Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Lasers in Medical Science 2/2020

05.07.2019 | Original Article

Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs

verfasst von: Azin Ayatollahi, Aniseh Samadi, Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi, Somayeh Yadangi, Keyvan Nouri, Alireza Firooz

Erschienen in: Lasers in Medical Science | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a novel diode system emitting 755 nm wavelength with conventional 755 nm alexandrite laser in skin types III and IV. It was a randomized, right-left comparison, assessor-blind, clinical study. Sixteen female volunteers age 29.52 ± 9.52 were randomly assigned to receive six treatment sessions using 755 nm diode laser on one axilla and 755 nm alexandrite on the opposite axilla. Efficacy was assessed by counting of hairs per square centimeter, 6 months after the last treatment. Treatment outcome was also evaluated by blind reviewing of before and after pictures, using Physician Global Assessment scale (GAS). Subject satisfaction was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS), pain level and adverse effects were recorded. Skin biophysical parameters (transepidermal water loss, skin sebum, and erythema index) were also measured. Significant reduction in hair count was observed, 6 months after the last treatment session, for both devices (− 33% for 755 nm diode and − 35% for 755 nm alexandrite; p value = 0.85). The mean GAS score was 2.66 for alexandrite treated side vs. 2.00 for diode treated side (p value = 0.036). No severe adverse events were reported. The subject satisfaction score was significantly higher after treatment with alexandrite laser. No significant changes were detected in none of skin biophysical parameters. 755 nm diode laser is suitable for hair removal procedures and it is as effective and safe as the 755 nm alexandrite laser in skin types III–IV.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W, Flotte T, Anderson RR (1996) Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol 35(6):889–894CrossRefPubMed Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W, Flotte T, Anderson RR (1996) Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol 35(6):889–894CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahimi OA, Avram MM, Hanke CW, Kilmer SL, Anderson RR (2011) Laser hair removal. Dermatol Ther 24:94–107CrossRefPubMed Ibrahimi OA, Avram MM, Hanke CW, Kilmer SL, Anderson RR (2011) Laser hair removal. Dermatol Ther 24:94–107CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 220:524–527CrossRefPubMed Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 220:524–527CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ (2001) Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 29:416–432CrossRefPubMed Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ (2001) Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 29:416–432CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouzari N, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, Firooz A, Dowlati Y (2004) Laser hair removal: comparison of long-pulsed Nd:YAG, long-pulsed alexandrite, and long-pulsed diode lasers. Dermatol Surg 30(4 Pt 1):498–502PubMed Bouzari N, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, Firooz A, Dowlati Y (2004) Laser hair removal: comparison of long-pulsed Nd:YAG, long-pulsed alexandrite, and long-pulsed diode lasers. Dermatol Surg 30(4 Pt 1):498–502PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouzari N, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, Firooz A, Dowlati Y (2005) Hair removal using an 800-nm diode laser: comparison at different treatment intervals of 45, 60, and 90 days. Int J Dermatol 44(1):50–53CrossRefPubMed Bouzari N, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, Firooz A, Dowlati Y (2005) Hair removal using an 800-nm diode laser: comparison at different treatment intervals of 45, 60, and 90 days. Int J Dermatol 44(1):50–53CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Davoudi SM, Behnia F, Gorouhi F, Keshavarz S, Nassiri Kashani M, Rashighi Firoozabadi M, Firooz A (2008) Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up. Arch Dermatol 144(10):1323–1327CrossRefPubMed Davoudi SM, Behnia F, Gorouhi F, Keshavarz S, Nassiri Kashani M, Rashighi Firoozabadi M, Firooz A (2008) Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up. Arch Dermatol 144(10):1323–1327CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunewald S, Bodendorf MO, Zygouris A, Simon JC, Paasch U (2013) Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser. J Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 46(1):13–19CrossRef Grunewald S, Bodendorf MO, Zygouris A, Simon JC, Paasch U (2013) Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser. J Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 46(1):13–19CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Eremia S, Li C, Newman N (2001) Laser hair removal with alexandrite versus diode laser using four treatment sessions: 1-year results. Dermatol Surg 27(11):925–929 discussion 929-30PubMed Eremia S, Li C, Newman N (2001) Laser hair removal with alexandrite versus diode laser using four treatment sessions: 1-year results. Dermatol Surg 27(11):925–929 discussion 929-30PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao J, Goldman MP (2005) Prospective, comparative evaluation of three laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg 31:1671–1676PubMed Rao J, Goldman MP (2005) Prospective, comparative evaluation of three laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg 31:1671–1676PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Handrick C, Alster TS (2001) Comparison of long-pulsed diode and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers for hair removal: a long-term clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg 27:622–626PubMed Handrick C, Alster TS (2001) Comparison of long-pulsed diode and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers for hair removal: a long-term clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg 27:622–626PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoury JG, Saluja R, Goldman MP (2008) Comparative evaluation of long-pulse alexandrite and long-pulse Nd: YAG laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg 34:665–670PubMed Khoury JG, Saluja R, Goldman MP (2008) Comparative evaluation of long-pulse alexandrite and long-pulse Nd: YAG laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg 34:665–670PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaafar FHMMS, Ismail AH, Mutter KN (2014) Comparison of alexandrite and diode lasers for hair removal in dark and medium skin: which is better? J Lasers Med Sci 5(4):188–193PubMedPubMedCentral Jaafar FHMMS, Ismail AH, Mutter KN (2014) Comparison of alexandrite and diode lasers for hair removal in dark and medium skin: which is better? J Lasers Med Sci 5(4):188–193PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pai G S, Bhat P S, Mallya H , Gold M (2011 ) Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high repetition rate versus high-flounce, lower petition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal - a split-face comparison study . J Cosmet Laser Ther. 13 :134–137CrossRefPubMed Pai G S, Bhat P S, Mallya H , Gold M (2011 ) Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high repetition rate versus high-flounce, lower petition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal - a split-face comparison study . J Cosmet Laser Ther. 13 :134–137CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Haedersdal M, Wulf HC (2006) Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 20(1):9–20CrossRefPubMed Haedersdal M, Wulf HC (2006) Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 20(1):9–20CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Paasch U, Wagner JA, Paasch HW (2015) Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal. J Cosmet Laser Ther 17(4):189–193CrossRefPubMed Paasch U, Wagner JA, Paasch HW (2015) Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal. J Cosmet Laser Ther 17(4):189–193CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nistico SP, Del Duca E, Farnetani F, Guida S, Pellacani G, Rajabi-Estarabadi, Nouri K (2018 ) Removal of unwanted hair: efficacy, tolerability, and safety of long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser equipped with a sapphire handpiece. Lasers Med Sci13. [Epub ahead of print] Nistico SP, Del Duca E, Farnetani F, Guida S, Pellacani G, Rajabi-Estarabadi, Nouri K (2018 ) Removal of unwanted hair: efficacy, tolerability, and safety of long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser equipped with a sapphire handpiece. Lasers Med Sci13. [Epub ahead of print]
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Royo J, Moreno-Moraga J, Trelles MA (2017) Clinical assessment of a new 755 nm diode laser for hair removal: efficacy, safety and practicality in 56 patients. Lasers Surg Med 49(4):355–360CrossRefPubMed Royo J, Moreno-Moraga J, Trelles MA (2017) Clinical assessment of a new 755 nm diode laser for hair removal: efficacy, safety and practicality in 56 patients. Lasers Surg Med 49(4):355–360CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Li W, Liu C, Chen Z, Cai L, Zhou C, Xu Q, Li H, Zhang J (2016) Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18(7):393–339CrossRefPubMed Li W, Liu C, Chen Z, Cai L, Zhou C, Xu Q, Li H, Zhang J (2016) Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18(7):393–339CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg DJ, Ahkami R (1999) Evaluation comparing multiple treatments with a 2-msec and 10-msec alexandrite laser for hair removal. Lasers Surg Med 25:223–228CrossRefPubMed Goldberg DJ, Ahkami R (1999) Evaluation comparing multiple treatments with a 2-msec and 10-msec alexandrite laser for hair removal. Lasers Surg Med 25:223–228CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Eremia S, Li CY, Umar SH, Newman N (2001) Laser hair removal: long-term results with a 755 nm alexandrite laser. Dermatol Surg 27(11):920–924PubMed Eremia S, Li CY, Umar SH, Newman N (2001) Laser hair removal: long-term results with a 755 nm alexandrite laser. Dermatol Surg 27(11):920–924PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasrollahi SA, Hassanzade H, Moradi A, Sabouri M, Samadi A, Kashani MN, Firooz A (2017) Safety assessment of Tretinoin loaded Nano emulsion and nanostructured lipid carriers: a non-invasive trial on human volunteers. Curr Drug Deliv 14(4):575–580CrossRefPubMed Nasrollahi SA, Hassanzade H, Moradi A, Sabouri M, Samadi A, Kashani MN, Firooz A (2017) Safety assessment of Tretinoin loaded Nano emulsion and nanostructured lipid carriers: a non-invasive trial on human volunteers. Curr Drug Deliv 14(4):575–580CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Alavi S, Abolhasani E, Nilforoushzadeh M (2016) Effects of hair removal alexandrite laser on biometric parameters of the skin. Lasers Med Sci 31(3):481–484CrossRefPubMed Alavi S, Abolhasani E, Nilforoushzadeh M (2016) Effects of hair removal alexandrite laser on biometric parameters of the skin. Lasers Med Sci 31(3):481–484CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs
verfasst von
Azin Ayatollahi
Aniseh Samadi
Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi
Somayeh Yadangi
Keyvan Nouri
Alireza Firooz
Publikationsdatum
05.07.2019
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Lasers in Medical Science / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02829-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Lasers in Medical Science 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe