Anzeige
Erschienen in:
27.11.2017 | Original Article
Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) with the intravesical administration of the ultrasound contrast agent Optison™ for vesicoureteral reflux detection in children: a prospective clinical trial
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2018
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background
Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) is widely used outside the United States to diagnose vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children and is highly sensitive while avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation. At the onset of this study, two ultrasound (US) contrast agents were available in the United States. Pediatric safety data for intravenous administration was published for one, Optison™.
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of ceVUS using Optison™ and compare its diagnostic efficacy with voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) for VUR detection and grading in children.
Materials and methods
The United States Food and Drug Administration and institutional Investigational New Drug authorizations were obtained to conduct a prospective comparative study of ceVUS with Optison™ and VCUG. CeVUS was performed with intravesical administration of 0.2% Optison™/normal saline solution. A standard VCUG followed. Safety assessment included physical examination, and heart rate, pulse oximetry and adverse reactions monitoring before, during and immediately after the examinations. A follow-up questionnaire was completed by telephone 48-h after the studies.
Results
Sixty-two pelviureteric units were studied in 30 patients with a mean age of 3.5 years (range: 0.1–17 years) including 21 girls and 9 boys. No severe adverse events occurred. All patients had normal heart rate and blood oxygenation saturation prior to, during and after the studies. At the 48-h follow-up, one patient (3.3%) reported transient dysuria. Taking the VCUG as the reference standard, ceVUS had a sensitivity of 91.7% (95%; confidence interval [CI]: 61.5%–99.8%) and specificity of 98% (95%; CI: 89.4%–99.9%). The concordance between ceVUS and VCUG for VUR detection and grading was 84.3% and 81.8%, respectively. VUR grades were discrepant in 4/11 refluxing pelviureteric units, with VCUG upgrading VUR in 2.
Conclusion
Detection of VUR with Optison™ ceVUS was comparable to VCUG without exposure to ionizing radiation. CeVUS with Optison™ is a well-tolerated diagnostic procedure with a favorable safety profile.