Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 8/2022

19.04.2022 | Research Article

Adjuvant therapy in early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy: are we overtreating our patients? A meta-analysis

verfasst von: Natalia R. Gómez-Hidalgo, Úrsula Acosta, Tomás Gómez Rodríguez, Soraya Mico, Ramona Verges, Vicente Bebia Conesa, Melissa Bradbury, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Asunción Pérez-Benavente, Antonio Gil-Moreno

Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Ausgabe 8/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

There is a gap in knowledge regarding the ideal management of patients with early-stage cervical cancer and intermediate-risk features. Here, we present a meta-analysis of the published literature on oncological outcomes in these patients and determine trends in postoperative management.

Methods

MEDLINE and PubMed were used for literature searches. The inclusion criteria were: English language articles including ≥ 10 patients, patients who underwent radical hysterectomy, nodes negative, studies reporting oncological outcomes and complications treatment-related and compare a surgery-only cohort with a radiotherapy cohort. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Combined relative risk was calculated using DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model and a forest plot was drawn.

Results

We collected 183 manuscripts on early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy alone or with adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Regarding oncological outcomes, survival was reported in five studies. The relative risk of recurrence and the relative risk of mortality was similar in both groups independently whether receive or not adjuvant therapy. Most of the studies did not report significant differences regarding morbidity treatment related between the groups, except for a higher rate of lymphedema after radiotherapy.

Conclusion

We found that the relative risk of recurrence and mortality was similar in both groups not depending on adjuvant therapy. Therefore, whether radiotherapy adjuvant treatment is indicated remains a topic of debate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:22–36.CrossRef Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:22–36.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray HJ. Primary management of early stage cervical cancer (IA1-IB) and appropriate selection of adjuvant therapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008;6(1):47–52.CrossRef Gray HJ. Primary management of early stage cervical cancer (IA1-IB) and appropriate selection of adjuvant therapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008;6(1):47–52.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606–13.CrossRef Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606–13.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R, Sevin BU, Creasman WT, et al. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;38:352–7.CrossRef Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R, Sevin BU, Creasman WT, et al. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;38:352–7.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CK, Nahhas WA, Stryker JA, Curry SL, Abt AB, et al. Analysis of factors contributing to treatment failures in stages IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:550–6.CrossRef Chung CK, Nahhas WA, Stryker JA, Curry SL, Abt AB, et al. Analysis of factors contributing to treatment failures in stages IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:550–6.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdulhayoglu G, Rich WM, Reynolds J, DiSaia PJ. Selective radiation therapy in stage IB uterine cervical carcinoma following radical pelvic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 1980;10:84–92.CrossRef Abdulhayoglu G, Rich WM, Reynolds J, DiSaia PJ. Selective radiation therapy in stage IB uterine cervical carcinoma following radical pelvic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 1980;10:84–92.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyce JG, Fruchter RG, Nicastri AD, De Regt RH, et al. Vascular invasion in Stage I carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 1984;53:1175–80.CrossRef Boyce JG, Fruchter RG, Nicastri AD, De Regt RH, et al. Vascular invasion in Stage I carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 1984;53:1175–80.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotman M, John M, Boyce J. Prognostic factors in cervical carcinoma: implications in staging and management. Cancer. 1981;48(Suppl. 2):560–7.CrossRef Rotman M, John M, Boyce J. Prognostic factors in cervical carcinoma: implications in staging and management. Cancer. 1981;48(Suppl. 2):560–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ, Lentz SS, Muderspach LI, et al. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:177–83.CrossRef Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ, Lentz SS, Muderspach LI, et al. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:177–83.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotman M, Sedlis A, Piedmonte MR, Bundy B, Lentz SS, et al. A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:169–75.CrossRef Rotman M, Sedlis A, Piedmonte MR, Bundy B, Lentz SS, et al. A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:169–75.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647.CrossRef Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.CrossRef Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilek K, Ebeling K, Leitsmann H, Seidel G. Radical pelvic surgery versus radical surgery plus radiotherapy for stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized clinical study. Arch Geschwulstforsch. 1982;52:223–9.PubMed Bilek K, Ebeling K, Leitsmann H, Seidel G. Radical pelvic surgery versus radical surgery plus radiotherapy for stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized clinical study. Arch Geschwulstforsch. 1982;52:223–9.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rushdan MN, Tay EH, Khoo-Tan HS, Lee KM, Low JH, et al. Tailoring the field and indication of adjuvant pelvic radiation for patients with FIGO stage Ib lymph nodes-negative cervical carcinoma following radical surgery based on the GOG score- a pilot study. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:367–472. Rushdan MN, Tay EH, Khoo-Tan HS, Lee KM, Low JH, et al. Tailoring the field and indication of adjuvant pelvic radiation for patients with FIGO stage Ib lymph nodes-negative cervical carcinoma following radical surgery based on the GOG score- a pilot study. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:367–472.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoorge JO, Molpus KL, Koelliker D, Nikrui N, Goodman A, et al. Stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with negative lymph nodes: the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;66:31–5.CrossRef Schoorge JO, Molpus KL, Koelliker D, Nikrui N, Goodman A, et al. Stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with negative lymph nodes: the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;66:31–5.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Snijders-Keilholz A, Hellebrekers BW, Zwinderman A, van de Vijver M, Trimbos J. Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma (1984–1996). Radiother Oncol. 1999;51(2):161–7.CrossRef Snijders-Keilholz A, Hellebrekers BW, Zwinderman A, van de Vijver M, Trimbos J. Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma (1984–1996). Radiother Oncol. 1999;51(2):161–7.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieterse QD, Trimbos J, Dijkman A, Creutzberg CL, Gaarenstroom KN, et al. Postoperative radiation therapy improves prognosis in patients with adverse risk factors in localized, early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1112–8.CrossRef Pieterse QD, Trimbos J, Dijkman A, Creutzberg CL, Gaarenstroom KN, et al. Postoperative radiation therapy improves prognosis in patients with adverse risk factors in localized, early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1112–8.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Bao B, Wang S, Yi M, Jiang L, Fang X. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2020;10(8):2590–600.CrossRef Zhang X, Bao B, Wang S, Yi M, Jiang L, Fang X. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2020;10(8):2590–600.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, et al. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:183–91.CrossRef Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, et al. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:183–91.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai CS, Lai CH, Chang TC, Yen TC, Ng KK, Hsueh S, Lee SP, Hong JH. A prospective randomized trial to study the impact of pretreatment FDG-PET for cervical cancer patients with MRI-detected positive pelvic but negative para-aortic lymphadenopathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(2):477–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.020 (Epub 2009 May 21 PMID: 19464824).CrossRefPubMed Tsai CS, Lai CH, Chang TC, Yen TC, Ng KK, Hsueh S, Lee SP, Hong JH. A prospective randomized trial to study the impact of pretreatment FDG-PET for cervical cancer patients with MRI-detected positive pelvic but negative para-aortic lymphadenopathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(2):477–84. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2009.​02.​020 (Epub 2009 May 21 PMID: 19464824).CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Cibula D. Management of patients with intermediate-risk early stage cervical cáncer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020;31(3):354.CrossRef Cibula D. Management of patients with intermediate-risk early stage cervical cáncer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020;31(3):354.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Adjuvant therapy in early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy: are we overtreating our patients? A meta-analysis
verfasst von
Natalia R. Gómez-Hidalgo
Úrsula Acosta
Tomás Gómez Rodríguez
Soraya Mico
Ramona Verges
Vicente Bebia Conesa
Melissa Bradbury
Santiago Pérez-Hoyos
Asunción Pérez-Benavente
Antonio Gil-Moreno
Publikationsdatum
19.04.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Ausgabe 8/2022
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Elektronische ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-022-02808-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2022

Clinical and Translational Oncology 8/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Alphablocker schützt vor Miktionsproblemen nach der Biopsie

16.05.2024 alpha-1-Rezeptorantagonisten Nachrichten

Nach einer Prostatabiopsie treten häufig Probleme beim Wasserlassen auf. Ob sich das durch den periinterventionellen Einsatz von Alphablockern verhindern lässt, haben australische Mediziner im Zuge einer Metaanalyse untersucht.

Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugat hält solide Tumoren in Schach

16.05.2024 Zielgerichtete Therapie Nachrichten

Trastuzumab deruxtecan scheint auch jenseits von Lungenkrebs gut gegen solide Tumoren mit HER2-Mutationen zu wirken. Dafür sprechen die Daten einer offenen Pan-Tumor-Studie.

Mammakarzinom: Senken Statine das krebsbedingte Sterberisiko?

15.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen mit lokalem oder metastasiertem Brustkrebs, die Statine einnehmen, haben eine niedrigere krebsspezifische Mortalität als Patientinnen, die dies nicht tun, legen neue Daten aus den USA nahe.

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

13.05.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Gerade bei aggressiven Malignomen wie dem duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas könnte Früherkennung die Therapiechancen verbessern. Noch jedoch klafft hier eine Lücke. Ein Studienteam hat einen Weg gesucht, sie zu schließen.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.