We report a patient with metastatic breast cancer who received three cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide [1,000 mg/(m2 day)], thiotepa (80 mg/(m2 day) and carboplatin (dose calculated based on modified Calvert formula with 3.25 mg min/ml as daily target AUC) over 4 days, followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell support. During the first two cycles the patient concomitantly used carbamazepine for the treatment of epilepsy. Due to severe nausea and vomiting the patient was unable to ingest carbamazepine; therefore, this was discontinued after the second cycle.
Methods
Blood samples were drawn on 2 days (day 1 and 2, 3 or 4) of each cycle and plasma levels of cyclophosphamide, its active metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa, its main, active metabolite tepa and carboplatin were determined.
Results
Exposure to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and tepa on day 1 was increased in the presence of carbamazepine (58 and 75%, respectively), while exposure to cyclophosphamide and thiotepa was reduced (40 and 43%, respectively).
Conclusion
Since increased exposure to the active metabolites is associated with an increased risk of toxicity, it is important to be aware of this drug–drug interaction.
Introduction
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support is used in the treatment of several haematological malignancies and solid tumours. Although haematological toxicity is manageable, significant end-organ toxicity may occur [1]. Interpatient variability in drug exposure has been shown to correlate with both toxicity and effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy [2]. Since pharmacokinetics may correlate with outcome, drug–drug interactions between the cytotoxic agents and concomitant medication may be of clinical importance.
Cyclophosphamide is an inactive prodrug and is activated by cytochrome P450 to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. CYP2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 3A4 and 3A5 have been reported to be involved in the 4-hydroxylation, of which CYP2B6 is the most important. Furthermore, cyclophosphamide shows strong autoinduction, resulting in increased clearance of the parent compound and increased formation of its metabolites [3, 4]. Thiotepa is metabolised by CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 to its main metabolite tepa [5]. Thiotepa and tepa have comparable alkylating activity [6].
Anzeige
Here we report the induction of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa metabolism due to carbamazepine, resulting in increased formation of the active metabolites, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and tepa, respectively.
Patient and method
Case
A 52-year-old female patient was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. As part of her treatment she received three cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. This regimen consisted of 4 days of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide [1,000 mg/(m2 day)] as 1 h infusion, immediately followed by carboplatin (dose calculated based on modified Calvert formula with 3.25 mg min/ml as daily target AUC) as 1 h infusion and thiotepa [80 mg/(m2 day)] divided over two 30 min infusions 12 h apart. Mesna (500 mg) was administered six times daily for a total of 36 doses, beginning 1 h prior to the first cyclophosphamide infusion. The three cycles were given with 4 week intervals. The patient prophylactically received antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and fluconazole orally), starting 4 days before chemotherapy. Furthermore, during the chemotherapy cycles the patient received dexamethasone and granisetron. Full details of the tCTC regimen have been published previously [1].
During the first and second cycles the patient received carbamazepine (twice daily 200 mg slow release) and vigabatrin (twice daily 500 mg) orally for the treatment of epilepsy. Due to severe nausea and vomiting, the patient was unable to ingest carbamazepine. Therefore, after the second tCTC cycle anti-epileptic treatment was stopped and not restarted until after the third tCTC cycle.
Pharmacokinetic analysis
For pharmacokinetic analyses, blood samples were collected from a double lumen intravenous catheter inserted in a subclavian vein. Samples were collected on day 1 and 2, 3 or 4 prior to the start of the infusions at 30 min after the start of cyclophosphamide infusion (t = 30) and t = 60 (end of cyclophosphamide infusion), 90, 120 (end of carboplatin infusion), 150 (end of thiotepa infusion), 180, 210, 285, 390, 660 min and when possible at 24 h. Thiotepa, tepa and cyclophosphamide were quantified with a validated gas chromatographic assay as described previously. The lower limits of quantitation for thiotepa, tepa and cyclophosphamide were 5, 5 and 50 ng/mL, respectively [7]. 4-Hydroxycyclophosphamide was determined as a semicarbazone derivative with a previously described and validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The lower limit of quantitation was 50 ng/mL [8].
Anzeige
A previously published population pharmacokinetic model of thiotepa (and its metabolite tepa) and cyclophosphamide (and its metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide) was used for estimating the AUC of all compounds using Bayesian analysis [9]. The Committee on the Medical Ethics of the Netherlands Cancer Institute had approved the protocol and written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Results
Plasma concentration versus time curves of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide of all three cycles are shown in Fig. 1 in combination with the model fitted curves. As can be seen in Fig. 1A, cyclophosphamide clearance on day 1 was increased in the presence of carbamazepine, resulting in a lower cyclophosphamide AUC with a concomitant increase in 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide AUC (Table 1). Furthermore, in the absence of carbamazepine, a more pronounced autoinduction of cyclophosphamide was observed. Cyclophosphamide clearance increased during the 4 days of cycle 3 (Fig. 1a) and the Cmax of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide was increased on day 4 compared to day 1 (1.9 vs. 0.99 µg/mL) of cycle 3 (Fig. 1b). In the presence of carbamazepine, no autoinduction could be identified.
Fig. 1
Plasma concentration versus time curves of a cyclophosphamide (CP 1,780 mg) and b 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4OHCP) in three high-dose tCTC chemotherapy cycles, the first and second cycles with carbamazepine and the third cycle without carbamazepine
Table 1
Effect of carbamazepine on the AUC of day 1 of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and metabolites
Compounds
Cycles 1 and 2 with carbamazepine mean AUC day 1 (AUC cycle 1–AUC cycle 2)
Cycle 3 without carbamazepine AUC day 1
Difference (%)
Cyclophosphamide
0.57 (0.59–0.56) mM h
0.95 mM h
−40
4-Hydroxycyclophosphamide
31.2 (31.8–30.5) μM h
19.7 μM h
58
Thiotepa
11.8 (12.3–11.4) μM h
20.6 μM h
−43
Tepa
50.3 (50.7–50.0) μM h
28.8 μM h
75
×
Figure 2 shows the plasma concentration versus time curves of thiotepa and tepa. Thiotepa clearance was increased in the presence of carbamazepine (Fig. 2a), resulting in a lower plasma exposure of thiotepa, with a concomitant increase in tepa AUC (Table 1).
Fig. 2
Plasma concentration versus time curves of a thiotepa (TT 70 mg) and b tepa (T), in three high-dose tCTC chemotherapy cycles; filled diamond, the first cycle (with carbamazepine); filled square, the second cycle (with carbamazepine); and open triangle, the third cycle (without carbamazepine)
×
Tables 1 and 2 show the effects of carbamazepine on the AUCs of cyclophosphamide, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa and tepa on day 1 and during the whole course, respectively. From these tables it can be seen that the effects of carbamazepine on cyclophosphamide and thiotepa pharmacokinetics are more pronounced during the first day of the course.
Table 2
Effect of carbamazepine on the overall AUC of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and metabolites
Compounds
Cycles 1 and 2 with carbamazepine mean AUC (AUC cycle 1–AUC cycle 2)
Cycle 3 without carbamazepine AUC
Difference (%)
Cyclophosphamide
2.5 (2.7–2.3) mM h
3.1 mM h
−19
4-Hydroxycyclophosphamide
122 (123–120) μM h
95 μM h
28
Thiotepa
46.4 (48.0–44.8) μM h
94.0 μM h
−51
Tepa
233 (228–239) μM h
191 μM h
22
The pharmacokinetics of carboplatin were similar during the three cycles. Besides severe nausea and vomiting during cycles 2 and 3, no other toxicity was observed during the three cycles.
Discussion
Here we report an increase in cyclophosphamide and thiotepa metabolism caused by co-administration of carbamazepine. Furthermore, in the presence of carbamazepine, autoinduction of cyclophosphamide is not detectable.
Carbamazepine acts as an anti-convulsant for partial and grand mal seizures. The activity of a variety of cyctochrome P450 enzymes, including CYP1A2, CYP2B, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 is induced by carbamazepine [10‐12].
Co-administration with carbamazepine is known to decrease values of mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve of many drugs, resulting in a need to increase the dose of these agents. Carbamazepine and other anticonvulsant drugs have also shown to increase the systemic clearance of chemotherapy, resulting in lower efficacy [13].
Anzeige
The increase in cyclophosphamide and thiotepa clearance observed, may be caused by the induction of CYP enzymes 2B6 and 3A4 which are mainly involved in cyclophosphamide and thiotepa metabolism. The absence of autoinduction of cyclophosphamide in the presence of carbamazepine is probably due to the metabolising enzymes already being induced by carbamazepine.
The effect of carbamazepine was more pronounced during the first day of the course. The overall AUC of the several compounds was only moderately affected by carbamazepine. This could be due to cyclophosphamide also being an inducer of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4, thereby increasing its own metabolism and the metabolism of thiotepa, if carbamazepine is absent, and therefore producing the same effect as carbamazepine [9].
For both cyclophosphamide and thiotepa, studies have demonstrated that alterations in liver CYP enzyme composition and activity have a major impact on the pharmacokinetics of these agents [14‐17]. Xie et al. [18] found one patient with a very high 4-hydroxylation activity in their study into the pharmacogenetics of cyclophosphamide in patients with haematological malignancies. Different from the other patients, this patient was treated with carbamazepine. No other reports have been published, to our knowledge, on the induction of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa metabolism by carbamazepine.
The patient in our report also received vigabatrin. It is unlikely that vigabatrin caused this interaction since vigabatrin does not induce the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system [19].
Anzeige
This report shows that carbamazepine induces the metabolism of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. This interaction will predominantly be important in single-dose administrations. Increases in exposure to the active metabolites could lead to increased toxicity.
Since the effect of changes in enzyme activity can vary substantially between patients and because of the unpredictability of the magnitude of this effect, it is recommended that carbamazepine is used with precaution with cyclophosphamide and thiotepa.
In a previous report a significant induction of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa metabolism by phenytoin was described [20]. When seizure control is necessary in patients receiving concomitant chemotherapy, drugs that do not influence the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system (gabapentin and levetiracetam) are to be preferred [21].
Acknowledgment
This work was supported with a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society (project NKI 2005–3418).
Anzeige
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.
Welchen Nutzen es trägt, wenn die Strahlentherapie nach radikaler Prostatektomie um eine Androgendeprivation ergänzt wird, hat die RADICALS-HD-Studie untersucht. Nun liegen die Ergebnisse vor. Sie sprechen für länger dauernden Hormonentzug.
Darmkrebserkrankungen in jüngeren Jahren sind ein zunehmendes Problem, das häufig längere Zeit übersehen wird, gerade weil die Patienten noch nicht alt sind. Welche Anzeichen Ärzte stutzig machen sollten, hat eine Metaanalyse herausgearbeitet.
Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.
Update Onkologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
