Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019

21.05.2019 | Breast Oncology

Clinical Validation of the BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module

verfasst von: Ilona Stolpner, Jörg Heil, MD, Manuel Feißt, MSc, Maria Margarete Karsten, MD, Walter P. Weber, MD, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, MD, Tobias Forster, MD, Michael Golatta, MD, Florian Schütz, MD, Christof Sohn, MD, André Hennigs, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The BREAST-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after breast surgery. The aim of this study is to test the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the most recently developed BREAST-Q module for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in a prospective clinical cohort.

Methods

The BREAST-Q BCT module was translated into German according to international guidelines. A total of 253 women with primary breast cancer undergoing BCT were recruited preoperatively. This study evaluated the BREAST-Q BCT subscales by using psychometric methods including acceptability, reliability, and validity. To examine construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity were determined by testing the instrument’s scales against the EORTC C30 and BR23 as reference questionnaires.

Results

Acceptability was supported by a high follow-up rate (90%) and low frequency of missing data (< 10%) in all but three scales. Scale reliability was supported by high Cronbach’s alpha coefficients (> 0.86) and item-total correlations (range of means, 0.33–0.89). Validity was shown by convergent and divergent correlations. The hypotheses of relationships between the scales of the BREAST-Q and the EORTC QLQ C30 BR23 revealed moderate to high correlations.

Conclusions

The BREAST-Q BCT module proved to be an accepted, reliable, and valid questionnaire for the assessment of HRQOL and patient satisfaction after BCT in breast cancer patients. It can be recommended as a possible standard PROM for individual clinical analysis, quality assessment, and future trials.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Héry C, Autier P, Sankaranarayanan R. Global burden of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Epidemiol: Springer; 2010:1–19. Ferlay J, Héry C, Autier P, Sankaranarayanan R. Global burden of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Epidemiol: Springer; 2010:1–19.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. Mar 1 2015;136(5):E359–386.CrossRef Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. Mar 1 2015;136(5):E359–386.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2008;27(1):1.CrossRef Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2008;27(1):1.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholson RM, Leinster S, Sassoon EM. A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction. Breast. 2007;16(4):396–410.CrossRef Nicholson RM, Leinster S, Sassoon EM. A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction. Breast. 2007;16(4):396–410.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Curran D, Van Dongen J, Aaronson N, et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(3):307–314.CrossRef Curran D, Van Dongen J, Aaronson N, et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(3):307–314.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Krishnan L, Stanton AL, Collins CA, Liston VE, Jewell WR 2001 Form or function? Part 2: Objective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 91(12):2282–2287.CrossRef Krishnan L, Stanton AL, Collins CA, Liston VE, Jewell WR 2001 Form or function? Part 2: Objective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 91(12):2282–2287.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(11):940–947.CrossRef Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(11):940–947.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang HT, Barone CM, Steigelman MB, et al. Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthetic Surg J. 2008;28(2):165–170.CrossRef Wang HT, Barone CM, Steigelman MB, et al. Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthetic Surg J. 2008;28(2):165–170.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Reaby LL, Hort LK, Vandervord J. Body image, self-concept, and self-esteem in women who had a mastectomy and either wore an external breast prosthesis or had breast reconstruction and women who had not experienced mastectomy. Health Care Women Int. 1994;15(5):361–375.CrossRef Reaby LL, Hort LK, Vandervord J. Body image, self-concept, and self-esteem in women who had a mastectomy and either wore an external breast prosthesis or had breast reconstruction and women who had not experienced mastectomy. Health Care Women Int. 1994;15(5):361–375.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Javid SH, Lawrence SO, Lavallee DC. Prioritizing patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer surgery quality improvement. Breast J. Mar 2017;23(2):127–137.CrossRef Javid SH, Lawrence SO, Lavallee DC. Prioritizing patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer surgery quality improvement. Breast J. Mar 2017;23(2):127–137.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Der Wees PJ, Nijhuis Van Der Sanden MW, Ayanian JZ, Black N, Westert GP, Schneider EC (2014) Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries. Milbank Q 92(4):754–775.CrossRef Van Der Wees PJ, Nijhuis Van Der Sanden MW, Ayanian JZ, Black N, Westert GP, Schneider EC (2014) Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries. Milbank Q 92(4):754–775.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al (2007) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(4):823–837.CrossRef Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al (2007) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(4):823–837.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Noh DY, Nam SJ, Ahn SH, et al. Association of clinical experiences with patient-reported outcomes among breast cancer surgery patients: breast cancer quality care study. Qual Life Res. Mar 2008;17(2):215–225.CrossRef Noh DY, Nam SJ, Ahn SH, et al. Association of clinical experiences with patient-reported outcomes among breast cancer surgery patients: breast cancer quality care study. Qual Life Res. Mar 2008;17(2):215–225.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Boone WJ (2016) Rasch analysis for instrument development why when and how. CBE Life Sci Ed 15(4):4.CrossRef Boone WJ (2016) Rasch analysis for instrument development why when and how. CBE Life Sci Ed 15(4):4.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley, New York, 2013. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley, New York, 2013.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. May 2002;11(3):193–205.CrossRef Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. May 2002;11(3):193–205.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Health UDo, Evaluation HSFCfD, Research, et al. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:1-20. Health UDo, Evaluation HSFCfD, Research, et al. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:1-20.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 2009;124(2):345–353.CrossRef Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 2009;124(2):345–353.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connell RL, DiMicco R, Khabra K, et al. Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Nov 2016;160(1):79–89.CrossRef O’Connell RL, DiMicco R, Khabra K, et al. Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Nov 2016;160(1):79–89.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McKenna SP, Heaney A, Wilburn J, Stenner AJ. Measurement of patient-reported outcomes. 1: The search for the Holy Grail. J Med Econ. 2019:1–7. McKenna SP, Heaney A, Wilburn J, Stenner AJ. Measurement of patient-reported outcomes. 1: The search for the Holy Grail. J Med Econ. 2019:1–7.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167.CrossRef Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Acquadro C, ed Linguistic validation manual for health outcome assessments. New ed. Lyon: Mapi Research Institute; 2012. Acquadro C, ed Linguistic validation manual for health outcome assessments. New ed. Lyon: Mapi Research Institute; 2012.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–376. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–376.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Letellier ME, Dawes D, Mayo N. Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Qual Life Res. Mar 2015;24(3):757–768.CrossRef Letellier ME, Dawes D, Mayo N. Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Qual Life Res. Mar 2015;24(3):757–768.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Michels FA, Latorre Mdo R, Maciel Mdo S. Validity, reliability and understanding of the EORTC-C30 and EORTC-BR23, quality of life questionnaires specific for breast cancer. Rev Bras Epidemiol. Jun 2013;16(2):352–363.CrossRef Michels FA, Latorre Mdo R, Maciel Mdo S. Validity, reliability and understanding of the EORTC-C30 and EORTC-BR23, quality of life questionnaires specific for breast cancer. Rev Bras Epidemiol. Jun 2013;16(2):352–363.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP, et al. Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England. J Plast Recon Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(10):1333–1344.CrossRef Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP, et al. Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England. J Plast Recon Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(10):1333–1344.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED, Chung KC. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. May 2014;155(5):799–808.CrossRef Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED, Chung KC. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. May 2014;155(5):799–808.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Heil J, Holl S, Golatta M, et al. Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast. Dec 2010;19(6):470–474.CrossRef Heil J, Holl S, Golatta M, et al. Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast. Dec 2010;19(6):470–474.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey R. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(6):571–573.CrossRef Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey R. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(6):571–573.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich M, Lesur A, Perdrizet-Chevallier C. Depression, quality of life and breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(1):9–17.CrossRef Reich M, Lesur A, Perdrizet-Chevallier C. Depression, quality of life and breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(1):9–17.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fingeret MC, Teo I, Epner DE. Managing body image difficulties of adult cancer patients: lessons from available research. Cancer. 2014;120(5):633–641.CrossRef Fingeret MC, Teo I, Epner DE. Managing body image difficulties of adult cancer patients: lessons from available research. Cancer. 2014;120(5):633–641.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3331–3337.CrossRef Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3331–3337.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu J, Groot G, Boden C, Busch A, Holtslander L, Lim H. Review of factors influencing women’s choice of mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review. Clin Breast Cancer. Jan 3 2018. Gu J, Groot G, Boden C, Busch A, Holtslander L, Lim H. Review of factors influencing women’s choice of mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review. Clin Breast Cancer. Jan 3 2018.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Efficace F, Bottomley A, Coens C, et al. Does a patient’s self-reported health-related quality of life predict survival beyond key biomedical data in advanced colorectal cancer? Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(1):42–49.CrossRef Efficace F, Bottomley A, Coens C, et al. Does a patient’s self-reported health-related quality of life predict survival beyond key biomedical data in advanced colorectal cancer? Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(1):42–49.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta D, Rodeghier M, Lis CG. Patient satisfaction with service quality as a predictor of survival outcomes in breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. January 01 2014;22(1):129–134.CrossRef Gupta D, Rodeghier M, Lis CG. Patient satisfaction with service quality as a predictor of survival outcomes in breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. January 01 2014;22(1):129–134.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 2012;129(2):293–302.CrossRef Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 2012;129(2):293–302.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright BD, Mok M. Understanding Rasch measurement: Rasch models overview. J Appl Measure. 2000. Wright BD, Mok M. Understanding Rasch measurement: Rasch models overview. J Appl Measure. 2000.
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical Validation of the BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module
verfasst von
Ilona Stolpner
Jörg Heil, MD
Manuel Feißt, MSc
Maria Margarete Karsten, MD
Walter P. Weber, MD
Jens-Uwe Blohmer, MD
Tobias Forster, MD
Michael Golatta, MD
Florian Schütz, MD
Christof Sohn, MD
André Hennigs, MD
Publikationsdatum
21.05.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07456-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.