Background
Thoracic trauma accounts for 20-25% of trauma-related mortality [1]. Multiple rib fractures are common in thoracic injury, which can lead to Flail Chest with up to 35% mortality rate, due to severe pulmonary complications and sepsis [2, 3]. Flail Chest happens when 3 or more consecutive segmental rib fractures take place in more than one location, [4] and it is normally associated with paradoxical movement of the chest wall, reliance on mechanical ventilation, and prolonged ICU stay [5].
Current treatments of flail chest remain controversial. Supportive or non-operative treatments have been the predominant management options, which mostly involve pain control with analgesia, mechanical ventilation (both invasive and non-invasive), strapping, and packing [6‐8]. Although being widely practiced, non-operative treatments can lead to higher rate of pneumonia, prolonged mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) [9] resulting in severe morbidity and mortality [6, 8, 10].
Anzeige
Surgical or operative treatments have gained popularity in recent years, and studies have shown that early surgical intervention can significantly improve outcomes and reduce mortality [11, 12]. Surgical rib fracture fixation can be performed by thoracic surgeons or by a collaboration of multiple disciplinary, including trauma and orthopedic surgeons [13]. The advantages of surgical stabilization of rib fractures include reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, prevention of pulmonary complications, and the reduction of long-term pain, disability, or chest wall deformity.
There are a variety of surgical fixation methods available, but there’s not an optimal treatment option established yet [10, 14]. Absorbable fixation plates are bio-compatible, but they are sometimes not strong enough to hold displaced ribs in alignment [15]. A number of metal prostheses have been tested and clinically applied, including less rigid Kirschner wires, [16] and rigid metal hardware such as Judget Struts, [17] Intramedullary pins, [18] and a wide range of metal plates. The deficiencies of metal fixation include hardware being palpable in CT or MRI scans, stress shielding of plates, [19] and the potential need for removal in a follow-up operation [20, 21].
Most of the metal plates require division of intercostal muscles on the outward facing side of the ribs, resulting in neurovascular injuries and chronic pain. A metal prosthesis stabilizing ribs from the inward facing side of the ribs can avoid splints of muscles, thus causing less damages to nerves and blood vessels that concentrate on the exterior side of ribs.
The current study is designed to test a minimally invasive method and novel surgical tools for the operative treatment of rib fracture. The effective stabilization of rib fractures can lead to successful management of flail chest. A novel VATS-assisted interior surgical fixation method is applied on a canine rib fracture model, in comparison to the exterior fixation method. Operation safety, efficiency and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two methods.
Anzeige
Methods
The animal experiment was carried out in accordance with the revised Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 in the UK and Directive 2010/63/EU in Europe. With approvals from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Hebei Medical University, and from the Research Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 healthy male canines were provided by the University. They were randomly divided into two groups with proper labeling: the Exterior Group (EG), in which the metal plates were applied on the outward facing side of the rib; the Interior Group (IG), in which the metal plates were applied on the inward facing side of the rib.
Material
The medal plates used in the experiment were custom made with titanium to fit the size and shape of the canine rib. Custom made tools, devices and operation scenes were as shown in Fig. 1, including a cordless electric drill, guiding wire loop, threaded metal plates, flexible soft shaft extension, and solid plate stand screwed onto a threaded plate.
Fig. 1
A: Tools used in operation; B: Metal plates of various sizes; C: Flexible soft shaft extension; D: Solid plate stand screwed onto threaded plate; E: Operation; F: VATS assisted operation
×
![]()
Methods
Preoperative preparation
Preparation before anesthesia
Food was withheld for 24 h, and water was withheld for 6 h before surgery in order to reduce the possibility of regurgitation and aspiration pneumonia. All canines were closely monitored for signs of anxiety, hypothermia (defined as body temperature below 37.2 °C), and dehydration [22].
Premedication before general anesthesia
Oxygen was delivered to the canine via face mask, in order to provide mild sedation, reduce aggression and facilitate drug injection [23]. Blood was withdrawn for ABG analysis.
General anesthesia
After premedication and mild sedation, the canine’s accurate body weight was measured for precise calculation of drug dosage. General anesthesia was given via intravenous injection of Buprenorphine (0.2 mg/kg) at the sacrococcygeal site. The injection was slowed once symptoms of anesthesia started to appear. The surgical anesthesia symptom was defined as lack of palpebral reflex, muscle relaxation of the jaw tone, and the absence of purposeful movement [22].
The canine was then secured to the operation bed and shaved. Its response was closely monitored as it was becoming unconscious. Observation and interpretation of the canine’s physiologic status were critical to avoid any anesthesia related complications. Body temperature below 37.2 °C should be especially alerted and appropriate measures should be taken to avoid hypothermia.
Animal model preparation
Canine rib fracture model
Under general anesthesia, standard osteotomy was prepared on the canine at the 5th and 6th rib on the left anterior side of the body resulting in oblique fractures. Two 0.5-cm incisions 3 cm apart were made by an electric knife between the 5th and 6th ribs. Through the two incisions, two fracture sites (3 cm apart) were made on the 5th rib, to closely mimic real world trauma injuries. Similarly through the same two incisions, two fracture sites were made on the 6th rib with a total of 4 fracture sites on the canine. The procedure was performed carefully to minimize the damage to the pleura during the operation. The Canine was closely monitored during surgical fixation.
Endotracheal intubation
A single-lumen endotracheal tube was placed for proper airway management to avoid any respiratory obstruction. Intubation was gently performed to avoid damage to the larynx. About 5–8 mL of air was injected into the catheter balloon at the distal end, and tubes were secured with tapes. An extended thin tube was used for the relatively long trachea of the canine. Breathing was maintained via a mechanical ventilator.
Preoperative measurements
Measurements include: RR (Respiratory Rate, Breath Per Minute), ABG analysis (PO2, PCO2, and SpCO2), Heart Rate (bpm), Body Temperature (℃), Duration of Surgery (Hours), and Total Blood Loss volume (mL).
Operation procedures
Exterior plate fixation
For canines in the Exterior Plate group, the plate was contoured to the appropriate shape and cut into the right size prior to the surgery. Under open surgery, a 5 cm incision was made with an electric knife. The muscles surrounding the broken rib segments were carefully divided. The exposed rib bones were approximated and aligned to the proper positions. The pre-contoured plate was positioned on the 6th rib, and screws of proper size were slowly drilled with 2 screws per fracture side. The same procedure was performed on the 5th rib.
Interior plate fixation
Incision preparation
There were totally three incisions made to perform the surgery as shown in Fig. 2 marked in red. The 1st incision of 0.5 cm was prepared below the 8th rib along the midaxillary line. A trocar was inserted through the hole and a thoracoscope (shown as A in Fig. 2) was inserted for visualization and inflation of CO2 (6 mm Hg pressure) in the thoracic cavity for the collapse of one lung. The 2nd incision of 0.5 cm was prepared below the 7th rib close to the fracture site. A metal wire device with a distal loop (shown as B in Fig. 2) was inserted here to control direction of the flexible shaft extension. The 3rd incision of 2 cm was made along the infrascapular line below the 7th rib on the posterior side for major operations. A circumferential surgical wound retractor was used here. A surgical glove was used to cover the opening to conserve the CO2 inflation pressure. A shaft extension with a screwdriver attached to the distal end (shown as C in Fig. 2) and a contoured titanium plate with a solid plate stand (shown as D and E in Fig. 2) were inserted here through the glove cover.
Fig. 2
A 3-D Animation of VATS operation setup. A. Thoracoscope (for visualization) and CO2 inflation; B. Guiding Wire with distal Loop (Controlling the tip of the driver); C. Flexible Shaft Extension; D. Solid Plate Stand (screwed into the metal plate, unscrewed and retrieved after fixation); E. Titanium Metal Plate with Threaded Holes (supported and pressed by the plate stand)
×
![]()
Plate description
The titanium plate had seven threaded holes (shown as E in Fig. 2). The solid plate stand (D in Fig. 2) was screwed into the middle threaded hole for firm support during the application process. Other screws were pre-inserted into the threaded holes on the plate (E) to secure their positions so that screws could be easily fastened during the operation.
Pre-drilling and fixation
The periosteum on the inward facing side of the 5th rib was carefully divided with an electric knife under thoracoscopic view. The inward facing side of the rib bone was then exposed, and small holes were drilled on the bone at locations guided by the plate holes (E) with the help of flexible shaft extension (C with drill bits attached to the distal end). The threaded plate (E) with pre-inserted screws was then approximated to the desired positions. While the plate was pushed firmly against the interior side of the rib by the rigid plate stand (D), the shaft extension with attached screwdriver (C) was inserted and was guided by the wire loop device (B). The screws were then slowly fastened to avoid thermal damage. After confirming that all screws were securely fastened, the solid plate stand was unscrewed and retrieved. Suction was used to remove any debris from the drilling and screwing. The same procedure was repeated on the 6th rib.
Postoperative measurements
Postoperative outcomes were recorded 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. In addition, the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale was assessed within 48 h and up to 14 days after surgery (A blank assessment sheet was shown in Fig. 3) [24]. Other postoperative outcomes were measured to compare the rates of recovery, including: Time to First Food and Water intake, Intake Frequencies, Vomiting and Regurgitation, Time to First Urine and Stool, Excretion Frequencies, Time to First Standing and Gentle Ambulation, and Mobilization Frequencies up to 14 day after operation. The outcomes were measured and recorded by assessors blinded to the groups. Long term recovery outcomes were not recorded due to limited resources.
Fig. 3
Short Form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale, with a score range of 0–24 (0 = less pain, and 24 = more pain)
×
![]()
Statistical analysis
The IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data processing and analysis. Independent-Samples T Test was used to compare functions and outcomes. Data was given as Mean ± S.D. or Median (Interquartile Range) with 95% confidence interval. All testing was two tailed, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
The surgical fixation was performed successfully on all 12 canines without major complication or respiratory aggression. Respiratory and cardiovascular functions were closely monitored and recorded throughout the operation to reflect the physiologic status of the canines under anesthesia. The difference in preoperative measurements on respiratory functions, cardiovascular functions and body temperature were not statistically different between the two groups, with P values greater than 0.05, as shown in Table 1.
Several postoperative outcomes were measured and recorded to compare the rate of recovery from the two rib stabilization methods. The difference in postoperative respiratory rates were not statistically significant between the two groups 6 and 12 h after the surgery (with P values greater than 0.05) as shown in Table 1. The respiratory rates of the canines in the interior group became slower than the exterior group 24 and 48 h after surgery (P values of 0.018 and 0.001 respectively).
Anzeige
The ABG analysis results (PCO2, PO2, SpO2) and Heart Rates of the two groups didn’t significantly differentiate 6 h, 12 h, or 24 h after surgery (with P values greater than 0.05), except for the PO2 values 24 h post operation (89.83 mmHg in EP and 92.00 mmHg in IG with P value of 0.021), as shown in Table 1. The difference in PCO2, PO2, SpO2, and HR were statistically significant between the two groups 48 h after the surgery (P values less than 0.05). The interior group canines had lower PCO2 and HR, higher PO2 and SpO2 values than canines in the exterior group in the 48th hour. The statistically significant difference in respiratory and cardiovascular functions between the two groups 48 h after surgery showed that the Interior Group canines had better recovery outcomes in terms of lung and heart functions.
The difference in body temperature between the two groups was not statistically significant between the two groups with P values greater than 0.05.
Preoperative and postoperative measurements
Table 1
Preoperative and Postoperative Measurements. Data was given as Mean ± S.D. with 95% confidence interval. P value was calculated using Independent-Samples T Test, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Pre, Pre-anesthesia Measurements, RR, Respiratory Rate. PCO2, Partial pressure of carbon dioxide. PO2, Partial pressure of oxygen. SpO2, Saturation of Pulse Oxygen. HR, Heart Rate. Temp, Body Temperature. DS, Duration of Surgery. TBL, Total Blood Loss volume
Factors | Exterior Group | Interior Group | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RR, Breath/Min | Pre | 18.50 ± 1.64 | 18.00 ± 1.41 | 0.636 |
6 h | 31.50 ± 1.64 | 30.50 ± 1.05 | 0.237 | |
12 h | 28.67 ± 2.25 | 26.00 ± 2.00 | 0.055 | |
24 h | 26.50 ± 1.64 | 24.00 ± 1.41 | 0.018 | |
48 h | 24.83 ± 1.47 | 21.33 ± 1.21 | 0.001 | |
PCO2, mmHg | Pre | 37.00 ± 1.67 | 36.33 ± 1.86 | 0.175 |
6 h | 40.17 ± 1.17 | 39.83 ± 1.17 | 0.632 | |
12 h | 40.00 ± 1.67 | 40.33 ± 1.86 | 0.751 | |
24 h | 39.50 ± 2.81 | 39.67 ± 1.97 | 0.908 | |
48 h | 39.50 ± 1.05 | 36.83 ± 1.47 | 0.005 | |
PO2, mmHg | Pre | 89.33 ± 3.27 | 89.67 ± 2.66 | 0.793 |
6 h | 89.50 ± 2.59 | 90.50 ± 2.07 | 0.477 | |
12 h | 89.33 ± 2.25 | 91.17 ± 1.72 | 0.144 | |
24 h | 89.83 ± 1.72 | 92.00 ± 0.89 | 0.021 | |
48 h | 89.50 ± 1.38 | 92.00 ± 0.83 | 0.004 | |
SpO2, % | Pre | 96.17 ± 0.41 | 96.50 ± 1.05 | 0.363 |
6 h | 95.17 ± 0.41 | 95.83 ± 0.75 | 0.086 | |
12 h | 94.17 ± 1.60 | 95.00 ± 1.41 | 0.362 | |
24 h | 95.00 ± 2.28 | 96.50 ± 1.38 | 0.198 | |
48 h | 95.67 ± 1.03 | 97.33 ± 0.82 | 0.011 | |
h,bpm | Pre | 89.33 ± 4.80 | 85.00 ± 3.79 | 0.184 |
6 h | 98.33 ± 4.80 | 96.50 ± 1.22 | 0.386 | |
12 h | 95.50 ± 5.75 | 92.00 ± 3.79 | 0.242 | |
24 h | 93.33 ± 3.56 | 90.83 ± 4.79 | 0.329 | |
48 h | 93.67 ± 3.14 | 89.67 ± 1.63 | 0.020 | |
Temp, ° | Pre | 38.17 ± 0.52 | 38.38 ± 0.70 | 0.492 |
6 h | 38.78 ± 0.60 | 38.28 ± 0.23 | 0.085 | |
12 h | 38.67 ± 0.52 | 38.68 ± 0.70 | 0.963 | |
24 h | 38.90 ± 0.11 | 38.88 ± 0.52 | 0.941 | |
48 h | 38.83 ± 0.41 | 38.55 ± 0.47 | 0.292 | |
The Exterior Group operation took shorter time than the Interior Group (45.83 ± 2.04 min in EG and 68.50 ± 2.43 min in IG respectively, with P value less than 0.001), which indicated that the Exterior fixation was quicker to perform than the interior minimally invasive procedure. However, the Exterior Group had higher total blood loss volumes (50.00 ± 3.22 mL in EG and 33.33 ± 1.86 mL in IG with P value less than 0.001) than the Interior Group.
Anzeige
The pain scale was evaluated and recorded by blinded assessors 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the surgery, and once every day on Day 3 through Day 14, as shown in Table 2. The median pain scores of the canines in the Exterior Group (11.50 within 48 h, 9.00 within 7 days, and 6.50 within 14 days) were higher than scores in the Interior Group (8.50 within 48 h, 7.00 within 7 days and 4.00 within 14 days), with P values of 0.002, 0.001 and less than 0.001. The difference in pain scores were statistically significant. Lower pain scores in the Interior Group showed that the canines suffered less pain.
Postoperative pain assessment
Table 2
Postoperative Pain Assessment. Data was given as Median (Interquartile Range) with 95% confidence interval. P value was calculated using Independent-Samples T Test, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant
Factors | Exterior Group | Interior Group | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
Pain Scale within 48 h (0–24) | 11.5 (10.75 -12.00) | 8.50 (8.00–9.00) | 0.002 |
Pain Scale within 7 Days (0–24) | 9.00 (8.75–9.00) | 7.00 (6.00–7.00) | 0.001 |
Pain Scale within 14 Days (0–24) | 6.50 (6.00–7.00) | 4.00 (4.00–4.25) | < 0.001 |
Gastrointestinal Mobility was evaluated to compare the recovery outcomes of the two groups, as shown in Table 3. It took canines in the Exterior Group longer time to start food intake (12.00 h in EG, 7.83 in IG with a P value of 0.001). The canines in EG also had lower Food Intake Frequencies within 7 days and 14 days with P values of 0.005 and less than 0.001. The difference in Time to First Water Intake was not statistically significant in the two groups, and the interior group had higher Water Intake Frequencies in the three time intervals with all three P values less than 0.001. The higher frequency of food and water intake in the Interior Group showed quicker appetite recoveries. However, the difference in the time to first urine and stool excretion and the excretion frequencies was not statistically significant, with P values greater than 0.05.
Postoperative gastrointestinal mobility
Table 3
Postoperative Gastrointestinal Mobility. Data was given as Mean ± S.D. with 95% confidence interval. P value was calculated using Independent-Samples T Test, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant
Postoperative Gastrointestinal Mobility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Factors | Exterior Group | Interior Group | P value | |
Time to First Food Intake (Hrs) | 12.00 ± 1.41 | 7.83 ± 0.75 | 0.001 | |
Food Intake Frequency | 48 h | 1.83 ± 0.75 | 2.83 ± 0.75 | 0.111 |
7 Days | 13.50 ± 1.05 | 15.83 ± 1.17 | 0.005 | |
14 Days | 26.50 ± 1.87 | 35.00 ± 1.41 | < 0.001 | |
Time to First Water Intake (Hrs) | 2.83 ± 0.75 | 2.50 ± 1.05 | 0.363 | |
Water Intake Frequency | 48 h | 9.50 ± 1.05 | 14.83 ± 1.17 | < 0.001 |
7 Days | 28.17 ± 2.32 | 37.67 ± 2.16 | < 0.001 | |
14 Days | 62.00 ± 2.37 | 84.67 ± 3.44 | < 0.001 | |
Vomiting and Regurgitation within 48 h | 2.00 ± 1.41 | 1.50 ± 1.05 | 0.542 | |
Time to First Urine (Hrs) | 4.50 ± 1.05 | 4.50 ± 1.05 | 1 | |
Urine Frequency | 48 h | 2.67 ± 0.82 | 2.83 ± 1.17 | 0.822 |
7 Days | 9.83 ± 1.47 | 10.83 ± 1.47 | 0.253 | |
14 Days | 34.00 ± 2.61 | 35.17 ± 1.17 | 0.272 | |
Time to First Stool (Hrs) | 5.50 ± 1.05 | 5.67 ± 1.21 | 0.809 | |
Stool Frequency | 48 h | 1.17 ± 0.75 | 1.50 ± 1.05 | 0.638 |
7 Days | 9.17 ± 1.17 | 10.17 ± 1.72 | 0.377 | |
14 Days | 19.83 ± 1.94 | 20.33 ± 1.75 | 0.611 | |
Anzeige
It took the EG canines longer time to fully stand without assistance (15.83 h in EG, 12.00 h in IG, with a P value of 0.016), and longer time to start gently walking around (20.50 h in EG, 14.5 h in IG, with a P value of 0.002), as shown in Table 4. The canines in the Exterior Group had lower mobilization frequencies within 48 h, 7 days and 14 days after the surgery, with P values of 0.013, 0.005, and less than 0.001. Shorter time to fully stand and gentle ambulation, together with higher mobilization frequencies showed that the canines in interior group recovered quicker and better to normal physical function.
Table 4
Postoperative Physical Mobility. Data was given as Mean ± S.D. with 95% confidence interval. P value was calculated using Independent-Samples T Test, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant
Postoperative Physical Mobility | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Factors | Exterior Group | Interior Group | P value |
Time to Standing without Assistance (Hrs) | 15.83 ± 1.47 | 12.00 ± 1.79 | 0.016 |
Time to First Gentle Ambulation (Hrs) | 20.50 ± 1.05 | 14.50 ± 1.87 | 0.002 |
Mobilization Frequency within 48 h | 5.50 ± 1.05 | 9.00 ± 1.41 | 0.013 |
Mobilization Frequency within 7 Days | 35.33 ± 2.16 | 42.17 ± 1.72 | 0.005 |
Mobilization Frequency within 14 Days | 85.33 ± 1.86 | 104.5 ± 3.78 | < 0.001 |
Discussion
The difference in preoperative measurements of the canines were not statistically significant in the two groups, indicating that any changes in postoperative measurements were effects of the two operation techniques. No serious operational complications were observed during and after the surgeries, which showed that both procedures were safe to perform. The exterior fixation took less operation time due to open surgery approach. The metal plate was applied under direct vision without the application of complicate tools and devices. However, the interior fixation led to less blood loss as results of small incisions and less damage to tissues and blood vessels surrounding the rib.
The postoperative results (RR, PCO2, PO2, SpO2, and HR) of the canines in the two groups didn’t significantly differentiate within 12 h post operation. Although canines tend to recover from trauma quickly, their physiological parameters and physical movements were slow in returning to normal levels in both groups in the first 24 h of operation, due to the traumatic event, general anesthesia and surgical operations. However, after the initial post-surgery period, the canines in the Interior Group started to show more signs of recovery comparing to canines in the Exterior Group.The RR and PO2 values of canines in the interior group showed better recovery starting from the 24thth hour and the interior group PCO2, SpO2, and HR values started to show better results since the 48th hour after surgery, indicating quicker respiratory and cardiovascular function recoveries than the exterior group canines.
The Body Temperature results didn’t significantly differentiate between the two groups before or after the operation. The canines in the Interior Group had lower pain scores, because the minimally invasive procedure didn’t require the splints of muscles, resulting in less neurovascular damages and less pain.
It took the EG canines longer time to start eating, and their food and water intake frequencies were lower than in the Interior Group. The delayed return to normal appetite for the EG canines showed that the interior fixation method led to quicker recovery to normal gastrointestinal mobility. However, the difference in vomiting, urine and stool data was not statistically significant between the two groups.
The results also showed that the IG canines had quicker recovery to normal physical function. With less injuries from the interior fixation, it took the IG canines less time to start standing and walking, and they were more willing to move around than the EG canines.
Flail chest as a result of multiple rib fractures is very common after blunt trauma injury, and it is often associated with severe morbidity and high mortality rates. Current treatment options remain controversial.
Traditional management of flail chest recommends supportive and non-operative treatment, such as active anesthesia with mechanical ventilation support. Conservative management can sometimes lead to reliance on pain medicine and mechanical ventilation, and the long-term ICU stay is costly. The healing and re-union of the fractured ribs are poor and slow. Chest deformity is common after the injury, and the rate of pulmonary infection is high [25].
Several studies have suggested that timely surgical fixation could lead to quicker release from ICU and that better post-operative outcomes could be achieved with the proper fixation method selected [11, 26]. Most importantly, the rate of pulmonary complications is lower comparing to that in non-operative treatments.
A variety of surgical fixation methods have been designed and tested in recent years. Thus far, there has not been a universally accepted optimal fixation option. Most of the commercially available products have both advantages and deficiencies. Designs and the testing of new fixation devices are clinically necessary in order to achieve better patient outcomes.
Metal prostheses provide adequate holding strength after placement. However, they could be contraindications to future MRI/CT scanning. These metal prostheses could also lead to stress-shielding, where the natural bone growth is interrupted by the strength of metals [19]. Loosening of the prosthesis is also common after continual forceful movement by breathing, coughing or sneezing. A follow-up removal surgery is sometimes necessary after initial implantation, which is costly and painful [20, 21].
Even with the above-mentioned setbacks, many studies on surgical fixation have focused on metal devices. One of the popular devices is the set of straight or pre-contoured titanium plates of various sizes. These plates are contoured and cut into the proper size and applied on the outward facing side of the rib. The application of these plates requires careful division of the muscles surrounding the rib for proper positioning and stabilization. However, the division process can damage intercostal nerves and blood vessels around the rib bones, causing bleeding and chronic pain after implantation. Tissue migration onto the metal plates can also be a challenge to potential future removal.
The novel interior fixation method is designed to minimize tissue division by application of plates on the inward facing side of the ribs. Only a thin layer of periosteum needs to be divided to expose the bone. Surrounding structures (Intercostal muscles, nerves and blood vessels) were mostly preserved during the fixation, minimizing adverse tissue reactions, hypersensitivity, or chronic pain.
This interior application could be technically difficult due to limited operation space and challenging angles. In this study, a few surgical tools were designed to overcome the challenges. A flexible soft shaft extension can be bent, twisted, and rotated into various angles with the help of a guiding wire loop. Previously inserted screws on the threaded metal plates can secure the positions while the force is being applied. The solid plate stand is also screwed into the plate to firmly support the metal plate by pressing against the bone during fixation. The stand can be easily unscrewed from the plate and retracted after the fixation.
The experiment results in this study demonstrated that the interior fixation method was safe to use, and it led to quicker and better recoveries after surgery, in terms of respiratory and cardiovascular functions, pain assessment, gastrointestinal and physical function. The experiment results could be clinically meaningful, because further preclinical and clinical studies could focus more on the interior fixation over the exterior fixation. Most of the current surgical methods were centered on the design and testing of various devices to stabilize the ribs on the outward facing side, requiring the splints of muscles and nerves on the rib, resulting in pain and slow recovery. This animal experiment results demonstrated that it was safe and effective to stabilize the broken ribs from the inward facing side, with less pain and quicker recovery to normal gastrointestinal and physical activities.
Although all operations were successful during the experiment, a few deficiencies still existed. The body line of canine is parallel to the ground, while it is perpendicular to the ground in human. The difference in body line angle means that gravity force on the interior attachment of metal prosthesis in canines is supported by the ribs themselves; while in human, the gravity force on metal plate does not have the same level of support as in dogs. Possible complication might exist when applying the fixation method in clinical use, so that stronger attachment would be needed if applied to human. The interior fixation method took longer time than the open surgery exterior fixation. Due to limited resources, all canines were not kept for long-term follow up. Straight and transverse fractures were made during the osteotomy, but practically, oblique fractures occur more often in blunt trauma. Also, in the real world of emergency trauma management, the timing and urgency of the situation sometimes do not allow minimum invasive operation to be performed. Only patients in stable living condition are suitable for VATS fixation under one-lung ventilation [27]. Further investigations and improvements are necessary before clinical trials. This study provides alternative solutions to surgical fixation on rib fracture.
Conclusions
The investigative interior metal plate fixation method was safe and effective in rib stabilization on a canine model, comparing to the open surgery exterior fixation method. The Interior fixation method was minimally invasive, causing less damage to tissues and nerves surrounding the ribs, leading to better postoperative outcomes.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Hebei Medical University for the help in study modification and guidance.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The animal experiment was approved by Hebei Medical University Ethics Committee.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication was obtained from all contributing authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.