Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Surgical Endoscopy
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2016

25.08.2015 | Review

Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review

verfasst von: Justin D. Bric, Derek C. Lumbard, Matthew J. Frelich, Jon C. Gould

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Worldwide, the annual number of robotic surgical procedures continues to increase. Robotic surgical skills are unique from those used in either open or laparoscopic surgery. The acquisition of a basic robotic surgical skill set may be best accomplished in the simulation laboratory. We sought to review the current literature pertaining to the use of virtual reality (VR) simulation in the acquisition of robotic surgical skills on the da Vinci Surgical System.

Materials and methods

A PubMed search was conducted between December 2014 and January 2015 utilizing the following keywords: virtual reality, robotic surgery, da Vinci, da Vinci skills simulator, SimSurgery Educational Platform, Mimic dV-Trainer, and Robotic Surgery Simulator. Articles were included if they were published between 2007 and 2015, utilized VR simulation for the da Vinci Surgical System, and utilized a commercially available VR platform.

Results

The initial search criteria returned 227 published articles. After all inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, a total of 47 peer-reviewed manuscripts were included in the final review.

Conclusions

There are many benefits to utilizing VR simulation for robotic skills acquisition. Four commercially available simulators have been demonstrated to be capable of assessing robotic skill. Three of the four simulators demonstrate the ability of a VR training curriculum to improve basic robotic skills, with proficiency-based training being the most effective training style. The skills obtained on a VR training curriculum are comparable with those obtained on dry laboratory simulation. The future of VR simulation includes utilization in assessment for re-credentialing purposes, advanced procedural-based training, and as a warm-up tool prior to surgery.
Literatur
1.
Kenngott HG, Fischer L, Nickel F, Rom J, Rassweiler J, Müller-Stich BP (2012) Status of robotic assistance—a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery? Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:333–341CrossRefPubMed
2.
Callery MP, Strasberg SM, Soper NJ (1996) Complications of laparoscopic general surgery. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 6(2):423–444PubMed
3.
Scott DJ, Dunnington GL (2008) The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 12:213–221CrossRefPubMed
4.
Sun LW, Van Meer F, Bailly Y, Thakre AA (2007) Advanced da Vinci surgical system simulator for surgeon training and operation planning. Int J Med Robot 3(3):245–251CrossRefPubMed
5.
Albani JM, Lee DI (2007) Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation. J Endourol 21:285–287CrossRefPubMed
6.
Smith R, Truong M, Perez M (2015) Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot. Surg Endosc 29(4):972–983CrossRefPubMed
7.
Raza SJ, Froghi S, Chowriappa A, Ahmed K, Field E, Stegemann AP, Rehman S, Sharif M, Shi Y, Wilding GE, Kesavadas T, Kaouk J, Guru K (2014) Construct validation of the key components of fundamental skills of robotic surgery (FSRS) curriculum—a multi-institution prospective study. J Surg Educ 71:316–324CrossRefPubMed
8.
Seixas-mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding GE, Guru KA (2010) Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology 76:357–360CrossRefPubMed
9.
Seixas-Mikelus S, Stegemann AP, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, Sathyaseelan G, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding GE, Peabody JO, Guru K (2011) Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. BJU Int 107:1130–1135CrossRefPubMed
10.
Chowriappa AJ, Shi Y, Raza SJ, Ahmed K, Stegemann A, Wilding G, Kaouk J, Peabody JO, Menon M, Hassett JM, Kesavadas T, Guru K (2013) Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training—the Robotic Skills Assessment Score. J Surg Res 185:561–569CrossRefPubMed
11.
Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, Rehman S, Ghani K, Autorino R, Sharif M, Rao A, Shi Y, Wilding GE, Hassett JM, Chowriappa A, Kesavadas T, Peabody JO, Menon M, Kaouk J, Guru KA (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81:767–774CrossRefPubMed
12.
Kenney P, Wszolek MF, Gould JJ, Libertino J, Moinzadeh A (2009) Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Urology 73:1288–1292CrossRefPubMed
13.
Korets R, Mues AC, Graversen J, Gupta M, Benson MC, Cooper KL, Landman J, Badani KK (2011) Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents. Urology 78:1326–1330CrossRefPubMed
14.
Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Huynh VB, Etafy M, McDougall EM (2012) Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator-role as an assessment tool? J Urol 187:998–1002CrossRefPubMed
15.
Lendvay T, Casale P, Sweet R, Peters C (2008) VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-trainer robotic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 132:242–244PubMed
16.
Liss M, Abdelshehid C, Quach S, Lusch A, Graversen J, Landman J, McDougall EM (2012) Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer and the daVinci surgical skills simulator using the Mimic software for urologic robotic surgical education. J Endourol 26:1629–1634CrossRefPubMed
17.
Perrenot C, Perez M, Tran N, Jehl J, Felblinger J, Bresler L, Hubert J (2012) The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer(®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26:2587–2593CrossRefPubMed
18.
Schreuder HW, Persson JE, Wolswijk RG, Ihse I, Schijven MP, Verheijen RH (2014) Validation of a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Sci World J. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​507076
19.
Lerner MA, Ayalew M (2010) Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 24:467–472CrossRefPubMed
20.
Sethi AS, Peine WJ, Ph D, Mohammadi Y, Sundaram CP (2009) Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. J Endourol 23:503–508CrossRefPubMed
21.
Cho JS, Hahn KY, Kwak JM, Kim J, Baek SJ, Shin JW, Kim SH (2013) Virtual reality training improves da Vinci performance: a prospective trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:992–998CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kang SG, Ryu BJ, Yang KS, Ko YH, Cho S, Kang SH, Patel VR, Cheon J (2014) An effective repetitive training schedule to achieve skill proficiency using a novel robotic virtual reality simulator. J Surg Educ 72(3):369–376CrossRefPubMed
23.
Kang SG, Cho S, Kang SH, Haidar AM, Samavedi S (2014) The tube 3 module designed for practicing vesicourethral anastomosis in a virtual reality robotic simulator: determination of face, content, and construct validity. Urology 84:345–350CrossRefPubMed
24.
Lendvay TS, Brand TC, White L, Kowalewski T, Jonnadula S, Mercer LD, Khorsand D, Andros J, Hannaford B, Satava RM (2013) Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Surg 216:1181–1192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Alzahrani T, Haddad R, Alkhayal A, Delisle J, Drudi L, Gotlieb W, Fraser S, Bergman S, Bladou F, Andonian S, Anidjar M (2013) Validation of the da Vinci surgical skill simulator across three surgical disciplines: a pilot study. Can Urol Assoc 7(7–8):E520–E529
26.
Connolly M, Seligman J, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC (2014) Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 28:1691–1694CrossRefPubMed
27.
Finnegan KT, Meraney AM, Staff I, Shichman SJ (2012) da Vinci skills simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance. Urology 80:330–335CrossRefPubMed
28.
Hung AJ, Jayaratna IS, Teruya K, Desai MM, Gill IS, Goh AC (2013) Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods. BJU Int 112(6):864–871CrossRefPubMed
29.
Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, Cai J, Ng CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 186:1019–1025CrossRefPubMed
30.
Kelly DC, Margules AC, Kundavaram CR, Narins H, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD (2012) Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci skills simulator. Urology 79:1068–1072CrossRefPubMed
31.
Lyons C, Goldfarb D, Jones SL, Badhiwala N, Miles B, Link R, Dunkin BJ (2013) Which skills really matter? Proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator. Surg Endosc 27:2020–2030CrossRefPubMed
32.
Culligan P, Gurshumov E, Lewis C, Priestley J, Komar J, Salamon C (2014) Predictive validity of a training protocol using a robotic surgery simulator. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20:48–51CrossRefPubMed
33.
Hung AJ, Patil MB, Zehnder P, Cai J, Ng CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM (2012) Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 187:630–637CrossRefPubMed
34.
Bric J, Connolly M, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC (2014) Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 28:3343–3348CrossRefPubMed
35.
Foell K, Finelli A, Yasufuku K, Bernardini MQ, Waddell TK, Pace KT, Honey RJ, Lee JY (2013) Robotic surgery basic skills training: evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum. Can Urol Assoc 7:430–434
36.
Gomez PP, Willis RE, Van Sickle KR (2014) Development of a virtual reality robotic surgical curriculum using the da Vinci Si surgical system. Surg Endosc. PMID: 25361648
37.
Vaccaro CM, Crisp CC, Fellner ÞAN, Jackson C, Kleeman SD, Pavelka J (2013) Robotic virtual reality simulation plus standard robotic orientation versus standard robotic orientation alone : a randomized controlled trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(5):266–270CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zhang N, Sumer BD (2013) Transoral robotic surgery: simulation-based standardized training. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:1111–1117CrossRefPubMed
39.
Lallas CD (2012) Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Endourol Endourol Soc 26:283–293CrossRef
40.
Gavazzi A, Bahsoun AN, Van Haute W, Ahmed K, Elhage O, Jaye P, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP robot). Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:152–156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Shamim Khan M, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, Gohil R, Thomas L, Poulsen J, Ahmed M, Jaye P, Dasgupta P (2013) Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int 111:518–523CrossRefPubMed
42.
Balasundaram I, Darzi A (2008) Short-phase training on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance in tele-robotic surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 4(2):139–145CrossRef
43.
44.
Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, Guru K, Challacombe B, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2013) Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators—a systematic review. BJU Int 111:194–205CrossRefPubMed
45.
Kumar A, Smith R, Patel VR (2015) Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills. Curr Opin Urol 25:168–174CrossRefPubMed
46.
Liu M, Curet M (2015) A review of training research and virtual reality simulators for the da Vinci surgical system. Teaching and learning in medicine. Teach Learn Med 27(1):37–41CrossRef
47.
Tergas AI, Sheth SB, Green IC, Giuntoli RL, Winder AD, Fader AN (2013) A pilot study of surgical training using a virtual robotic surgery simulator. JSLS 17:219–226CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Rehman S, Raza SJ, Stegemann AP, Zeeck K, Din R, Llewellyn A, Dio L, Trznadel M, Seo YW, Chowriappa AJ, Kesavadas T, Ahmed K, Guru K (2013) Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 11:841–846CrossRefPubMed
49.
Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain N, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26:1516–1521CrossRefPubMed
50.
Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain N, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2012) Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. Surgery 152:477–488CrossRefPubMed
51.
Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RH (2012) Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG 119:137–149CrossRefPubMed
52.
Brinkman WM, Luursema JM, Kengen B, Schout BM, Witjes JA, Bekkers RL (2013) Da vinci skills simulator for assessing learning curve and criterion-based training of robotic basic skills. Urology 81:562–566CrossRefPubMed
53.
Kang SG, Yang KS, Ko YH, Kang SH, Park HS, Lee JG, Kim JJ, Cheon J (2012) A study on the learning curve of the robotic virtual reality simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:438–442CrossRefPubMed
54.
Smith R, Patel V, Satava R (2014) Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 10(3):379–384CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review
verfasst von
Justin D. Bric
Derek C. Lumbard
Matthew J. Frelich
Jon C. Gould
Publikationsdatum
25.08.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Video

Deep shaving and transanal disc excision in large endometriosis of mid and lower rectum: the Rouen technique

OriginalPaper

Pilot study of a novel pain management strategy: evaluating the impact on patient outcomes

OriginalPaper

Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma

New Technology

Preliminary design of an actuated imaging probe for generation of additional visual cues in a robotic surgery

Dynamic Manuscript

In vivo characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions by needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE): proposition of a comprehensive nCLE classification confirmed by an external retrospective evaluation

OriginalPaper

Stent-in-stent technique for removal of embedded partially covered self-expanding metal stents

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.
Bildnachweise