Erschienen in:
27.05.2020 | SHOULDER
Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability
verfasst von:
Giuseppe Sircana, Maristella F. Saccomanno, Fabrizio Mocini, Vincenzo Campana, Piermarco Messinese, Andrea Monteleone, Andrea Salvi, Alessandra Scaini, Almerico Megaro, Giuseppe Milano
Erschienen in:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
|
Ausgabe 7/2021
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
To systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
Methods
Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist.
Results
Fourty-four studies were included for a total of 1020 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 38 years. Mean follow-up was 32.9 months. Arthroscopic techniques showed better results than open approach (p < 0.0001). Synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better functional outcomes compared to internal fixation and biologic techniques (p < 0.0001). Among biologic techniques, combined coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments reconstruction showed better Constant (p = 0.0270) and ASES (p = 0.0113) scores compared to isolated coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction; anatomic biologic non-augmented graft reconstruction showed better Constant (p < 0.0001), VAS (p < 0.0001) and SSV (p = 0.0177) results compared to augmented techniques. No differences in functional outcomes could be found between anatomic biologic non-augmented graft versus synthetic reconstructions. Overall, methodological quality of the included studies was low.
Conclusion
Anatomic reconstructions, both synthetic and biologic, showed the best functional results.