Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Forensic Toxicology 1/2017

08.08.2016 | Short Communication

Detection of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath after cannabis smoking and comparison with oral fluid

verfasst von: Pascal Kintz, Patrick Mura, Carole Jamey, Jean-Sébastien Raul

Erschienen in: Forensic Toxicology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Exhaled breath is commonly used in alcohol testing, but has been recently demonstrated by scientists from Sweden, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, and the United States to contain a large number of both volatile and non-volatile substances that can be measured using dedicated devices. ExaBreath® is a sampling device that collects the bio-aerosol particles from the donor. Approximately 2 min exhaled breath is enough for the test. The device collects the very small bio-aerosols on a filter, which is consecutively incubated into methanol to release drugs at a laboratory. Four occasional cannabis smokers were recruited for this study. Oral fluid, collected with the Quantisal® device, and exhaled breath were simultaneously collected up to 6 h after smoking a standard joint of cannabis. ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) was tested using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) or gas chromatography–MS/MS for exhaled breath and oral fluid, respectively. Linearity, precision and limit of quantification (5 pg/filter and 0.5 ng/mL for exhaled breath and oral fluid, respectively) were established. In each analytical batch, low and high controls were included. THC was identified in exhaled breath up to 6 h after smoking from all the four subjects, with concentrations in the range 15–1598 pg/filter. THC breath concentrations significantly decreased with time after smoking in all four participants. All the oral fluid specimens tested positive for THC over the 6 h of the study, with concentrations in the range 1–89 ng/mL. 11-Nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the main metabolite of THC was also analysed, but was undetectable in both exhaled breath and oral fluid. This study gives further support to the possibility of using exhaled breath as a new matrix to document exposure to drugs, particularly for cannabis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kintz P (2011) Alternative matrices to urine. In: Verstraete A (ed) Workplace drug testing. Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp 187–215 Kintz P (2011) Alternative matrices to urine. In: Verstraete A (ed) Workplace drug testing. Pharmaceutical Press, London, pp 187–215
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones AW, Andersson L (2003) Comparison of ethanol concentrations in venous blood and end-expired breath during a controlled drinking study. Forensic Sci Int 132:18–25CrossRefPubMed Jones AW, Andersson L (2003) Comparison of ethanol concentrations in venous blood and end-expired breath during a controlled drinking study. Forensic Sci Int 132:18–25CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Skoglund C, Hermansson U, Beck O (2015) Clinical trial of a new technique for drugs of abuse testing: a new possible sampling technique. J Subst Abuse Treat 48:132–136CrossRefPubMed Skoglund C, Hermansson U, Beck O (2015) Clinical trial of a new technique for drugs of abuse testing: a new possible sampling technique. J Subst Abuse Treat 48:132–136CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Berchtold C, Bosilkovska M, Daali Y, Walder B, Zenobi R (2014) Real-time monitoring of exhaled drugs by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 33:394–413CrossRefPubMed Berchtold C, Bosilkovska M, Daali Y, Walder B, Zenobi R (2014) Real-time monitoring of exhaled drugs by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 33:394–413CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck O, Sandqvist S, Dubbelboer I, Franck J (2011) Detection of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath collected from cannabis users. J Anal Toxicol 35:541–544CrossRefPubMed Beck O, Sandqvist S, Dubbelboer I, Franck J (2011) Detection of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath collected from cannabis users. J Anal Toxicol 35:541–544CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Himes S, Scheidweiler K, Beck O, Gorelick D, Desrosiers N, Huestis M (2013) Cannabinoids in exhaled breath following controlled administration of smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 59:1780–1789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Himes S, Scheidweiler K, Beck O, Gorelick D, Desrosiers N, Huestis M (2013) Cannabinoids in exhaled breath following controlled administration of smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 59:1780–1789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Coucke L, Massarini E, Ostijn Z, Beck O, Verstraete A (2016) ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations in exhaled breath and physiological effects following cannabis intake—a pilot study using illicit cannabis. Clin Biochem. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.06.003 PubMed Coucke L, Massarini E, Ostijn Z, Beck O, Verstraete A (2016) ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations in exhaled breath and physiological effects following cannabis intake—a pilot study using illicit cannabis. Clin Biochem. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clinbiochem.​2016.​06.​003 PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kintz P, Brunet B, Muller JF, Serra W, Villain M, Cirimele V, Mura P (2009) Evaluation of the Cozart DDSV test for cannabis in oral fluid. Ther Drug Monit 31:131–134CrossRefPubMed Kintz P, Brunet B, Muller JF, Serra W, Villain M, Cirimele V, Mura P (2009) Evaluation of the Cozart DDSV test for cannabis in oral fluid. Ther Drug Monit 31:131–134CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee D, Schwope DM, Milman G, Barnes AJ, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA (2012) Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 58:748–756CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee D, Schwope DM, Milman G, Barnes AJ, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA (2012) Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 58:748–756CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Detection of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath after cannabis smoking and comparison with oral fluid
verfasst von
Pascal Kintz
Patrick Mura
Carole Jamey
Jean-Sébastien Raul
Publikationsdatum
08.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Forensic Toxicology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1860-8965
Elektronische ISSN: 1860-8973
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-016-0333-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Forensic Toxicology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

Molekularpathologische Untersuchungen im Wandel der Zeit

Open Access Biomarker Leitthema

Um auch an kleinen Gewebeproben zuverlässige und reproduzierbare Ergebnisse zu gewährleisten ist eine strenge Qualitätskontrolle in jedem Schritt des Arbeitsablaufs erforderlich. Eine nicht ordnungsgemäße Prüfung oder Behandlung des …

Vergleichende Pathologie in der onkologischen Forschung

Pathologie Leitthema

Die vergleichende experimentelle Pathologie („comparative experimental pathology“) ist ein Fachbereich an der Schnittstelle von Human- und Veterinärmedizin. Sie widmet sich der vergleichenden Erforschung von Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden von …

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren

Open Access GIST CME-Artikel

Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren (GIST) stellen seit über 20 Jahren ein Paradigma für die zielgerichtete Therapie mit Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren dar. Eine elementare Voraussetzung für eine mögliche neoadjuvante oder adjuvante Behandlung bei …

Personalisierte Medizin in der Onkologie

Aufgrund des erheblichen technologischen Fortschritts in der molekularen und genetischen Diagnostik sowie zunehmender Erkenntnisse über die molekulare Pathogenese von Krankheiten hat in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten ein grundlegender …