Erschienen in:
01.04.2015 | Original Article
Antibiotic embedded absorbable prosthesis for prevention of surgical mesh infection: experimental study in rats
verfasst von:
J. M. Suárez-Grau, S. Morales-Conde, V. González Galán, J. A. Martín Cartes, F. Docobo Durantez, F. J. Padillo Ruiz
Erschienen in:
Hernia
|
Ausgabe 2/2015
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Introduction
Ventral hernias are a common problem in a general surgery and hernioplasty is an integral part of a general surgeon’s practice. The use of prosthetic material has drastically reduced the risk of recurrence, but has introduced additional potential complications such as surgical wound infections, adhesion formation, graft rejection, etc. The development of a wound infection in a hernia that is repaired with a prosthetic material is a grave complication, often requiring removal of the prosthesis. This experimental study examined efficacy of completely absorbable, hydrophilic, PGA–TMC (polyglycolic acid–trimethylene carbonate) prosthesis impregnated with antibiotic for reduction of infectious complications.
Methods
Antibiotic-impregnated PGA–TMC prostheses were placed intraperitoneally in 90 Wistar white rats that were randomized and distributed into four groups. Group 0 (23 rats): there were placed PGA–TMC prosthesis without antibiotic impregnation (control group). Group 1 (25 rats): meshes were placed and infected later with 1 × 108 UFC of S. aureus/1 ml/2 cm2 (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD). Group 2 (21 rats): cefazolin-impregnated prostheses were placed (1 g × 100 ml, at the rate of 1 ml/cm2 of prosthesis) and were subsequently infected with the same bacterial inoculate. Group 3 (21 rats): cefazolin-impregnated prostheses with double quantity of cefazolin and infected. A week later these animals were killed and specimens were extracted for bacterial quantification and histological studies.
Results
Evident decrease of bacterial colonization was observed in series 2 and 3 [the ones impregnated with cefazolin, in comparison with the group 1 (infected without previous antibiotic impregnation)] with statistically significant results (p < 0.00). Results were really positive when the antibiotic solution had been applied to the mesh. There have been formed adherences to the prosthesis when placing it in contact with intraabdominal viscera. However, cefazolin impregnation of the mesh has reduced an adhesion formation, mostly when the infection reached a minimum, inhibiting the inflammatory answer to the infection in a prosthetic material.
Conclusion
Impregnation of the absorbable hydrophilic prosthesis PGA–TMC with cefazolin prevents the infection of the prosthesis placed in infected localization. Therefore, we think this option should be considered as a new and useful alternative in case of contaminated and dirty surgical fields or when a replacement of the prosthesis is required.