Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2019

25.10.2018

Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment versus endoscopic treatment for early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia larger than 2 cm: a retrospective study

verfasst von: Baisi Yuan, Leilei Liu, Hairong Huang, Demin Li, Yi Shen, Bo Wu, Jiong Liu, Miaofang Yang, Zhenkai Wang, Heng Lu, Yuxiu Liu, Lianming Liao, Fangyu Wang

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

NCCN Guidelines of esophageal cancer recommend that endoscopic therapy is considered “preferred” for patients with limited early-stage disease less than or equal to 2 cm. However, there is currently no definite evidence to support either endoscopic therapy or esophagectomy for early esophageal cancer larger than 2 cm. We aimed to explore the optimal treatment for this condition.

Methods

From January 2010 to June 2016, 116 patients with early esophageal neoplasia [high-grade dysplasia (HGD), lamina propria and muscularis mucosae (T1a) cancer, selected superficial submucosa (T1b) cancer without lymph node metastases] larger than 2 cm and treated either surgically or endoscopically were included.

Results

Endoscopic therapy was performed in 69 patients and esophagectomy in 47 patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 43.8 months in the endoscopic cohort and 49.4 months in the surgical cohort. The overall survival was similar between the two cohorts (97.1% vs. 91.5%, P = 0.18). Survival without readmission for treatment-related complicates was also similar. Minor and severe procedure-related complications occurred more often in the surgical cohort than in the endoscopic cohort (63.8% vs. 43.5% and 8.5% vs. 0 respectively, P < 0.05 for both). Four patients in the endoscopic cohort had to undergo additional esophagectomy and were alive during follow-up. There were no procedure-related deaths in the endoscopic cohort, whereas two deaths occurred in the surgical cohort. Recurrence occurred in nine patients in the endoscopic group (13%): six with local recurrence, one with residual neoplasia and two with metachronous neoplasia. None of them died after repeated endoscopic treatments.

Conclusions

Efficacy was similar between endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy in the treatment of early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia larger than 2 cm and endoscopic therapy was associated with fewer and manageable complications. We recommend endoscopic treatment should be preferred selected for early esophageal neoplasia larger than 2 cm.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Eloubeidi MA, Mason AC, Desmond RA, El-Serag HB (2003) Temporal trends (1973–1997) in survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States: a glimmer of hope? Am J Gastroenterol 98(7):1627–1633PubMed Eloubeidi MA, Mason AC, Desmond RA, El-Serag HB (2003) Temporal trends (1973–1997) in survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States: a glimmer of hope? Am J Gastroenterol 98(7):1627–1633PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Evans JA, Early DS, Chandraskhara V, Chathadi KV, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Foley KQ, Hwang JH, Jue TL, Pasha SF, Sharaf R, Shergill AK, Dominitz JA, Cash BD, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2013) The role of endoscopy in the assessment and treatment of esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 77(3):328–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.001 CrossRef ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Evans JA, Early DS, Chandraskhara V, Chathadi KV, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Foley KQ, Hwang JH, Jue TL, Pasha SF, Sharaf R, Shergill AK, Dominitz JA, Cash BD, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2013) The role of endoscopy in the assessment and treatment of esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 77(3):328–334. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​gie.​2012.​10.​001 CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pech O, Behrens A, May A, Nachbar L, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Manner H, Guenter E, Huijsmans J, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C (2008) Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 57(9):1200–1206. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.142539 CrossRefPubMed Pech O, Behrens A, May A, Nachbar L, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Manner H, Guenter E, Huijsmans J, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C (2008) Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 57(9):1200–1206. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​gut.​2007.​142539 CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ell C, May A, Pech O, Gossner L, Guenter E, Behrens A, Nachbar L, Huijsmans J, Vieth M, Stolte M (2007) Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer). Gastrointest Endosc 65(1):3–10CrossRefPubMed Ell C, May A, Pech O, Gossner L, Guenter E, Behrens A, Nachbar L, Huijsmans J, Vieth M, Stolte M (2007) Curative endoscopic resection of early esophageal adenocarcinomas (Barrett’s cancer). Gastrointest Endosc 65(1):3–10CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chennat J, Konda VJ, Ross AS, de Tejada AH, Noffsinger A, Hart J, Lin S, Ferguson MK, Posner MC, Waxman I (2009) Complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: an American single-center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 104(11):2684–2692. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.465 CrossRefPubMed Chennat J, Konda VJ, Ross AS, de Tejada AH, Noffsinger A, Hart J, Lin S, Ferguson MK, Posner MC, Waxman I (2009) Complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: an American single-center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 104(11):2684–2692. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​ajg.​2009.​465 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters FP, Kara MA, Rosmolen WD, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, van Lanschot JJ, Fockens P, Bergman JJ (2006) Stepwise radical endoscopic resection is effective for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(7):1449–1457CrossRefPubMed Peters FP, Kara MA, Rosmolen WD, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, van Lanschot JJ, Fockens P, Bergman JJ (2006) Stepwise radical endoscopic resection is effective for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(7):1449–1457CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Moraca RJ, Low DE (2006) Outcomes and health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer. Arch Surg 141(6):545–549CrossRefPubMed Moraca RJ, Low DE (2006) Outcomes and health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer. Arch Surg 141(6):545–549CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Thota PN, Sada A, Sanaka MR, Jang S, Lopez R, Goldblum JR, Liu X, Dumot JA, Vargo J, Zuccarro G (2017) Correlation between endoscopic forceps biopsies and endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic ultrasound in patients with Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and early cancer. Surg Endosc 31(3):1336–1341CrossRefPubMed Thota PN, Sada A, Sanaka MR, Jang S, Lopez R, Goldblum JR, Liu X, Dumot JA, Vargo J, Zuccarro G (2017) Correlation between endoscopic forceps biopsies and endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic ultrasound in patients with Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and early cancer. Surg Endosc 31(3):1336–1341CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergeron EJ, Lin J, Chang AC, Orringer MB, Reddy RM (2014) Endoscopic ultrasound is inadequate to determine which T1/T2 esophageal tumors are candidates for endoluminal therapies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(2):765–771CrossRefPubMed Bergeron EJ, Lin J, Chang AC, Orringer MB, Reddy RM (2014) Endoscopic ultrasound is inadequate to determine which T1/T2 esophageal tumors are candidates for endoluminal therapies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(2):765–771CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Yamana H, Shinozaki K, Toh U, Tanaka Y, Mine T, Kubota M, Shirouzu K, Toyonaga A, Harada H, Ban S, Watanabe M, Toda Y, Tabuchi E, Hayabuchi N, Inutsuka H (2001) Optimum treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer: endoscopic mucosal resection versus radical esophagectomy. World J Surg 25(4):424–431CrossRefPubMed Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Yamana H, Shinozaki K, Toh U, Tanaka Y, Mine T, Kubota M, Shirouzu K, Toyonaga A, Harada H, Ban S, Watanabe M, Toda Y, Tabuchi E, Hayabuchi N, Inutsuka H (2001) Optimum treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer: endoscopic mucosal resection versus radical esophagectomy. World J Surg 25(4):424–431CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad GA, Wang KK, Buttar NS, Wongkeesong LM, Krishnadath KK, Nichols FC 3rd, Lutzke LS, Borkenhagen LS (2007) Long-term survival following endoscopic and surgical treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 132(4):1226–1233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prasad GA, Wang KK, Buttar NS, Wongkeesong LM, Krishnadath KK, Nichols FC 3rd, Lutzke LS, Borkenhagen LS (2007) Long-term survival following endoscopic and surgical treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 132(4):1226–1233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosmolen WD, Boer KR, de Leeuw RJ, Gamel CJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bergman JJ, Sprangers MA (2010) Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence after endoscopic and surgical treatment for early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 42(7):525–531. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1244222 CrossRef Rosmolen WD, Boer KR, de Leeuw RJ, Gamel CJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bergman JJ, Sprangers MA (2010) Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence after endoscopic and surgical treatment for early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 42(7):525–531. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0029-1244222 CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollis AC, Quinn LM, Hodson J, Evans E, Plowright J, Begum R, Mitchell H, Hallissey MT, Whiting JL, Griffiths EA (2017) Prognostic significance of tumor length in patients receiving esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 116(8):1114–1122CrossRefPubMed Hollis AC, Quinn LM, Hodson J, Evans E, Plowright J, Begum R, Mitchell H, Hallissey MT, Whiting JL, Griffiths EA (2017) Prognostic significance of tumor length in patients receiving esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 116(8):1114–1122CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pacifico RJ, Wang KK, Wongkeesong LM, Buttar NS, Lutzke LS (2003) Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy versus esophagectomy for management of early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1(4):252–257CrossRefPubMed Pacifico RJ, Wang KK, Wongkeesong LM, Buttar NS, Lutzke LS (2003) Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy versus esophagectomy for management of early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1(4):252–257CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed MF, Tolis G Jr, Edil BH, Allan JS, Donahue DM, Gaissert HA, Moncure AC, Wain JC, Wright CD, Mathisen DJ (2005) Surgical treatment of esophageal high-grade dysplasia. Ann Thorac Surg 79(4):1110–1115CrossRefPubMed Reed MF, Tolis G Jr, Edil BH, Allan JS, Donahue DM, Gaissert HA, Moncure AC, Wain JC, Wright CD, Mathisen DJ (2005) Surgical treatment of esophageal high-grade dysplasia. Ann Thorac Surg 79(4):1110–1115CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulscher F, van Sandick J, de Boer A, Wijnhoven B, Tijssen J, Fockens P (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347(21):1662–1669CrossRef Hulscher F, van Sandick J, de Boer A, Wijnhoven B, Tijssen J, Fockens P (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347(21):1662–1669CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamieson G, Mathew G, Ludemann R, Wayman J, Myers J, Devitt P (2004) Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 5(8):943–947CrossRef Jamieson G, Mathew G, Ludemann R, Wayman J, Myers J, Devitt P (2004) Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 5(8):943–947CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohiuddin K, Dorer R, El Lakis MA, Hahn H, Speicher J, Hubka M, Low DE (2016) Outcomes of surgical resection of T1bN0 esophageal cancer and assessment of endoscopic mucosal resection for identifying low-risk cancers appropriate for endoscopic therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 23(8):2673–2678CrossRefPubMed Mohiuddin K, Dorer R, El Lakis MA, Hahn H, Speicher J, Hubka M, Low DE (2016) Outcomes of surgical resection of T1bN0 esophageal cancer and assessment of endoscopic mucosal resection for identifying low-risk cancers appropriate for endoscopic therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 23(8):2673–2678CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang S, Huang Y, Xie J, Zhuge L, Shao L, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Hu H, Chen S, Lerut T, Luketich JD, Zhang J, Chen H (2018) Does delayed esophagectomy after endoscopic resection affect outcomes in patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer? A propensity score-based analysis. Surg Endosc 32(3):1441–1448CrossRefPubMed Wang S, Huang Y, Xie J, Zhuge L, Shao L, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Hu H, Chen S, Lerut T, Luketich JD, Zhang J, Chen H (2018) Does delayed esophagectomy after endoscopic resection affect outcomes in patients with stage T1 esophageal cancer? A propensity score-based analysis. Surg Endosc 32(3):1441–1448CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith I, Kahaleh M (2015) Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for Barrett’s esophagus neoplasia. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(1):31–35CrossRefPubMed Smith I, Kahaleh M (2015) Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for Barrett’s esophagus neoplasia. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(1):31–35CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariette C, Finzi L, Piessen G, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP (2005) Esophageal carcinoma: prognostic differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 29(1):39–45CrossRefPubMed Mariette C, Finzi L, Piessen G, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP (2005) Esophageal carcinoma: prognostic differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 29(1):39–45CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment versus endoscopic treatment for early esophageal squamous cell neoplasia larger than 2 cm: a retrospective study
verfasst von
Baisi Yuan
Leilei Liu
Hairong Huang
Demin Li
Yi Shen
Bo Wu
Jiong Liu
Miaofang Yang
Zhenkai Wang
Heng Lu
Yuxiu Liu
Lianming Liao
Fangyu Wang
Publikationsdatum
25.10.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6524-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Wie sieht der OP der Zukunft aus?

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.