Background
Multi-gene panel testing of cancer by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is now widespread, leading to proposals for optimal treatment of individual cancer patients in the clinical practice of oncology [
1,
2]. Therapeutic approaches targeting driver gene abnormalities have been separately developed for each cancer type [
3], but the basket trials, which examine whether a molecular targeted agent works for various types of cancers with the same driver gene abnormalities, are increasing [
4]. Variants of the
HER2 gene, which encodes the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein, are one of the most promising therapeutic targets. The MyPathway trial showed that patients with
HER2 amplification benefited from a combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab even if they had cancers other than those of the stomach and breast in which
HER2-targeted therapies have been conventionally approved [
5].
HER2 mutations, especially those in the intracellular kinase domain, have been considered to be an appropriate molecular target [
6‐
8]. The SUMMIT trial, a basket trial of neratinib targeting
HER2 and
HER3 mutations, showed some efficacy.
HER2 mutations are most frequently observed in the kinase domain; however, the potential therapeutic significance of
HER2 extracellular domain mutations other than S310F, a hot spot mutation in the extracellular domain, have not been clarified [
9].
We recently experienced a case of carcinoma of unknown primary with
HER2 E401G, a variant of unknown significance (VUS) in the extracellular domain concomitant with
HER2 amplification. Comprehensive analysis using cell line and animal models, as well as molecular dynamic simulation in silico, showed that
HER2 E401G has an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated activation mechanism, the same as
HER2 S310F [
10]. Determining therapeutic strategies in accordance with the activation mechanism of variants is an important challenge for precision medicine based on the cancer genome, which we aimed to put into practice in this case. We hypothesized that a treatment strategy that suppresses EGFR signaling simultaneously with HER2 might be promising for
HER2 E401G based on the activation mechanism. To assess this hypothesis, we examined the efficacy of afatinib, an irreversible multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of EGFR, HER2, and HER4 [
11,
12], and we compared it to other drugs: lapatinib, which is also a TKI of EGFR and HER2 but weaker than afatinib in its EGFR inhibitory effect [
12], and trastuzumab and pertuzumab, which have been demonstrated to be effective for treating cancers with wild-type
HER2 amplification.
Evaluation of drug efficacy was performed primarily with cancer models based on patient-derived specimens, the patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and the cancer tissue-originated spheroid (CTOS).
Methods
Materials
Human lung cancer cell line NCI-H2170 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA); cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS. Afatinib and lapatinib were purchased from LC laboratories (Woburn, MA, USA), and trastuzumab and pertuzumab were purchased from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Immunodeficient Balb/c Rag-2−/− Jak3−/− (BRJ) mice, which lack mature T and B lymphocytes and natural killer cells, were provided by Prof. Seiji Okada (Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan).
Generation of patient-derived xenograft and cancer-tissue originated spheroid
To examine drug efficacy of the agents mentioned above, we established PDX using cancer tissue obtained from the patient of unknown primary. The cancer tissue used to prepare the cancer models was obtained from a portion of a skin biopsy specimen collected for clinical use with Institutional Review Board approval (2020–07-R-10) and written informed consent from the patient for use for this research. The cancer tissue was subcutaneously transplanted into the dorsal flanks of 7-week-old female BRJ mice (
n = 2) under anesthesia with midazolam, medetomidine, and butorphanol tartrate, and three or four in vivo passages were performed to establish PDX for drug efficacy evaluation experiments (
n = 42). Tumors excised from mice engrafted patient tumors were defined as the first generation (G1), and the generations of tumors excised at passaging were defined as G2, G3, and G4, in that order. These characteristics were evaluated using morphology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and droplet digital PCR. CTOS was established according to the method previously described [
13,
14], using a portion of the G3 tumor of PDX in this study. Briefly, tumors were minced and digested using Liberase™ DH (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), after which CTOS size fractions of 100- or 40- μm were collected using a cell strainer. Fractions were cultured in StemPro™ hESC SFM (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 8 ng/mL bFGF (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Wako Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). CTOS were established as CTOS lines after at least two in vivo passages of subcutaneous transplantation of CTOS into BRJ mice under anesthesia, and CTOS in the 40–70 μm size fraction were used for evaluation of drug efficacies.
Immunohistochemistry
Patient tumor samples and tumors excised from patient-derived models were stained with IHC and Hematoxylin Eosin (HE). Primary antibodies used for IHC were as follows: HER2 (HER2/neu, Agilent Technologies, Glostrup, Denmark), CK7 (OV-TL12/30, Agilent Technologies, Glostrup, Denmark), CK20 (Ks20.8, Agilent Technologies, Glostrup, Denmark), and GATA3 (L50–823, Cell Marque, The Hague, Netherlands). Glass slide samples were digitized with a NanoZoomer S60 digital slide scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan).
Droplet digital PCR for analyzing HER2 copy number and the ratio of mutant and wild type HER2
Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR™) for analyzing the ratio of E401G and wild type
HER2 was performed as described previously [
10]. Copy number assay using ddPCR was performed with a
HER2 probe set (dHsaCP1000116, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA) and the reference gene, RPP30, probe set (dHsaCP2500350, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Animal studies
To explore appropriate treatment for the patient, we examined drug efficacy using PDX described above (
n = 6 per group). We also used xenograft using H2170 cells with wild-type
HER2 amplification to compare the effects with PDX with
HER2 E401G amplification (
n = 3 or 4 per group). H2170 cells (1 × 10
7 each) were injected into the dorsal flanks of 7-week-old female BRJ mice under anesthesia with midazolam, medetomidine, and butorphanol tartrate. Tumor sizes were measured with calipers twice per week and tumor volumes were calculated as
V = 1/2 × [(the shortest diameter)
2 × (the longest diameter)]. For drug efficacy evaluation, drug or vehicle administration was started on the day that the tumor size reached 150–200 mm
3 for PDX and 100–200 mm
3 for H2170 xenograft (in both cases defined as “day 1”). On day 22, mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation and excised tumors were photographed. Regarding the administration of the drugs, sub-maximal tolerated doses of afatinib and lapatinib were reported to be 20–25 mg/kg [
11,
12,
15] and 100–150 mg/kg [
11,
16,
17], respectively, so the initial experiments were performed with 20 mg/kg of afatinib and 100 mg/kg of lapatinib. However, due to a lack of efficacy in the lapatinib 100 mg/kg group, a lapatinib 150 mg/kg group was added. Afatinib and lapatinib were prepared in 0.5 w/v (%) methyl cellulose and administered orally once daily for 5 days per week. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab were administered intraperitoneally once a week at 30 mg/kg diluted in saline according to the literature published during the time of their development [
18,
19]. PDX excised tumors were cryopreserved and analyzed for
HER2 copy number by droplet digital PCR. In each experiment, the mice were randomly assigned into two or three groups. Mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility within the Analytical Research Center for Experimental Sciences, Saga University. Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation when a loss of more than 20% baseline body weight occurred or other human endpoints such as lethargy. All animal studies were performed in accordance with animal research protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board of Saga University (A2021–022-0) and the university’s institutional guidelines. The study was completed and reported in compliance with the recommendations of Animals in Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines.
Drug sensitivity assay using CTOS
CTOSs prepared by the method described above were counted and seeded into 96-well plates at approximately 10 CTOSs/well. Twenty-four hours later, medium containing each drug was added to each well to achieve the targeted final concentration, then the culture was continued. Seven days after the addition of the drugs, ATP content was measured with CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assays (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and the content was adjusted with vehicle-treated control.
Drug sensitivity assay in vitro
H2170 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 7 × 103 cells/well; 24 hours later each drug was added, then the culture was continued. Cell growth was measured with a Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo Molecular Technology, Kumamoto, Japan) on the third day after the addition of the drugs, and the content was adjusted using vehicle-treated control.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). Differences between two groups were tested with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Differences among three groups were tested with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s test for pairwise comparisons. For all comparisons, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Most calculations were performed using JMP Pro 15.2.0 (SAS Institute Inc., USA). Dose response curves were plotted and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated with the DRC package (version 3.0.1) for R (version 4.1.3) in RStudio (version 2022.2.1.461; RStudio PBC, Boston, Massachusetts, USA).
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that afatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is effective against both HER2 and EGFR, showed an anti-cancer effect for HER2 E401G and its amplification using the cancer models PDX and CTOS derived from a patient tissue specimen. These results support the hypothesis that suppression of EGFR signaling simultaneously with HER2 could be effective against cancers with the HER2 E401G mutation, based on our previous results of in vitro analyses and in silico molecular dynamics simulation in which HER2 activation was mediated through stabilization between EGFR and HER2.
As is often the case, results with cell lines used for evaluation of drug efficacy were not identical to clinical outcomes [
23,
24]. This is likely due to changes in genetic profiles and gene expressions during the process of cell line establishment [
25,
26]. Therefore, PDX and other patient-derived cancer models have been studied and there are many reports suggesting that these models reflect therapeutic efficacy in clinical practice [
27‐
29]. However, PDX requires a relatively long time to establish and has a low throughput, allowing study of the effects of only a limited number of drugs. Recently, organoid culture methods have been developed as a new model to fill this gap [
30,
31]. One of them is CTOS, a high-yield method that produces highly pure organoids [
13,
32,
33]. Therefore, we used PDX and CTOS to evaluate drug efficacies for cancer with amplified
HER2 E401G. We confirmed that morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of the cancer, as well as
HER2 gene profiles in the original tumors, were maintained in PDX and CTOS-established tumors.
In the evaluation of drug efficacy in the present study, different results were demonstrated between the cell line, H2170, and the patient-derived cancer model. As a premise of our conclusion, the difference in drug efficacy due to the presence of
HER2 E401G is presumably due to factors other than a mutation-induced change in drug binding. Because afatinib and lapatinib bind to the target kinase domain, whereas pertuzumab and trastuzumab bind to HER2 extracellular domains 2 and 4, respectively [
34], the
HER2 E401G mutation site (extracellular domain 3) and the binding sites of these drugs are different. T + P produced remarkable tumor shrinkage of xenografts in the H2170 cell line with wild-type
HER2 amplification, whereas the PDX model with E401G co-existing with
HER2 amplification produced only a small effect. The best therapeutic effect of T + P on the patient from whom cancer tissue was obtained was “stable disease”, and tumor shrinkage was not observed, as shown in Fig.
1. We previously showed that the biological effect of E401G on HER2 activation was similar to that of S310F, a hot spot of
HER2 extracellular domain mutation. A report on the evaluation of drug efficacy in a PDX model established from patients with cancers harboring coexisting
HER2 S310F mutation and
HER2 amplification showed that afatinib was markedly superior to trastuzumab plus lapatinib and other agents [
35]. This suggests that the coexistence of
HER2 E401G mutation with
HER2 amplification may attenuate the therapeutic effect of targeting HER2 alone.
We also showed that afatinib was superior to lapatinib and T + P in both PDX and CTOS models with amplified
HER2 E401G mutation. In addition, there was a statistically significant reduction in
HER2 copy number in PDX tumor only with afatinib treatment. Both lapatinib and afatinib are selective ATP-competitive inhibitors of EGFR and HER2 [
36]. The IC
50 for EGFR and HER2 in a cell-free in vitro kinase assay were 3 nM and 15 nM for lapatinib and 0.5 nM and 14 nM for afatinib, respectively, showing that afatinib is more potent in its inhibitory activity on EGFR [
12]. In addition, lapatinib has a reversible binding mode to the receptor [
36], whereas afatinib has an irreversible binding mode to the receptor through covalent binding, resulting in a long-lasting inhibitory effect [
37]. Based on the different properties of these agents, it is possible that afatinib, due to its potent and prolonged inhibition of EGFR in addition to its inhibition of HER2, provided a better effect than lapatinib on cancer with
HER2 E401G. The decrease in
HER2 copy-number is presumably due to a decrease of the average copy number in cancer cells as a result of HER2-targeted therapy. High efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy reduced the number of clones with high
HER2 copy number, resulting in reduction of the average copy number in all cancer cells. The effects of anti-HER2 therapies on
HER2 wild type and E401G mutants, with amplification, are summarized in Fig.
5D. Possible mechanisms for the effects are also illustrated.
We acknowledge several limitations in our study. First, we did not perform experiments to evaluate whether similar results are obtained with other extracellular domain mutations such as S310F. However, other groups have already reported significant efficacy of afatinib in PDX with
HER2 S310F and in patients [
35]. Second, we could not provide molecular evidence that EGFR inhibition is a key factor in the efficacy of afatinib against cancers with
HER2 E401G mutation, due to the limited tissue and necrosis. Third, we have not conducted any additional combination experiments of afatinib with T + P. Theoretically, these combinations could produce additional benefits, but afatinib is a drug that requires management of side effects, such as skin toxicity and diarrhea, so adding drugs might not be feasible. In fact, in a phase I study of the combination of afatinib and trastuzumab, side effects such as diarrhea were a major problem [
38]. Our study not only demonstrates that afatinib is a promising therapeutic option for the present variant combination, but also highlights the importance of determining the activation mechanism of the mutations and developing therapies based on such findings.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.