nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.06.2012 | Case Report

Clinical, radiological, histological and retrieval findings of Activ-L and Mobidisc total disc replacements: a study of two patients

verfasst von: Shennah Austen, Ilona M. Punt, Jack P. M. Cleutjens, Paul C. Willems, Steven M. Kurtz, Daniel W. MacDonald, Lodewijk W. van Rhijn, André van Ooij

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Sonderheft 4/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

This study evaluates the short-term clinical outcome, radiological, histological and device retrieval findings of two patients with second generation lumbar total disc replacement (TDR).

Materials and methods

The first patient had a single level L4-L5 Activ-L TDR, the second patient a L4-L5 Mobidisc and L5-S1 Activ-L TDR. The TDRs were implanted elsewhere and had implantation times between 1.3 and 2.8 years.

Results

Plain radiographs and CT-scanning showed slight subsidence of the Activ-L TDR in both patients and facet joint degeneration. The patients underwent revision surgery because of recurrent back and leg pain. After removal of the TDR and posterolateral fusion, the pain improved. Histological examination revealed large ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) particles and giant cells in the retrieved tissue surrounding the Mobidisc. The particles in the tissue samples of the Activ-L TDR were smaller and contained in macrophages. Retrieval analysis of the UHMWPE cores revealed evidence of minor adhesive and abrasive wear with signs of impingement in both TDR designs.

Conclusion

Although wear was unrelated to the reason for revision, this study demonstrates the presence of UHMWPE particles and inflammatory cells in second generation TDR. Long-term follow-up after TDR is indicated for monitoring wear and implant status.

Yajun W, Yue Z, Xiuxin H, Cui C (2010) A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 19:1250–1261PubMedCrossRef

Bono CM, Garfin SR (2004) History and evolution of disc replacement. Spine J 4:145S–150SPubMedCrossRef

Kurtz SM (2009) Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacement and medical devices. In: UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, Goldfarb N, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1701–1707CrossRef

Chung SK, Kim YE, Wang KC (2009) Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1281–1286CrossRef

Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Wright TM (2003) The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:412–417PubMedCrossRef

Steib J, Aubourg L, Beaurain J (2008) Mobidisc prosthesis. In: Yue JJ (ed) Motion preservation surgery of the spine. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 326–329CrossRef

van den Eerenbeemt KD, Ostelo RW, van Royen BJ, Peul WC, van Tulder MW (2010) Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 19:1262–1280PubMedCrossRef

Ha SK, Kim SH, Kim DH, Park JY, Lim DJ, Lee SK (2009) Biomechanical study of lumbar spinal arthroplasty with a semi-constrained artificial disc (activ L) in the human cadaveric spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 45:169–175PubMedCrossRef

10.

Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G (2009) Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24:135–142CrossRef

11.

Moumene M, Geisler FH (2007) Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1840–1851CrossRef

12.

Delécrin J, Allain J, Steib J, Beucrain J, Dufour T, Chataigner H, Gau M, Huppert J, Onimus M, Zeegers W (2008) Mobidisc lumbar arthroplasty: Multi-center study with 2 years follow-up. In: 9th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Nice, France

13.

Yue JJ (2010) A prospective clinical comparison of 3 biomechanical types of lumbar total disc replacements: A semi-constrained device, a controlled translation device, and an unconstrained device, minimum 2 year follow-up. In: Annual Conference of the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Perpignan, France

14.

Punt IM, Cleutjens JP, de Bruin T, Willems PC, Kurtz SM, van Rhijn LW, Schurink GW, van Ooij A (2009) Periprosthetic tissue reactions observed at revision of total intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Biomaterials 30:2079–2084PubMedCrossRef

15.

Kurtz SM, van Ooij A, Ross R, de Waal Malefijt J, Peloza J, Ciccarelli L, Villarraga ML (2007) Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. Spine J 7:12–21PubMedCrossRef

16.

Punt I, Baxter R, van Ooij A, Willems P, van Rhijn L, Kurtz S, Steinbeck M (2011) Submicron sized ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particle analysis from revised SB Charite III total disc replacements. Acta Biomater 7:3404–3411PubMedCrossRef

17.

Punt IM, Austen S, Cleutjens JP, Kurtz SM, Ten Broeke RH, van Rhijn LW, Willems PC, Ooij AV (2011) Are periprosthetic tissue reactions observed after revision of total disc replacement comparable to the reactions observed after total hip or knee revision surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (in press)

18.

Gallo J, Raska M, Mrazek F, Petrek M (2008) Bone remodeling, particle disease and individual susceptibility to periprosthetic osteolysis. Physiol Res 57:339–349PubMed

19.

Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA (2002) A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17:649–661CrossRef

20.

Mirra JM, Amstutz HC, Matos M, Gold R (1976) The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:221–240PubMed

21.

de Maat GH, Punt IM, van Rhijn LW, Schurink GW, van Ooij A (2009) Removal of the Charite lumbar artificial disc prosthesis: surgical technique. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:334–339PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kurtz SM, MacDonald D, Ianuzzi A, van Ooij A, Isaza J, Ross ER, Regan J (2009) The natural history of polyethylene oxidation in total disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2369–2377CrossRef

23.

Costa L, Bracco P, Brach del Prever EM, Kurtz SM, Gallinaro P (2006) Oxidation and oxidation potential in contemporary packaging for polyethylene total joint replacement components. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 78:20–26PubMed

24.

Kurtz SM (2008) Wear in highly crosslinked polyethylenes. Curr Orthop 22:392–399CrossRef

25.

Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Miyaguchi M, Kadoya Y, Ohashi H, Takaoka K (2004) Characteristics of polyethylene wear particles isolated from synovial fluid after mobile-bearing and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 71:1–6PubMedCrossRef

26.

Hirakawa K, Bauer TW, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH, Borden LS (1996) Characterization of debris adjacent to failed knee implants of 3 different designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:151–158PubMedCrossRef

27.

Kurtz SM, Austin MS, Azzam K, Sharkey PF, MacDonald DW, Medel FJ, Hozack WJ (2010) Mechanical properties, oxidation, and clinical performance of retrieved highly cross-linked Crossfire liners after intermediate-term implantation. J Arthroplast 25(614–623):e611–e612

28.

Currier BH, Currier JH, Mayor MB, Lyford KA, Collier JP, Van Citters DW (2007) Evaluation of oxidation and fatigue damage of retrieved crossfire polyethylene acetabular cups. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2023–2029PubMedCrossRef

29.

Nam D, Kepler CK, Nho SJ, Craig EV, Warren RF, Wright TM (2010) Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:1003–1012CrossRef

30.

Day JS, Macdonald DW, Olsen M, Getz C, Williams GR, Kurtz SM (2011) Polyethylene wear in retrieved reverse total shoulder components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (in press)

31.

Scholz J, Woolf CJ (2007) The neuropathic pain triad: neurons, immune cells and glia. Nat Neurosci 10:1361–1368PubMedCrossRef

32.

Thacker MA, Clark AK, Marchand F, McMahon SB (2007) Pathophysiology of peripheral neuropathic pain: immune cells and molecules. Anesth Analg 105:838–847PubMedCrossRef

33.

Siepe CJ, Zelenkov P, Sauri-Barraza JC, Szeimies U, Grubinger T, Tepass A, Stabler A, Mayer MH (2010) The fate of facet joint and adjacent level disc degeneration following total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1991–2003CrossRef

34.

Schmidt H, Midderhoff S, Adkins K, Wilke HJ (2009) The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4–5 segment. Eur Spine J 18:1695–1705PubMedCrossRef

35.

Siepe CJ, Korge A, Grochulla F, Mehren C, Mayer HM (2008) Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations. Eur Spine J 17:44–56PubMedCrossRef

36.

Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC (2003) Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S110–S117CrossRef

37.

Ahn DK, Park HS, Choi DJ, Kim KS, Yang SJ (2010) Survival and prognostic analysis of adjacent segments after spinal fusion. Clin Orthop Surg 2:140–147PubMedCrossRef

38.

Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee SW, Ahn YJ, Kim YT, Lee DH, Lee MY (2009) Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 18:1637–1643PubMedCrossRef

39.

Ching AC, Birkenmaier C, Hart RA (2010) Short segment coronal plane deformity after two-level lumbar total disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:44–50CrossRef

40.

Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A (2007) Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:782–790CrossRef

41.

Huppert J, Beaurain J, Steib JP, Bernard P, Dufour T, Hovorka I, Stecken J, Dam-Hieu P, Fuentes JM, Vital JM, Vila T, Aubourg L (2011) Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement. Eur Spine J 20:1417–1426PubMedCrossRef

42.

Gstoettner M, Heider D, Liebensteiner M, Bach CM (2008) Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 17:1470–1475PubMedCrossRef

43.

Spivak JM, Petrizzo AM (2010) Revision of a lumbar disc arthroplasty following late infection. Eur Spine J 19:677–681PubMedCrossRef

44.

Tropiano P (2010) Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “Revision of a lumbar disc arthroplasty following late infection” (by Jeffrey M. Spivak and Anthony M. Petrizzo). Eur Spine J 19:682–684PubMedCrossRef

45.

Patel AA, Brodke DS, Pimenta L, Bono CM, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Riew KD, Youssef JA, Vaccaro AR (2008) Revision strategies in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1276–1283CrossRef

46.

Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, Kurtz SM, Antonis J, Schurink GW, van Ooij A (2008) Complications and reoperations of the SB Charite lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 17:36–43PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Clinical, radiological, histological and retrieval findings of Activ-L and Mobidisc total disc replacements: a study of two patients
verfasst von: Shennah Austen
Ilona M. Punt
Jack P. M. Cleutjens
Paul C. Willems
Steven M. Kurtz
Daniel W. MacDonald
Lodewijk W. van Rhijn
André van Ooij
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe Sonderheft 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2141-7

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Clinical, radiological, histological and retrieval findings of Activ-L and Mobidisc total disc replacements: a study of two patients