nach oben

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2021 | Research article

Association between glucose variability and postoperative delirium in acute aortic dissection patients: an observational study

verfasst von: Yan-Juan Lin, Ling-Yu Lin, Yan-Chun Peng, Hao-Ruo Zhang, Liang-wan Chen, Xi-Zhen Huang, Qiong Chen

Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Blood glucose variability is associated with poor prognosis after cardiac surgery, but the relationship between glucose variability and postoperative delirium in patients with acute aortic dissection is unclear. The study aims to investigate the association of blood glucose variability with postoperative delirium in acute aortic dissection patients.

Methods

We prospectively analyzed 257 patients including 103 patients with delirium. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether delirium was present. The outcome measures were postoperative delirium, the length of the Intensive Care Unit stay, and the duration of hospital stay. Multivariable Cox competing risk survival models was used to assess.

Results

A total of 257 subjects were enrolled, including 103 patients with delirium. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in body mass index, history of cardiac surgery, first admission blood glucose, white blood cell counts, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, hypoxemia, mechanical ventilation duration, and the length of Intensive Care Unit stay(P < 0.05). The delirium group exhibited significantly higher values of the mean of blood glucose (MBG) and the standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) than in the non-delirium group(P < 0.05). In model 1, the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of the standard deviation of blood glucose was 1.436(P < 0.05). In Model 2, the standard deviation of blood glucose (AHR = 1.418, 95%CI = 1.195–1.681, P < 0.05) remained significant after adjusting for confounders. The area under the curve of the SDBG was 0.763(95%CI = 0.704–0.821, P < 0.01). The sensitivity was 81.6%, and the specificity was 57.8%.

Conclusions

Glucose variability is associated with the risk of delirium in patients after aortic dissection surgery, and high glycemic variability increases the risk of postoperative delirium.

Yan-Juan Lin and Ling-Yu Lin are first co-authors.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

POD

Postoperative delirium

Glucose variability

ICU

Intensive Care Unit

AAD

Acute aortic dissection

MBG

Mean of blood glucose

SDBG

Standard deviation of blood glucose

Standard deviation

CAM-ICU

The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit

Blood glucose

AHR

Adjusted hazard ratio

Hazard ratio

Confidence intervals

BMI

Body mass index

WBC

White blood cell

APACHE-II

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score

ROC

Receiver operating characteristic

IQR

Interquartile

RBC

Red blood cell

Hemoglobin

ASA

American Society of Anesthesiologists

CPB

Cardiopulmonary bypass

Background

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a severe cerebral dysfunction, and is characterized by episodes of confusion, inattention, thinking disorder and altered level of consciousness [1]. It is one of the neurological complications after cardiac surgery with an incidence of as high as 11.0–54.9% [2, 3]. And the incidence of delirium after aortic dissection surgery is 32.5–52.0% [4]. Studies have shown that POD leads to prolonged mechanical ventilation, prolonged Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, a 20% increased risk of long-term hospitalization for each day, the lasting delirium, and increased hospital costs [5‐7]. The patients’ activity ability and quality of life are decreased were also reported [8].

In recent years, more attention has been paid to the study of blood glucose variability (GV) on disease progression and prognosis of patients, and it has important clinical significance for monitoring and controlling blood GV in severe patients [9, 10]. Compared with hyperglycemia, blood GV better reflects changes in the condition and has greater adverse effects on the body, which may have higher clinical value [10, 11]. It is well known that blood GV increases the risk of adverse events after cardiac surgery, such as acute kidney injury, and the risk of short-term and long-term death [12, 13]. At present, only one article has pointed out that hypoglycemia is positively correlated with delirium in mixed ICU diabetic patients, but high blood GV is not correlated with delirium [14]. And there is no study on the correlation between POD and blood GV in patients after cardiac surgery, nor the effect of blood GV on POD after acute aortic dissection (AAD).

According to reports, the annual incidence of AAD was 3.0–6.0 per 100,000 [4]. The mortality rate was 36–72% in AAD in the hospital during 48 h, and an increase of 1–2% in the hourly mortality rate [15]. Surgery is an important way to AAD. Therefore, this study conducted an observational study to investigate the relationship between blood GV after postoperative aortic dissection and POD, and to further clarify whether blood GV affects POD.

Methods

The aim and design

The study is to investigate the relationship between blood GV and POD in AAD patients who underwent surgery, and to further clarify whether blood GV affects POD, which is a prospective study.

Participants

All patients who underwent AAD surgery at Cardiac Medical Center of Fujian Province from June 2017 to June 2019. All patients were ≥ 18 years old, no metabolic disease, no history of malignant tumor, autoimmune disease, or no severe liver and kidney dysfunction. Excluding those who stayed in ICU less than 48 h after the operation, a history of transcranial trauma, congenital deafness or schizophrenia, epilepsy before surgery, and patients who had been using glucocorticoids for a long time. Besides, patients who remained in a coma in the ICU after the operation were also excluded. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) [16] was used to assess whether the patient had positive delirium.

The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE-II) is the most authoritative critical illness evaluation system that has been widely used in ICU. The more serious the illness is, the higher the score is. Studies have shown that the severity of the disease is closely related to the risk of delirium [17, 18].

Delirium assessment

Delirium was assessed by two ICU nurses who have been worked in the ICU for more than 3 years. Evaluation time was from 8:00 to 11:00, 15:00 to 17:00, and 20:00 to 23:00 on the first day after surgery, until delirium occurred or the patient transferred out of ICU.

The CAM-ICU scale can identify the following four characteristics: (1) acute onset of change or fluctuation in mental status; (2) attention disorder; (3) altered level of consciousness; (4) disorganized thinking. At the same time satisfy the features 1, 2, and 3 or 1, 2, and 4 can be a diagnosis of positive delirium.

Data collection

After the patient was transferred to the ICU, the general demographic data, intraoperative data, and postoperative data were collected by two investigators. Blood glucose (BG) monitor was carried out every 2–6 h according to the glucose control after the doctors evaluated the patient’s condition. We started to collect the BG values obtaining from the arterial blood gas analysis at 8 am on day one postoperatively, which continuously for 48 h. If the interval of two blood glucose monitors was longer than 6 h, the patient was excluded. Mean blood glucose (MBG) level as an arithmetic mean of all recorded glucose values for each patient for 48 h, and the variability of blood glucose was assessed by the standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG).

Power and sample size

The sample size of this study was calculated using the Leslie Kish formula [19] for sample size determination for a single proportion as follows: \( n={Z}_{a/2}^2\pi \left(1-\uppi \right)/{\delta}^2 \). According to one review, the prevalence of delirium after aortic dissection surgery is 32.5–52.0% [4], which we used the prevalence of 52% in order to obtain the maximum possible sample size that provided more precise estimates. Considering the existence of shedding and other factors, the sample size was enlarged by 20%. Thus, the final calculated sample size is 115 patients.

Statistical analysis

We used Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) to calculate the SDBG and the MBG, and SPSS statistical package of 21.0 version for statistical analysis, using the appropriate statistical methods to describe data. The continuity variable conforms with the normal distribution uses the t-test and the non-compliance with the normal distribution uses the Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test. The length of ICU stay was the time index, calculating in days. It started from the first day when patients stay in the ICU until the ICU discharge. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether delirium occurred as a dependent variable (event), and hazard ratio (HR) values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

From June 2017 to June 2019, 296 patients with AAD were included, and 257 patients were finally included, as shown in Fig. 1. There were 103 patients with delirium and 154 patients without delirium, and the incidence of delirium was 40.08%.

Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the delirium group and the non-delirium group. There was no statistically significant difference in age between the two groups(P > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in body mass index (BMI), history of cardiac surgery, first admission blood glucose, white blood cell (WBC) count, APACHE-II score, hypoxemia, mechanical ventilation duration, and the length of ICU stay(P < 0.05). The delirium group exhibited significantly higher values of MBG and SDBG than in the non-delirium group(P < 0.05).

Table 1

Characteristics of delirium patients and non-delirium patients

Variables	Delirium (n = 103)	Non-delirium (n = 154)	P
Demographic information
Age, mean (SD), years	53.3 ± 10.5	51.1 ± 12.8	0.145
BMI, median IQR, kg/m²	25.4 (23.5, 27.7)	24.0 (22.2, 26.7)	0.014
Male, n (%)	81 (78.6)	113 (73.4)	0.336
Smoker, n (%)	41 (39.8)	60 (39.0)	0.892
Drinker, n (%)	41 (39.8)	56 (36.4)	0.577
High school and above, n (%)	20 (19.4)	36 (23.4)	0.374
Married, n (%)	100 (97.1)	152 (98.7)	0.648
Hypertension, n (%)	83 (80.6)	112 (72.7)	0.149
History of cardiac surgery, n (%)	7 (6.8)	2 (1.3)	0.019
Preoperative data
First admission blood glucose, IQR, mmol/L	7.6 (6.6, 9.2)	6.9 (5.9, 7.8)	< 0.001
WBC, mean (SD), [×10⁹/L]	12.9 ± 4.1	11.8 ± 3.9	0.033
Neutrophil, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	10.0 (7.0, 12.6)	8.5 (4.6, 11.5)	0.061
Lymphocyte, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	6.5 (4.1, 10.0)	7.1 (4.1, 11.3)	0.330
Monocyte, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	5.0 (3.5, 8.0)	5.4 (2.6, 7.6)	0.344
RBC, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	4.3 (3.9, 4.8)	4.3 (4.0, 4.7)	0.922
Platelet, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	196.0 (149.8, 235.0)	193.0 (149.8, 217.0)	0.138
Hb, median (IQR), g/L	134.0 (122.0, 146.0)	131.0 (118.0, 142.0)	0.175
Anemia, n (%)	18 (17.5)	21 (13.6)	0.896
ASA grade, n (%)			0.608
III level	20 (19.4)	34 (22.1)
≥ IV level	83 (80.6)	120 (77.9)
Entry status, n (%)			0.173
Quiet	50 (48.5)	64 (41.6)
nervous	33 (32.0)	67 (43.5)
confused	20 (19.4)	23 (14.9)
Intraoperative data
Operating time, median (IQR), minutes	299.0 (255.0, 365.0)	290.5 (253.5, 362.5)	0.642
Aortic cross-clamp time, median (IQR), minutes	65.0 (46.0, 95.0)	57.0 (43.0, 95.0)	0.326
CPB, median (IQR), minutes	155.0 (130.0, 188.0)	149.0 (125.0, 186.5)	0.600
Blood loss, median (IQR), ml	800.0 (600.0, 1000.0)	800.0 (600.0, 1000.0)	0.367
Postoperative data
APACHE-II scores, n (%)			< 0.001
< 15	38 (36.9)	111 (72.1)
15–20	46 (44.7)	32 (20.8)
> 20	19 (18.4)	11 (7.1)
Hypoxemia, n (%)	52 (50.5)	25 (16.2)	< 0.001
MBG, mmol	13.1 (11.6, 15.0)	10.7 (9.6, 11.9)	0.001
SDBG, mmol	2.9 (2.2, 3.9)	1.7 (1.3, 2.5)	< 0.001
ICU stay, median (IQR), day	7.0 (5.0, 10.0)	5.0 (4.0, 7.0)	< 0.001
Mechanical ventilation duration, median (IQR), hours	61.0 (37.0, 139.0)	42.5 (27.8, 82.3)	< 0.001
Hospitalization days, median (IQR), day	21.0 (15.0, 26.0)	18.0 (14.0, 25.0)	0.357

Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated

SD Standard Deviation, BMI Body Mass Index, IQR Interquartile, WBC White Blood Cell, RBC Red Blood Cell, Hb Hemoglobin, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, CPB Cardiopulmonary Bypass, APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score, MBG Mean of Blood Glucose, SDBG Standard Deviation of Blood Glucose, ICU Intensive Care Unit

In Table 2, patients are divided into lower GV group and higher GV group using the median cut-off of the standard deviation of blood glucose. There were no statistically significant differences in age, BMI, gender, smoker, drinker, education level, marital status, hypertension, and history of cardiac surgery, etc. Compared with the lower GV group, the length of ICU stay in the higher GV was longer, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P < 0.05).

Table 2

Baseline characteristics of patients with low and high GV

Variables	Lower GV N = 129	Higher GV N = 128	P
Age, mean (SD), years	50.8 ± 12.7	53.1 ± 11.0	0.117
BMI, median IQR, kg/m²	24.8 (22.8, 27.2)	24.2 (22.5, 26.7)	0.575
Male, n (%)	97 (75.2)	97 (75.8)	0.913
Smoker, n (%)	52 (40.3)	45 (35.2)	0.394
Drinker, n (%)	53 (41.1)	48 (37.5)	0.556
High school and above, n (%)	31 (24.0)	25 (19.5)	0.190
Hypertension, n (%)	92 (71.3)	103 (80.5)	0.086
Married, n (%)	127 (98.4)	125 (97.7)	0.645
History of cardiac surgery, n (%)	2 (1.6)	7 (5.5)	0.088
First time blood glucose, median (IQR), mmol	7.0 (5.9, 8.5)	7.2 (6.2, 8.3)	0.274
WBC, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	12.4 ± 3.8	12.2 ± 4.2	0.643
Neutrophil, median (IQR), [× 10⁹/L]	9.2 (5.7, 11.7)	9.0 (5.5, 12.3)	0.880
Lymphocyte, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	6.7 (3.7, 10.4)	7.2 (4.5, 11.5)	0.202
Monocyte, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	4.8 (2.2, 7.7)	5.8 (3.8, 7.9)	0.085
RBC, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	4.3 (4.0, 4.7)	4.4 (3.9, 4.7)	0.909
Platelet, median (IQR), [×10⁹/L]	192.0 (150.0, 234.5)	187.5 (149.3, 225.8)	0.846
Hb, median (IQR), g/L	131.0 (119.5, 141.5)	134.0 (121.0, 145.0)	0.251
Anemia, n (%)	21 (16.3)	18 (14.1)	0.620
Mechanical ventilation duration, median (IQR), hours	45.0 (33.5, 96.0)	48.3 (28.3, 102.2)	0.609
ICU stay, median (IQR), day	6.0 (4.0, 8.0)	6.0 (4.0, 10.0)	0.040
Hospitalization days, median (IQR), day	19.5 (14.3, 25.0)	20.0 (15.0, 27.0)	0.455

Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated

SD Standard Deviation, IQR Interquartile Range, BMI Body Mass Index, GV Glucose Variability, WBC White Blood Cell, RBC Red Blood Cell, Hb Hemoglobin, ICU Intensive Care Unit

As shown in Table 3, after adjusting for age, gender, and BMI in model 1, the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of WBC was 0.932(P > 0.05), which was not correlated with the risk of POD; the AHR of APACHE-II > 20 scores was 2.178(95% CI = 1.108–4.281), the AHR of hypoxemia was 1.563(95% CI = 1.070–2.518), and the AHR of SDBG was 1.436(95% CI = 1.205–1.711), all three increased the risk of delirium(P < 0.05). In Model 2, the AHR of APACHE-II > 20 scores was 2.376(95% CI = 1.342–3.876), the AHR of hypoxemia was 1.778(95% CI = 1.122–2.818), and the AHR of SDBG was 1.418(95% CI = 1.195–1.681), all three remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors(P < 0.05).

Table 3

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of possible predictors of delirium

	Model 1		Model 2
Variables	AHR(95% CIs)	P	AHR(95%CIs)	P
Age, years	1.007 (0.985–1.028)	0.547	1.002 (0.983–1.002)	0.813
BMI, kg/m²	1.029 (0.971–1.091)	0.336	1.021 (0.963–1.083)	0.482
Male	1.381 (0.801–2.381)	0.246	–	–
WBC	0.932 (0.852–1.020)	0.124	0.993 (0.994–1.046)	0.802
First time blood glucose	1.012 (0.968–1.058)	0.607	1.015 (0.973–1.058)	0.931
Neutrophil	1.062 (0.988–1.143)	0.105	–	–
APACHE-II (> 20 scores)	2.178 (1.108–4.281)	0.024	2.376 (1.342–3.876)	0.002
Hypoxemia	1.563 (1.070–2.518)	0.046	1.778 (1.122–2.818)	0.014
SDBG, mmol	1.436 (1.205–1.711)	< 0.001	1.418 (1.195–1.681)	0.001
Mechanical ventilation duration	1.000 (0.999–1.002)	0.791	1.000 (0.998–1.001)	0.931

BMI Body Mass Index, WBC White Blood Cell, APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score, SDBG Standard Deviation of Blood Glucose

According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve of the SDBG was 0.763(P < 0.01). The sensitivity was 81.6%, and the specificity was 57.8%. The area under the curve of the MBG was 0.628(P = 0.001). The sensitivity was 75.7%, and the specificity was 53.2%. The difference of area under the curve between the two groups was statistically significant(P = 0.002), which was shown in Fig. 2.

Discussion

Delirium is a common complication after aortic dissection surgery with an incidence of 32.5 to 52.0% [4], and the results of this study showed that the incidence of delirium was 40.08%, which was consistent with other studies. The area under the curve of the SDBG was greater than the MBG. After adjusting for confounding factors, the SDBG was independently correlated with the risk of delirium.

No matter how the quality of perioperative blood glucose controls in patients who underwent cardiac surgery, blood glucose changes are reported they are related to postoperative complications [20, 21]. Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia have been identified as risk factors for delirium [22, 23], but there are few reports on the relationship between glucose fluctuation and delirium. Keulen et al. [14] shows that delirium is positively associated with hypoglycemia in severe patients with diabetes, but not associated with pronounced glycemic variability. And Heymann et al. [24] found that patients with hyperactive delirium have higher MBG than the non-hyperactive delirium patients. There is no consensus on the relationship between glucose fluctuation and delirium, and this study showed that high glycemic variability increases the risk of postoperative delirium.

Glucose, a simple carbohydrate, is the main source of energy for many cells. Studies have shown that the brain consumes 50% of the total body’s consumption of glucose [25]. Glucose sensory neurons are present in several areas of the brain. The activity of neurons changes with the level of glucose, and the brain function depends on the stable glucose levels, which is why the brain is particularly sensitive to glucose level. Therefore, the blood glucose level needs to be maintained in a narrow physiological range [26]. A study shows that people with diabetes are at least 1.5 times more likely to develop dementia than people without diabetes, further highlighting the effect of glucose changes on brain function and long-term consequences [25]. Both acute and chronic hyperglycemia has been shown to cause oxidative stress, subsequent neuronal damage, and cognitive decline [27], and the reason is closely related to delirium.

At present, the mechanism of blood glucose volatility promoting the development of critical illness and poor prognosis is not clear. However, blood glucose volatility is the biological basis of the human body [28]. According to the theory of oxidative stress, fluctuating hyperglycemia can easily cause oxidative stress than persistent hyperglycemia [29]. The specific mechanism may be that intermittent hyperglycemia can increase the overexpression of reactive oxygen species in the mitochondrial transport chain, thereby promoting oxidative stress response, increasing the apoptosis rate of endothelial cells, and ultimately causing damage to central nervous function [27]. Meanwhile, it has been reported that the oxidative stress of intermittent hyperglycemia is greater than that of sustained hyperglycemia under experimental conditions, which has been confirmed by clinical studies. Besides, high blood glucose will also cause the release of a large number of pro-inflammatory cytokines, resulting in coagulation dysfunction, vascular reactivity abnormalities, and other injuries. However, patients with acute aortic dissection often present intermittent hyperglycemia due to acute illness, surgical stress, drugs, and other reasons, which are closely involved in a central nervous injury.

Cardiopulmonary bypass is the main technology for acute aortic dissection. Inflammatory mediators are released in large quantities during cardiopulmonary bypass cardiac surgery, and the inflammatory state is another common phenomenon of a stress response. The inflammatory response itself has a protective effect on the body. But when the balance between inflammatory and anti-inflammatory is broken, the body shows an inflammatory state and a large number of inflammatory factors in the peripheral circulation enter the central nervous system through various channels, which can cause inflammation in the central nervous system [30]. A large number of studies have suggested that neuron inflammation may be one of the mechanisms of cognitive impairment. Cibelli et al. [31] founds that surgical trauma activates the innate immune system, which in turn triggers an IL-1-mediated inflammatory response in the hippocampus, resulting in memory impairment in mice. Besides, the operation itself is a kind of serious trauma, causing the organism to appear stress state. The imbalance of the central nervous system about noradrenaline and acetylcholine decreases the acetylcholine content, resulting in a series of neurological complications.

There are several limitations to this study. First, the sample size was small, and the relevant conclusions need to be further demonstrated with a larger sample. Second, we only evaluated delirium in ICU patients without long-term follow-up. Finally, continuous glucose monitoring was used to continuously measure blood glucose in recent studies, which the frequency of BG tests in our study may not be enough. In future studies, we will use the continuous glucose monitoring for real-time monitoring of patients.

Conclusions

Glucose variability is associated with the risk of delirium in patients after aortic dissection surgery, and high glycemic variability increases the risk of POD. Therefore, we should pay more attention to it.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Cardiac Surgery of a tertiary care university hospital.

Declarations

The work was conducted at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (Ethical Review No. 2017KY009). All subjects or their families informed consent form to participate in the study.

Parental/guardian consent obtained.

Competing interests

No competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abelha FJ, Luís C, Veiga D, et al. Outcome and quality of life in patients with postoperative delirium during an ICU stay following major surgery. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):257.CrossRef

Sanson G, Khlopenyuk Y, Milocco S, Sartori M, Dreas L, Fabiani A. Delirium after cardiac surgery. Incidence, phenotypes, predisposing and precipitating risk factors, and effects. Heart Lung. 2018;47(4):408–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.04.005.CrossRefPubMed

Smulter N, Lingehall HC, Gustafson Y, Olofsson B, Engström KG. Delirium after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17(5):790–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt323.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Howard DP, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, Perkins J, Silver LE, Rothwell PM, et al. Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control: 10-year results from the Oxford Vascular Study. Circulation. 2013;127(20):2031–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000483.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mangusan RF, Hooper V, Denslow SA, Travis L. Outcomes associated with postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. Am J Crit Care. 2015;24(2):156–63. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2015137.CrossRefPubMed

Siddiqi N, Harrison JK, Clegg A, et al. Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD005563.PubMed

Salluh JI, Wang H, Schneider EB, et al. Outcome of delirium in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350(may19 3):h2538. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2538.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pisani MA, Kong SY, Kasl SV, et al. Days of delirium are associated with 1-year mortality in an older intensive care unit population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(11):1092–7. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200904-0537OC.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Krinsley JS, Maurer P, Holewinski S, Hayes R, McComsey D, Umpierrez GE, et al. Glucose control, diabetes status, and mortality in critically ill patients: the continuum from intensive care unit admission to hospital discharge. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(7):1019–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.04.015.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Doola R, Greer RM, Hurford R, et al. Glycaemic variability and its association with enteral and parenteral nutrition in critically ill ventilated patients. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(4):1707–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.001.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Aramendi I, Burghi G, Manzanares W. Dysglycemia in the critically ill patient: current evidence and future perspectives. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(3):364–72. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20170054.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Bansal B, Carvalho P, Mehta Y, Yadav J, Sharma P, Mithal A, et al. Prognostic significance of glycemic variability after cardiac surgery. J Diabetes Complicat. 2016;30(4):613–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.02.010.CrossRef

13.

Akirov A, Shochat T, Dotan I, Diker-Cohen T, Gorshtein A, Shimon I. Glycemic variability and mortality in patients hospitalized in general surgery wards. Surgery. 2019;166(2):184–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.022.CrossRefPubMed

14.

van Keulen K, Knol W, Belitser SV, Zaal IJ, van der Linden PD, Heerdink ER, et al. Glucose variability during delirium in diabetic and non-diabetic intensive care unit patients: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0205637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205637.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Pape LA, Awais M, Woznicki EM, Suzuki T, Trimarchi S, Evangelista A, et al. Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: 17-year trends from the international registry of acute aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(4):350–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.029.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, et al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1370–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Schoe A, Bakhshi-Raiez F, de Keizer N, van Dissel JT, de Jonge E. Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic-models. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-00975-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Li Y, Yuan D, Li X, Wang S. Risk factors for delirium in intensive care unit and its duration. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020;32(1):62–6.PubMed

19.

Kish L. Survey sampling. J R Stat Soc Ser D (The Statistician). 1995;45(1).

20.

Ogawa S, Okawa Y, Sawada K, Goto Y, Yamamoto M, Koyama Y, et al. Continuous postoperative insulin infusion reduces deep sternal wound infection in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: a propensity-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(2):420–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv106.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Subramaniam B, Lerner A, Novack V, Khabbaz K, Paryente-Wiesmann M, Hess P, et al. Increased glycemic variability in patients with elevated preoperative HbA1C predicts adverse outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(2):277–87. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000100.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Zaal I, Devlin J, Peelen L, et al. A systematic review of risk factors for delirium in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(1):40–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000625.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Inouye S, Westendorp RGJ, Saczynski J. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383(9920):911–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Heymann A, Sander M, Krahne D, Deja M, Weber-Carstens S, MacGuill M, et al. Hyperactive delirium and blood glucose control in critically ill patients. J Int Med Res. 2007;35(5):666–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000703500511.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Scheen AJ. Central nervous system: a conductor orchestrating metabolic regulations harmed by both hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36(Suppl 3):31–8.CrossRef

26.

Sanford AM, Flaherty JH. Do nutrients play a role in delirium? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014;17(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000000022.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Stadler K. Oxidative stress in diabetes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;771:272–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5441-0_21.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Silverstein JH, Steinmetz J, Reichenberg A, Harvey PD, Rasmussen LS. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in patients with preoperative cognitive impairment: which domains are most vulnerable? Anesthesiology. 2007;106(3):431–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200703000-00006.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(6):395–402. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200102083440601.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Cunningham C, Campion S, Lunnon K, Murray CL, Woods JFC, Deacon RMJ, et al. Systemic inflammation induces acute behavioral and cognitive changes and accelerates neurodegenerative disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65(4):304–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07.024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Cibelli M, Fidalgo AR, Terrando N, Ma D, Monaco C, Feldmann M, et al. Role of interleukin-1beta in postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Ann Neurol. 2010;68(3):360–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22082.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Association between glucose variability and postoperative delirium in acute aortic dissection patients: an observational study
verfasst von: Yan-Juan Lin
Ling-Yu Lin
Yan-Chun Peng
Hao-Ruo Zhang
Liang-wan Chen
Xi-Zhen Huang
Qiong Chen
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2021
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1749-8090
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01456-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publisher’s Note

Background

Methods

The aim and design

Participants

Delirium assessment

Data collection

Power and sample size

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Early extubation is associated with improved outcomes after complete surgical repair of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect and hypoplastic pulmonary arteries in pediatric patients

Neonatal repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection accompanied by unilateral lung agenesis and Goldenhar syndrome: a case report

Posterior pericardiotomy to prevent new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials

The use of fibrinolytic therapy for parapneumonic effusion in pregnancy: a case report and a review

MiR-497-5p down-regulates CDCA4 to restrains lung squamous cell carcinoma progression

Vein-first versus artery-first ligation procedure for lung cancer surgery: An updated review

Update Chirurgie