209–34.CrossRef

44.

Brzykcy AZ, Boehm SA, Baldridge DC. Fostering sustainable careers across the lifespan: The role of disability, idiosyncratic deals and perceived work ability. J Vocat Behav. 2019 June;1:112:185–98.CrossRef

45.

Matthysen M, Harris C. The relationship between readiness to change and work engagement: A case study in an accounting firm undergoing change. SA J Hum Resour Manag. 2018 May 17;16(1):1–11.

46.

Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 19;4(1):4–67.

47.

Lyons P. The crafting of jobs and individual differences. J Bus Psychol. 2008 Sep 1;23(1):25–36.

48.

Kriegel RJ, Brandt D. Sacred cows make the best burgers. Developing change-ready people and organizations. 1st ed.: Hachette, UK; Warner Books, Inc; 2008. 334 p.

49.

Howley C. Readiness for change. White paper. [Internet]. ICF International [updated 2012; cited Sept 2021 27] ICF Int NJ1. 2012; Available from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535400.pdf.

50.

Petrou P, Demerouti E, Peeters MC, Schaufeli WB, Hetland J. Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. J Organ Behav. 2012 Feb;23(8):1120–41. 33(.CrossRef

51.

de Beer LT, Tims M, Bakker AB. Job crafting and its impact on work engagement and job satisfaction in mining and manufacturing. South Afr J Econ Manag Sci. 2016 Sept 5;19(3):400–12.

52.

Tims M, Bakker AB, Derks D, van Rhenen W. Job crafting at the team and individual level: Implications for work engagement and performance. Group Organ Manag. 2013 Aug 1;38(4):427–54.

53.

Fritz C, Sonnentag S. Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: A look at job stressors and positive affect during the workday†. J Manag. 2009 Feb;35(1)(1):94–111.

54.

Parker S, Bindl UK. Feeling good and performing well? Psychological engagement and positive behaviors at work. In: Albrecht SL, editor. Handbook of employee engagement: perspectives, issues, research and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2010. pp. 385–98.

55.

Neuber L, Englitz C, Schulte N, Forthmann B, Holling H. How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: a meta-analysis. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2021 Aug;15:1–24.

56.

Rich BL, Lepine JA, Crawford ER. Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad Manage J. 2010 Jun;53(3):617–35.CrossRef

57.

Taylor TK, Mueller KL, Blink RC, McKinney DW, Silverman W, Das R. Workers’ compensation elements in different jurisdictions in the united states. J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec 1;62(12):e760–9.

58.

Lerner D, Amick BC III, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K, Cynn D. The work limitations questionnaire. Med Care. 2001 Jan 1;72–85.

59.

Walker TJ, Tullar JM, Diamond PM, Kohl HW, Amick BC. Validity and reliability of the 8-item work limitations questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):576–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

U.S. Department of Labor. Table 1. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by disability status and selected characteristics, 2021 annual averages – 2021 A01 Results [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/disabl.t01.htm.

61.

Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, Van Buuren S, Van der Beek AJ, De Vet HC. Improving the individual work performance questionnaire using Rasch analysis. J Appl Meas. 2014 Nov;15(2):160–75.PubMed

62.

Campbell JP. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM, editors. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1990. pp. 687–732.

63.

Ramdani Z, Marliani R, Rahman AA. The individual work performance scale: A psychometric study and its application for employee performance. Humanit Soc Sci Rev. 2019 Oct 3;7(5):405–14.

64.

van der Vaart L. The performance measurement conundrum: Construct validity of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire in South Africa. South Afr J Econ Manag Sci [Internet]. 2021 Jan 27 [cited 2021 Sep 27];24(1). Available from: http://www.sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/3581.

65.

Schaufeli W, Bakker A. Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) Premilimary Manual [Internet]. Occupational health Psychology Unit, Uterecht University; 2004 Dec [cited 2021 Sep 27]. (Version 1.1). Available from: https://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/Test%20Manuals/Test_manual_UWES_English.pdf.

66.

Reinartz W, Haenlein M, Henseler J. An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. Int J Res Mark. 2009 Dec;26(4)(1):332–44.CrossRef

67.

Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Gudergan SP. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications; 2017. 273 p.

68.

Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H, editors. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications [Internet]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2010 [cited 2021 Sep 27]. (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics). Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540328254.

69.

Garson GD. Partial Least Squares: Regression and Structural Equation Models [Internet]. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishers; 2016 [cited 2021 Sep 27]. Available from: http://www.statisticalassociates.com/pls-sem.htm.

70.

Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015 Jan 1;43(1):115–35.

71.

Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Henseler J, Hair JF. On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon (2012). Long Range Plann. 2014 Jun;47(3)(1):154–60.CrossRef

72.

Ab Hamid MR, Sami W, Mohmad Sidek MH. Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017 Sep;1:890:012163.CrossRef

73.

Kenny DA. Moderation [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2018 Sept 15; cited 2022 March 150. Available from https://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htm.

74.

Aguinis H, Beaty JC, Boik RJ, Pierce CA. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review. J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):94.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q. article. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res. 2010 Aug 1;37(2):197–206.

76.

Man X, Zhu X, Sun C. The positive effect of workplace accommodation on creative performance of employees with and without disabilities. Front Psychol. 2020 Jun;17:11:1217.CrossRef

77.

Sundar V, Brucker D. “Today I felt like my work meant something”: A pilot study on job crafting, a coaching-based intervention for people with work limitations and disabilities. Work. 2021 Jun 24;69(2):423–38.

78.

Britt E, Sawatzky R, Swibaker K. Motivational interviewing to promote employment. J Employ Couns. 2018 Dec;55(4):176–89.

79.

Harju LK, Hakanen JJ, Schaufeli WB. Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study. J Vocat Behav. 2016 Aug;1:95:11–20.CrossRef

80.

Kooij DT, Tims M, Akkermans J. The influence of future time perspective on work engagement and job performance: the role of job crafting. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2017 Jan;26(1)(2):4–15.CrossRef

Titel: Work limitations as a moderator of the relationship between job crafting and work performance: results from an SEM analysis of cross-sectional survey data
verfasst von: Vidya Sundar
Debra L. Brucker
Publikationsdatum: 19.07.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10055-6

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Injury Profiles of Police Recruits Undergoing Basic Physical Training: A Prospective Cohort Study

Perceived Injustice as a Determinant of the Severity of Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms Following Occupational Injury

Impact of Opioid Use on Duration of Time Loss After Work-Related Lower Limb Injury

Correction to: Work-related support in clinical care for patients with a chronic disease: development of an intervention

Exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders in returning to work after minor to serious road traffic injuries: a qualitative study

“I noticed that when I have a good supervisor, it can make a Lot of difference.” A Qualitative Study on Guidance of Employees with a Work Disability to Improve Sustainable Employability