Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2018

09.03.2018 | Original Article

Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination

Part 2: Reproducibility and statistical measures of the torque coordination angle (TCA)

verfasst von: H. Sino, B. Zimmer, I. Schelper, S. Schenk-Kazan, F. Streibelt

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the reproducibility and statistical measures of the torque coordination angle (TCA).

Methods

A total of 107 final cephalograms and corresponding casts were included, all reflecting treatment outcomes that met high qualitative standards, one of them being a Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) score of ≤3. Based on these records, the TCA was measured as a parameter to identify differences related to tooth morphology and bracket position between the torque-relevant reference plane at the bracket base and the long axis of a tooth. All measurements were performed on upper and lower central incisors (U1 and L1).

Results

Several reproducibility assessments for the TCA measurements yielded good results, including objectivity at 1.26 ± 0.81° (U1) or 1.41 ± 1.18° (L1), examiner reliability at 1.30 ± 0.97° (U1) or 1.25 ± 0.82° (L1), and method reliability at 1.80 ± 1.13° (U1) or 1.53 ± 1.07° (L1). The statistical measures revealed a high degree of interindividual variability. With bracket placement 4.5 mm (U1) or 4.0 mm (L1) above the incisal edge, the differences between the maximum and minimum TCA values were similarly large in both jaws (21.0° for U1 or 20.0° for L1), given mean TCA values of 24.6 ± 3.6° (U1) or 22.9 ± 4.3° (L1). Moving the bracket placement from 3.5 to 5.5 mm (U1) or from 3.0 to 5.0 mm (L1) changed the mean TCA values by 4.5° (U1) or 3.2° (L1).

Conclusions

The TCA is a suitable cephalometric parameter to identify differences related to tooth morphology and bracket placement. Given its high interindividual variability, the fixed torque value of a specific bracket system should not be expected to produce the same incisor inclinations across patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Albarakati SF, Kula KS, Ghoneima AA (2012) The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:11–17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Albarakati SF, Kula KS, Ghoneima AA (2012) The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:11–17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrews LF (1976) In: Andrews LF (ed) Die Straight-Wire-Apparatur. “A”-Company, München, p 4, 23, 25, 26, 67 (Deutsche Übersetzung der Originalarbeit “The Straight-Wire-Appliance” 1975,) Andrews LF (1976) In: Andrews LF (ed) Die Straight-Wire-Apparatur. “A”-Company, München, p 4, 23, 25, 26, 67 (Deutsche Übersetzung der Originalarbeit “The Straight-Wire-Appliance” 1975,)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumrind S, Frantz RC (1971) The reliability of head film landmarks. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 60:111–127CrossRefPubMed Baumrind S, Frantz RC (1971) The reliability of head film landmarks. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 60:111–127CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumrind S, Frantz RC (1971) The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod 60:505–517CrossRefPubMed Baumrind S, Frantz RC (1971) The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod 60:505–517CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bryant RM, Sadowsky PL, Dent M, Hazelrig JB (1984) Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 86:25–32CrossRef Bryant RM, Sadowsky PL, Dent M, Hazelrig JB (1984) Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 86:25–32CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Celik E, Polat-Ozsoy O, Toygar Memikoglu TU (2009) Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod 31:241–246CrossRefPubMed Celik E, Polat-Ozsoy O, Toygar Memikoglu TU (2009) Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod 31:241–246CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chachada AD, Kamble RH (2014) Influence of morphology of maxillary central incisor on expression of torque using 2D surface scanning and confirmation with 3D photographic model: an in vitro study. World J Dent 5:21–27CrossRef Chachada AD, Kamble RH (2014) Influence of morphology of maxillary central incisor on expression of torque using 2D surface scanning and confirmation with 3D photographic model: an in vitro study. World J Dent 5:21–27CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF et al (2000) Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod 70:387–392PubMed Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF et al (2000) Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod 70:387–392PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fassl H (2012) In: Fassl H (ed) Einführung in die Medizinische Statistik. Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag, Hüthig GmbH, Berlin, pp 22–26 Fassl H (2012) In: Fassl H (ed) Einführung in die Medizinische Statistik. Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag, Hüthig GmbH, Berlin, pp 22–26
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M, Hansson LG (1998) Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional films, hardcopy and monitor-displayed images obtained by the phosphor technique. Eur J Orthod 20:331–340CrossRefPubMed Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M, Hansson LG (1998) Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional films, hardcopy and monitor-displayed images obtained by the phosphor technique. Eur J Orthod 20:331–340CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Germane N, Bentley BE, Isaacson RJ (1989) Three biologic variables modifying faciolingual tooth angulation by straight-wire appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:312–319CrossRefPubMed Germane N, Bentley BE, Isaacson RJ (1989) Three biologic variables modifying faciolingual tooth angulation by straight-wire appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:312–319CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghoneima A, Albarakati S, Baysal A, Uysal T, Kula K (2012) Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study. Aust Orthod J 28:232–239PubMed Ghoneima A, Albarakati S, Baysal A, Uysal T, Kula K (2012) Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study. Aust Orthod J 28:232–239PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagemann K, Vollmer D, Niegel T, Ehmer U, Reuter I (2000) Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms. J Orofac Orthop 61:91–99CrossRefPubMed Hagemann K, Vollmer D, Niegel T, Ehmer U, Reuter I (2000) Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms. J Orofac Orthop 61:91–99CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagg U, Cooke MS, Chan TC, Tng TT, Lau PY (1998) The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls. Aust Orthod J 15:177–185PubMed Hagg U, Cooke MS, Chan TC, Tng TT, Lau PY (1998) The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls. Aust Orthod J 15:177–185PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Harries EF, Hassankiadeh S, Harries JT (1993) Maxillary incisor crown-root relationships in different angle malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:48–53CrossRef Harries EF, Hassankiadeh S, Harries JT (1993) Maxillary incisor crown-root relationships in different angle malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:48–53CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Haynes S, Chau MN (1993) Inter- and intra-observer identification of landmarks used in the Delaire analysis. Eur J Orthod 15:79–84CrossRefPubMed Haynes S, Chau MN (1993) Inter- and intra-observer identification of landmarks used in the Delaire analysis. Eur J Orthod 15:79–84CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Houston WJ (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83:382–390CrossRefPubMed Houston WJ (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83:382–390CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu XQ, Kong WD, Cai B, Chen MY (2009) Evaluation of the effect of maxillary anterior teeth morphology on torque using cone beam dental computed tomography. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 27:297–300PubMed Hu XQ, Kong WD, Cai B, Chen MY (2009) Evaluation of the effect of maxillary anterior teeth morphology on torque using cone beam dental computed tomography. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 27:297–300PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Israr J, Bhutta N, Chatha MR (2016) Comparison of Collum angle of maxillary central incisors in class II Div 1 & 2 malocclusions. Pak Oral Dent J 36:91–93 Israr J, Bhutta N, Chatha MR (2016) Comparison of Collum angle of maxillary central incisors in class II Div 1 & 2 malocclusions. Pak Oral Dent J 36:91–93
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Krey K‑F (2010) Untersuchungen zur Morphologie von dentofazialen und skelettalen Strukturen Erwachsener mit Methoden der geometrischen Morphometrie. Leipzig, Univ., Habil.-Schr. Krey K‑F (2010) Untersuchungen zur Morphologie von dentofazialen und skelettalen Strukturen Erwachsener mit Methoden der geometrischen Morphometrie. Leipzig, Univ., Habil.-Schr.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Loenen M van, Degrieck J, De Pauw G, Dermau L (2005) Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque. Eur J Orthod 27:258–262CrossRefPubMed Loenen M van, Degrieck J, De Pauw G, Dermau L (2005) Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque. Eur J Orthod 27:258–262CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ (2001) Bracket positioning and case set-up. In: McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ, Parkinson M (eds) Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics. Mosby International, St. Louis, pp 8–12, 55–69 McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ (2001) Bracket positioning and case set-up. In: McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ, Parkinson M (eds) Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics. Mosby International, St. Louis, pp 8–12, 55–69
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Midtgard J, Bjork G, Linder-Aronson S (1974) Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthod 44:56–61PubMed Midtgard J, Bjork G, Linder-Aronson S (1974) Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthod 44:56–61PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nimkarn Y, Miles PG (1995) Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 10:43–52PubMed Nimkarn Y, Miles PG (1995) Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 10:43–52PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Normenausschuss Dental (NADENT) im DIN (2010) Zahnheilkunde – Brackets und Röhrchen für die Kieferorthopädie. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin (Deutsche Fassung) Normenausschuss Dental (NADENT) im DIN (2010) Zahnheilkunde – Brackets und Röhrchen für die Kieferorthopädie. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin (Deutsche Fassung)
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ongkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, van’t Hof MA, Bodegom JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2002) The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods. Eur J Orthod 24:655–665CrossRefPubMed Ongkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, van’t Hof MA, Bodegom JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (2002) The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods. Eur J Orthod 24:655–665CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Polat-Ozsoy O, Gokcelik A, Memikoglu TU (2009) Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods. Eur J Orthod 31:254–259CrossRefPubMed Polat-Ozsoy O, Gokcelik A, Memikoglu TU (2009) Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods. Eur J Orthod 31:254–259CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardarian A, Danaei SM, Shahidi S, Boushehri SG, Geramy A (2014) The effect of vertical bracket positioning on torque and the resultant stress in the periodontal ligament—a finite element study. Prog Orthod 15:50–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sardarian A, Danaei SM, Shahidi S, Boushehri SG, Geramy A (2014) The effect of vertical bracket positioning on torque and the resultant stress in the periodontal ligament—a finite element study. Prog Orthod 15:50–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen Y‑W, Hsu J‑T, Wang Y‑H, Huang H‑L, Fuh L‑J (2012) The Collum angle of the maxillary central incisors in patients with different types of malocclusion. J Dent Sci 7:72–76CrossRef Shen Y‑W, Hsu J‑T, Wang Y‑H, Huang H‑L, Fuh L‑J (2012) The Collum angle of the maxillary central incisors in patients with different types of malocclusion. J Dent Sci 7:72–76CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor RM (1969) Variation in form of human teeth. An anthropologic and forensic study of maxillary incisors. J Dent Res 48:5–16CrossRefPubMed Taylor RM (1969) Variation in form of human teeth. An anthropologic and forensic study of maxillary incisors. J Dent Res 48:5–16CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Woelfel JB (1990) In: Woelfel JB (ed) Dental anatomy: its relevance to dentistry, 4th edn. Verlag Lea und Febiger, Philadelphia, p 54–55 Woelfel JB (1990) In: Woelfel JB (ed) Dental anatomy: its relevance to dentistry, 4th edn. Verlag Lea und Febiger, Philadelphia, p 54–55
Metadaten
Titel
Coordinating bracket torque and incisor inclination
Part 2: Reproducibility and statistical measures of the torque coordination angle (TCA)
verfasst von
H. Sino
B. Zimmer
I. Schelper
S. Schenk-Kazan
F. Streibelt
Publikationsdatum
09.03.2018
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-018-0130-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.