Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Erschienen in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine 4/2012

01.08.2012

An affective booster moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening

verfasst von: Rebecca A. Ferrer, William M. P. Klein, Laura E. Zajac, Stephanie R. Land, Bruce S. Ling

Erschienen in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that loss-framed messages are more effective than gain-framed messages in motivating detection behaviors such as screening. The present study examined whether affective context moderates the degree to which message frame is associated with behavioral intentions to engage in colorectal cancer screening. In particular, we buttressed a framing manipulation with an “affective booster” to increase anticipated and anticipatory emotions associated with the framed messages. Consistent with previous research, we found that loss-framed messages are more effective in increasing intentions to screen. However, we found that among individuals who received gain-framed messages (but not loss-framed messages), the affective booster increased message persuasiveness. This effect on intentions was partially mediated by self-efficacy for engaging in screening. This study indicates that in the presence of emotional boosters, loss-framed messages may lose their advantage over gain-framed messages in motivating detection behaviors, and that self-efficacy may partially explain these effects.
Fußnoten
1
These items were also analyzed as separate outcomes. Analyses yielded similarly significant results. For ease of interpretation, we present results of analyses using the combined scale.
 
2
Analyses were also undertaken without controlling for baseline likelihood, and the pattern of results did not change.
 
3
Analyses could also be undertaken using a series of planned comparisons and assuming a 4 group design, as opposed to a 2 × 2. We recognize that this approach may be clearer in reflecting that the affective booster conditions differed in terms of the emotions targeted, and were not a uniform intervention. Results of planned comparisons were consistent with results of regressions of main and interacting effects. However, we assert that the affective booster is conceptually similar across condition, despite its necessitated focus on different emotions in the loss versus gain framed conditions. Thus, we present results from regressions, consistent with this assertion.
 
4
For all analyses, gender, age, insurance status, race, education, household income, and marital status were originally included as control variables; ethnicity was not included due to extremely limited variability. However, these covariates were not significant in predicting any outcomes, and were trimmed from the final models.
 
5
We replicated these findings with data from the present study. In the subsample of participants who received only the framed message but no affective booster, we found that loss-framed messages were more effective in promoting colorectal cancer screening intentions among those with high perceived risk for colorectal cancer, but not among those with low perceived risk (interaction β = −6.78, p = .02). Given that we were underpowered to examine a three-way interaction, we did not include these analyses in the results section.
 
Literatur
Abraham, C., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Deciding to exercise: The role of anticipated regret. British Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 269–278.PubMedCrossRef
Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22, 60–67.PubMedCrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P., Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (1998). Goal-directed emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 1–26.CrossRef
Barron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRef
Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981.CrossRef
Bowen, D. J., Helmes, A., Powers, D., Andersen, R., Burke, W., Mctiernan, A., et al. (2003). Predicting breast cancer screening intentions and behavior with emotion and cognition. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 213–232.CrossRef
Cameron, L. D., & Reeve, J. (2006). Risk perceptions, worry, and attitudes about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Psychology and Health, 21, 211–230.PubMedCrossRef
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50–75 years—United States, 2008. MMWR, 59, 808–812.
Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 375–389.CrossRef
Chang, C.-T., & Lee, Y.-K. (2009). Framing charity advertising: Influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2910–2935.CrossRef
Chapman, G. B., & Coups, E. J. (2006). Emotions and preventive health behavior: Worry, regret, and influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 25, 82–90.PubMedCrossRef
De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. (2006). Frames, biases and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687.PubMedCrossRef
Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189–196.PubMedCrossRef
Diefenbach, M. A., Miller, S. M., & Daly, M. B. (1999). Specific worry about breast cancer predicts mammography use in women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Health Psychology, 18, 532–536.PubMedCrossRef
Dijkstra, A., & Brosschot, J. (2003). Worry about health in smoking behavior change. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1081–1092.PubMedCrossRef
Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30, 297–321.CrossRef
Frazier, A. L., Colditz, G. A., Fuchs, C. S., & Kuntz, K. M. (2000). Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 1954–1961.PubMedCrossRef
Gallagher, K. M., Updegraff, J. A., Rothman, A. J., & Sims, L. (2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30, 145–152.PubMedCrossRef
Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 503–514.PubMedCrossRef
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstetter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.CrossRef
Hay, J. L., McCaul, K. D., & Magnan, R. E. (2006). Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? Meta-analysis of the prospective evidence. Preventive Medicine, 42, 401–408.PubMedCrossRef
Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R. (1972). Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown: General Learning Press.
Klein, W. M. P., Lipkus, I. M., Scholl, S. M., McQueen, A., Cerully, J. L., & Harris, P. R. (2010). Self-affirmation moderates effects of unrealistic optimism and pessimism on reactions to tailored risk feedback. Psychology and Health, 25, 1195–1208.PubMedCrossRef
Latimer, A. E., Salovey, P., & Rothman, A. J. (2007). The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention and behavior: Is all hope lost? Journal of Health Communication, 12, 645–649.PubMedCrossRef
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Lerner, J., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Emotion and Cognition, 14, 473–493.CrossRef
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processe, 76, 149–188.CrossRef
Lipkus, I. M., & Klein, W. M. P. (2006). Effects of communicating social comparison information on risk perceptions for colorectal cancer. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 391–407.PubMedCrossRef
Loewenstein, G. F., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective science (pp. 619–642). New York: Oxford University Press.
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.PubMedCrossRef
McCaul, K. D., Branstetter, A. D., Schroeder, D. M., & Glasgow, R. E. (1996). What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review. Health Psychology, 15, 423–429.PubMedCrossRef
McCaul, K. D., & Mullens, A. B. (2003). Affect, thought, and self-protective health behavior: The case of worry and cancer screening. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness. Blackwell series in health psychology and behavioral medicine (pp. 137–168). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
McCaul, K. D., Mullens, A. B., Romanek, K. M., Erickson, S. C., & Gatheridge, B. J. (2007). The motivational effects of thinking and worrying about the effects of smoking cigarettes. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1780–1798.CrossRef
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., & Tversky, A. (1988). On the framing of medical decisions. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 562–568). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McQueen, A., Vernon, S. W., Meyers, R. E., Watts, B. G., Lee, E. S., & Tilley, B. C. (2007). Correlates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening among male automotive workers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 16, 500–509.PubMedCrossRef
Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500–510.PubMedCrossRef
O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623–644.PubMedCrossRef
Peters, E., Lipkus, I., & Diefenbach, M. A. (2006). The functions of affect in health communications and in the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication, 56, S140–S162.CrossRef
Pinon, A., & Gambara, H. (2005). A meta-analytic review of framing effects: Risky attribute and goal framing. Psicothema, 17, 325–331.
Prochaska, J. O., & Redding, C. A. (2002). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed., pp. 99–120). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Richard, R., van der Pligt, J., & de Vries, N. (1996). Anticipated regret and time perspective: Changing sexual risk-taking behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 185–199.CrossRef
Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114.CrossRef
Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 175–183.PubMedCrossRef
Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, S202–S220.CrossRef
Rothman, A. J., Klein, W. M., & Weinstein, N. D. (1996). Absolute and relative biases in estimations of personal risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1213–1236.CrossRef
Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P. (1999). The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1355–1369.CrossRef
Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3–19.PubMedCrossRef
Ruiter, R. A. C., Abraham, C., & Kok, G. (2001). Scary warning and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health, 16, 613–630.CrossRef
Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Augmenting the theory of planned behaviour: Roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2107–2142.CrossRef
Sherman, D. K., Mann, T., & Updengraff, J. A. (2006). Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 165–169.PubMedCrossRef
Toll, B. A., Salovey, P., O’Malley, S. S., Mazure, C. M., Latimer, A., & McKee, S. A. (2008). Message framing for smoking cessation: The interaction of risk perceptions and gender. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 195–200.CrossRef
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1987). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In R. M., Hogarth & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology (pp. 67–94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2008). Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 627–637.
Weinstein, N. D., Kwitel, A., McCaul, K. D., Magnan, R. E., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Risk perceptions: Assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 146–151.PubMedCrossRef
West, R. (2009). The multiple facets of cigarette addiction and what they mean for encouraging and helping smokers to stop. Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 6, 277–283.PubMedCrossRef
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.CrossRef
Wilson, D. K., Purdon, S. E., & Wallston, K. A. (1988). Compliance to health recommendations: A theoretical overview of message framing. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 3, 161–171.
Winawer, S. J., Zauber, A. G., Ho, M. N., O’Brien, M. J., Gottlieb, L. S., & Sternberg, S. S. (1993). Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. NEJM, 329, 1977–1981.PubMedCrossRef
Wong, C. O., & McMurray, N. E. (2002). Framing communication: Communicating the antismoking message effectively to all smokers. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 433–447.CrossRef
Yan, C., Dillard, J. P., & Shen, F. (2010). The effects of mood, message framing, and behavioral advocacy on persuasion. Journal of Communication, 60, 344–363.CrossRef
Zajac, L. E., & Klein, W. M. P. (October 2007). Effect of worry on behavioral intentions, behavior, and processing of health information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Pittsburgh, PA.
Metadaten
Titel
An affective booster moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening
verfasst von
Rebecca A. Ferrer
William M. P. Klein
Laura E. Zajac
Stephanie R. Land
Bruce S. Ling
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9371-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2012

Journal of Behavioral Medicine 4/2012 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Symptom experience during acute coronary syndrome and the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms

OriginalPaper

Choice and placebo expectation effects in the context of pain analgesia

OriginalPaper

Planning and self-efficacy can increase fruit and vegetable consumption: a randomized controlled trial

OriginalPaper

Fear-related predictors of vasovagal symptoms during blood donation: it’s in the blood

OriginalPaper

Multiple plans and memory performance: results of a randomized controlled trial targeting fruit and vegetable intake

OriginalPaper

UV photography, masculinity, and college men’s sun protection cognitions

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

ADHS-Medikation erhöht das kardiovaskuläre Risiko

16.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Erwachsene, die Medikamente gegen das Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-Hyperaktivitätssyndrom einnehmen, laufen offenbar erhöhte Gefahr, an Herzschwäche zu erkranken oder einen Schlaganfall zu erleiden. Es scheint eine Dosis-Wirkungs-Beziehung zu bestehen.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Typ-2-Diabetes und Depression folgen oft aufeinander

14.05.2024 Typ-2-Diabetes Nachrichten

Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind überdurchschnittlich gefährdet, in den nächsten Jahren auch noch eine Depression zu entwickeln – und umgekehrt. Besonders ausgeprägt ist die Wechselbeziehung laut GKV-Daten bei jüngeren Erwachsenen.

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise