Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
In the United States, three vaccines directed against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been used in clinical practice: two messenger RNA-based vaccines (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and one adenovirus vector-based vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S). Data suggest that dialysis patients demonstrate diminished reactivity to vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S relative to mRNA-based vaccination, as assessed by magnitude and duration of antibody response [1, 2]. Although booster vaccination, preferably with an mRNA-based vaccine, is recommended, the effect of booster doses among dialysis patients who initially received an adenovirus-based vaccine has not been characterized.
As part of a continuing quality-improvement project across Fresenius Kidney Care (FKC) clinics, we examined antibody levels among dialysis patients who received primary vaccination against COVID with Ad26.COV2.S. Patients who received no additional vaccine doses, those who received an additional dose of Ad26.COV2.S, and those who received one to two doses of an mRNA vaccine were included in the present analysis. Patients with laboratory evidence of COVID-19 infection (positive polymerase chain reaction test) and those with suspected or documented COVID-19 infection were excluded.
Anzeige
Antibody levels were assessed in remnant blood samples at a centralized laboratory using a semiquantitative chemiluminescent assay for immunoglobulin G directed against the receptor-binding domain of the S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen (ADVIA Centaur® XP/XPT sCOVG; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.; Tarrytown, NY). Antibody indices were broadly categorized as nonreactive (< 1) or reactive (≥ 1). Reactive indices were further categorized as adequate (> 7) and beyond the maximum detectable range (≥ 750) [1]. Patients were included in the present analysis if they had at least two antibody tests available: one collected after administration of the initial Ad26.COV2.S vaccination and before eligibility for an additional vaccine dose at approximately 6 months (i.e., early antibody level), and one collected after availability/eligibility of additional vaccine doses (i.e., late antibody level). For patients with multiple antibody levels during a given time period, the last value was included in the analysis. All patients allowed the use of their remnant blood samples collected for routine care for research purposes as part of the consent form signed upon receiving treatment.
Overall, 839 patients receiving dialysis at FKC clinics received primary vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S. After excluding those with vaccination regimens that could not be determined (n = 2), those with prior COVID infection (n = 281), and those without early and late antibody levels (n = 102), the analysis cohort included 454 patients. Approximately 23% of patients (n = 103) did not receive additional vaccination after the initial adenovirus-based vaccination (Ad26.COV2.S). Of the 351 patients receiving additional vaccine doses, 8 (2%) received a second dose of the adenovirus-based vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S + Ad26.COV2.S), 329 (72%) received a single dose of an mRNA vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S + mRNA), and 14 (3%) received 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S + mRNA + mRNA). Patients who received a second vaccine dose did so a median of 231 (Ad26.COV2.S + mRNA + mRNA) to 243 (Ad26.COV2.S + Ad26.COV2.S) days after their primary vaccination.
Based on early antibody levels (mean [SD] of 97 [12] days after initial vaccination), 46% of patients were considered nonreactive and fewer than 25% had adequate antibody levels. Late antibody levels were assessed, on average (SD), 325 (14) days after initial vaccination. Median antibody indices were markedly higher among patients who received additional vaccination with an mRNA vaccine (Fig. 1A). Antibody indices ≤ 7 were observed for 43% and 51% of the Ad26.COV2.S and Ad26.COV2.S + Ad26.COV2.S subgroups, respectively. In contrast, only 7% of patients receiving one booster of an mRNA vaccine exhibited an inadequate late antibody response. All patients receiving two mRNA booster doses exhibited adequate antibody responses.
×
Our findings should be reviewed in the context of several methodological limitations. Although we aimed to exclude patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, it is likely that not all cases were excluded, as suggested by the increase in mean (SD) antibody titers from the early measurement to the late measurement among patients who did not receive any additional vaccine dose (48 [147]–177 [253]). This may be attributable to an increase in asymptomatic infection. We do not have consistent documentation of reasons for not receiving boosters. Our sample size for some vaccination combinations were small. We also cannot generalize differences in antibody levels to differences in clinical effectiveness. Brunelli and colleagues recently published data suggesting primary vaccination with either Ad26.COV2.S or BNT162b2 exhibited similar effectiveness at 6 months among dialysis patients [3].
Anzeige
Our findings that booster vaccine doses enhance serologic immune responses among dialysis patients are consistent with findings from cohorts initially treated with mRNA vaccines [4]. Our findings are unique in that we demonstrated a greater immune response among those patients receiving a heterologous vaccine regimen (i.e., adenovirus- and mRNA-based vaccines) than those receiving a homologous regimen (adenovirus-based only). In contrast, Reindl-Schwaighofer et al. found similar benefit in administering Ad26.COV2.S vs. mRNA vaccines to kidney transplant recipients previously receiving two doses of an mRNA vaccine [5]. Our results support the practice of administering booster doses of mRNA vaccines for all eligible dialysis patients who received primary vaccination with adenovirus-based vaccines.
Acknowledgements
Medical writing and editing support were provided by Adam Perahia, MD, of NorthStar Strategic Consulting, LLC, via funding by Fresenius Medical Care.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
J. Willetts, L.H. Ficociello, S.E. Alexander, C. Mullon, and J.L. Hymes are employees of Fresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office. C.D. Johnson is an employee of Spectra Laboratories. C. Mullon and C.D. Johnson own stock in Fresenius Medical Care North America. J.L. Hymes is the Global Head of Clinical Affairs.
Ethical approval
The purpose of this project was to a) implement a practice to improve the quality of patient care, and b) collect patient data regarding the implementation of clinical practice. Under the HHS regulations, these activities do not satisfy the definition of “research” under 45 CFR 46.102(d). For this reason, no additional study-specific informed consent or institutional review board approval was required for this quality improvement project. This project was reviewed and determined to be quality improvement using standardized criteria from the Office of Human Research Protection. This process takes into account the project’s intent, design, funding, patient risk above standard of care, and protection of health information.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.
Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.
Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.
Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.
Update Innere Medizin
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.