It is crucial for AAD patients to quickly confirm the diagnosis, clarify the classification, and locate the intimal injury site. ATAAD can be misdiagnosed as myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or cardiac arrest of unknown reasons in emergency department [
3]. It is essential to separate the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection from other diseases since treatment differences might lead to disastrous consequences [
11]. Among misdiagnosed patients, 81% were determined to have type A aortic dissection [
34]. Those walking into the hospital or providing an obscure history might meet increased risks of misdiagnosis[
35]. Up to 80% of patients who diagnosed with AAD had received an emergency diagnosis previously [
36]. According to a retrospective study, the initial misdiagnosis of AAD was 31% in emergency department [
36]. The primary diagnostic imaging method currently used is contrast-enhanced CT angiography. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well-suited for diagnosing aortic diseases [
11]. However, it is limited due to longer acquisition times than CT and the difficulty in long-term monitoring for patients with unstable circulation [
37]. In patients with ATAAD complicated ALI, comprehensive evaluation and early diagnosis of ALI have predictive value. According to Berlin’s gold standard definition, the clinical definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) mainly relies on the acute onset, chest imaging of bilateral opacities, and PaO
2/FiO
2 ≤ 200 mmHg with positive end-expiratory pressure or continuous positive airway pressure ≥ 5 cmH
2O; ALI was introduced using the same criteria but with less-severe hypoxemia (i.e., PaO
2/FiO
2 ≤ 300 mmHg) [
38]. Additionally, to diagnose AAD complicated with ALI, we should exclude pulmonary edema caused by cardiac failure, fluid overload, or other extrapulmonary factors. The degree of bilateral lung opacities is used in the radiographic assessment of lung edema (RALE) score [
39]. The score is obtained by summing the chest X-ray analysis score according to density and consolidation. When the RALE score is ≥ 16, 36.3% of patients develop dyspnea and hypoxemia, defined as ALI [
40]. In recent years, lung ultrasound has gained popularity for its portability and real-time and noninvasive characteristics. A lung ultrasound score (LUS) has been gradually applied in predicting the severity and prognosis of AAD-complicated ALI. Lung ultrasound is used to evaluate the lung areas, including bilateral, lateral, upper, and lower posterior chest walls, to provide a point score based on the severity of lung tissues: lung consolidation = 3 points, severely reduced lung ventilation area = 2 points; moderately reduced lung ventilation area = 1 point; normal ventilation area = 0 points. The cutoff values for the LUS score in ALI patients are 18.6 points [
41,
42]. As PaO2/FiO2 changes occur after the lung ventilation area change, the LUS can well reflect lung changes and evaluate ALI severity.