Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015

01.06.2015

Analysis of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) right colectomy reveals a minimal learning curve

verfasst von: Katherine A. Kirk, Brian A. Boone, Leonard Evans, Steven Evans, David L. Bartlett, Matthew P. Holtzman

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Single-incision right colectomy has emerged as a safe and feasible alternative to standard laparoscopic resection. As with any new surgical approach, definition of the number of procedures required to optimize the technique is an important goal. Data on this learning curve for single-incision right colectomy are lacking; therefore, we report the outcomes of consecutive single-incision right colectomies to identify the procedural learning curve.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive single-incision right colectomies performed by a single surgeon from May 2010 to May 2013. Patients were evaluated in groups of ten to minimize individual patient variability and selection bias. Demographics and peri-operative outcomes among groups were evaluated using ANOVA or KruskalWallis. Statistical improvement was assessed between groups using Student T tests or MannWhitney U tests.

Results

Seventy consecutive single-incision right colectomies were performed during the study period. There were no differences in patient demographics over the course of the experiences, suggesting that the selection bias did not influence the outcomes. There was a statistical improvement in operative time after the first 10 cases (103 vs. 130 min, p = 0.01). A second statistical improvement in operative time occurred after 40 cases (97 vs. 114 min, p = 0.03). There was no statistical improvement in estimated blood loss, lymph node harvest, conversion rate, length of stay, or post-operative morbidity throughout the experience.

Conclusions

Analysis of our large series of consecutive cases indicates that for a surgeon trained in advanced laparoscopic techniques and given adequate case volume, the outcomes from the procedure are quickly optimized with a minimal learning curve. Operative time is optimized following 40 procedures. Identification of the learning curve is critical for surgeons wishing to implement a single-incision approach and to ensure that the outcomes are optimized prior to thorough comparison with standard laparoscopic or open approaches.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032651 CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa032651 CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2 CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(05)66545-2 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182378442 CrossRefPubMed Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3182378442​ CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gash KJ, Goede AC, Chambers W, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy. Surg Endosc 25:835–840. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1275-8 CrossRefPubMed Gash KJ, Goede AC, Chambers W, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy. Surg Endosc 25:835–840. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1275-8 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishida H, Okada N, Ishibashi K, Ohsawa T, Kumamoto K, Haga N (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer via a periumbilical approach using a surgical glove: initial experience with 9 cases. Int J Surg 9:150–154. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.010 CrossRefPubMed Ishida H, Okada N, Ishibashi K, Ohsawa T, Kumamoto K, Haga N (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer via a periumbilical approach using a surgical glove: initial experience with 9 cases. Int J Surg 9:150–154. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijsu.​2010.​10.​010 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross H, Steele S, Whiteford M, Lee S, Albert M, Mutch M, Rivadeneira D, Marcello P (2011) Early multi-institution experience with single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum. 54(2):187–192CrossRefPubMed Ross H, Steele S, Whiteford M, Lee S, Albert M, Mutch M, Rivadeneira D, Marcello P (2011) Early multi-institution experience with single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum. 54(2):187–192CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Velthuis S, van den Boezem PB, Lips DJ, Prins HA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2012) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy: a two-center, prospective case-controlled study of 100 patients. Dig Surg 29:477–483. doi:10.1159/000346044 CrossRefPubMed Velthuis S, van den Boezem PB, Lips DJ, Prins HA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2012) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy: a two-center, prospective case-controlled study of 100 patients. Dig Surg 29:477–483. doi:10.​1159/​000346044 CrossRefPubMed
18.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Morales-Conde S, Moreno JG, Gómez JC, Socas M, Barranco A, Alarcón I, Casado M, Cadet J-M, Martín-Cartes J (2010) Total intracorporeal anastomosis during single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of colon: a new step forward. Surg Innov 17:226–228. doi:10.1177/1553350610372378 CrossRefPubMed Morales-Conde S, Moreno JG, Gómez JC, Socas M, Barranco A, Alarcón I, Casado M, Cadet J-M, Martín-Cartes J (2010) Total intracorporeal anastomosis during single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of colon: a new step forward. Surg Innov 17:226–228. doi:10.​1177/​1553350610372378​ CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietrasanta D, Romano N, Prosperi V, Lorenzetti L, Basili G, Goletti O (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a single-centre preliminary experience. Updates Surg 62:111–115. doi:10.1007/s13304-010-0023-x CrossRefPubMed Pietrasanta D, Romano N, Prosperi V, Lorenzetti L, Basili G, Goletti O (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a single-centre preliminary experience. Updates Surg 62:111–115. doi:10.​1007/​s13304-010-0023-x CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Bartley Pickron T, Haas EM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 24:2613–2616. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1017-y CrossRefPubMed Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Bartley Pickron T, Haas EM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 24:2613–2616. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1017-y CrossRefPubMed
28.
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen WTL, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng L, Bin WuC, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1481-4 CrossRefPubMed Chen WTL, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng L, Bin WuC, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1481-4 CrossRefPubMed
34.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 207:613–622. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.045 CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Lasithiotakis K, Chalkiadakis GE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 207:613–622. doi:10.​1016/​j.​amjsurg.​2013.​07.​045 CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP (2011) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:415–421. doi:10.1007/s00384-010-1091-6 CrossRefPubMed Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP (2011) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:415–421. doi:10.​1007/​s00384-010-1091-6 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) right colectomy reveals a minimal learning curve
verfasst von
Katherine A. Kirk
Brian A. Boone
Leonard Evans
Steven Evans
David L. Bartlett
Matthew P. Holtzman
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3803-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.