Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Nephrology 3/2023

Open Access 23.01.2023 | COVID-19 | Research Letter

Antibody levels following booster SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among dialysis patients initially vaccinated with adenovirus vector-based vaccine

verfasst von: Joanna Willetts, Linda H. Ficociello, Curtis D. Johnson, Sandra E. Alexander, Claudy Mullon, Jeffrey L. Hymes

Erschienen in: Journal of Nephrology | Ausgabe 3/2023

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
In the United States, three vaccines directed against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been used in clinical practice: two messenger RNA-based vaccines (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and one adenovirus vector-based vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S). Data suggest that dialysis patients demonstrate diminished reactivity to vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S relative to mRNA-based vaccination, as assessed by magnitude and duration of antibody response [1, 2]. Although booster vaccination, preferably with an mRNA-based vaccine, is recommended, the effect of booster doses among dialysis patients who initially received an adenovirus-based vaccine has not been characterized.
As part of a continuing quality-improvement project across Fresenius Kidney Care (FKC) clinics, we examined antibody levels among dialysis patients who received primary vaccination against COVID with Ad26.COV2.S. Patients who received no additional vaccine doses, those who received an additional dose of Ad26.COV2.S, and those who received one to two doses of an mRNA vaccine were included in the present analysis. Patients with laboratory evidence of COVID-19 infection (positive polymerase chain reaction test) and those with suspected or documented COVID-19 infection were excluded.
Antibody levels were assessed in remnant blood samples at a centralized laboratory using a semiquantitative chemiluminescent assay for immunoglobulin G directed against the receptor-binding domain of the S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen (ADVIA Centaur® XP/XPT sCOVG; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.; Tarrytown, NY). Antibody indices were broadly categorized as nonreactive (< 1) or reactive (≥ 1). Reactive indices were further categorized as adequate (> 7) and beyond the maximum detectable range (≥ 750) [1]. Patients were included in the present analysis if they had at least two antibody tests available: one collected after administration of the initial Ad26.COV2.S vaccination and before eligibility for an additional vaccine dose at approximately 6 months (i.e., early antibody level), and one collected after availability/eligibility of additional vaccine doses (i.e., late antibody level). For patients with multiple antibody levels during a given time period, the last value was included in the analysis. All patients allowed the use of their remnant blood samples collected for routine care for research purposes as part of the consent form signed upon receiving treatment.
Overall, 839 patients receiving dialysis at FKC clinics received primary vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S. After excluding those with vaccination regimens that could not be determined (n = 2), those with prior COVID infection (n = 281), and those without early and late antibody levels (n = 102), the analysis cohort included 454 patients. Approximately 23% of patients (n = 103) did not receive additional vaccination after the initial adenovirus-based vaccination (Ad26.COV2.S). Of the 351 patients receiving additional vaccine doses, 8 (2%) received a second dose of the adenovirus-based vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S + Ad26.COV2.S), 329 (72%) received a single dose of an mRNA vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S + mRNA), and 14 (3%) received 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S + mRNA + mRNA). Patients who received a second vaccine dose did so a median of 231 (Ad26.COV2.S + mRNA + mRNA) to 243 (Ad26.COV2.S + Ad26.COV2.S) days after their primary vaccination.
Based on early antibody levels (mean [SD] of 97 [12] days after initial vaccination), 46% of patients were considered nonreactive and fewer than 25% had adequate antibody levels. Late antibody levels were assessed, on average (SD), 325 (14) days after initial vaccination. Median antibody indices were markedly higher among patients who received additional vaccination with an mRNA vaccine (Fig. 1A). Antibody indices ≤ 7 were observed for 43% and 51% of the Ad26.COV2.S and Ad26.COV2.S + Ad26.COV2.S subgroups, respectively. In contrast, only 7% of patients receiving one booster of an mRNA vaccine exhibited an inadequate late antibody response. All patients receiving two mRNA booster doses exhibited adequate antibody responses.
Our findings should be reviewed in the context of several methodological limitations. Although we aimed to exclude patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, it is likely that not all cases were excluded, as suggested by the increase in mean (SD) antibody titers from the early measurement to the late measurement among patients who did not receive any additional vaccine dose (48 [147]–177 [253]). This may be attributable to an increase in asymptomatic infection. We do not have consistent documentation of reasons for not receiving boosters. Our sample size for some vaccination combinations were small. We also cannot generalize differences in antibody levels to differences in clinical effectiveness. Brunelli and colleagues recently published data suggesting primary vaccination with either Ad26.COV2.S or BNT162b2 exhibited similar effectiveness at 6 months among dialysis patients [3].
Our findings that booster vaccine doses enhance serologic immune responses among dialysis patients are consistent with findings from cohorts initially treated with mRNA vaccines [4]. Our findings are unique in that we demonstrated a greater immune response among those patients receiving a heterologous vaccine regimen (i.e., adenovirus- and mRNA-based vaccines) than those receiving a homologous regimen (adenovirus-based only). In contrast, Reindl-Schwaighofer et al. found similar benefit in administering Ad26.COV2.S vs. mRNA vaccines to kidney transplant recipients previously receiving two doses of an mRNA vaccine [5]. Our results support the practice of administering booster doses of mRNA vaccines for all eligible dialysis patients who received primary vaccination with adenovirus-based vaccines.

Acknowledgements

Medical writing and editing support were provided by Adam Perahia, MD, of NorthStar Strategic Consulting, LLC, via funding by Fresenius Medical Care.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

J. Willetts, L.H. Ficociello, S.E. Alexander, C. Mullon, and J.L. Hymes are employees of Fresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office. C.D. Johnson is an employee of Spectra Laboratories. C. Mullon and C.D. Johnson own stock in Fresenius Medical Care North America. J.L. Hymes is the Global Head of Clinical Affairs.

Ethical approval

The purpose of this project was to a) implement a practice to improve the quality of patient care, and b) collect patient data regarding the implementation of clinical practice. Under the HHS regulations, these activities do not satisfy the definition of “research” under 45 CFR 46.102(d). For this reason, no additional study-specific informed consent or institutional review board approval was required for this quality improvement project. This project was reviewed and determined to be quality improvement using standardized criteria from the Office of Human Research Protection. This process takes into account the project’s intent, design, funding, patient risk above standard of care, and protection of health information.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

e.Med Urologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Urologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu den urologischen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der urologischen Fachzeitschriften.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulhern JG, Fadia A, Patel R, Ficociello LH, Willetts J, Dahne-Steuber IA, Pollan MC, Mullon C, DeLisi J, Johnson C, Mysayphonh C, Kossmann RJ, Anger MS, Hymes JL (2021) Humoral response to mRNA versus an adenovirus vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 16:1720–1722CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mulhern JG, Fadia A, Patel R, Ficociello LH, Willetts J, Dahne-Steuber IA, Pollan MC, Mullon C, DeLisi J, Johnson C, Mysayphonh C, Kossmann RJ, Anger MS, Hymes JL (2021) Humoral response to mRNA versus an adenovirus vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 16:1720–1722CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficociello LH, Willetts J, Mullon C, Mysayphonh C, Dahne-Steuber IA, Johnson C, Pollan M, Alexander S, Mulhern JG, Kossmann RJ, Anger MS, Hymes JL (2022) Antibody response to the coronavirus disease 2019 Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Med 4:100409CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ficociello LH, Willetts J, Mullon C, Mysayphonh C, Dahne-Steuber IA, Johnson C, Pollan M, Alexander S, Mulhern JG, Kossmann RJ, Anger MS, Hymes JL (2022) Antibody response to the coronavirus disease 2019 Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Med 4:100409CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunelli SM, Sibbel S, Karpinski S, Marlowe G, Walker AG, Giullian J, Van Wyck D, Kelley T, Lazar R, Zywno ML, Connaire JJ, Young A, Tentori F (2022) Comparative effectiveness of mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine versus adenovirus vector-based Ad26.COV2.S vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 among dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 33:688–697CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brunelli SM, Sibbel S, Karpinski S, Marlowe G, Walker AG, Giullian J, Van Wyck D, Kelley T, Lazar R, Zywno ML, Connaire JJ, Young A, Tentori F (2022) Comparative effectiveness of mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine versus adenovirus vector-based Ad26.COV2.S vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 among dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 33:688–697CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia P, Han J, Montez-Rath ME, Sun S, Shang T, Parsonnet J, Chertow GM, Anand S, Schiller B, Abra G (2022) SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine response among patients receiving dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 17:1036–1038CrossRefPubMed Garcia P, Han J, Montez-Rath ME, Sun S, Shang T, Parsonnet J, Chertow GM, Anand S, Schiller B, Abra G (2022) SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine response among patients receiving dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 17:1036–1038CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Heinzel A, Mayrdorfer M, Jabbour R, Hofbauer TM, Merrelaar A, Eder M, Regele F, Doberer K, Spechtl P, Aschauer C, Koblischke M, Paschen C, Eskandary F, Hu K, Öhler B, Bhandal A, Kleibenböck S, Jagoditsch RI, Reiskopf B, Heger F, Bond G, Böhmig GA, Strassl R, Weseslindtner L, Indra A, Aberle JH, Binder M, Oberbauer R (2022) Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response 4 weeks after homologous vs heterologous third vaccine dose in kidney transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 182:165–171CrossRefPubMed Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Heinzel A, Mayrdorfer M, Jabbour R, Hofbauer TM, Merrelaar A, Eder M, Regele F, Doberer K, Spechtl P, Aschauer C, Koblischke M, Paschen C, Eskandary F, Hu K, Öhler B, Bhandal A, Kleibenböck S, Jagoditsch RI, Reiskopf B, Heger F, Bond G, Böhmig GA, Strassl R, Weseslindtner L, Indra A, Aberle JH, Binder M, Oberbauer R (2022) Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response 4 weeks after homologous vs heterologous third vaccine dose in kidney transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 182:165–171CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Antibody levels following booster SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among dialysis patients initially vaccinated with adenovirus vector-based vaccine
verfasst von
Joanna Willetts
Linda H. Ficociello
Curtis D. Johnson
Sandra E. Alexander
Claudy Mullon
Jeffrey L. Hymes
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2023
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Schlagwort
COVID-19
Erschienen in
Journal of Nephrology / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1121-8428
Elektronische ISSN: 1724-6059
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01559-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Journal of Nephrology 3/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.