Anzeige
Erschienen in:
20.08.2019 | Original Paper
Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2020
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
To compare the difference between biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) and noncontact IOP measurement (IOPNCT) and to investigate the effect of corneal biomechanical properties on IOP.
Methods
IOP was evaluated in 1046 myopic eyes (544 subjects) using a conventional noncontact tonometer and a novel corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST). Corneal biomechanical parameters were measured using the Corvis ST.
Results
The mean IOPNCT and bIOP values were significantly different (15.59 ± 2.56 mmHg and 15.89 ± 1.75 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001). The bIOP showed a less correlation with central corneal thickness (CCT), compared with IOPNCT (P < 0.01). The IOPNCT was lower than the bIOP when the thickness of cornea was ≤ 550 μm but higher than bIOP when it was ≥ 550 μm (P < 0.01). A strong association was found between IOPNCT and deflection amplitude and deflection area at the highest concavity (HC DefA and HC DefArea), stiff parameter, maximum deformation amplitude (DAmax), and maximum deflection amplitude (DefAmax), as well as for bIOP (r > 0.500, P < 0.001). The bIOP could be calculated based on IOPNCT according to different values of CCT (P < 0.01).
Conclusions
The bIOP was less affected by CCT as compared to IOPNCT. IOPNCT may be underestimated when the cornea is thinner and overestimated when the cornea is thicker because of the difference in corneal biomechanics.