Adenocarcinoma of the lung: from BAC to the future

A new, international, histopathologic classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung was introduced in 2011 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) [1].

Adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic type of lung cancer and accounts for over 40% of non-small cell lung cancers [2].

However, the terminology used to describe it has been inconsistent and non-uniform. For the radiologist, the new classification required some adjustment. The most striking change was the discontinuation of the term bronchoalveolar carcinoma (BAC).

The first descriptions of this entity date back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries when Malassez [3] and Musser [4] referred to lung tumours with features of BAC as ‘epithelioma’ and ‘primary cancer of the lung’ respectively. The histological hallmark of these tumours was a prominent bronchioalveolar pattern with variable extension into surrounding tissues.

Subsequent publications described tumours with similar features under a variety of names including ‘alveolar cell tumour of lung’, ‘pulmonary adenomatosis’ and ‘mucocellular papillary adenocarcinoma of the lung’ [5‐8].

In 1960, Liebow [9] identified BAC as a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and defined distinct growth patterns:

In contrast to some of his predecessors, Liebow described a potential for pleural invasion, nodal metastases and distant metastases. However, the tumours were considered characteristically slow-growing, particularly the single nodule subtype.

From a pathological standpoint, 3 macroscopic subtypes of BAC were identified [10]:

A new classification system was introduced to provide more uniform terminology and diagnostic criteria. Four new entities were proposed: adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.

The aim was to separate tumours with a 100% (AIS) [11] and near 100% (MIA) [12] 5-year survival after surgical resection from those with a poor prognosis.

A retrospective 2-year review was performed through our institution’s laboratory information system to identify all surgical lung resection specimens for which the final histopathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma or lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma. The review covered the period January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018.

There were 35 cases in total which included 24 females and 11 males. The age range was 44 to 86 and the mean age at pathological diagnosis was 69. The cases were divided by histologic subtype into adenocarcinoma in situ (16), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (13) and lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (Table 2) (6).

There were 15 tumours resected from the right upper lobe, 8 from the right lower lobe, 7 from the left upper lobe and 5 from the left lower lobe.

The prior CT scans were reviewed in each case to the identify imaging features which may help to classify a lesion as either pre-invasive/minimally invasive or invasive. A pictorial review was created to illustrate the salient learning points for the radiologist.

There are a number of specific features of adenocarcinomas on CT with have been shown to represent favourable and unfavourable prognostic indicators [19].

Favourable indicators include a ground glass component, bubble-like lucencies, air bronchograms and small size. Unfavourable indicators include thick spiculations, thickened bronchovascular bundles, pleural retraction, concave cuts and large size.

Ground glass attenuation in a nodule correlates with a lepidic growth pattern in the tumour and is associated with a better prognosis [20]. Bubble-like lucencies and air bronchograms are suggestive of a well-differentiated tumour and a favourable prognosis [21, 22].

In contrast, coarse spiculations, thickened bronchovascular bundles and a low proportion of ground glass attenuation in the tumour are associated with a higher incidence of lymph node metastases and vascular invasion [23]. A smooth tumour margin and a ‘solid appearance without air bronchogram’ are suggestive of a poorly differentiated tumour and a poorer prognosis [22]. The presence of a concave cut or notch in the margin of the tumour is also considered an unfavourable prognostic indicator [24].

The size of a pulmonary nodule has prognostic relevance. For a nodule under 2 cm, the size of the lesion correlates with the incidence of vascular invasion [1]. For a nodule or mass over 3 cm, the size of the lesion correlates with the incidence of central nervous system metastases [25].

However, there is growing evidence that the solid component of a part-solid nodule is more important than the overall nodule size in staging and prognosis. It has been suggested that a solid component under 3–5 mm can exclude invasive adenocarcinoma, whereas a solid component over 9 mm has 100% specificity for the diagnosis of invasive adenocarcinoma [26, 27].

A larger solid component has more recently been associated with a shorter tumour doubling time, an increased incidence of lymph node metastases and vascular invasion and an increased incidence of local recurrence [23].

While a more detailed discussion of nodule measurement and follow-up is beyond the scope of this review, suffice is to say that measurement of the solid component of a part-solid nodule rather than the whole nodule is under consideration for the forthcoming IASLC classification. The relative proportion of the solid component in the nodule has also been shown to have prognostic value [28].

Our review was based on patients in whom a final histopathological diagnosis was made from surgical resection specimens. However, it is worth noting that only 2 of 35 patients in our cohort proceeded directly to surgical resection without a pre-operative biopsy. The remaining 33 patients underwent a CT-guided biopsy to confirm the histopathological diagnosis before resection.

CT-guided biopsies were performed in 8 different centres. One to 3 core biopsies were taken from each patient using 18–20 gauge core biopsy needles.

The biopsy was complicated by a pneumothorax in 10 of 33 patients. Three of these patients required chest drain insertion. The remaining 7 patients required no treatment and were followed up radiologically to resolution.

Thirteen patients had pulmonary haemorrhage which presented as a focal opacity on CT. Two patients had post-procedural haemoptysis and both were managed conservatively (Table 3).

There are two special considerations to be made when contemplating biopsy of a primary lung adenocarcinoma. Every effort should be made to target the solid component of any part-solid nodule, as it is the solid component that represents invasive growth and the ground glass component that represents lepidic growth. Failure to sample the solid component may falsely identify an invasive lesion as a pre-invasive or minimally invasive lesion.

Secondly, every effort should be made to obtain enough tissue for both morphological and molecular/immunohistochemical analysis. This allows testing for mutations, including EGFR and KRAS, which may determine suitability for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Traditionally, core biopsy has been considered superior to fine needle aspiration (FNA) for morphological analysis but some studies have found FNA to be superior. Rekhtman et al. for example, found FNA cell blocks to be adequate for molecular analysis in 98% of samples [29]. They suggested that the number of tumour cells in a core biopsy may be inadequate due to the large number of stromal cells. By contrast, samples obtained by FNA tend to have a relatively higher number of tumour cells. It is thus useful, where resources allow, to have a cytotechnologist present at the time of the FNA or biopsy to confirm the adequacy of the sample.

There is a new classification system for adenocarcinoma of the lung which has been designed to more accurately reflect the correlation between radiology, pathology and prognosis. The classification describes a spectrum which includes pre-invasive, minimally invasive and invasive lesions. The pre-invasive and minimally invasive lesions have almost 100% survival after surgical resection.

Diagnosis of these lesions is multidisciplinary, but primarily histopathological. The imaging features of lesions on this spectrum vary wildly with a significant amount of overlap. However, the take home message for the radiologist is that certain imaging features, including the size, shape and attenuation of the lesion, will help to determine on which side of the spectrum the lesion is likely to fall. Correct interpretation of the imaging features will help in accurate diagnosis and prognostication.