Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2016

01.02.2016 | 2015 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Cost-Effectiveness in Hepatic Lobectomy: the Effect of Case Volume on Mortality, Readmission, and Cost of Care

verfasst von: Jeffrey M. Sutton, Richard S. Hoehn, Audrey E. Ertel, Gregory C. Wilson, Dennis J. Hanseman, Koffi Wima, Jeffrey J. Sussman, Syed A. Ahmad, Shimul A. Shah, Daniel E. Abbott

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective(s)

Higher-volume centers demonstrate better perioperative outcomes for complex surgical interventions, though resource utilization implications of this hospital-level variation are unclear. We hypothesized that for hepatic lobectomy, higher operative volume correlates with better outcomes and lower costs.

Methods

From 2009 to 2011, 4163 patients undergoing hepatic lobectomy were identified from the University HealthSystems Consortium database. Univariate, multivariate logistic regression, and decision analytic models were constructed to identify differences in hospital utilization and cost. Cost included both index and readmission hospitalizations, when applicable.

Results

The annual number of hepatic lobectomies performed by the institutions within the study ranged from 1 to 86. The median age of the 4163 patients was 58 years with a roughly equal gender split (M/F 49 %:51 %) and a racial breakdown which reflected that of the general US population. For all patients, the overall perioperative mortality rate was 2.3 % and the 30-day readmission rate was 13.4 %. Hospitals performing >30 hepatic lobectomies per year had significantly lower mortality and readmission rates than those hospitals performing ≤15 lobectomies annually (both p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, higher severity of illness (odd ratio (OR) 2.13, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [1.48–3.07], p < 0.001), discharge to rehab (OR 1.84, [1.28–2.64], p < 0.001), home with home health care (OR 1.38, [1.08–1.76], p = 0.01), and surgery at a low-volume hospital (OR 1.49, [1.18–1.88], p < 0.001) were significant predictors of readmission. Conversely, surgical intervention at high-volume centers was associated with decreased risk of readmission (OR 0.67, [0.53–0.85], p < 0.001). When both index and readmission costs were considered, per-patient cost at low-volume centers was 21.9 % higher than at high-volume centers ($19,669 vs. $16,137). Sensitivity analyses adjusting for perioperative mortality and readmission at all centers did not significantly change the analysis.

Conclusions

These data, for the first time, demonstrate that hospital volume in hepatic lobectomy is an important, modifiable risk factor for readmission and cost. To optimize resource utilization, patients undergoing complex hepatic surgery should be directed to higher-volume surgical institutions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Glick, H.A., et al., Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analyses frequently agree on value. Health Aff (Millwood), 2015. 34(5): p. 805–11.CrossRef Glick, H.A., et al., Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analyses frequently agree on value. Health Aff (Millwood), 2015. 34(5): p. 805–11.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Naylor, M.D., et al., Unintended consequences of steps to cut readmissions and reform payment may threaten care of vulnerable older adults. Health Aff (Millwood), 2012. 31(7): p. 1623–32.CrossRef Naylor, M.D., et al., Unintended consequences of steps to cut readmissions and reform payment may threaten care of vulnerable older adults. Health Aff (Millwood), 2012. 31(7): p. 1623–32.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Goozner, M., Readmissions penalties at work. Effort pushed most hospitals to reduce or eliminate penalties in second year. Mod Healthc, 2013. 43(33): p. 25. Goozner, M., Readmissions penalties at work. Effort pushed most hospitals to reduce or eliminate penalties in second year. Mod Healthc, 2013. 43(33): p. 25.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigmond, J., Avoiding the penalty box. New rules on readmissions push hospitals, post-acute providers into closer collaboration. Mod Healthc, 2012. 42(5): p. 38–9.PubMed Zigmond, J., Avoiding the penalty box. New rules on readmissions push hospitals, post-acute providers into closer collaboration. Mod Healthc, 2012. 42(5): p. 38–9.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jweinat, J.J., Hospital readmissions under the spotlight. J Healthc Manag, 2010. 55(4): p. 252–64.PubMed Jweinat, J.J., Hospital readmissions under the spotlight. J Healthc Manag, 2010. 55(4): p. 252–64.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter, T., J.R. Nelson, and J. Birmingham, Preventing readmissions through comprehensive discharge planning. Prof Case Manag, 2013. 18(2): p. 56–63; quiz 64–5.CrossRefPubMed Hunter, T., J.R. Nelson, and J. Birmingham, Preventing readmissions through comprehensive discharge planning. Prof Case Manag, 2013. 18(2): p. 56–63; quiz 64–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kagedan, D.J., et al., Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. HPB (Oxford), 2015. 17(1): p. 11–6.CrossRef Kagedan, D.J., et al., Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. HPB (Oxford), 2015. 17(1): p. 11–6.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, T.C., et al., Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2012. 94(5): p. 318–26.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hall, T.C., et al., Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2012. 94(5): p. 318–26.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Thiele, R.H., et al., Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg, 2015. 220(4): p. 430–43.CrossRefPubMed Thiele, R.H., et al., Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg, 2015. 220(4): p. 430–43.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbott, A.M., et al., Short-term outcomes after combined colon and liver resection for synchronous colon cancer liver metastases: a population study. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(1): p. 139–47.CrossRefPubMed Abbott, A.M., et al., Short-term outcomes after combined colon and liver resection for synchronous colon cancer liver metastases: a population study. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(1): p. 139–47.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wicherts, D.A., et al., Short- and long-term results of extended left hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. HPB (Oxford), 2011. 13(8): p. 536–43.CrossRef Wicherts, D.A., et al., Short- and long-term results of extended left hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. HPB (Oxford), 2011. 13(8): p. 536–43.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik, K.Y., et al., Improved survival following right trisectionectomy with caudate lobectomy without operative mortality: surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008. 12(7): p. 1268–74.CrossRefPubMed Paik, K.Y., et al., Improved survival following right trisectionectomy with caudate lobectomy without operative mortality: surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008. 12(7): p. 1268–74.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer, J.D., et al., Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346(15): p. 1128–37.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer, J.D., et al., Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346(15): p. 1128–37.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, G.C., et al., Cost-effectiveness of total pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation for the treatment of minimal change chronic pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015. 19(1): p. 46–54; discussion 54–5. Wilson, G.C., et al., Cost-effectiveness of total pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation for the treatment of minimal change chronic pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015. 19(1): p. 46–54; discussion 54–5.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton, J.M., et al., Cost effectiveness after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: bolstering the volume argument. HPB (Oxford), 2014. 16(12): p. 1056–61.CrossRef Sutton, J.M., et al., Cost effectiveness after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: bolstering the volume argument. HPB (Oxford), 2014. 16(12): p. 1056–61.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbott, D.E., et al., Cost-effectiveness of simultaneous resection and RFA versus 2-stage hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol, 2014. 109(6): p. 516–20.CrossRefPubMed Abbott, D.E., et al., Cost-effectiveness of simultaneous resection and RFA versus 2-stage hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol, 2014. 109(6): p. 516–20.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzeng, C.W., et al., Frequency and intensity of postoperative surveillance after curative treatment of pancreatic cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(7): p. 2197–203.CrossRefPubMed Tzeng, C.W., et al., Frequency and intensity of postoperative surveillance after curative treatment of pancreatic cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(7): p. 2197–203.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton, J.M., et al., Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Influence of the Volume Effect Beyond Mortality. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015. Sutton, J.M., et al., Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Influence of the Volume Effect Beyond Mortality. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Heisler, M., et al., Medicaid managed care: are academic medical centers penalized by attracting patients with high-cost conditions? Am J Manag Care, 2003. 9(1): p. 19–29.PubMed Heisler, M., et al., Medicaid managed care: are academic medical centers penalized by attracting patients with high-cost conditions? Am J Manag Care, 2003. 9(1): p. 19–29.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuhausen, K., et al., Disproportionate-share hospital payment reductions may threaten the financial stability of safety-net hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood), 2014. 33(6): p. 988–96.CrossRef Neuhausen, K., et al., Disproportionate-share hospital payment reductions may threaten the financial stability of safety-net hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood), 2014. 33(6): p. 988–96.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cost-Effectiveness in Hepatic Lobectomy: the Effect of Case Volume on Mortality, Readmission, and Cost of Care
verfasst von
Jeffrey M. Sutton
Richard S. Hoehn
Audrey E. Ertel
Gregory C. Wilson
Dennis J. Hanseman
Koffi Wima
Jeffrey J. Sussman
Syed A. Ahmad
Shimul A. Shah
Daniel E. Abbott
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2964-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.