Introduction
Bacterial surface contamination is an important reservoir for micro-organisms and a potential route for transmission. ATP bioluminescence is a relatively new method to assess environmental contamination, and gives direct results.
Objectives
We compared ATP bioluminescence with aerobic colony count and presence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae.
Methods
The study was performed in a nursing home in the Netherlands during an outbreak of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, mainly Escherichia coli. During 5 consecutive surveys, ATP measurements (3M, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands) were performed on several predefined surfaces. ATP measurements were combined with aerobic colony count, using Rodac agar plates in 2 surveys, and selective culture for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in 3 surveys. ATP bioluminescence was expressed in relative light units (RLU), AAC was expressed in cfu/cm2;for the analysis a Natural Logarithmic transformation was performed to obtain an normal distribution of the values (LnRLU and LnCFU).
Results
In total we performed 483 ATP-measurements, 197 ACC cultures and 285 ESBL-selective cultures. Toilet seats were significantly associated with higher RLU (P<0.001), higher prevalence of more than 40 cfu/cm2on aerobic colony count, but not with difference in prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (P=0.31), compared to water taps, kitchen- and living room areas.
The ATP and ACC results of the 98 paired samples showed a good correlation between LnRLU and LnCFU(R2=0.277; P<0.001). Furthermore, LnRLU of the sample sites which yielded an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was significantly higher than of other the sites (P=0.016).
Conclusion
Our study showed that ATP bioluminescence has a good correlation with bacterial contamination determined of surfaces. Furthermore, we did find a significant correlation between LnRLU and surface contamination with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. In conclusion, ATP bioluminescence is a valid replacement for measuring the bacterial contamination of surfaces, and can be a useful tool for direct feedback to assess cleaning properties.
Disclosure of interest
I. Overdevest: None declared, I. Willemsen: None declared, Y. Hendriks: None declared, C. Verhulst: None declared, J. Kluytmans Consultant for: Pfizer, biomerieux, 3M.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.