Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 5/2019

03.06.2019 | Original Article

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Anti-Rh (D) Immunoglobulin with Polyclonal Anti-Rh (D) Immunoglobulin for the Prevention of Maternal Rh-Isoimmunization

verfasst von: Anahita R. Chauhan, Yogeshwar S. Nandanwar, Aruna Ramaiah, Kanan A. Yelikar, M. D. Rashmi, Rekha Sachan, Rahul V. Mayekar, Yamini N. Trivedi, Gopalkrishna V. Paradkar, Kiran P. Patole

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of monoclonal anti-Rhesus (anti-D) immunoglobulin (IgG) with polyclonal anti-D IgG in the prevention of maternal Rh-isoimmunization.

Methods

This was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, comparative clinical trial conducted in the obstetric in-patient departments of nine tertiary care hospitals in India. 206 Rhesus (D)-negative women, not sensitized to Rh antigen, and delivering Rh positive babies, received postpartum intramuscular administration of monoclonal or polyclonal anti-D IgG. The main outcome measures were the proportion of subjects protected from Rh-isoimmunization, identified by a negative indirect Coombs test (ICT) result, at day 180 after anti-D IgG administration, and incidence of adverse events.

Results

105 subjects were randomized to the monoclonal group and 101 to the polyclonal group. 94 from the monoclonal group had a negative ICT result and none had a positive ICT result at day 180, whereas 87 from the polyclonal group had a negative ICT result and one had a positive ICT result; the rest (11 and 13 subjects respectively) were lost to follow-up. A total of 5 adverse events were reported (3 in the monoclonal group and 2 in the polyclonal group); only one of these was serious. All the adverse events were judged to be unrelated to the interventional drug. None of the subjects in the monoclonal group developed immunogenic reaction to the monoclonal anti-D.

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of the monoclonal preparation of anti-D was comparable to the polyclonal preparation of anti-D when used in the prevention of maternal Rh-isoimmunization.
Trial registration Clinical Trial Registration Number: CTRI/2015/09/006172.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kent J, Farrell AM, Soothill P. Routine administration of Anti-D: the ethical case for offering pregnant women fetal RHD genotyping and a review of policy and practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):87.CrossRef Kent J, Farrell AM, Soothill P. Routine administration of Anti-D: the ethical case for offering pregnant women fetal RHD genotyping and a review of policy and practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):87.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolton-Maggs PH, Davies T, Poles D, et al. Errors in anti-D immunoglobulin administration: retrospective analysis of 15 years of reports to the UK confidential haemovigilance scheme. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(7):873–8.CrossRef Bolton-Maggs PH, Davies T, Poles D, et al. Errors in anti-D immunoglobulin administration: retrospective analysis of 15 years of reports to the UK confidential haemovigilance scheme. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(7):873–8.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Olovnikova N. Anti-RhD-mediated immunosuppression: can monoclonal antibodies imitate the action of polyclonal antibodies?. In: Immunosuppression-role in health and diseases 2012. InTech. Olovnikova N. Anti-RhD-mediated immunosuppression: can monoclonal antibodies imitate the action of polyclonal antibodies?. In: Immunosuppression-role in health and diseases 2012. InTech.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McBain RD, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9(2):CD000020. McBain RD, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9(2):CD000020.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dajak S, Roje D, Hašpl ŽH, et al. The importance of antenatal prevention of RhD immunisation in the first pregnancy. Blood Transfus. 2014;12(3):410.PubMedPubMedCentral Dajak S, Roje D, Hašpl ŽH, et al. The importance of antenatal prevention of RhD immunisation in the first pregnancy. Blood Transfus. 2014;12(3):410.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat De Haas M, Thurik FF, Van Der Ploeg CP, et al. Sensitivity of fetal RHD screening for safe guidance of targeted anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis: prospective cohort study of a nationwide programme in the Netherlands. BMJ. 2016;7(355):i5789.CrossRef De Haas M, Thurik FF, Van Der Ploeg CP, et al. Sensitivity of fetal RHD screening for safe guidance of targeted anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis: prospective cohort study of a nationwide programme in the Netherlands. BMJ. 2016;7(355):i5789.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Velkova E. Correlation between the amount of anti-D antibodies and IgG subclasses with severity of haemolytic disease of foetus and newborn. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2015;3(2):293.CrossRef Velkova E. Correlation between the amount of anti-D antibodies and IgG subclasses with severity of haemolytic disease of foetus and newborn. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2015;3(2):293.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fyfe TM, Ritchey MJ, Taruc C, et al. Appropriate provision of anti-D prophylaxis to RhD negative pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):411.CrossRef Fyfe TM, Ritchey MJ, Taruc C, et al. Appropriate provision of anti-D prophylaxis to RhD negative pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):411.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Prevention of Rh D alloimmunization. Practice Bulletin No. 181 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obs Gynecol. 2017;130:e57–70.CrossRef Prevention of Rh D alloimmunization. Practice Bulletin No. 181 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obs Gynecol. 2017;130:e57–70.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumpel BM. Efficacy of RhD monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials as replacement therapy for prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin: more questions than answers. Vox Sang. 2007;93(2):99–111.CrossRef Kumpel BM. Efficacy of RhD monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials as replacement therapy for prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin: more questions than answers. Vox Sang. 2007;93(2):99–111.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2017. In: MAbs 2017 Feb 17, vol 9, no. 2. Taylor & Francis. p. 167–81. Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2017. In: MAbs 2017 Feb 17, vol 9, no. 2. Taylor & Francis. p. 167–81.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Qureshi H, Massey E, Kirwan D, et al. BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Transfus Med. 2014;24(1):8–20.CrossRef Qureshi H, Massey E, Kirwan D, et al. BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Transfus Med. 2014;24(1):8–20.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsey G. Inaccurate doses of Rh immune globulin after Rh-incompatible fetomaternal hemorrhage: survey of laboratory practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(3):465–9.PubMed Ramsey G. Inaccurate doses of Rh immune globulin after Rh-incompatible fetomaternal hemorrhage: survey of laboratory practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(3):465–9.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Anti-Rh (D) Immunoglobulin with Polyclonal Anti-Rh (D) Immunoglobulin for the Prevention of Maternal Rh-Isoimmunization
verfasst von
Anahita R. Chauhan
Yogeshwar S. Nandanwar
Aruna Ramaiah
Kanan A. Yelikar
M. D. Rashmi
Rekha Sachan
Rahul V. Mayekar
Yamini N. Trivedi
Gopalkrishna V. Paradkar
Kiran P. Patole
Publikationsdatum
03.06.2019
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01234-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.