Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2017

22.07.2016

Additive treatment improves survival in elderly patients after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

verfasst von: Da Hyun Jung, Yong Chan Lee, Jie-Hyun Kim, Sang Kil Lee, Sung Kwan Shin, Jun Chul Park, Hyunsoo Chung, Jae Jun Park, Young Hoon Youn, Hyojin Park

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and study aims

Endoscopic resection (ER) is accepted as a curative treatment option for selected cases of early gastric cancer (EGC). Although additional surgery is often recommended for patients who have undergone non-curative ER, clinicians are cautious when managing elderly patients with GC because of comorbid conditions. The aim of the study was to investigate clinical outcomes in elderly patients following non-curative ER with and without additive treatment.

Patients and methods

Subjects included 365 patients (>75 years old) who were diagnosed with EGC and underwent ER between 2007 and 2015. Clinical outcomes of three patient groups [curative ER (n = 246), non-curative ER with additive treatment (n = 37), non-curative ER without additive treatment (n = 82)] were compared.

Results

Among the patients who underwent non-curative ER with additive treatment, 28 received surgery, three received a repeat ER, and six experienced argon plasma coagulation. Patients who underwent non-curative ER alone were significantly older than those who underwent additive treatment. Overall 5-year survival rates in the curative ER, non-curative ER with treatment, and non-curative ER without treatment groups were 84, 86, and 69 %, respectively. No significant difference in overall survival was found between patients in the curative ER and non-curative ER with additive treatment groups. The non-curative ER groups were categorized by lymph node metastasis risk factors to create a high-risk group that exhibited positive lymphovascular invasion or deep submucosal invasion greater than SM2 and a low-risk group without risk factors. Overall 5-year survival rate was lowest (60 %) in the high-risk group with non-curative ER and no additive treatment.

Conclusions

Elderly patients who underwent non-curative ER with additive treatment showed better survival outcome than those without treatment. Therefore, especially with LVI or deep submucosal invasion, additive treatment is recommended in patients undergoing non-curative ER, even if they are older than 75 years.
Literatur
1.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Park CH, Lee H, Kim DW, Chung H, Park JC, Shin SK, Hyung WJ, Lee SK, Lee YC, Noh SH (2014) Clinical safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with surgery in elderly patients with early gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 80(4):599–609CrossRefPubMed Park CH, Lee H, Kim DW, Chung H, Park JC, Shin SK, Hyung WJ, Lee SK, Lee YC, Noh SH (2014) Clinical safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with surgery in elderly patients with early gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 80(4):599–609CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14(2):113–123CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14(2):113–123CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kusano C, Iwasaki M, Kaltenbach T, Conlin A, Oda I, Gotoda T (2011) Should elderly patients undergo additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer? long-term comparative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1064–1069CrossRefPubMed Kusano C, Iwasaki M, Kaltenbach T, Conlin A, Oda I, Gotoda T (2011) Should elderly patients undergo additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer? long-term comparative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1064–1069CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003) Public health and aging: trends in aging. United States and worldwide. JAMA 289(11):1371–1373CrossRef From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003) Public health and aging: trends in aging. United States and worldwide. JAMA 289(11):1371–1373CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Damhuis RA, Tilanus HW (1995) The influence of age on resection rates and postoperative mortality in 2773 patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A(6):928–931CrossRefPubMed Damhuis RA, Tilanus HW (1995) The influence of age on resection rates and postoperative mortality in 2773 patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A(6):928–931CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence W Jr, Menck HR, Steele GD Jr, Winchester DP (1995) The National cancer data base report on gastric cancer. Cancer 75(7):1734–1744CrossRefPubMed Lawrence W Jr, Menck HR, Steele GD Jr, Winchester DP (1995) The National cancer data base report on gastric cancer. Cancer 75(7):1734–1744CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Janes RH Jr, Niederhuber JE, Chmiel JS, Winchester DP, Ocwieja KC, Karnell JH, Clive RE, Menck HR (1996) National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer: results of a survey by the commission on cancer. Ann Surg 223(3):261–272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Janes RH Jr, Niederhuber JE, Chmiel JS, Winchester DP, Ocwieja KC, Karnell JH, Clive RE, Menck HR (1996) National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer: results of a survey by the commission on cancer. Ann Surg 223(3):261–272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Benhamiche AM, Faivre J, Tazi AM, Couillault C, Villing AL, Rat P (1997) Time trends in diagnostic strategy, treatment, and prognosis of gastric cancer in the elderly: a population based study. Eur J Cancer Prev 6(1):71–77CrossRefPubMed Benhamiche AM, Faivre J, Tazi AM, Couillault C, Villing AL, Rat P (1997) Time trends in diagnostic strategy, treatment, and prognosis of gastric cancer in the elderly: a population based study. Eur J Cancer Prev 6(1):71–77CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Roviello F, Marrelli D, De Stefano A, Messano A, Pinto E, Carli A (1998) Complications after surgery for gastric cancer in patients aged 80 years and over. Jpn J Clin Oncol 28(2):116–122CrossRefPubMed Roviello F, Marrelli D, De Stefano A, Messano A, Pinto E, Carli A (1998) Complications after surgery for gastric cancer in patients aged 80 years and over. Jpn J Clin Oncol 28(2):116–122CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsushita I, Hanai H, Kajimura M, Tamakoshi K, Nakajima T, Matsubayashi Y, Kanek E (2002) Should gastric cancer patients more than 80 years of age undergo surgery? comparison with patients not treated surgically concerning prognosis and quality of life. J Clin Gastroenterol 35(1):29–34CrossRefPubMed Matsushita I, Hanai H, Kajimura M, Tamakoshi K, Nakajima T, Matsubayashi Y, Kanek E (2002) Should gastric cancer patients more than 80 years of age undergo surgery? comparison with patients not treated surgically concerning prognosis and quality of life. J Clin Gastroenterol 35(1):29–34CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert R (2005) Treatment of early gastric cancer in the elderly: leave it, cut out, peel out? Gastrointest Endosc 62(6):872–874CrossRefPubMed Lambert R (2005) Treatment of early gastric cancer in the elderly: leave it, cut out, peel out? Gastrointest Endosc 62(6):872–874CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Katai H, Sasako M, Sano T, Fukagawa T (2004) Gastric cancer surgery in the elderly without operative mortality. Surg Oncol-Oxford 13(4):235–238CrossRef Katai H, Sasako M, Sano T, Fukagawa T (2004) Gastric cancer surgery in the elderly without operative mortality. Surg Oncol-Oxford 13(4):235–238CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakushima N, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Tateishi A, Yahagi N, Omata M (2007) Technical feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms in the elderly Japanese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(3):311–314CrossRefPubMed Kakushima N, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Tateishi A, Yahagi N, Omata M (2007) Technical feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms in the elderly Japanese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(3):311–314CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Isomoto H, Ohnita K, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Akiyama M, Ozawa E, Nakao K, Kohno S, Shikuwa S (2010) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with early gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(3):311–317CrossRefPubMed Isomoto H, Ohnita K, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Akiyama M, Ozawa E, Nakao K, Kohno S, Shikuwa S (2010) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with early gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(3):311–317CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokioka S, Umegaki E, Murano M, Takeuchi N, Takeuchi T, Kawakami K, Yoda Y, Kojima Y, Higuchi K (2012) Utility and problems of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27(Suppl 3):63–69CrossRefPubMed Tokioka S, Umegaki E, Murano M, Takeuchi N, Takeuchi T, Kawakami K, Yoda Y, Kojima Y, Higuchi K (2012) Utility and problems of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27(Suppl 3):63–69CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Oda I, Gotoda T, Sasako M, Sano T, Katai H, Fukagawa T, Shimoda T, Emura F, Saito D (2008) Treatment strategy after non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 95(12):1495–1500CrossRefPubMed Oda I, Gotoda T, Sasako M, Sano T, Katai H, Fukagawa T, Shimoda T, Emura F, Saito D (2008) Treatment strategy after non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 95(12):1495–1500CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat da Jung H, Park YM, Kim JH, Lee YC, Youn YH, Park H, Lee SI, Kim JW, Choi SH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH (2013) Clinical implication of endoscopic gross appearance in early gastric cancer: revisited. Surg Endosc 27(10):3690–3695CrossRefPubMed da Jung H, Park YM, Kim JH, Lee YC, Youn YH, Park H, Lee SI, Kim JW, Choi SH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH (2013) Clinical implication of endoscopic gross appearance in early gastric cancer: revisited. Surg Endosc 27(10):3690–3695CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Additive treatment improves survival in elderly patients after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer
verfasst von
Da Hyun Jung
Yong Chan Lee
Jie-Hyun Kim
Sang Kil Lee
Sung Kwan Shin
Jun Chul Park
Hyunsoo Chung
Jae Jun Park
Young Hoon Youn
Hyojin Park
Publikationsdatum
22.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5123-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.