nach oben

Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Erschienen in:

18.11.2022

“You nearly feel a little bit like you’ve less right to grieve”: a qualitative study on the impact of cancer on adult siblings

verfasst von: Hazel Burke, Simon Dunne

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Family members of cancer patients experience a range of challenges and are impacted in various ways by cancer. To our knowledge, the impact of cancer on adult siblings has yet to be explored. Sibling relationships are one of the longest relationships individuals have across the lifespan. Thus, the current study sought to investigate the perspectives of siblings of those who previously had cancer.

Methods

Ten participants were recruited using purposive sampling. A qualitative, cross-sectional design was implemented with both virtual and in-person semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

The researchers identified five themes relating to both the impact of cancer on siblings and the supports they received: changes in family relationships, sibling’s grief is forgotten, benefits of social support networks, supporting their sibling and caregiving and self-support.

Conclusions

Cancer organizations and support services should focus on signposting services for siblings in order to ensure they can access support. Further research is needed with siblings to gain greater insight into what supports siblings feel are available for them to access, whether there are any for them to access or how supports can be improved.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

The provision of appropriate psychological support for siblings of cancer patients will ensure they can provide optimal support and care to their siblings. This will in turn benefit cancer patients along their cancer trajectory as adequate support from their caregivers will enhance their quality of life.

Interview schedule available upon request.

Risk management protocol available upon request.

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre L A & Jemal A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 68(6):394–424

Miller, K. D., Nogueira, L., Mariotto, A. B., Rowland, J. H., Yabroff, K. R., Alfano, C. M., ... & Siegel, R. L. (2019). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 69(5), 363–385.

McKeague B, Maguire R. “The effects of cancer on a family are way beyond the person who’s had it”: the experience and effect of a familial cancer diagnosis on the health behaviours of family members. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021;51:101905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101905.CrossRefPubMed

McElvaney R, McDonnell Murray R, Dunne S. Siblings’ perspectives of the impact of child sexual abuse disclosure on sibling and family relationships. Fam Process. 2022;61(2):858–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12681.CrossRefPubMed

Cicirelli V. Sibling relationships across the life span. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.

Sanders R. Sibling relationships: theory and issues for practice. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2017

Volkom M. Sibling relationships in middle and older adulthood. Marriage Fam Rev. 2006;40(2–3):151–70. https://doi.org/10.1300/j002v40n02_08.CrossRef

Cicirelli V. Sibling relationships in adulthood. Marriage Fam Rev. 1991;16(3–4):291–310. https://doi.org/10.1300/j002v16n03_05.CrossRef

Dunn J. Siblings and socialization. In: Grusec JE, Hastings PD, editors. Handbook of socialization: theory and research. New York: Guilford Press; 2007. p. 309–27.

10.

Connidis I, Campell L. Closeness, confiding, and contact among siblings in middle and late adulthood. J Fam Issues. 1995;16(6):722–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251395016006003.CrossRef

11.

Riggio H. Measuring attitudes toward adult sibling relationships: the lifespan sibling relationship scale. J Soc Pers Relat. 2000;17(6):707–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500176001.CrossRef

12.

Stocker CM, Gilligan M, Klopack ET, et al. Sibling relationships in older adulthood: links with loneliness and well-being. J Fam Psychol. 2020;34(2):175–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000586.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Weiner JA, Woodley LK. An integrative review of sibling responses to childhood cancer. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2018;31(4):109–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12219.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Levesque JV, Maybery D. Parental cancer: catalyst for positive growth and change. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(3):397–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311421617.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Friðriksdóttir N, Saevarsdóttir T, Halfdánardóttir SÍ, et al. Family members of cancer patients: needs, quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):252–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2010.529821.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Woźniak K, Iżycki D. Cancer: a family at risk. Prz Menopauzalny. 2014;13(4):253–61. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2014.45002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

D’Urso A, Mastroyannopoulou K, Kirby A. Experiences of posttraumatic growth in siblings of children with cancer. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;22(2):301–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104516660749.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Cheung C, Acquati C, Smith E, Katerere-Virima T, Helbling L, Betz G. The impact of a cancer diagnosis on sibling relationships from childhood through young adulthood: a systematic review. J Fam Soc Work. 2020;23(4):357–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2020.1799897.CrossRef

19.

Neville A, Simard M, Hancock K, Rokeach A, Saleh A, Barrera M. The emotional experience and perceived changes in siblings of children with cancer reported during a group intervention. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016;43(5):E188–94. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.ONF.E188-E194.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Prchal A, Landolt MA. How siblings of pediatric cancer patients experience the first time after diagnosis: a qualitative study. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35(2):133–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e31821e0c59.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Arora SRA, Shama W, Lucchetta S, Markowitz S, Yohan A. The cancer journey through the lens of a sibling: a photovoice intervention for teen siblings of children with cancer. Soc Work Health Care. 2021;60(5):430–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2021.1926397.CrossRefPubMed

22.

O’Shea ER, Shea J, Robert T, Cavanaugh C. The needs of siblings of children with cancer: a nursing perspective. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2012;29(4):221–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454212451365.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Jenholt Nolbris M, Enskär K, Hellström AL. Grief related to the experience of being the sibling of a child with cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(5):E1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182a3e585.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hagedoorn M, Kreicbergs U, Appel C. Coping with cancer: the perspective of patients’ relatives. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):205–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2010.536165.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Northouse L, Kershaw T, Mood D, Schafenacker A. Effects of a family intervention on the quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family caregivers. Psychooncology. 2005;14(6):478–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.871.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Hopkinson JB, Brown JC, Okamoto I, Addington-Hall JM. The effectiveness of patient-family carer (couple) intervention for the management of symptoms and other health-related problems in people affected by cancer: a systematic literature search and narrative review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;43(1):111–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.03.013.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Baik OM, Adams KB. Improving the well-being of couples facing cancer: a review of couples-based psychosocial interventions. J Marital Fam Ther. 2011;37(2):250–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00217.x.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Whiteman SD, McHale SM, Soli A. Theoretical perspectives on sibling relationships. J Fam Theory Rev. 2011;3(2):124–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00087.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Sofaer S. Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1101–18.PubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Maly RC. Qualitative research for the study of cancer and age. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14(1):79–ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70279-3.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Van’t Riet A, Berg M, Hiddema F, Sol K. Meeting patients’ needs with patient information systems: potential benefits of qualitative research methods. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00185-x.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.CrossRefPubMed

33.

King DB, O’Rourke N, DeLongis A. Social media recruitment and online data collection: a beginner’s guide and best practices for accessing low-prevalence and hard-to-reach populations. Can Psychol. 2014;55(4):240.CrossRef

34.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef

35.

Alhojailan MI. Thematic analysis: a critical review of its process and evaluation. WEJESS. 2012;1(1):39–47.

36.

Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New dir. program eval. 1986;73–84.

37.

Ashton S. Researcher or nurse? Difficulties of undertaking semi-structured interviews on sensitive topics. Nurse Res. 2014;22(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.1.27.e1255.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Mealer M, Jones RJ. Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics. Nurse Res. 2014;21(4):32–7. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2014.03.21.4.32.e1229.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Bowman S, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Wade D, McGorry P, Howie L. Forgotten family members: the importance of siblings in early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2014;8(3):269–75.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Dyregrov K, Dyregrov A. Siblings after suicide—“the forgotten bereaved.” Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2005;35(6):714–24.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Lund L, Ross L, Petersen MA, Groenvold M. The interaction between informal cancer caregivers and health care professionals: a survey of caregivers’ experiences of problems and unmet needs. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(6):1719–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2529-0.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Utley A, Garza Y. The therapeutic use of journaling with adolescents. J Creat Ment Health. 2011;6(1):29–41.CrossRef

43.

Mosher CE, Ott MA, Hanna N, Jalal SI, Champion VL. Coping with physical and psychological symptoms: a qualitative study of advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(7):2053–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2566-8.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Akpan-Idiok PA, Ehiemere IO, Asuquo EF, Chabo JAU, Osuchukwu EC. Assessment of burden and coping strategies among caregivers of cancer patients in sub-Saharan Africa. World J Clin Oncol. 2020;11(12):1045–63. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v11.i12.1045.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Pitceathly C, Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients’ partners and other key relatives: a review. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(11):1517–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00309-5.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Schafenacker AM, Weiss D. The impact of caregiving on the psychological well-being of family caregivers and cancer patients. In Seminars in oncology nursing. WB Saunders 2012;28(4):236–245).

47.

Head KJ, Iannarino NT. “It changed our outlook on how we want to live”: cancer as a transformative health experience for young adult survivors and their family members. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(3):404–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318800674.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Thornton AA. Perceiving benefits in the cancer experience. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2002;9:153–65.CrossRef

49.

Molinaro ML, Fletcher PC. 2017 “It changed everything. and not all in a bad way” reflections of pediatric cancer experiences. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs 40(3):157–172 https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2017.1307471

50.

Yi J. Cultural influences on the survivorship of families affected by childhood cancer: a case for using family systems theories. Fam Syst Health. 2009;27(3):228–36.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Northouse LL. Helping patients and their family caregivers cope with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012;39(5):500–6. https://doi.org/10.1188/12.ONF.500-506.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Girgis A, Lambert S, Johnson C, Waller A, Currow D. Physical, psychosocial, relationship, and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: a review. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9(4):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2012.000690.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Ullgren H, Tsitsi T, Papastavrou E, Charalambous A. How family caregivers of cancer patients manage symptoms at home: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;85:68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.004.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Kent EE, Rowland JH. Northouse L et al, Caring for caregivers and patients: research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer. 2016;122(13):1987–95.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: “You nearly feel a little bit like you’ve less right to grieve”: a qualitative study on the impact of cancer on adult siblings
verfasst von: Hazel Burke
Simon Dunne
Publikationsdatum: 18.11.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Elektronische ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01295-9

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

“You nearly feel a little bit like you’ve less right to grieve”: a qualitative study on the impact of cancer on adult siblings

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

Hypertherme Chemotherapie bietet Chance auf Blasenerhalt

Update Onkologie

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

A randomised controlled trial evaluating two cognitive rehabilitation approaches for cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment

Physical activity intervention benefits persist months post-intervention: randomized trial in breast cancer survivors

Healthcare providers’ promotion of physical activity among child and adolescent cancer survivors: strategies and challenges

Quantification of breast lymphoedema following conservative breast cancer treatment: a systematic review

Characterizing risky alcohol use, cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and physical inactivity among cancer survivors in the USA—a cross-sectional study

Association of financial worry with substance use, mental health, and quality of life in cancer patients

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

Hypertherme Chemotherapie bietet Chance auf Blasenerhalt

Update Onkologie