Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Acta Neurochirurgica 3/2021

06.01.2021 | Original Article - Spine degenerative

Current patterns of practice in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain—results from a survey at the German Spine Societies’ Annual Congress 2018

verfasst von: Dominik Baschera, Sofia Syrianos, Christina Samel, Alex Alfieri, Leonard Westermann

Erschienen in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is debate regarding criteria to select patients for lumbar fusion surgery who have chronic low back pain (CLBP) and corresponding degenerative changes, but without nerve root compression or neurogenic claudication. The aim of this study was to compare patterns in current practice.

Method

A total of 143 printed questionnaires containing 51 questions were distributed at the German Spine Societies' (DWG) annual congress, 6–8 December 2018.

Results

We received 127 (89%) surveys (64 orthopedic surgeons and 63 neurosurgeons). Excluding the 22% who do not perform lumbar fusion for CLBP, 41.4% reported performing 1–10 lumbar fusion procedures for patients with CLBP per year, 20.2% reported 11–20, 10.1% reported 21–30 and 17.2% reported performing more than 50. A total of 44.9% of surgeons reported treating patients for at least 6–12 months conservatively before considering surgery; 65.6% considered postoperative pain reduction of 50–70% a treatment success; 32.6% of respondents believe that <50% of patients showed good outcomes after fusion in CLBP and only 15.5% believed that 70% or more showed good outcomes. Orthopedic surgeons perform more lumbar fusion surgeries than neurosurgeons (p = 0.05), fuse more lumbar segments than neurosurgeons (p = 0.02) and are more likely to suggest that their patients with CLBP cease smoking preoperatively (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Despite discouraging evidence in the literature, the majority of respondents still perform fusion surgery in patients with CLBP. The use of preoperative diagnostics and tests vary widely among spine surgeons.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Datta S, Lee M, Falco FJ, Bryce DA, Hayek SM (2009) Systematic assessment of diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic utility of lumbar facet joint interventions. Pain Phys 12:437–460 Datta S, Lee M, Falco FJ, Bryce DA, Hayek SM (2009) Systematic assessment of diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic utility of lumbar facet joint interventions. Pain Phys 12:437–460
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritzell P, Hagg O, Jonsson D, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study G (2004) Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:421–434; discussion Z423. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000102681.61791.12CrossRef Fritzell P, Hagg O, Jonsson D, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study G (2004) Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:421–434; discussion Z423. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​01.​brs.​0000102681.​61791.​12CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study G (2001) 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2521–2532; discussion 2532-2524. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002CrossRef Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study G (2001) 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2521–2532; discussion 2532-2524. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​00007632-200112010-00002CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtori S, Koshi T, Yamashita M, Yamauchi K, Inoue G, Suzuki M, Orita S, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Takaso M, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Ishikawa T, Arai G, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Suzuki M, Nakamura J, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2011) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of selected patients with discogenic low back pain: a small-sized randomized trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d0c944CrossRef Ohtori S, Koshi T, Yamashita M, Yamauchi K, Inoue G, Suzuki M, Orita S, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Takaso M, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Ishikawa T, Arai G, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Suzuki M, Nakamura J, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2011) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of selected patients with discogenic low back pain: a small-sized randomized trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:347–354. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181d0c944​CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Watters WC 3rd, Resnick DK, Eck JC, Ghogawala Z, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Choudhri TF, Sharan A, Groff MW, Wang JC, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG (2014) Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 13: injection therapies, low-back pain, and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 21:79–90. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14281CrossRefPubMed Watters WC 3rd, Resnick DK, Eck JC, Ghogawala Z, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, Choudhri TF, Sharan A, Groff MW, Wang JC, Dhall SS, Kaiser MG (2014) Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 13: injection therapies, low-back pain, and lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 21:79–90. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3171/​2014.​4.​SPINE14281CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Current patterns of practice in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain—results from a survey at the German Spine Societies’ Annual Congress 2018
verfasst von
Dominik Baschera
Sofia Syrianos
Christina Samel
Alex Alfieri
Leonard Westermann
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Elektronische ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04691-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Acta Neurochirurgica 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.