A multivariable model of ultrasound and clinicopathological features for predicting axillary nodal burden of breast cancer: potential to prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection
verfasst von:
Lei Yang, Yifan Gu, Bing Wang, Ming Sun, Lei Zhang, Lei Shi, Yanfei Wang, Zheng Zhang, Yifei Yin
To develop a clinical model for predicting high axillary nodal burden in patients with early breast cancer by integrating ultrasound (US) and clinicopathological features.
Methods and materials
Patients with breast cancer who underwent preoperative US examination and breast surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (centre 1, n = 250) and at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (centre 2, n = 97) between January 2012 and December 2016 and between January 2020 and March 2022, respectively, were deemed eligible for this study (n = 347). According to the number of lymph node (LN) metastasis based on pathology, patients were divided into two groups: limited nodal burden (0–2 metastatic LNs) and heavy nodal burden (≥ 3 metastatic LNs). In addition, US features combined with clinicopathological variables were compared between these two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the most valuable variables for predicting ≥ 3 LNs in breast cancer. A nomogram was then developed based on these independent factors.
Results
Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the cortical thickness (p < 0.001), longitudinal to transverse ratio (p = 0.001), absence of hilum (p < 0.001), T stage (p = 0.002) and Ki-67 (p = 0.039) were significantly associated with heavy nodal burden. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, cortical thickness (p = 0.001), absence of hilum (p = 0.042) and T stage (p = 0.012) were considered independent predictors of high-burden node. The area under curve (AUC) of the nomogram was 0.749.
Conclusion
Our model based on US variables and clinicopathological characteristics demonstrates that can help select patients with ≥ 3 LNs, which can in turn be helpful to predict high axillary nodal burden in early breast cancer patients and prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection.
Hinweise
Lei Yang and Yifan Gu contributed equally to this work.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
US
Ultrasound
ALN
Axillary lymph node
ALND
Axillary lymph node dissection
ER
Estrogen receptor
PR
Progesterone receptor
Her-2
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
AUC
Area under curve
ACC
Accuracy
SN
Sensitivity
SP
Specificity
PPV
Positive predictive value
NPV
Negative predictive value
CI
Confidence interval
DCA
Decision curve analysis
Background
Axillary lymph node (ALN) status is a critical prognostic factor in the therapeutic plan of breast cancer patients because it can determine the extent of surgery and assess the necessity of chemotherapy or radiotherapy [1‐4]. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is used to assess ALN status, provide accurate staging of axillary lymph nodes and eliminate potential metastatic lymph nodes, and it is the standard surgical method for patients associated with greater lymph node burden [3‐6]. However, ALND can cause severe complications, such as shoulder dyskinesia and arm lymphedema, which can have a negative impact on quality of life [7‐12]. Hence, avoiding excessive ALND becomes a pressing issue. The results of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial showed no statistically significant differences between the ALND and no-ALND groups in terms of local recurrence rate and 10-year overall survival rate in patients with < 3 axillary lymph node metastases [13]. Patients with ≥ 3 axillary lymph node metastases (high axillary nodal burden) are more likely to have local recurrence, and are thus considered suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or ALND [14‐17]. Therefore, preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis and identification of patients with high axillary nodal burden are crucial to determine the appropriate therapeutic management.
Preoperative imaging, including ultrasound (US), mammography, computed Tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography etc., has become increasingly important and more widely used in assessing ALN metastasis in patients with breast cancer [18‐21]. Compared with other imaging modalities, ultrasound is more cost-effective, non-invasive and reproducible [14, 15, 22]. However, Hieken et al. showed a false positive rate of 79.8% for suspicious axillary ultrasound results according to pathological examination [23]. Therefore, it is insufficient to assess ALN burden by axillary ultrasound alone. Fortunately, the US characteristics of primary breast lesion are reported to be obviously associated with high ALN metastasis [24, 25]. In addition, certain clinicopathological features of patients with breast cancer are related to ALN metastasis [26‐28]. The purpose of this study was to integrate the ultrasonic features of lymph nodes and primary lesions with clinicopathological characteristics to identify independent predictors and develop a model to predict high-burden lymph node (≥ 3) in patients with breast cancer and prevent unnecessary ALND.
Anzeige
Materials and methods
This study design followed the international regulations according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Our research was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (2022-K108-01) and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (KY2021K1213), and written informed consent was obtained from participants.
Patient enrolment
Patients who underwent breast surgery and US examination at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (centre 1, n = 1232) and at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (centre 2, n = 566) between January 2012 and December 2016 and between January 2020 and March 2022, respectively, were deemed eligible for this study (n = 1798). Patients were included if they: [1] had clinical N1 or N0; [2] had a preoperative breast US and axillary US performed within two weeks of surgery, which recorded US characteristics of the primary breast tumour and axillary lymph nodes; [3] had breast surgery and axillary lymph node dissection; [4] had pathology which documented the number of axillary lymph node metastasis; [5] and had a pathology tumour size that was T1 or T2. Exclusion criteria were as follows: [1] patients with a history of other malignant tumours and ipsilateral axillary surgery history; [2] patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy and [3] absence of clinicopathological or US information. Finally, 347 patients were included in this study (Fig. 1).
×
US analysis
All patients included in this study underwent a preoperative breast and axillary US examination within two weeks of surgery using the GE LOGIQ E9 with a linear array transducer (12–15 MHz). Patients were positioned flat with bilateral arms raised to fully expose the bilateral breasts and axilla. US parameters, such as gain, depth, focal length, etc., were adjusted to enable a clear display of the primary lesion. The primary lesion or lymph node used for the assessment was situated in the central part of the ultrasound screening. Subsequently, we scanned the lesion from multiple angles and acquired images of the primary lesion and lymph nodes. The images were then stored for further analysis.
US features of the primary tumour and ALNs were observed independently by two radiologists who were blinded to any information that could interfere or bias with their task. Potential disagreements or differences were arbitrated by a third experienced radiologist to reach a consensus. The US features of the primary tumour were analysed, including quadrants (upper outer, upper inner, lower outer and lower inner quadrants), margins (circumscribed or non-circumscribed), orientation (parallel or non-parallel), shape (regular or irregular), attenuation (weak or not) and calcification (with or without). Furthermore, axillary US measured the longitudinal to transverse ratio (< 2 or ≥ 2) and cortical thickness (< 3 mm or ≥ 3 mm), and determined the absence of hilum (yes or not).
Anzeige
Clinicopathological analysis
Surgical-histopathologic data included the number of metastatic lymph nodes (< 3 or ≥ 3), T stage (≤ 2 cm or 2–5 cm), histological grade (I, II or III) and the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), CerbB-2, P53 and Ki-67 from histopathology reports. ER and PR positivity were defined as the expression of greater than 1% [29], while Ki67 positivity was defined as the expression of greater than 14% [30]. CerbB-2 receptor of 3 + in HE or 2 + in gene amplification was defined as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive [29, 31].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS software (ver. 24.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), the MedCalc software (ver.19.07) the R software (ver 4.0.1). The enrolled patients were randomly divided into the training group and the verification group according to the ratio of 7:3. X2 tests or Fisher’s exact test were performed between the training and the validation groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors that could significantly affect the training group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to determine independent predictors of the number of axillary lymph node metastasis and incorporate them into the model. The area under the area under curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) was used to assess model discrimination. Delong test was conducted to compare different diagnostic models across the training and validation cohort for nomogram, cortical thickness, lymphatic gate, and T stage by MedCale. Finally, a calibration diagram was drawn to evaluate the ability of calibration and the fit of the model was assessed by the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.
Results
Baseline characteristics
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the research population. Patients were divided into the training group (n = 243) and the verification group (n = 104) with a ratio of 7:3. Fifty-six (23.0%) and 30 (28.8%) patients had ≥ 3 lymph node metastases of primary breast cancer in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. There were no significant differences in the US characteristics and clinicopathological parameters between the two groups. The mean ages of the training and validation groups were 55.84 ± 10.74 and 55.54 ± 11.66, respectively.
Table 1
Characteristics of the training and validation cohorts
In the univariate analysis, variables that were significantly associated with ≥ 3 lymph node metastases included cortical thickness (p < 0.001), longitudinal to transverse ratio (p = 0.001), absence of hilum (p < 0.001), T stage (p = 0.002) and Ki-67 (p = 0.039) (Table 2 and 3). The remaining factors were not found to be significant for the identification of high-burden lymph nodes (all p > 0.05). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, cortical thickness (p = 0.001), absence of hilum (p = 0.042) and T stage (p = 0.012) are shown in Table 4. Ki-67 and longitudinal to transverse ratio were not independent predictors. Cortical thickness, absence of hilum and T stage were considered as independent predictors of HBN, and these parameters were then incorporated into the predictive model to create a nomogram (p < 0.05).
Table 2
Univariable analysis ultrasound features of lymph nodes in the training cohort
Variable
0 or 1, 2 metastatic LNs (n = 187)
≥ 3 metastatic LNs (n = 56)
Odds Ratio
95% CI
P-value
Cortical thickness
< 3
131(70.1%)
18(32.1%)
Reference
≥ 3
56(29.9%)
38(67.9%)
4.938
2.598–9.386
< 0.000*
Longitudinal to transverse ratio
≥ 2
123(65.8%)
22(39.3%)
2.970
1.605–5.497
0.001*
< 2
64(34.2%)
34(60.7%)
Reference
Absence of hilum
No
159(85.0%)
32(57.1%)
Reference
Yes
28(15.0%)
24(42.9%)
4.259
2.192–8.277
< 0.001*
*P values less than 0.05
Table 3
Univariable analysis of ultrasound and clinicopathological features of primary tumor in the training cohort
Variable
0 or 1, 2 metastatic LNs (n = 187)
≥ 3 metastatic LNs (n = 56)
Odds Ratio
95% CI
P-value
Age
< 60
121(64.7%)
34(60.7%)
Reference
≥ 60
66(35.3%)
22(39.3%)
1.186
0.642–2.193
0.586
Location
UIQ
31(16.6%)
8(14.3%)
Reference
LIQ
13(7.0%)
3(5.4%)
0.812
0.341–1.934
0.638
LOQ
36(19.3%)
11(19.6%)
0.726
0.195–2.701
0.633
UOQ
107(57.2%)
34(60.7%)
0.962
0.442–2.093
0.921
Orientation
Parallel
137(73.3%)
37(66.1%)
Reference
Non-parallel
50(26.7%)
19(33.9%)
1.407
0.741–2.671
0.296
Shape
Regular
19(10.2%)
8(14.3%)
Reference
Irregular
168(89.8%)
48(85.7%)
0.679
0.280–1.646
0.391
Margin
Circumscribed
35(18.7%)
6(10.7%)
Reference
Non-circumscribed
152(81.3%)
50(89.3%)
1.919
0.762–4.830
0.166
Calcification
No
83(44.4%)
21(37.5%)
Reference
Yes
104(55.6%)
35(62.5%)
1.330
0.720–2.456
0.362
Attenuation
No
128(68.4%)
31(55.4%)
Reference
Yes
59(31.6%)
25(44.6%)
1.750
0.950–3.222
0.073
ER
Negative
69(36.9%)
20(35.7%)
Reference
1 +
23(12.3%)
8(14.3%)
0.870
0.438–1.727
0.690
2 +
26(13.9%)
5(8.9%)
1.043
0.411–2.652
0.929
3 +
69(36.9%)
23(41.1%)
0.577
0.198–1.677
0.312
PR
Negative
81(43.3%)
28(50.0%)
Reference
1 +
30(16.0%)
10(17.9%)
1.267
0.587–2.736
0.546
2 +
32(17.1%)
6(10.7%)
1.222
0.468–3.189
0.682
3 +
44(23.5%)
12(21.4%)
0.688
0.233–2.026
0.497
Her-2
Negative
150(80.2%)
45(80.4%)
Reference
Positive
37(19.8%)
11(19.6%)
0.991
0.468–2.100
0.981
P53
Negative
81(43.3%)
28(50.0%)
Reference
Positive
87(46.5%)
26(46.4%)
0.352
0.077–1.613
0.179
Unknow
19(10.2%)
2(3.6%)
1.157
0.626–2.137
0.642
Ki-67
< 14
31(16.6%)
3(5.4%)
Reference
≥ 14
151(80.7%)
53(94.6%)
0.276
0.081–0.939
0.039*
Unknow
5(2.7%)
0(0.0%)
Tumor size
T1
102(54.5%)
17(30.4%)
Reference
T2
85(45.5%)
39(69.6%)
2.753
1.454–5.212
0.002*
Histological grade
I
16(8.6%)
2(3.6%)
Reference
II
84(44.9%)
33(58.9%)
3.143
0.685–14.429
0.141
III
83(44.4%)
21(37.5%)
2.024
0.431–9.498
0.371
Unknow
4(2.1%)
0(0.0%)
LN Lymph node, UOQ Upper outer quadrant, UIQ Upper inner quadrant, LOQ Lower outer quadrant, LIQ Lower inner quadrant, ER Estrogen receptor, PR Progesterone receptor, HER2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor *P values less than 0.05
Table 4
Comparison of the multivariable in the training cohort
Variable
Odds Ratio
95% CI
P-value
Ki-67
0.496
0.135–1.818
0.290
Longitudinal to transverse ratio
1.242
0.581–2.658
0.576
Cortical thickness
3.300
1.598–6.817
0.001*
Absence of Hilum
2.207
1.031–4.727
0.042*
Tumor size
2.389
1.214–4.698
0.012*
*P values less than 0.05
Development of the nomogram
Based on the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis, cortical thickness, absence of hilumand T stage were incorporated to create a nomogram (Fig. 2). The nomogram had an AUC of 0.749 (95% CI: 0.676–0.823), sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 75.9%, PPV of 67.7% and NPV of 81.1% (Table 5). The AUCs of cortical thickness, lymphatic gate and T stage were 0.690 (95% CI: 0.609–0.770), 0.639 (95% CI: 0.551–0.728) and 0.621 (95% CI: 0.539–0.703), respectively (Fig. 3). The AUC of model was greater than the AUCs of cortical thickness (p = 0.003), lymphatic gate (p < 0.001) and T stage (p < 0.001) (Table 5). The C-index of this model was 0.749 (95% CI: 0.677–0.820). The Hosmer–Lemeshow-Goodness-of-Fit test had a p-value of 0.995 and the calibration plot is shown in Fig. 3. Through bootstrap validation, the C-index of the nomogram was considered 0.68. The decision curve analysis (DCA) showed good net benefits in the training set in Fig. 4.
Table 5
The ROC analysis of cortical thickness, hilum, T stage and the model in the training cohort
Variable
AUC
ACC(%)
SN (%)
SP (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
P-value
95%CI
Lower
Upper
Cortical_thickness
0.690
69.5
67.9
70.1
50.4
87.9
0.003
0.609
0.770
Hilum
0.639
75.3
42.9
85.0
56.1
83.2
< 0.001
0.551
0.728
T stage
0.621
58.0
69.6
54.5
41.5
85.7
< 0.001
0.539
0.703
Model
0.749
78.6
71.4
75.9
67.7
81.1
0.676
0.823
AUC Area under curve, ACC Accuracy, SN Sensitivity, SP Specificity, PPV Positive Predictive Value, NPV Negative Predictive Value, P-value: DeLong test of AUC, CI Confidence interval
×
×
×
Validation of the nomogram
The validation group model consisted of 104 patients. The AUC of the prediction model for the validation group was 0.783 (95% CI: 0.685–0.881) (Fig. 5 and Table 6). The C-index of the validation group was 0.783(95% CI:0.685–0.881). The AUC of model was greater than the AUCs of cortical thickness (p = 0.009), lymphatic gate (p = 0.001) and T stage (p = 0.007) (Table 6). The P-value of the Hosmer–Lemeshow-Goodness-of-Fit test was 0.783. The DCA had good net benefits in the validation group (Fig. 6).
Table 6
The ROC analysis of cortical thickness, hilum, T stage and the model in the validation cohort
Variable
AUC
ACC(%)
SN (%)
SP (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
P-value
95%CI
Lower
Upper
Cortical_thickness
0.718
74.0
66.7
77.0
54.1
85.1
0.009
0.605
0.832
Hilum
0.639
74.0
40.0
87.8
57.1
78.3
0.001
0.514
0.764
T stage
0.614
57.6
70.0
70.0
37.5
81.3
0.007
0.496
0.731
Model
0.783
77.9
70.0
71.6
61.2
84.9
0.685
0.881
AUC Area under curve, ACC Accuracy, SN Sensitivity, SP Specificity, PPV Positive Predictive Value, NPV Negative Predictive Value, P-value: DeLong test of AUC, CI Confidence interval
×
×
Discussion
Although US examination is currently one of the most widely used and important imaging technologies, it is not completely accurate in predicting high-burden lymph nodes [32, 33]. Predicting high lymph node burden can guide individualised treatment strategies with respect to the application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and selection of the type of axillary surgery (SLNB vs. ALND) [34]. Therefore, prediction of lymph node metastasis and identification of patients with high axillary lymph node loads are both essential and challenging processes. The main strength of this study is that we successfully integrated US and clinicopathological features of lymph nodes and primary lesion ultrasound and establish a nomogram that could predict a high axillary lymph node burden.
In our study, the cortical thickness and lymphatic hilum of lymph nodes and the T stage of the primary lesion were found to be independent predictors of high-burden lymph nodes. Based on these three parameters, we established a nomogram to predict high-burden node (HBN), and our results showed that its AUC was 0.749, i.e. a satisfactory predictive value. In the nomogram, cortical thickness was more important. The point of cortical thickness, which was ≥ 3 mm, was 100 points, and thus greater than the lymphatic hilum of lymph nodes and T stage. The US characteristics of the lesion proved impossible to identify high-burden lymph nodes. However, according to the studies performed by Torstenson and Ansari, the distance between the tumour and nipple and the distance between the tumour and skin were significantly correlated with positive lymph node metastasis [35, 36]. In Yi’s study, the distance from the nipple was interconnected with high-burden lymph nodes [24]. Since this was a retrospective study, the US report failed to count the distance from the primary lesion to the nipple, which may have caused a degree of impact on the diagnostic efficiency. To our knowledge, only a limited number of studies have combined ultrasound of axillary lymph nodes, ultrasound of primary lesions and clinicopathological characteristics. Our study could comprehensively evaluate the relationship between these three parameters and high burden lymph nodes metastasis.
Anzeige
There are still some limitations in our research. First, this study was a retrospective study. In the axillary ultrasound report, we mainly focused on lymph nodes with large size or potential malignancies, while some lymph nodes with small size but abnormal morphology were ignored. Consequently, there may be sample selection deviation. Second, due to the small sample size, the low-burden group included a significantly greater number of cases compared to the high-burden group, which may influenced our results. Third, we did not statistically analyse the blood flow in the lymph nodes and the primary lesion. In addition, the clinical and pathological factors used in developing the nomogram were obtained postoperatively, making it challenging to directly predict the burden of lymph nodes before surgery. However, the study added information about ultrasound results, and future research may require additional studies incorporating MRI, molybdenum target and clinically assessable pathological factors before surgery and establish a preoperative prediction model. Therefore, future studies with a larger sample size and more comprehensive characteristics are expected to confirm the clinical application of the present model.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we established a nomogram integrating the US and clinicopathological features of axillary lymph nodes and primary breast lesions to predict high-burden lymph nodes metastasis. Lymph node cortical thickness, lymphatic hilum and T stage were found to be important indicators for predicting high-burden lymph nodes metastasis, and these parameters are expected to be helpful in clinical practice in terms of reducing unnecessary ALND and identifying the patients requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to all the teams and patients who participated in this trail and made it possible.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study design followed the international regulations according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Our research was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (2022-K108-01) and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (KY2021K1213), and written informed consent was obtained from participants.
Anzeige
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A multivariable model of ultrasound and clinicopathological features for predicting axillary nodal burden of breast cancer: potential to prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection
verfasst von
Lei Yang Yifan Gu Bing Wang Ming Sun Lei Zhang Lei Shi Yanfei Wang Zheng Zhang Yifei Yin
Nach einer Prostatabiopsie treten häufig Probleme beim Wasserlassen auf. Ob sich das durch den periinterventionellen Einsatz von Alphablockern verhindern lässt, haben australische Mediziner im Zuge einer Metaanalyse untersucht.
Gerade bei aggressiven Malignomen wie dem duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas könnte Früherkennung die Therapiechancen verbessern. Noch jedoch klafft hier eine Lücke. Ein Studienteam hat einen Weg gesucht, sie zu schließen.
Ein hoher Anteil pflanzlicher Nahrung trägt möglicherweise dazu bei, das Progressionsrisiko von Männern mit Prostatakarzinomen zu senken. In einer US-Studie war das Risiko bei ausgeprägter pflanzlicher Ernährung in etwa halbiert.
Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.
Update Onkologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.