Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2017 | Case report | Ausgabe 1/2017 Open Access

BMC Cancer 1/2017

Alpha–fetoprotein elevation in NUT midline carcinoma: a case report

Zeitschrift:
BMC Cancer > Ausgabe 1/2017
Autoren:
Lorenzo D’Ambrosio, Erica Palesandro, Marina Moretti, Giuseppe Pelosi, Alessandra Fabbri, Fabrizio Carnevale Schianca, Massimo Aglietta, Giovanni Grignani
Abbreviations
AFP
Alpha-fetoprotein
ALK
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase
beta-HCG
Human chorionic gonadotropin
BRD
Bromodomain-containing protein
EMA
Epithelial membrane antigen
FISH
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
GCT
Germ-cell tumor
LDH
Lactate dehydrogenase
NUT
Nuclear protein in testis
PLAP
Placental alkaline phosphatase
TTF-1
Thyroid transcription factor-1

Background

Nuclear protein in testis (NUT) midline carcinoma is an exceedingly rare subtype of squamous poorly–differentiated carcinoma and is considered one of the most aggressive human solid tumors [13]. NUT midline carcinoma is a relatively new entity, that may likely be under–recognized and under–diagnosed. All ages and organs might be affected, but most frequently NUT midline carcinoma arises along the trunk or the head and, in particular, in midline structures such as the mediastinum [13]. NUT midline carcinoma is characterized by the pathognomonic chromosomal rearrangement between the NUT gene with either bromodomain–containing protein 4 (BRD4) or, less frequently, with BRD3 (on chromosome 9), leading to the fusion genes BRD4–NUT or BRD3–NUT, respectively [13]. BRD is a DNA reader that activates transcription by binding to acetyl–modified lysine residues of histone tails [1, 3, 4]. The expression of several oncogenes, including transcription factors and MYC, is epigenetically regulated by BRD. More recently, a novel fusion gene between the methyl-transferase protein NSD3 on chromosome 8 and NUT has been reported (NSD3–NUT) [1, 5, 6]. NSD3 has shown to be associated with the extraterminal domains of BET proteins, which serves as a key component in the BRD–NUT oncogene complex [1]. Moreover, two novel three–way translocations [t(9;15;19;q34;q13;p13.1), and t(4;15;19)(q13;q14;p13.1)] have been described [5, 6]. NUT rearrangement has been suggested to possibily represent a tumor–initiating event. Its importance in the pathogenesis of NUT midline carcinoma is further supported by the evidences that withdrawal of the NUT fusion protein resulted in a dramatic and irreversible squamous differentiation and growth arrest, thus demonstrating that the BRD–NUT protein blocks differentiation [7].
Alpha–fetoprotein elevation has been associated with chronic liver diseases and a limited number of cancers (hepatic primary tumors and metastases, bile duct, pancreatic, gastric and lung cancer, and non–seminoma germ–cell tumors). Moreover, in presence of testicular or mediastinal mass an elevated alpha–fetoprotein strongly suggests a non–seminoma germ–cell tumor especially in young patients.

Case presentation

A 22–year old man was referred to our center because of a large mediastinal mass along with skeletal and lymph node metastases. The clinical picture was dominated by shortness of breath due to severe superior vena cava syndrome with pleural–pericardial effusion (Fig. 1 panels a, b, c). Laboratory tests showed elevated alpha–fetoprotein (765 ng/mL; normal value <10.9 ng/mL) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) = 14,468 U/L (normal range 240–480 U/L). Taken altogether these findings strongly suggested a mediastinal non–seminoma germ cell tumor (GCT) [7] but, unexpectedly, a biopsy of a supraclavicular enlarged lymph node revealed a poorly differentiated and diffusely necrotic carcinoma (Fig. 2, panels a, b). Immunohistochemistry was weakly positive for AE1–AE3 cytokeratin pool, TTF–1, p63, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CD34 and, focally, EMA and cytokeratin 7, but negative for PLAP, alpha–fetoprotein, beta–HCG, CD30, CD3, CD20, CD117, Melan–A, S100 protein, ALK, PAX8, and desmin, thereby ruling out GCT (Table.1 describes detailed immunohistochemistry profile and clues to diagnosis suggested by each immunohistochemical marker) [7]. Due to such peculiar presentation and the high levels of alpha–fetoprotein, a second pathology opinion was requested. GCT was again excluded and a diagnosis of poorly differentiated large cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation was rendered. However, taking advantage of the clinical presentation and the patient’s young age, in a third consultation, a monoclonal antibody against NUT protein was used (Fig. 2, panel c) [8] along with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for NUT–BRD4 translocation [3]. Tumor cells revealed diffuse decoration for NUT protein and FISH analysis confirmed the occurrence of t(15;19) BRD4–NUT translocation (Fig. 2 panel d), thereby establishing the diagnosis of NUT midline carcinoma [1, 3].
Table 1
Immunohistochemistry profile at the time of first evaluation
Weakly positive
Clues to diagnosis (if positive)
Negative
Clues to diagnosis (if positive)
AE1-AE3 cytokeratin pool
Carcinomas, GCT (rare), thymoma, mesenchymal tumors
PLAP
Seminoma
TTF-1
Lung, thyroid cancer
AFP
Non-seminoma GCT, HCC, pancreas carcinoma
p63
Basal/squamous carcinoma, mesenchymal tumors, lymphomas, adenoid cystic carcinoma, salivary gland tumors, thymoma, thymic carcinoma, breast, urothelial carcinoma
Beta-HCG
Non-seminoma GCT
Synaptophysin
Neuroendocrine neoplasms, adrenal gland carcinoma, mesenchymal tumors
CD30
Lymphomas (HL and NHL), non-seminoma GCT,
Chromogranin A
Neuroendocrine tumors
CD3
T-cell lymphomas
CD34
Hematologic malignances, mesenchymal tumors, papillary thyroid carcinoma, thymoma
CD20
B-cell lymphomas
Focally positive
 
CD117
Mesenchymal tumors, GCT, SCLC, leukemias, lymphomas, melanoma
EMA
adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, mesenchymal tumors, mesothelioma, lymphoma, thymic carcinoma
Melan-A
Melanoma, mesenchymal tumors, adrenal cortical tumors, sex-cord stromal tumors
Cytokeratin 7
Lung cancer and other carcinomas, GCT (rare), mesenchymal tumors
S-100
Melanoma, mesenchymal tumors, adenoid cystic carcinoma, sex-cord stromal tumors
  
ALK
Lymphomas, NSCLC, mesenchymal tumors, RCC (rare)
  
PAX8
Thymic carcinoma, thymomas, thyroid anaplastic carcinoma, RCC, neuroendocrine neoplasms, seminoma
  
Desmin
Mesenchymal tumors
TTF-1 thyroid transcription factor-1, EMA epithelial membrane antigen, PLAP placental alkaline phosphatase, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, beta-HCG human chorionic gonadotropin, ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase, GCT germ cell tumor, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, HL Hodgkin’s lymphoma, NHL Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, RCC renal cell carcinoma, SCLC small cell lung cancer, NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer
Notably, in our patient alpha–fetoprotein levels directly correlated with disease course. Indeed, in this young gentleman, basal level was 765 u/mL and declined to 505 u/mL after two chemotherapy cycles (cisplatin 25 mg/m2 days 1- > 4, etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1- > 4) along with a sharp clinical improvement due to attenuation of the superior vena cava syndrome. Unfortunately, clinical benefit was short–lasting and alpha–fetoprotein rose up again at the time of subsequent disease progression (Fig. 3).

Discussion and conclusions

Diagnosis of NUT midline carcinoma is quite challenging and demands to be hypothesized and specifically demonstrated. Indeed, microscopic features are quite unspecific and range from completely undifferentiated carcinoma to carcinoma with squamous differentiation and abrupt keratinization that may be either focal or prominent. Tumor cells usually have an epithelioid, medium–size appearance and are in general monomorphic with round to oval nuclei and distinct nucleoli. Further morphologic aspects are a high mitotic rate along with necrosis and neutrophilic infiltrates. Immunohistochemistry with the NUT antibody is positive with a diffuse nuclear staining. However, NUT positivity might be found in GCTs as well and, to be regarded as truly positive, it must be seen in >50% of tumor cells.
Another peculiarity of NUT midline carcinoma is represented by the relatively simple karyotype that often presents the NUT translocation as the only relevant abnormality. This strongly differentiate this tumor from other squamous cell carcinomas that usually harbor highly aberrant and complex karyotypes [9, 10].
Differential diagnosis includes several tumors, encompassing hematologic malignancies or neuroendocrine tumors, because of non–specific morphology and immunohistochemistry profile apart from the pathognomonic NUT protein expression and the characteristic cytogenetic abnormalities [1, 3, 11]. As a general rule, it is recommended to perform immunohistochemistry for NUT protein in all poorly differentiated carcinomas that lack glandular differentiation and whenever the clinical picture is not completely consistent with more frequent tumors (midline or unusual position, young people, no smoking habit, rapid progression upon therapy) [2, 8, 12]. Both clinical history and some pathologic features (i.e., monomorphic tumor cells with abrupt keratinization) might help in generating the suspicion of NUT midline carcinoma. [1012].
In the absence of hepatic involvement (Fig. 1 panel c), the diagnosis of NUT midline carcinoma was particularly challenging in our patient because alpha–fetoprotein has only seldom been reported associated with this tumor [1, 3, 1316]. Table 2 describes other clinical cases reporting alpha–fetoprotein elevation. Moreover, in NUT midline carcinoma immunohistochemical expression of alpha-fetoprotein is negative, as it was in our patient and in other NUT midline carcinoma cases describing serum alpha-fetoprotein elevation [1, 3, 17]. Interestingly, alpha–fetoprotein levels during treatment were not reported in the majority of the cases, whereas this marker correlated with disease course in our patient. In light of these findings, we suggest not to exclude and, on the contrary, to take into consideration the diagnosis of NUT midline carcinoma when facing a patient with fast–growing lump in midline structures and alpha-fetoprotein elevation. Of course, evaluation of alpha–fetoprotein levels in other cases of NUT midline carcinoma might help to better define the role of this serum marker in this challenging disease.
Table 2
Case reports of NUT midline carcinoma describing alpha–fetoprotein (AFP) elevation
Authors
Year
Site(s) of disease
Age
Gender
Serum AFP level
IHC AFP
Zhu B et al.
2011
Mediastinum, lung
42
Male
Elevated
Negative
Ball A et al.
2013
Mediastinum, pelvis
19
Female
Elevated
NA
Parikh SA et al.
2013
Mediastinum, lung
36
Male
Elevated
NA
Raza A et al.
2015
Mediastinum, lung
36
Male
Elevated
Negative
Harada Y et al.
2016
Mediastinum, lung, bone
28
Male
Elevated
NA
Present report
2017
Mediastinum, lymphnodes, bone
22
Male
Elevated
Negative
IHC immunohistochemistry, NA not available
The observed elevation of alpha–fetoprotein in NUT midline carcinoma might be related to the suggested hypothesis that these cells arise from primitive neural crest–derived cells. [9] Indeed, both gene expression profile similar to adult ciliary ganglion [18] and the absence of the in-situ component are consistent with this cell of origin. [7].
Beyond its rarity, NUT midline carcinoma may initially and transiently respond to several cytotoxics [2] used to treat undifferentiated carcinomas, making even less likely the raising of the right diagnostic suspicion. Regardless the chosen treatment, activity was at most transient and short–lasting [2]. Therefore, to reach the correct diagnosis in the shortest possible time is crucial because prognosis is dismal, clinical conditions may worsen in few days, conventional chemotherapy is only marginally active and, finally, a new target therapy based on bromodomain inhibitors is showing promising results [4, 19, 20]. Despite being an experimental treatment, patients should be strongly encouraged to enroll in clinical trials to rapidly explore these innovative therapeutic strategies.
In conclusion, to avoid misleading diagnostic interpretation in case of alpha–fetoprotein elevation, sharing patient information between pathologists and clinicians assessing patients affected by poorly differentiated carcinoma arising nearby midline structures is crucial and we point out to consider NUT midline carcinoma in the differential diagnosis. Finally, in light of our observation, we also suggest to measure alpha–fetoprotein levels during tumor treatment to monitor disease course.

Acknowledgements

All authors wish to thank the patient and his family for their courage in fighting against this extremely aggressive disease. The authors also thank Joan C. Leonard for language editing.

Funding

This work was in part supported by the “Fondazione per la ricerca sui tumori dell’apparato muscoloscheletrico e rari Onlus” (CRT RF = 2016–0917 to G.G.) and by the “Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro” (IG 2015 Id.17226 to G.G.).
Study funders had no role in data collection and interpretation, writing of the report, nor the decision to submit for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

LD, EP, FCS, MA, and GG took care of the patient; MM took care of the patient and required pathological consultations; GP and AF performed the pathological diagnosis; LD, GP, and GG wrote the manuscript on behalf of all authors; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed for publication. The corresponding author (GG) has final responsibility to submit for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

The authors obtained written informed consent from the patient to publish information on his disease and clinical course.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval is not applicable for this manuscript. The authors obtained patient’s written consent to participate.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

BMC Cancer 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Onkologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise