Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019

24.05.2019 | Clinical trial

Creating a pragmatic trials program for breast cancer patients: Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT)

verfasst von: Bassam Basulaiman, Arif Ali Awan, Dean Fergusson, Lisa Vandermeer, Angel Arnaout, John Hilton, Brian Hutton, Anil Abraham Joy, Andrew Robinson, Nadia Califaretti, Carol Stober, Marta Sienkiewicz, Kednapa Thavorn, Mark Clemons

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The proportion of breast cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials is falling. The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) program was developed to challenge some of the contemporary barriers responsible for this fall in accrual. In this article, we review the successes and challenges our program has faced.

Methods

The REaCT program was created to improve care and outcomes for cancer patients through surveys of patients and healthcare providers, systematic reviews, economic evaluations, and the performance of pragmatic randomized trials with patient-centered outcomes. Likely, the greatest difference to conventional trial methodologies has been our widespread use of the integrated consent model (ICM) incorporating oral consent.

Results

Between 2014 and 2018, the program has recruited over 2000 patients to 15 randomized studies at 11 Canadian cancer centers. The REaCT program has completed and published five patient surveys, six healthcare provider surveys, ten systematic reviews, performed four economic evaluations, opened 15 clinical trials comparing standard of care interventions (two surgical, two adjuvant chemotherapy, five adjuvant supportive care, one radiology, two vascular devices, two palliative supportive care, and one molecular diagnostics). Patient surveys have shown high levels of satisfaction with the ICM.

Conclusion

The REaCT program was developed to tackle important practice questions that will better guide optimal practice and to increase the availability of pragmatic clinical trials. While many challenges remain, future strategies will involve including more study sites and efforts to integrate novel information technology strategies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorcraft SY, Marriott C, Peckitt C et al (2016) Patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials and their views on aspects of cancer research: results of a prospective patient survey. Trials 17:17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moorcraft SY, Marriott C, Peckitt C et al (2016) Patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials and their views on aspects of cancer research: results of a prospective patient survey. Trials 17:17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat The 2018 Cancer System Performance Report. Toronto (ON): Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. In. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer 2018; 63 The 2018 Cancer System Performance Report. Toronto (ON): Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. In. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer 2018; 63
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Report on the State of Cancer Clinical Trials in Canada. In. Canadian Cancer Research Alliance (CCRA) 2011; 52 Report on the State of Cancer Clinical Trials in Canada. In. Canadian Cancer Research Alliance (CCRA) 2011; 52
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Flanagan MB, Dabbs DJ, Brufsky AM et al (2008) Histopathologic variables predict oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol 21:1255–1261CrossRefPubMed Flanagan MB, Dabbs DJ, Brufsky AM et al (2008) Histopathologic variables predict oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol 21:1255–1261CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph G, Dohan D (2009) Recruiting minorities where they receive care: institutional barriers to cancer clinical trials recruitment in a safety-net hospital. Contemp Clin Trials 30:552–559CrossRefPubMed Joseph G, Dohan D (2009) Recruiting minorities where they receive care: institutional barriers to cancer clinical trials recruitment in a safety-net hospital. Contemp Clin Trials 30:552–559CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B et al (2006) Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol 7:141–148CrossRefPubMed Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B et al (2006) Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol 7:141–148CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Unger JM, Cook E, Tai E, Bleyer A (2016) The role of clinical trial participation in cancer research: barriers, evidence, and strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 35:185–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Unger JM, Cook E, Tai E, Bleyer A (2016) The role of clinical trial participation in cancer research: barriers, evidence, and strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 35:185–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams RJ, Tse T, DiPiazza K, Zarin DA (2015) Terminated trials in the clinicaltrials.gov results database: evaluation of availability of primary outcome data and reasons for termination. PLoS ONE 10:e0127242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Williams RJ, Tse T, DiPiazza K, Zarin DA (2015) Terminated trials in the clinicaltrials.gov results database: evaluation of availability of primary outcome data and reasons for termination. PLoS ONE 10:e0127242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilton J, Mazzarello S, Fergusson D et al (2016) Novel methodology for comparing standard-of-care interventions in patients with cancer. J Oncol Pract 12:e1016–e1024CrossRefPubMed Hilton J, Mazzarello S, Fergusson D et al (2016) Novel methodology for comparing standard-of-care interventions in patients with cancer. J Oncol Pract 12:e1016–e1024CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart DJ, Whitney SN, Kurzrock R (2010) Equipoise lost: ethics, costs, and the regulation of cancer clinical research. J Clin Oncol 28:2925–2935CrossRefPubMed Stewart DJ, Whitney SN, Kurzrock R (2010) Equipoise lost: ethics, costs, and the regulation of cancer clinical research. J Clin Oncol 28:2925–2935CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilton J, Vandermeer L, Sienkiewicz M et al (2018) Filgrastim use in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer-a survey of physicians and patients. Support Care Cancer 26:2323–2331CrossRefPubMed Hilton J, Vandermeer L, Sienkiewicz M et al (2018) Filgrastim use in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer-a survey of physicians and patients. Support Care Cancer 26:2323–2331CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilton J, Vandermeer L, Sienkiewicz M et al (2018) Filgrastim use in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer-a survey of physicians and patients. Support Care Cancer: Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 26:2323–2331CrossRef Hilton J, Vandermeer L, Sienkiewicz M et al (2018) Filgrastim use in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer-a survey of physicians and patients. Support Care Cancer: Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 26:2323–2331CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim MFK, Hilton J, Mazzarello S et al (2018) A multi-center pragmatic, randomized, feasibility trial comparing standard of care schedules of filgrastim administration for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 168:371–379CrossRefPubMed Ibrahim MFK, Hilton J, Mazzarello S et al (2018) A multi-center pragmatic, randomized, feasibility trial comparing standard of care schedules of filgrastim administration for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 168:371–379CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzarello S, Clemons M, Graham ID, Jacobs C (2015) Surviving surveys. J Oncol Pract 11:44–46CrossRefPubMed Mazzarello S, Clemons M, Graham ID, Jacobs C (2015) Surviving surveys. J Oncol Pract 11:44–46CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs C, Hutton B, Mazzarello S et al (2015) Optimisation of steroid prophylaxis schedules in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy—a survey of health care providers and patients. Support Care Cancer 23:3269–3275CrossRefPubMed Jacobs C, Hutton B, Mazzarello S et al (2015) Optimisation of steroid prophylaxis schedules in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy—a survey of health care providers and patients. Support Care Cancer 23:3269–3275CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu X, Bouganim N, Vandermeer L et al (2012) Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience. Curr Oncol 19:e239–e243CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhu X, Bouganim N, Vandermeer L et al (2012) Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience. Curr Oncol 19:e239–e243CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kassam F, Enright K, Dent R et al (2009) Survival outcomes for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: implications for clinical practice and trial design. Clin Breast Cancer 9:29–33CrossRefPubMed Kassam F, Enright K, Dent R et al (2009) Survival outcomes for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: implications for clinical practice and trial design. Clin Breast Cancer 9:29–33CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Amir E, Ocana A, Freedman O et al (2010) Chemotherapy: dose-dense treatment for triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:79–80CrossRefPubMed Amir E, Ocana A, Freedman O et al (2010) Chemotherapy: dose-dense treatment for triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7:79–80CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalaf D, Hilton JF, Clemons M et al (2014) Investigating the discernible and distinct effects of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer on time to progression. Oncol Lett 7:866–870CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khalaf D, Hilton JF, Clemons M et al (2014) Investigating the discernible and distinct effects of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer on time to progression. Oncol Lett 7:866–870CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs C, Clemons M, Mazzarello S et al (2017) Enhancing accrual to chemotherapy trials for patients with early stage triple-negative breast cancer: a survey of physicians and patients. Support Care Cancer 25:1881–1886CrossRefPubMed Jacobs C, Clemons M, Mazzarello S et al (2017) Enhancing accrual to chemotherapy trials for patients with early stage triple-negative breast cancer: a survey of physicians and patients. Support Care Cancer 25:1881–1886CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilton J, Stober C, Mazzarello S et al (2018) Randomised feasibility trial to compare three standard of care chemotherapy regimens for early stage triple-negative breast cancer (REaCT-TNBC trial). PLoS ONE 13:e0199297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hilton J, Stober C, Mazzarello S et al (2018) Randomised feasibility trial to compare three standard of care chemotherapy regimens for early stage triple-negative breast cancer (REaCT-TNBC trial). PLoS ONE 13:e0199297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandes R, Mazzarello S, Stober C et al (2018) Primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis for patients who receive FEC-D chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review. J Glob Oncol 4:1–8CrossRefPubMed Fernandes R, Mazzarello S, Stober C et al (2018) Primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis for patients who receive FEC-D chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review. J Glob Oncol 4:1–8CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat McGee SF, Mazzarello S, Caudrelier JM et al (2018) Optimal sequence of adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer—a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 69:132–142CrossRefPubMed McGee SF, Mazzarello S, Caudrelier JM et al (2018) Optimal sequence of adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer—a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 69:132–142CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson A, Souied O, Bota AB et al (2018) Optimal vascular access strategies for patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 171:607–620CrossRefPubMed Robinson A, Souied O, Bota AB et al (2018) Optimal vascular access strategies for patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 171:607–620CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandes R, Mazzarello S, Stober C et al (2017) Optimal primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis for patients receiving docetaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161:1–10CrossRefPubMed Fernandes R, Mazzarello S, Stober C et al (2017) Optimal primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis for patients receiving docetaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161:1–10CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat LeVasseur N, Stober C, Daigle K et al (2018) Optimizing vascular access for patients receiving intravenous systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer—a survey of oncology nurses and physicians. Curr Oncol 25:e298–e304PubMedPubMedCentral LeVasseur N, Stober C, Daigle K et al (2018) Optimizing vascular access for patients receiving intravenous systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer—a survey of oncology nurses and physicians. Curr Oncol 25:e298–e304PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemons M. REaCT-VA HER2 Positive: Randomized Trial Standard of Care Vascular Access Strategies for (Neo)Adjuvant Trastuzumab-based Breast Cancer Treatment NCT02632435. In. 2015 Clemons M. REaCT-VA HER2 Positive: Randomized Trial Standard of Care Vascular Access Strategies for (Neo)Adjuvant Trastuzumab-based Breast Cancer Treatment NCT02632435. In. 2015
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemons M. REaCT-VA HER2 Negative: Vascular Access Strategies for (Neo) Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Without Trastuzumab NCT02688998. In. 2016 Clemons M. REaCT-VA HER2 Negative: Vascular Access Strategies for (Neo) Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Without Trastuzumab NCT02688998. In. 2016
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemons M. REaCT-BTA: 4-weekly Versus 12-weekly Administration of Bone-targeted Agents in Patients With Bone Metastases NCT02721433. In. 2016 Clemons M. REaCT-BTA: 4-weekly Versus 12-weekly Administration of Bone-targeted Agents in Patients With Bone Metastases NCT02721433. In. 2016
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemons M. REaCT-G2: A Study to Compare Administration Schedules of G-CSF (Filgrastim) for Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia NCT02816164. In. 2016 Clemons M. REaCT-G2: A Study to Compare Administration Schedules of G-CSF (Filgrastim) for Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia NCT02816164. In. 2016
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, Kass NE (2014) Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care. N Engl J Med 370:766–768CrossRefPubMed Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, Kass NE (2014) Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care. N Engl J Med 370:766–768CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SYH, Miller FG (2014) Informed consent for pragmatic trials—the integrated consent model. N Engl J Med 370:769–772CrossRefPubMed Kim SYH, Miller FG (2014) Informed consent for pragmatic trials—the integrated consent model. N Engl J Med 370:769–772CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kearney A, McKay A, Hickey H et al (2014) Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays. BMJ Open 4:e005874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kearney A, McKay A, Hickey H et al (2014) Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays. BMJ Open 4:e005874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemons M. REaCT-TAPS: Comparing Tapering Low Dose Dexamethasone to Other Standard of Care Therapies for TAPS in Breast Cancer Patients NCT03348696. In. 2017 Clemons M. REaCT-TAPS: Comparing Tapering Low Dose Dexamethasone to Other Standard of Care Therapies for TAPS in Breast Cancer Patients NCT03348696. In. 2017
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H et al (2015) Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II—an ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value in Health 18:161–172CrossRefPubMed Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H et al (2015) Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II—an ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value in Health 18:161–172CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristensen N, Nymann C, Konradsen H (2016) Implementing research results in clinical practice—the experiences of healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 16:48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kristensen N, Nymann C, Konradsen H (2016) Implementing research results in clinical practice—the experiences of healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 16:48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahmud A, Zalay O, Springer A et al (2018) Barriers to participation in clinical trials: a physician survey. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont) 25:119–125CrossRef Mahmud A, Zalay O, Springer A et al (2018) Barriers to participation in clinical trials: a physician survey. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont) 25:119–125CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Borno HT, Zhang L, Siegel A et al (2018) At what cost to clinical trial enrollment? a retrospective study of patient travel burden in cancer clinical trials. Oncologist 23:1242–1249CrossRefPubMed Borno HT, Zhang L, Siegel A et al (2018) At what cost to clinical trial enrollment? a retrospective study of patient travel burden in cancer clinical trials. Oncologist 23:1242–1249CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilton J. REaCT-EF: An Integrated Consent Model Study to Compare Two Standard of Care Schedules for Monitoring Cardiac Function in Patients Receiving Trastuzumab for Early Stage Breast Cancer NCT02696707. In. 2016 Hilton J. REaCT-EF: An Integrated Consent Model Study to Compare Two Standard of Care Schedules for Monitoring Cardiac Function in Patients Receiving Trastuzumab for Early Stage Breast Cancer NCT02696707. In. 2016
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemons M. REaCT-TC2: Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factors or Antibiotics for Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia NCT02816112. In. 2016 Clemons M. REaCT-TC2: Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factors or Antibiotics for Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia NCT02816112. In. 2016
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemons M. REaCT-ZOL: Comparing a Single-Dose vs. Twice Yearly Zoledronate in Patients With Early Stage Breast Cancer NCT03664687. In. 2018 Clemons M. REaCT-ZOL: Comparing a Single-Dose vs. Twice Yearly Zoledronate in Patients With Early Stage Breast Cancer NCT03664687. In. 2018
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemons M. ILIAD: Individualised Versus Standard Care for Breast Cancer Patients at High-risk for Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting The ILIAD Study NCT02861859. In. 2016 Clemons M. ILIAD: Individualised Versus Standard Care for Breast Cancer Patients at High-risk for Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting The ILIAD Study NCT02861859. In. 2016
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Auer R. REaCT-NSQIP: Comparing No Mechanical Bowel Preparation With Oral Antibiotics Alone in Patients Undergoing Elective Colon Surgery NCT03663504. In. 2018 Auer R. REaCT-NSQIP: Comparing No Mechanical Bowel Preparation With Oral Antibiotics Alone in Patients Undergoing Elective Colon Surgery NCT03663504. In. 2018
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Vickers M. REaCT-Mg: Feasibility of Using an Integrated Consent Model to Compare Two Standard of Care Regimens for the Management of Hypomagnesemia From Anti-Cancer Therapies NCT02690012. In. 2016 Vickers M. REaCT-Mg: Feasibility of Using an Integrated Consent Model to Compare Two Standard of Care Regimens for the Management of Hypomagnesemia From Anti-Cancer Therapies NCT02690012. In. 2016
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnaout A. REaCT-ADM: The Use of Alloderm Versus Dermacell in Immediate Implant Based Breast Reconstruction NCT03064893. In. 2017 Arnaout A. REaCT-ADM: The Use of Alloderm Versus Dermacell in Immediate Implant Based Breast Reconstruction NCT03064893. In. 2017
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu T. REaCT-dex: Schedules of Dexamethasone in Patients Incorrectly Taking Dexamethasone Premedication NCT02815319. In. 2016 Hsu T. REaCT-dex: Schedules of Dexamethasone in Patients Incorrectly Taking Dexamethasone Premedication NCT02815319. In. 2016
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson SJ, Ibrahim MFK, Stober C et al (2019) Does integration of Magee equations into routine clinical practice affect whether oncologists order the oncotype DX test? a prospective randomized trial. J Eval Clin Pract 25:196–204CrossRefPubMed Robertson SJ, Ibrahim MFK, Stober C et al (2019) Does integration of Magee equations into routine clinical practice affect whether oncologists order the oncotype DX test? a prospective randomized trial. J Eval Clin Pract 25:196–204CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Creating a pragmatic trials program for breast cancer patients: Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT)
verfasst von
Bassam Basulaiman
Arif Ali Awan
Dean Fergusson
Lisa Vandermeer
Angel Arnaout
John Hilton
Brian Hutton
Anil Abraham Joy
Andrew Robinson
Nadia Califaretti
Carol Stober
Marta Sienkiewicz
Kednapa Thavorn
Mark Clemons
Publikationsdatum
24.05.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05274-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

07.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Auch für Trägerinnen von BRCA-Varianten gilt: Erkranken sie fünf bis zehn Jahre nach der letzten Schwangerschaft an Brustkrebs, ist das Sterberisiko besonders hoch.

Hypertherme Chemotherapie bietet Chance auf Blasenerhalt

07.05.2024 Harnblasenkarzinom Nachrichten

Eine hypertherme intravesikale Chemotherapie mit Mitomycin kann für Patienten mit hochriskantem nicht muskelinvasivem Blasenkrebs eine Alternative zur radikalen Zystektomie darstellen. Kölner Urologen berichten über ihre Erfahrungen.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Bessere Prognose mit links- statt rechtsseitigem Kolon-Ca.

06.05.2024 Kolonkarzinom Nachrichten

Menschen mit linksseitigem Kolonkarzinom leben im Mittel zweieinhalb Jahre länger als solche mit rechtsseitigem Tumor. Auch aktuell ist das Sterberisiko bei linksseitigen Tumoren US-Daten zufolge etwa um 11% geringer als bei rechtsseitigen.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.