Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Das Thema chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen wird im Live-Webinar am 7. Mai von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr aus internistischer, gynäkologischer und psychologisch-neurowissenschaftlicher Perspektive beleuchtet. Besprochen werden krankheitsbedingte Ursachen, Mechanismen der kognitiven Schmerzmodulation sowie mögliche Therapieoptionen. Die Fortbildung ist mit 2 CME-Punkten zertifiziert. Melden Sie sich jetzt an!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Radiology
Erschienen in: European Radiology 4/2022

03.09.2021 | Breast

Dedicated breast CT: state of the art—Part II. Clinical application and future outlook

verfasst von: Yueqiang Zhu, Avice M. O’Connell, Yue Ma, Aidi Liu, Haijie Li, Yuwei Zhang, Xiaohua Zhang, Zhaoxiang Ye

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Dedicated breast CT is being increasingly used for breast imaging. This technique provides images with no compression, removal of tissue overlap, rapid acquisition, and available simultaneous assessment of microcalcifications and contrast enhancement. In this second installment in a 2-part review, the current status of clinical applications and ongoing efforts to develop new imaging systems are discussed, with particular emphasis on how to achieve optimized practice including lesion detection and characterization, response to therapy monitoring, density assessment, intervention, and implant evaluation. The potential for future screening with breast CT is also addressed.

Key Points

• Dedicated breast CT is an emerging modality with enormous potential in the future of breast imaging by addressing numerous clinical needs from diagnosis to treatment.
• Breast CT shows either noninferiority or superiority with mammography and numerical comparability to MRI after contrast administration in diagnostic statistics, demonstrates excellent performance in lesion characterization, density assessment, and intervention, and exhibits promise in implant evaluation, while potential application to breast cancer screening is still controversial.
• New imaging modalities such as phase-contrast breast CT, spectral breast CT, and hybrid imaging are in the progress of R & D.
Literatur
1.
Bleyer A, Welch HG (2012) Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 367:1998–2005PubMedCrossRef
2.
Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Kopans DB (2015) Digital breast tomosynthesis: state of the art. Radiology 277:663–684PubMedCrossRef
3.
Gao Y, Heller SL (2020) Abbreviated and ultrafast breast MRI in clinical practice. Radiographics 40:1507–1527PubMedCrossRef
4.
Boone JM, Kwan ALC, Yang K, Burkett GW, Lindfors KK, Nelson TR (2006) Computed tomography for imaging the breast. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 11:103–111PubMedCrossRef
5.
O’Connell AM, Conover DL, Lin CFL (2009) Cone-beam computed tomography for breast imaging. J Radiol Nurs 28:3–11CrossRef
6.
Ning R, Conover DL, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Liu S, Neugebauer J (2010) Koning cone beam breast CT for breast cancer detection, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Clin Oncol Cancer Clin Trials 33:526–527
7.
O’Connell AM (2012) The evolution and future of dedicated breast CT. Breast diseases: a year book quarterly 23:131–133
8.
O’Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S (2014) The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples. Breast J 20:592–605PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
10.
Yin L, Ye Z (2016) New 3D X-ray modalities in breast imaging: digital breast tomosynthesis and cone beam breast computed tomography. Chin Med Device Inform 22:17-20 in Chinese
11.
Ye Z, Wu Y, Liu P (2017) Cone-beam breast CT diagnostic atlas. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing in Chinese
12.
Wienbeck S, Lotz J, Fischer U (2017) Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe. Clin Imaging 42:50–59PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
Bärnklau-Gooriah E, Ruth V, Steiding C, Kolditz D (2020) Spiral Breast CT: an innovative technology for high resolution real 3D breast imaging without compression. DI Europe 36:70–73
15.
Ridder K (2020) Breast CT - a ground-breaking innovation. DI Europe 36:18–21
16.
17.
O’Connell A, Conover DL, Zhang Y et al (2010) Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:496–509PubMedCrossRef
18.
O’Connell AM, Kawakyu-O’Connor D (2012) Dedicated cone-beam breast computed tomography and diagnostic mammography: comparison of radiation dose, patient comfort, and qualitative review of imaging findings in BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions. J Clin Imaging Sci 2:7PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
20.
Chen L, Abbey CK, Nosratieh A, Lindfors KK, Boone JM (2012) Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies. Med Phys 39:1435–1441PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Vedantham S, Shi L, Glick SJ, Karellas A (2013) Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT. Med Phys 40:011901PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
24.
Seifert P, Conover D, Zhang Y et al (2014) Evaluation of malignant breast lesions in the diagnostic setting with cone beam breast computed tomography (breast CT): feasibility study. Breast J 20:364–374PubMedCrossRef
25.
Prionas ND, Aminololama-Shakeri S, Yang K, Martinez SR, Lindfors KK, Boone JM (2015) Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT detection of invasive breast cancer preceding mammographic diagnosis. Radiol Case Rep 10:936
26.
Lindfors KK, Boone JM, Newell MS, D’Orsi CJ (2010) Dedicated breast computed tomography: the optimal cross-sectional imaging solution? Radiol Clin North Am 48:1043–1054PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Berger N, Marcon M, Saltybaeva N et al (2019) Dedicated breast computed tomography with a photon-counting detector: initial results of clinical in vivo imaging. Invest Radiol 54:409–418PubMedCrossRef
28.
Shen Y, Zhong Y, Lai CJ, Wang T, Shaw CC (2013) Cone beam breast CT with a high pitch (75 μm), thick (500 μm) scintillator CMOS flat panel detector: visibility of simulated microcalcifications. Med Phys 40:101915PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Rößler AC, Kalender W, Kolditz D et al (2017) Performance of photon-counting breast computed tomography, digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis in evaluating breast specimens. Acad Radiol 24:184–190PubMedCrossRef
30.
Aminololama-Shakeri S, Abbey CK, López JE et al (2019) Conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast enhanced breast CT compared to digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography. Br J Radiol 92:20181034PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zuley M, Sumkin J, Ganott M et al (2011) Comparison of contrast-enhanced cone beam computed tomography to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the categorization of breast lesions. RSNA2011, November 26 - December 2, 2011, Chicago IL. http://​archive.​rsna.​org/​2011/​11003962.​html. Accessed 18 Oct 2020
32.
33.
Zuley M, Guo B, Ganott M et al (2013) Comparison of visibility and diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography, tomosynthesis, MRI and digital mammography for breast masses. RSNA2013, December 1 - December 6, 2013, Chicago IL. http://​archive.​rsna.​org/​2013/​13022530.​html. Accessed 18 Oct 2020
34.
Zhao B, Zhang X, Cai W, Conover D, Ning R (2015) Cone beam breast CT with multiplanar and three dimensional visualization in differentiating breast masses compared with mammography. Eur J Radiol 84:48–53PubMedCrossRef
35.
Cole E, Campbell A, Vedantham S, Pisano E, Karellas A (2015) Clinical performance of dedicated breast computed tomography in comparison to diagnostic digital mammography. RSNA2015, November 29 - December 4, 2015, Chicago IL. http://​archive.​rsna.​org/​2015/​15006483.​html. Accessed 18 Oct 2020
36.
Aminololama-Shakeri S, Abbey CK, Gazi P et al (2016) Differentiation of ductal carcinoma in-situ from benign micro-calcifications by dedicated breast computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 85:297–303PubMedCrossRef
37.
He N, Wu YP, Kong Y et al (2016) The utility of breast cone-beam computed tomography, ultrasound, and digital mammography for detecting malignant breast tumors: a prospective study with 212 patients. Eur J Radiol 85:392–403PubMedCrossRef
38.
Jung HK, Kuzmiak CM, Kim KW et al (2017) Potential use of American College of Radiology BI-RADS mammography atlas for reporting and assessing lesions detected on dedicated breast CT imaging: preliminary study. Acad Radiol 24:1395–1401PubMedCrossRef
39.
Wienbeck S, Uhlig J, Luftner-Nagel S et al (2017) The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast densitye. Eur Radiol 27:5185–5195PubMedCrossRef
40.
Uhlig J, Fischer U, Surov A, Lotz J, Wienbeck S (2018) Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy. Eur J Radiol 99:9–16PubMedCrossRef
41.
Liu A, Ma Y, Yin L, Han P, Li H, Ye Z (2018) Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency in breast malignancy between cone beam breast CT and mammography in dense breast. Chin J Oncol 40:604–609 in Chinese
42.
Uhlig J, Uhlig A, Kunze M et al (2018) Novel breast imaging and machine learning: predicting breast lesion malignancy at cone-beam CT using machine learning techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:W123–W131PubMedCrossRef
43.
Wienbeck S, Fischer U, Luftner-Nagel S, Lotz J, Uhlig J (2018) Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI. Eur Radiol 28:3731–3741PubMedCrossRef
44.
Liu A, Ma Y, Yin L, Han P, Li H, Ye Z (2018) Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT in dense breast lesions. Chin Oncol 28:807–812 in Chinese
45.
Uhlig J, Fischer U, Biggemann L, Lotz J, Wienbeck S (2019) Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy? Eur Radiol 29:3141–3148PubMedCrossRef
46.
47.
Uhlig J, Uhlig A, Biggemann L, Fischer U, Lotz J, Wienbeck S (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 29:1194–1202PubMedCrossRef
48.
49.
50.
Zhao X, Su D, Kang W et al (2020) The value of cone beam breast CT in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mass lesions. Radiol Pract 35:1268–1273 in Chinese
51.
Caballo M, Mann R, Sechopoulos I (2018) Patient-based 4D digital breast phantom for perfusion contrast-enhanced breast CT imaging. Med Phys 45:4448–4460PubMedCrossRef
52.
Caballo M, Michielsen K, Fedon C, Sechopoulos I (2019) Towards 4D dedicated breast CT perfusion imaging of cancer: development and validation of computer simulated images. Phys Med Biol 64:245004PubMedCrossRef
53.
Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116–124PubMedCrossRef
54.
Wienbeck S, Fischer U, Perske C et al (2017) Cone-beam breast computed tomography: CT density does not reflect proliferation potential and receptor expression of breast carcinoma. Transl Oncol 10:599–603PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Uhlig J, Fischer U, von Fintel E et al (2017) Contrast enhancement on cone-beam breast-CT for discrimination of breast cancer immunohistochemical subtypes. Transl Oncol 10:904–910PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Ma Y et al (2020) Cone-beam breast CT features associated with HER2/neu overexpression in patients with primary breast cancer. Eur Radiol 30:2731–2739PubMedCrossRef
57.
58.
Ma Y, Liu A, O’Connell AM et al (2021) Contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT features of breast cancers: correlation with immunohistochemical receptors and molecular subtypes. Eur Radiol 31:2580–2589PubMedCrossRef
59.
Chen JT, Zhou CY, He N, Wu YP (2020) Optimal acquisition time to discriminate between breast cancer subtypes with contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT. Diagn Interv Imaging 101:391–399PubMedCrossRef
60.
61.
Ma Y, Ye Z, Liu A, Yin L, Han P, Li H (2019) The accuracy of tumor size evaluation on invasive breast cancer based on cone beam breast CT. Chin J Radiol 53:286–291 in Chinese
62.
Wienbeck S, Uhlig J, Fischer U et al (2019) Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e17082CrossRef
63.
Vedantham S, O’Connell AM, Shi L, Karellas A, Huston AJ, Skinner KA (2014) Dedicated breast CT: feasibility for monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment. J Clin Imaging Sci 4:64PubMedPubMedCentral
64.
Zhong W, Kang W, Su D et al (2020) Comparative analysis of contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT, MRI and digital mammography measure size of breast non-mass lesions. Adv Clin Exp Med 10:2387–2392 in ChineseCrossRef
65.
Meng L, Su D, Zhao X et al (2020) Consistency analysis of cone beam breast CT and MRI for morphological description of breast cancer. J Clin Radiol 39:1952–1957 in Chinese
66.
He N, Meng T, Zhou C et al (2020) Contrast enhanced cone-beam breast CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI for evaluating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. RSNA2020, November 29 - December 5, 2020, Chicago IL. http://​archive.​rsna.​org/​2020/​20010505.​html. Accessed 18 Mar 2021
67.
Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236PubMedCrossRef
68.
Kopans DB (2008) Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. Radiology 246:348–353PubMedCrossRef
69.
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O’Connell AM (2012) Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. Med Phys 39:7317–7328PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Liu A, Ye Z, Ma Y, Cao Y (2018) Reliability of breast density estimation based on cone beam breast CT. Chin J Clin Oncol 45:246–250 in Chinese
71.
Ma Y, Cao Y, Liu A et al (2019) A reliability comparison of cone-beam breast computed tomography and mammography: breast density assessment referring to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS Atlas. Acad Radiol 26:752–759PubMedCrossRef
72.
Ducote JL, Molloi S (2009) SU-FF-I-135: breast density measurement with cone-beam CT and MRI: a post mortem study. Med Phys 36:2466
73.
Johnson T, Ding H, Le HQ, Ducote JL, Molloi S (2013) Breast density quantification with cone-beam CT: a post-mortem study. Phys Med Biol 58:8573–8591PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Ding H, Johnson T, Lin M, Su L, Molloi S (2013) TH-A-103-11: breast density measurement with cone-beam CT and MRI: a postmortem study. Med Phys 40:528CrossRef
75.
Seifert PJ, Morgan RC, Conover DL, Arieno AL (2017) Initial experience with a cone-beam breast computed tomography-guided biopsy system. J Clin Imaging Sci 7:1PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
Wienbeck S, Lotz J, Fischer U (2017) Feasibility of vacuum-assisted breast cone-beam CT-guided biopsy and comparison with prone stereotactic biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:1154–1162PubMedCrossRef
77.
Zheng Z, Kang W, Zhao X, Meng L, Liu Y (2020) Cone-beam breast CT-guided needle biopsy in diagnosis of breast invasive ductal carcinoma: case report. Chin J Interv Imaging Ther 17:319 in Chinese
78.
Meng L (2020) Comparative analysis of immunohistochemical detection indexes and molecular subtypes with breast specimens acquired with cone beam breast computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy and surgical resection. RSNA2020, November 29 - December 5, 2020, Chicago IL. http://​archive.​rsna.​org/​2020/​20010810.​html. Accessed 18 Mar 2021
79.
Zheng Z, Kang W, Su D (2012) Progresses in biopsy of breast cancer guided by different imaging techniques. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 35:1590–1593 in Chinese
80.
Prionas ND, McKenney SE, Stern RL, Boone JM (2012) Kilovoltage rotational external beam radiotherapy on a breast computed tomography platform: a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:533–539PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
Couto LS, Freitas-Junior R, Correa RS et al (2019) Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants. J Radiol Prot 39:498–510PubMedCrossRef
82.
Ruby L, Shim S, Berger N, Marcon M, Frauenfelder T, Boss A (2020) Diagnostic value of a spiral breast computed tomography system equipped with photon counting detector technology in patients with implants: an observational study of our initial experiences. Medicine (Baltimore) 99:e20797CrossRef
83.
Boone JM, Lindfors KK (2006) Breast CT: potential for breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Future Oncol 2:351–356PubMedCrossRef
84.
Ye Z (2015) Breast cancer screening: looking forward to new technology amid controversy. Chin Comput Med Imaging 21:418 in Chinese
85.
Aminololama-Shakeri S, Hargreaves JB, Boone JM, Lindfors KK (2016) Dedicated breast CT: screening technique of the future. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 8:242–247CrossRef
86.
87.
Ruile G, Djanatliev A, Kriza C et al (2015) Screening for breast cancer with breast-CT in a ProHTA simulation. J Comp Eff Res 4:553–567PubMedCrossRef
88.
Berger N, Marcon M, Frauenfelder T, Boss A (2020) Dedicated spiral breast computed tomography with a single photon-counting detector: initial results of the first 300 women. Invest Radiol 55:68–72PubMedCrossRef
89.
Lee TC, Reyna C, Shaughnessy E, Lewis JD (2019) Screening of populations at high risk for breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 120:820–830PubMedCrossRef
90.
Pijpe A, Andrieu N, Easton DF et al (2012) Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK). BMJ 345:e5660PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
91.
Auweter SD, Herzen J, Willner M et al (2014) X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast--advances towards clinical implementation. Br J Radiol 87:20130606PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
92.
Tavakoli Taba S, Gureyev TE, Alakhras M, Lewis S, Lockie D, Brennan PC (2018) X-ray phase-contrast technology in breast imaging: principles, options, and clinical application. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:133–145CrossRef
93.
Fiedler S, Bravin A, Keyriläinen J et al (2004) Imaging lobular breast carcinoma: comparison of synchrotron radiation DEI-CT technique with clinical CT, mammography and histology. Phys Med Biol 49:175–188PubMedCrossRef
94.
Sztrókay A, Herzen J, Auweter SD et al (2013) Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up. Eur Radiol 23:381–387PubMedCrossRef
95.
Grandl S, Willner M, Herzen J et al (2014) Visualizing typical features of breast fibroadenomas using phase-contrast CT: an ex-vivo study. PLoS One 9:e97101PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
96.
Baran P, Mayo S, McCormack M et al (2018) High-resolution X-ray phase-contrast 3-D imaging of breast tissue specimens as a possible adjunct to histopathology. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37:2642–2650PubMedCrossRef
97.
Hellerhoff K, Birnbacher L, Sztrókay-Gaul A et al (2019) Assessment of intraductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT at conventional X-ray sources: an experimental ex-vivo study. PLoS One 14:e0210291PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
98.
Li X, Gao H, Chen Z et al (2018) Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT. Eur Radiol 28:3742–3750PubMedCrossRef
99.
Brombal L, Arfelli F, Delogu P et al (2019) Image quality comparison between a phase-contrast synchrotron radiation breast CT and a clinical breast CT: a phantom based study. Sci Rep 9:17778PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
100.
Pacilè S, Dullin C, Baran P et al (2019) Free propagation phase-contrast breast CT provides higher image quality than cone-beam breast-CT at low radiation doses: a feasibility study on human mastectomies. Sci Rep 9:13762PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
101.
Tavakoli Taba S, Baran P, Nesterets YI et al (2020) Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging. Eur Radiol 30:2740–2750PubMedCrossRef
102.
Pacilè S, Baran P, Dullin C et al (2018) Advantages of breast cancer visualization and characterization using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast tomography. J Synchrotron Radiat 25:1460–1466PubMedCrossRef
103.
Ding H, Klopfer MJ, Ducote JL, Masaki F, Molloi S (2014) Breast tissue characterization with photon-counting spectral CT imaging: a postmortem breast study. Radiology 272:731–738PubMedCrossRef
104.
Ruth V, Kolditz D, Steiding C, Kalender WA (2020) Investigation of spectral performance for single-scan contrast-enhanced breast CT using photon-counting technology: a phantom study. Med Phys 47:2826–2837PubMedCrossRef
105.
Shah JP, Mann SD, McKinley RL, Tornai MP (2017) Implementation and CT sampling characterization of a third-generation SPECT-CT system for dedicated breast imaging. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 4:033502CrossRef
106.
Raylman RR, Van Kampen W, Stolin AV et al (2018) A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: evaluation of basic performance characteristics. Med Phys 45:1603–1613PubMedCrossRef
107.
Reiser I, Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Boone JM, Lindfors KK, Yang K (2012) Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study. Med Phys 39:866–873PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
108.
Wang X, Nagarajan MB, Conover D, Ning R, O’Connell A, Wismüller A (2014) Investigating the use of texture features for analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced cone beam CT. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 9038:903822PubMedPubMedCentral
109.
Caballo M, Teuwen J, Mann RM, Sechopoulos I (2019) Computer-aided detection of breast masses in dedicated breast CT images using adaptive parenchyma local search and deep learning. ECR2019 Book of Abstracts. Insights Imaging 10:S508. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13244-019-0713-y
110.
111.
Lee J, Nishikawa RM, Reiser I, Boone JM, Lindfors KK (2015) Local curvature analysis for classifying breast tumors: preliminary analysis in dedicated breast CT. Med Phys 42:5479–5489PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
112.
Caballo M, Pangallo DR, Sanderink W et al (2021) Multi-marker quantitative radiomics for mass characterization in dedicated breast CT imaging. Med Phys 48:313–328PubMedCrossRef
113.
Ma Y, Zhang Y, Liu A, Zhu Y, Ye Z (2019) Radiomics analysis on cone-beam breast CT: prediction of breast cancer immunohistochemical subtypes. CCR2019, November 11 - November 13, Beijing. https://​ccr2019.​medmeeting.​org/​cn. Accessed 16 Jan 2020
114.
115.
Esserman LJ, Kumar AS, Herrera AF et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 24:4603–4610PubMedCrossRef
116.
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB et al (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Dedicated breast CT: state of the art—Part II. Clinical application and future outlook
verfasst von
Yueqiang Zhu
Avice M. O’Connell
Yue Ma
Aidi Liu
Haijie Li
Yuwei Zhang
Xiaohua Zhang
Zhaoxiang Ye
Publikationsdatum
03.09.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08178-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

European Radiology 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Neuro

Infratentorial lesions in multiple sclerosis patients: intra- and inter-rater variability in comparison to a fully automated segmentation using 3D convolutional neural networks

Gastrointestinal

Comparison of metabolic and immunologic responses to transarterial chemoembolization with different chemoembolic regimens in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model

Magnetic Resonance

Application of diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI for response monitoring in multiple myeloma after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Magnetic Resonance

Pragmatic role of noncontrast magnetic resonance lymphangiography in postoperative chylothorax or cervical chylous leakage as a diagnostic and preprocedural planning tool

Head and Neck

Diffusion kurtosis imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of parotid gland tumors

Vascular-Interventional

Center experience and other determinants of patient radiation exposure during prostatic artery embolization: a retrospective study in three Scandinavian centers

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise