The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
WS led study design, data collection, statistical analysis and drafting of manuscript; SZ made part of the statistical analysis and wrote part of the article; SA and AS revised the article for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and agreed on its submission.
Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancers affecting women worldwide. The main objective of this study was to assess and compare research activity in breast cancer in Arab countries with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries.
Publications about “breast cancer” as a research topic were retrieved using the ISI Web of Science database. Analysis was confined to original research and review articles. Research productivity was assessed by assessing number of publications and time trend of these publications, names of journals, citation analysis, top 10 active institutions as well as country contribution to breast cancer research. The quantity and quality of publications from Arab countries in addition to 3 other Middle East countries (Turkey, Iran and Israel) were assessed and compared using the h-index tool.
A total of 1658 original research and review articles about “breast cancer” were published from Arab countries. Annual research productivity from Arab countries in the field of “breast cancer” was negligible but showed a significant increase in the last decade. Retrieved documents had relatively high citation parameters as measured by h-index of 61 and average citations of 17.46 per document. The highest research productivity was from Egypt with a total publication of 582 (35.10%). Cairo University with a total of 149 (8.99%) publications had the highest research productivity among institutions in Arab world. Forty four documents (2.65%) of breast cancer documents were published in Saudi Medical Journal. Arab researchers collaborated mostly with researchers from the United States of America (305; 18.40%) in breast cancer research. Compared with other non-Arab Middle Eastern countries, Arab countries had higher research productivity than some countries and lower than others, particularly Israel.
The present data reveals a good contribution of some Arab countries to the field of “breast cancer” research. There is a gap between Arab countries and Israel in the quality of breast cancer research.
Salim EI, Moore MA, Al-Lawati JA, Al-Sayyad J, Bazawir A, Bener A, et al. Cancer epidemiology and control in the arab world - past, present and future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10(1):3–16. PubMed
Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Bibliometric analysis of diabetes mellitus research output from Middle Eastern Arab countries during the period (1996–2012). Scientometrics. 2014;101(1):819–32. CrossRef
Thomson Reuters. Web of Knowledge. 2013 [cited 2013 December 11]; Available from: http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/SSR1103443WoK5-2_web3.pdf
Abdel-Halim RE. Contributions of Ibn Al-Nafis (1210–1288 AD) to the progress of medicine and urology. A study and translations from his medical works. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(1):13–22. PubMed
Al-Khader AA. Enhancing research productivity in the Arab world. Saudi Med J. 2004;25(10):1323–7. PubMed
Benamer HT, Bredan A, Bakoush O. Scientific publication productivity of Libyan medical schools: a bibliometric study of papers listed in PubMed, 1988–2007. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009;22(2):310.
Bissar-Tadmouri N, Tadmouri GO. Bibliometric analyses of biomedical research outputs in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates (1988–2007). Saudi Med J. 2009;30(1):130–9. PubMed
Shaban SF, Abu-Zidan FM. A quantitative analysis of medical publications from Arab countries. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(3):294–6. PubMed
Bredan A, Benamer H, Bakoush O. Visibility of Arab countries in the world biomedical literature. Libyan J Med. 2011;6:6325. CrossRef
Plomp R. The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group’s scientific performance. Scientometrics. 1994;29(3):377–93. CrossRef
Aksnes DW, Sivertsen G. The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics. 2004;59(2):213–24. CrossRef
Aksnes DW. Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;57(2):169–85. CrossRef
Fowler JH, Aksnes DW. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics. 2007;72(3):427–37. CrossRef
Vinkler P. Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. J Inform Sci. 2007;33(4):481–91. CrossRef
Jacsó P. The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Web of Science. Online Inf Rev. 2008;32(5):673–88. CrossRef
Jacsó P. The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Scopus. Online Inf Rev. 2008;32(4):524–35. CrossRef
Jacsó P. The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar. Online Inf Rev. 2008;32(3):437–52. CrossRef
Garfield E. The meaning of the impact factor. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2003;3(2):363–9.
Lee S, Bozeman B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies Sci. 2005;35(5):673–702. CrossRef
Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Di Costa F. Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? High Educ. 2009;57(2):155–71. CrossRef
Bordons M, Gomez I, Fernandez MT, Zulueta MA, Mendez A. Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics. 1996;37(2):279–95. CrossRef
Bozeman B, Corley E. Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy. 2004;33(4):599–616. CrossRef
Wagner CS. Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics. 2005;62(1):3–26. CrossRef
He Z-L, Geng X-S, Campbell-Hunt C. Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Res Policy. 2009;38(2):306–17. CrossRef
Basu A, Kumar BSV. International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics. 2000;48(3):381–402. CrossRef
Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R. A bibliometric analysis of research productivity of Malaysian publications in leading toxicology journals during a 10-year period (2003–2012). Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013;33(12):1284–93. CrossRef
- Contribution of Arab countries to breast cancer research: comparison with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries
Waleed M Sweileh
Sa’ed H Zyoud
Samah W Al-Jabi
Ansam F Sawalha
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II