Achievement of pathological complete response with osimertinib for EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma

Systemic treatment with a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has become a standard treatment of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating mutations in the EGFR gene such as deletions in the exon 19 (del19) and a point mutation in the exon 21 (L858R) [1]. First-generation EGFR-TKIs such as gefitinib and erlotinib provide durable tumor shrinkage associated with significant survival benefit in the majority of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. However, first-generation EGFR-TKIs, which are reversible inhibitors of tyrosine kinase, may provide an inferior pathological response, as compared with the impressive radiographical response. In fact, a retrospective study of 29 patients who received salvage surgery following systemic treatment with first-generation or second-generation EGFR-TKIs for advanced lung adenocarcinoma showed that major pathological response was achieved in only 9 (31.0%) patients, and that pathological complete response (pCR) was not achieved in any patient [2]. In a neoadjuvant setting for resectable NSCLC patients, a systematic review of clinical trials using first-generation EGFR-TKIs showed that pCR was not documented in 68 patients with clinical stage IIIA disease with mediastinal nodal involvement (N2) [3].

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI showing reversible and potent inhibitory effects of tyrosine kinase. As a randomized controlled trial (FLAURA) showed that osimertinib provided a superior survival benefit over first-generation EGFR-TKIs for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC [4], osimertinib monotherapy is recommended as the first-line treatment [1]. Here, we present a case of conversion surgery in which pCR was achieved with osimertinib treatment for initially unresectable adenocarcinoma of the lung. The present case not only indicates the safety and feasibility of surgery following osimertinib treatment, but also provides pathological evidence of potent anti-tumor efficacy of osimertinib.

A 61-year-old Japanese man was admitted to our hospital for salvage surgery. Four months prior to the admission, he had been diagnosed with unresectable adenocarcinoma (clinical stage IIIA/T4N1M0; an activating EGFR-mutation [L858R]-positive; proportion of tumor expressing PD-L1, 50–74%) originating from the right lower lobe (Figs. 1, 2, and 3). Chest computed tomography (CT) had revealed a 3.4-cm tumor and enlarged hilar nodes that invaded into the left atrium through the lower pulmonary vein (Fig. 2). Definitive radiotherapy had not been indicated, as it may cause fatal bleeding due to rapid shrinkage of the tumor invading the left atrium. Osimertinib monotherapy (80 mg/day, daily) had been performed, which had provided a dramatic radiographic response (Fig. 4) with a 60% decrease in the sum of tumor diameters (3.4 cm [primary tumor] plus 3.6 cm [lymph nodes] before osimertinib treatment, and 2.3 cm plus 0.5 cm after osimertinib treatment; tumor response by RECIST criteria, partial response [PR]). As no distant metastasis had developed, the patient was diagnosed with potentially resectable disease and was referred to our hospital.

Osimertinib treatment had been ceased for 7 days before surgery. As preoperative CT revealed no apparent residual tumor in the left atrium, achievement of complete tumor resection without cardio-pulmonary bypass was expected. Through an anterolateral thoracotomy, a right lower lobectomy with combined resection of the left atrium was performed. No pericardial involvement by the tumor was identified (Fig. 5A). The pericardial sac was opened, and the cytological examination of the pericardial effusion revealed no malignant cells. No apparent tumor extent to the intrapericardial lower pulmonary vein or the left atrium was identified (Fig. 5B). The left atrium was safely clamped without its elongation by dissection of the interatrial groove between the left atrium and the right atrium (Fig. 5C). The atrial cuff of the left atrium was resected. The stump of the left atrium was closed with a continuous 4–0 prolene suture (Fig. 5D). Frozen sections revealed negative surgical margins.

Pathological sections showed no residual tumor (Fig. 6). Postoperative course was uneventful. Osimertinib monotherapy has been resumed after 3 months’ interruption after surgery. The patient is alive without tumor recurrence at 2 years after surgery.

The present patient had been initially diagnosed with an unresectable disease by the previous physician due to tumor extent into the left atrium. Even when the length of the left atrial cuff was increased with dissection of the interatrial groove, the maximum extension was about 2 cm [5]. Accordingly, at the initial diagnosis, the involved left atrium had been too large to be safely clamped without cardiopulmonary bypass. After effective systemic treatment with osimertinib, the patient was diagnosed with resectable disease and was referred to our institute for conversion surgery.

Conversion surgery following systemic treatment using TKIs may be a feasible treatment option for selected patients with initially unresectable NSCLC harboring oncogenic gene alterations such as activating EGFR-mutations and rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. In fact, a nationwide Japanese retrospective study of 36 patients who received salvage surgery including conversion surgery following EGFR-TKI (gefitinib, n = 26; erlotinib, n = 4; afatinib, n = 3) or ALK-TKI (crizotinib, n = 2; alectinib, n = 1) showed that grade 3 postoperative adverse events occurred only in 2 (5.6%) patients and that no death was reported within 90 days after surgery. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates at 3 years after surgery were 75.1% and 22.2%, respectively [6]. The present case treated with osimertinib also indicated that conversion surgery following a third-generation EGFR-TKI is safe and feasible. In addition, for initially resectable NSCLC with oncogenic alterations, neoadjuvant treatment with TKIs may be effective [3]. An ongoing randomized clinical trial (NeoADAURA) may reveal whether neoadjuvant treatment with osimertinib is effective for resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC [7].

A dramatic radiographic response to osimertinib treatment, as seen in the present case, has been commonly observed in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients [4]. However, no case showing pathological evidence of pCR achieved with osimertinib has been reported. For advanced and previously-untreated EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients, the progression-free survival and overall OS were significantly longer in patients treated with osimertinib than in those treated with a first-generation EGFR-TKI [4]. For early resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients, adjuvant treatment with a first-generation EGFR-TKI provided a modest improvement in RFS [7‐10], and that with osimertinib provided a tremendous RFS benefit with a hazard ration of 0.17 [11]. Superior survival benefits of osimertinib observed in these clinical trials may indicate its potent anti-tumor effect, and the present case may provide direct pathological evidence for the superior anti-tumor efficacy of osimertinib.

The duration of preoperative and postoperative osimertinib interruption is controversial. Perioperative treatment with an EGFR-TKI may cause several postoperative adverse events mainly through inhibition of tyrosine kinase activity of normal cells, which may indicate a need of a long-term interruption such as 2–4 weeks’ cessation. On the other hand, interruption of treatment may cause tumor flaring, which can be avoided by a short-term interruption. Considering a milder toxicity profile of a third-generation EGFR-TKI, a shorter-time interruption of osimertinib treatment may be feasible. In fact, in a neoadjuvant trial with osimertinib (NeoADAURA) for NSCLC, it is recommended that surgery is performed just after the completion of preoperative treatment [7]. In the present case, we adopted a moderate-term interruption (7 days’ cessation) before surgery considering the advantages and disadvantages of treatment interruption.

The adequacy of adjuvant therapy, especially when pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved with preoperative treatment, remains to be discussed. Although pCR is a well-known surrogate indicator of a favorable prognosis in NSCLC patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant treatment, achievement of pCR does not warrant that no viable tumor cell is present in each patient (Ref. [12]). The prophylactic use of osimertinib following surgery may kill residual tumor cells, which can lead to a cure. On the other hand, adjuvant treatment may only cause adverse events in patients who actually harbor no viable cancer cells. I think that the choice to use osimertinib in the adjuvant setting comes down to each patient. In the present case, we discussed the necessity as well as the advantages and disadvantage of adjuvant osimertinib treatment with the patient. As a result, 3 months after surgery, osimertinib treatment has been resumed according to the patient’s wish.

In conclusion, we presented a case of EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma with pCR in resected specimens after treatment with osimertinib. Conversion surgery after osimertinib treatment may be safe and effective for NSCLC harboring activating EGFR-mutations.