Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BioDrugs 5/2018

01.10.2018 | Original Research Article

Biosimilar Knowledge Among Oncology/Hematology Team Members in Colorado, USA: An Educational Initiative and Follow-Up Survey

verfasst von: Rovshan M. Ismailov, Zaytuna D. Khasanova

Erschienen in: BioDrugs | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

No data exist regarding oncology/hematology team members’ knowledge of and views on biosimilars in Colorado, USA. Published research has suggested that health professionals may have a poor understanding of many issues related to biosimilars.

Objectives

Our goal was to increase oncology/hematology team members’ knowledge of biosimilars and then use an anonymous online survey to assess the knowledge gained. We also aimed to examine oncology/hematology team members’ overall interest in the subject and their motivation to learn more about biosimilars in the future.

Methods

In phase I of the project, we developed printed materials covering many topics related to biosimilars, such as definition, regulation, and interchangeability, and the potential of biosimilars in optimal combination therapy for cancer. We distributed our brochures to each participating oncology/hematology office in Colorado. The oncology/hematology team members were then asked to complete the survey.

Results

A total of 62 team members responded to our survey. Nearly three-quarters of participants were oncology nurses or oncology nurse practitioners. More than 90% of survey respondents identified correct answers about the definition, regulations, interchangeability, safety, cost issues, and use of biosimilars in oncology and in older patients with cancer. Overall, and compared with those who had low levels of interest and motivation, significantly more (p < 0.05) study participants were interested in the subject of biosimilars [57 (92%) vs. 5 (8%)], motivated to learn more about them [59 (95%) vs. 3 (5%)], and interested in sharing information about biosimilars with colleagues and patients [51 (82%) vs. 11 (18%)].

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that oncology/hematology team members participating in our study became familiar with many important issues related to biosimilars. Many survey respondents were highly motivated to participate in future training focused on biosimilars, which should pave the way for new educational projects in the area.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Simoens S. Health economics of market access for biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars. J Med Econ. 2009;12(3):211–8.CrossRefPubMed Simoens S. Health economics of market access for biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars. J Med Econ. 2009;12(3):211–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehr SR, Brook RA. Factors influencing the economics of biosimilars in the US. J Med Econ. 2017;20(12):1268–71.CrossRefPubMed Mehr SR, Brook RA. Factors influencing the economics of biosimilars in the US. J Med Econ. 2017;20(12):1268–71.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen H, Beydoun D, Chien D, Lessor T, McCabe D, Muenzberg M, et al. Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of biosimilars among specialty physicians. Adv Ther. 2017;33(12):2160–72.CrossRefPubMed Cohen H, Beydoun D, Chien D, Lessor T, McCabe D, Muenzberg M, et al. Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of biosimilars among specialty physicians. Adv Ther. 2017;33(12):2160–72.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bordage G, Carlin B, Mazmanian PE. Continuing medical education effect on physician knowledge: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest. 2009;135(3 Suppl):29S–36S.CrossRef Bordage G, Carlin B, Mazmanian PE. Continuing medical education effect on physician knowledge: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest. 2009;135(3 Suppl):29S–36S.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverberg M, Weizberg M, Murano T, Smith JL, Burkhardt JC, Santen SA. What is the prevalence and success of remediation of emergency medicine residents? West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(6):839–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silverberg M, Weizberg M, Murano T, Smith JL, Burkhardt JC, Santen SA. What is the prevalence and success of remediation of emergency medicine residents? West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(6):839–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimenez Verotti CC, de Miranda Torrinhas RS, Pires Corona L, Waitzberg DL. Design of quality indicators for oral nutritional therapy. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31(6):2692–5.PubMed Gimenez Verotti CC, de Miranda Torrinhas RS, Pires Corona L, Waitzberg DL. Design of quality indicators for oral nutritional therapy. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31(6):2692–5.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearson D, Bond MC, Kegg J, Pillow T, Hopson L, Cooney R, et al. Evaluation of social media use by emergency medicine residents and faculty. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(5):715–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pearson D, Bond MC, Kegg J, Pillow T, Hopson L, Cooney R, et al. Evaluation of social media use by emergency medicine residents and faculty. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(5):715–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mircioiu C, Atkinson J. A comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods applied to a Likert scale. Pharmacy (Basel). 2017;5(2):26.CrossRef Mircioiu C, Atkinson J. A comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods applied to a Likert scale. Pharmacy (Basel). 2017;5(2):26.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rugo HS, Cortes J. The new world of biosimilars in oncology: translation of data to the clinic. Eur J Cancer. 2018;96:125–7.CrossRefPubMed Rugo HS, Cortes J. The new world of biosimilars in oncology: translation of data to the clinic. Eur J Cancer. 2018;96:125–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabernero J, Vyas M, Giuliani R, Arnold D, Cardoso F, Casali PG, et al. Biosimilars: a position paper of the European Society for Medical Oncology, with particular reference to oncology prescribers. ESMO Open. 2016;1(6):e000142.CrossRefPubMed Tabernero J, Vyas M, Giuliani R, Arnold D, Cardoso F, Casali PG, et al. Biosimilars: a position paper of the European Society for Medical Oncology, with particular reference to oncology prescribers. ESMO Open. 2016;1(6):e000142.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyman GH. Emerging opportunities and challenges of biosimilars in oncology practice. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(9_suppl):7s–9s.CrossRefPubMed Lyman GH. Emerging opportunities and challenges of biosimilars in oncology practice. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(9_suppl):7s–9s.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schellekens H, Smolen JS, Dicato M, Rifkin RM. Safety and efficacy of biosimilars in oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):e502–9.CrossRefPubMed Schellekens H, Smolen JS, Dicato M, Rifkin RM. Safety and efficacy of biosimilars in oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(11):e502–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rugo HS, Linton KM, Cervi P, Rosenberg JA, Jacobs I. A clinician’s guide to biosimilars in oncology. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;46:73–9.CrossRefPubMed Rugo HS, Linton KM, Cervi P, Rosenberg JA, Jacobs I. A clinician’s guide to biosimilars in oncology. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;46:73–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat van Overbeeke E, De Beleyr B, de Hoon J, Westhovens R, Huys I. Perception of originator biologics and biosimilars: a survey among belgian rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists. BioDrugs. 2017;31(5):447–59.CrossRefPubMed van Overbeeke E, De Beleyr B, de Hoon J, Westhovens R, Huys I. Perception of originator biologics and biosimilars: a survey among belgian rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists. BioDrugs. 2017;31(5):447–59.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman SR, Fitzpatrick RW, Aladul MI. Knowledge, attitude and practice of healthcare professionals towards infliximab and insulin glargine biosimilars: result of a UK web-based survey. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e016730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chapman SR, Fitzpatrick RW, Aladul MI. Knowledge, attitude and practice of healthcare professionals towards infliximab and insulin glargine biosimilars: result of a UK web-based survey. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e016730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Carrera PM, Kantarjian HM, Blinder VS. The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: Understanding and stepping-up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(2):153–65.CrossRefPubMed Carrera PM, Kantarjian HM, Blinder VS. The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: Understanding and stepping-up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(2):153–65.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley CJ. Cancer, financial burden, and medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(22):2461–2.CrossRefPubMed Bradley CJ. Cancer, financial burden, and medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(22):2461–2.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogenberg FR. Biosimilars policy forum: perspectives on safety and efficacy of future products. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2009;2(4):165–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Vogenberg FR. Biosimilars policy forum: perspectives on safety and efficacy of future products. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2009;2(4):165–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Biosimilar Knowledge Among Oncology/Hematology Team Members in Colorado, USA: An Educational Initiative and Follow-Up Survey
verfasst von
Rovshan M. Ismailov
Zaytuna D. Khasanova
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
BioDrugs / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1173-8804
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-190X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0301-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

BioDrugs 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe