Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 7/2019

01.04.2019 | Hepatobiliary

Comparison of CT methods for determining graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation

verfasst von: Mehmet Şeker, Cengiz Erol, Şinasi Sevmiş, Burcu Saka, Afak Durur Karakaya

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) attenuation indices in the assessment of hepatic steatosis by using biopsy as the reference standard.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. 55 Potential donors who underwent both NECT and triphasic CECT and core liver biopsy, were included the study. Average attenuation measurements that were obtained from multiple regions in liver, spleen, and psoas muscle on both unenhanced and CECT were used for analysis. Hepatic attenuation measurements were analyzed with and without normalization with the spleen and psoas muscle. Linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to evaluate the statistical association between CT indices and steatosis at histology.

Results

Linear regression analysis confirmed the strongest correlation between steatosis and normalized measurements of hepatic attenuation with splenic attenuations on hepatic venous phase of CECT scan (R 0.821; R2 0.674 and R 0.816; R2 0.665, respectively). The use of ROC curve analysis also demonstrated that normalized measurements of hepatic attenuation with splenic attenuations on hepatic venous phase of CECT showed high diagnostic performance regarding the qualitative distinction of steatosis (AUC values greater than 0.9).

Conclusion

Attenuation measurements of liver normalized with spleen on hepatic venous phase may be useful in evaluating steatosis in donor candidates with moderate to severe steatosis who are unacceptable for liver donation. In this manner unnecessary liver biopsy may be avoided in those donor candidates.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Trevisani F, Colantoni A, Caraceni P, et al. The use of donor fatty liver for liver transplantation: a challenge or a quagmire? J Hepatol. 1996; 22:114–121.CrossRef Trevisani F, Colantoni A, Caraceni P, et al. The use of donor fatty liver for liver transplantation: a challenge or a quagmire? J Hepatol. 1996; 22:114–121.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam R, Reynes M, Johann M, et al. The outcome of steatotic grafts in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:1538–1540.PubMed Adam R, Reynes M, Johann M, et al. The outcome of steatotic grafts in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:1538–1540.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Behrns KE, Tsiotos GG, DeSouza NF, et al. Hepatic steatosis as a potential risk factor for major hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg.1998;2:292–298.CrossRefPubMed Behrns KE, Tsiotos GG, DeSouza NF, et al. Hepatic steatosis as a potential risk factor for major hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg.1998;2:292–298.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorwal P, Gautam D, Sharma D, et al. Donor biopsy in living donor liver transplantation: is it still relevant in a developing country? Malaysian J Pathol. 2015;37:39–43. Dorwal P, Gautam D, Sharma D, et al. Donor biopsy in living donor liver transplantation: is it still relevant in a developing country? Malaysian J Pathol. 2015;37:39–43.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandhagen D, Fidler J, Rosen C. Evaluation of the donor liver for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003;9(10 Suppl 2):S16–S28.CrossRefPubMed Brandhagen D, Fidler J, Rosen C. Evaluation of the donor liver for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003;9(10 Suppl 2):S16–S28.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat van Werven JR, Marsman HA, Nederveen AJ, Smits NJ, ten Kate FJ, van Gulik TM, et al. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: Comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2010;256:159–68. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091790. van Werven JR, Marsman HA, Nederveen AJ, Smits NJ, ten Kate FJ, van Gulik TM, et al. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: Comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2010;256:159–68. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​10091790.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston RJ, Stamm ER, Lewin JM, et al. Diagnosis of fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast enhanced CT: limitations of liver-minus-spleen attenuation difference measurements. Abdom Imaging 1998;23:409–15.CrossRefPubMed Johnston RJ, Stamm ER, Lewin JM, et al. Diagnosis of fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast enhanced CT: limitations of liver-minus-spleen attenuation difference measurements. Abdom Imaging 1998;23:409–15.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Panicek DM, Giess CS, Schwartz LH. Qualitative assessment of liver for fatty infiltration on contrastenhanced CT: is muscle a better standard of reference than spleen? J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 699–705.CrossRef Panicek DM, Giess CS, Schwartz LH. Qualitative assessment of liver for fatty infiltration on contrastenhanced CT: is muscle a better standard of reference than spleen? J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 699–705.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwasaki M, Takada Y, Hayashi M, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 2004;78:1501–1505.CrossRefPubMed Iwasaki M, Takada Y, Hayashi M, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 2004;78:1501–1505.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Seifalian AM, Chidambaram V, Rolles K, Davidson BR. In vivo demonstration of impaired microcirculation in steatotic human liver grafts. Liver Transpl Surg 1998; 4:71–77.CrossRefPubMed Seifalian AM, Chidambaram V, Rolles K, Davidson BR. In vivo demonstration of impaired microcirculation in steatotic human liver grafts. Liver Transpl Surg 1998; 4:71–77.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Seifalian AM, Piasecki C, Agarwal A, Davidson BR. The effect of graded steatosis on flow in the hepatic parenchymal microcirculation. Transplantation 1999; 68 (6):780–784.CrossRefPubMed Seifalian AM, Piasecki C, Agarwal A, Davidson BR. The effect of graded steatosis on flow in the hepatic parenchymal microcirculation. Transplantation 1999; 68 (6):780–784.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of CT methods for determining graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation
verfasst von
Mehmet Şeker
Cengiz Erol
Şinasi Sevmiş
Burcu Saka
Afak Durur Karakaya
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01993-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Abdominal Radiology 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Fadeout sign of liver

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.