nach oben

Journal of Genetic Counseling

Erschienen in:

12.10.2017 | Original Research

Development of FOCUS-GC: Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling

verfasst von: Deborah Cragun, Heather Zierhut

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Conceptual frameworks bring together existing theories and models in order to identify, consolidate, and fill in gaps between theory, practice, and evidence. Given the vast number of possible outcomes that could be studied in genetic counseling, a framework for organizing outcomes and postulating relationships between communication services and genetic counseling outcomes was sought. Through an iterative approach involving literature review, thematic analysis, and consolidation, outcomes and processes were categorized to create and define components of a conceptual framework. The final product, “Framework for Outcomes of Clinical commUnication Services” (FOCUS) contains the following domains: communication strategy; communication process measures; patient care experience, patient changes, patient health; and family changes. A website was created to allow easier access and ongoing modifications to the framework. In addition, a step-by-step guide and two examples were created to show flexibility in how the framework can be used. FOCUS may help in conceptualizing, organizing and summarizing outcomes research related to risk communication and counseling in genetic service delivery as well as other healthcare settings.

Accreditation Counsel for Genetic Counseling. (2015). Practice-Based Competencies for Genetic Counselors. Retrieved from http://www.gceducation.org/Documents/ACGC%20Core%20Competencies%20Brochure_15_Web.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2017

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Quality Measures Clearninghouse. (2017). https://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/. Accessed 6 Feb 2017.

Bernhardt, B. A., Biesecker, B. B., & Mastromarino, C. L. (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: Client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94(3), 189–197.CrossRefPubMed

Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057539.

DiClemente, R. J., Crosby, R. A., & Kegler, M. (2009). In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion pracitce and research (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care - how can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743–1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033.CrossRefPubMed

Epstein, R.M., Street, R.L., Jr. (2007) Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 07-6225. Bethesda. Retrieved from https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/pcc/pcc_monograph.pdf.

George, R., Kovak, K., & Cox, S. L. (2015). Aligning policy to promote cascade genetic screening for prevention and early diagnosis of heritable diseases. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(3), 388–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9805-5.CrossRefPubMed

Glanz, K., & Bishop, D. B. (2010). The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604.CrossRefPubMed

Hallowell, N., Lawton, J., & Gregory, S. (2005). Reflections on research: The Realitities of doing research in the social sciences. New York: Open University Press.

Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2015). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: A validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6.CrossRefPubMed

Hoerger, M., Epstein, R. M., Winters, P. C., Fiscella, K., Duberstein, P. R., Gramling, R., et al. (2013). Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): Study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers. BMC Cancer, 13, 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Boston: Addison-Wesley Pub Co..

Kenyon, C. C., Palakshappa, D., & Feudtner, C. (2015). Logic models--tools to bridge the theory-research-practice divide. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(9), 801–802. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1365.CrossRefPubMed

Kinney, A. Y., Boonyasiriwat, W., Walters, S. T., Pappas, L. M., Stroup, A. M., Schwartz, M. D., et al. (2014). Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: The family CARE randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 32(7), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.51.6765.CrossRef

Légaré, F., O’Connor, A. C., Graham, I., Saucier, D., Côté, L., Cauchon, M., & Paré, L. (2006). Supporting patients facing difficult health care decisions: Use of the Ottawa decision support framework. Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien, 52, 476–477 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17327891.PubMedPubMedCentral

Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043.CrossRefPubMed

Lundahl, B., Moleni, T., Burke, B. L., Butters, R., Tollefson, D., Butler, C., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012.CrossRefPubMed

Makoul, G., & Clayman, M. L. (2006). An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 60(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010.CrossRefPubMed

McAllister, M., & Dearing, A. (2015). Patient reported outcomes and patient empowerment in clinical genetics services. Clinical Genetics, 88(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12520.CrossRefPubMed

McAllister, M., Payne, K., Nicholls, S., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. M. (2007). Improving service evaluation in clinical genetics: Identifying effects of genetic diseases on individuals and families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9046-3.CrossRefPubMed

McAllister, M., Payne, K., Macleod, R., Nicholls, S., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2008). Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(7), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308095063.CrossRefPubMed

Mcallister, M., Wood, A., Dunn, G., Shiloh, S., & Todd, C. (2011). The genetic counseling outcome scale: A new patient-reported outcome measure for clinical genetics services. Clinical Genetics, 79, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01636.x.CrossRefPubMed

McAllister, M., Moldovan, R., Paneque, M., & Skirton, H. (2016). The need to develop an evidence base for genetic counselling in Europe. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG, 24(4), 504–505. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.134.CrossRefPubMed

Meiser, B., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A. L., Schnieden, V., Gattas, M., Kirk, J., & Psychological Impact Collaborative Group. (2001). Long-term outcomes of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 44(3), 215–225.CrossRefPubMed

Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: A critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(5), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-008-9173-0.CrossRefPubMed

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

Nilsen, P., Eccles, M., Grimshaw, J., Walker, A., Johnston, M., Pitts, N., et al. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Paul, J., Metcalfe, S., Stirling, L., Wilson, B., & Hodgson, J. (2015). Analyzing communication in genetic consultations--a systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.09.017.CrossRefPubMed

Payne, K., Nicholls, S., McAllister, M., Macleod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. M. (2007a). Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: A systematic review of validated measures. Value in Health : The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 11(3), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00259.x.CrossRef

Payne, K., Nicholls, S. G., McAllister, M., MacLeod, R., Ellis, I., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. M. (2007b). Outcome measures for clinical genetics services: A comparison of genetics healthcare professionals and patients’ views. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 84(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.03.005.CrossRef

Pengchit, W., Walters, S. T., Simmons, R. G., Kohlmann, W., Burt, R. W., Schwartz, M. D., & Kinney, A. Y. (2011). Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: An integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(8), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311402408.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Peters, K. F., & Petrill, S. A. (2011). A comparison of the background, needs, and expectations of patients seeking genetic counseling services. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 155A(4), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33979.

Pithara, C. (2014). Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: Qualitative evidence and methodological considerations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9654-7.CrossRefPubMed

Redlinger-Grosse, K., Veach, P. M., Cohen, S., LeRoy, B. S., MacFarlane, I. M., & Zierhut, H. (2015). Defining our clinical practice: The identification of genetic counseling outcomes utilizing the reciprocal engagement model. Journal of Genetic Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9864-2.

Roter, D., Ellington, L., Erby, L. H., Larson, S., & Dudley, W. (2006). The genetic counseling video project (GCVP): Models of practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30094.CrossRef

Ruiter, R. A. C., Kessels, L. T. E., Peters, G.-J. Y., & Kok, G. (2014). Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology : Journal International de Psychologie, 49(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12042.CrossRefPubMed

Silvey, K., Stock, J., Hasegawa, L. E., & Au, S. M. (2009). Outcomes of genetics services: Creating an inclusive definition and outcomes menu for public health and clinical genetics services. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 151C(3), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30218.CrossRef

Street, R. L. (2013). How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: Modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Education and Counseling, 92(3), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.004.CrossRefPubMed

Street, R. L., & Epstein, R. M. (2007). Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing & Reducing Suffering. Bethesda: NIH publication.

Street, R. L., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015.CrossRefPubMed

Uhlmann, W. R., Schuette, J. L., & Yashar, B. M. (2009). In W. R. Uhlmann, J. L. Schuette, & B. M. Yashar (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

Veach, P. M., LeRoy, B. S., & Bartels, D. M. (2003). Facilitating the genetic counseling process: A practice manual. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Veach, P. M., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: A reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9113-4.CrossRefPubMed

Veach, P. M., LeRoy, B., & Bartels, D. M. (2010). Genetic counseling practice : Advanced concepts and skills. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

Wang, C., Gonzalez, R., & Merajver, S. D. S. D. (2004). Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: Current research and future directions. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1427–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00337-X.CrossRef

Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276.CrossRef

Zellerino, B. C., Milligan, S. A., Gray, J. R., Williams, M. S., & Brooks, R. (2009). Identification and prioritization of quality indicators in clinical genetics: An international survey. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 151C(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30220.CrossRefPubMed

Zierhut, H. A., Shannon, K. M., Cragun, D. L., & Cohen, S. A. (2016). Elucidating genetic counseling outcomes from the perspective of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(5), 993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9930-9.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Development of FOCUS-GC: Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling
verfasst von: Deborah Cragun
Heather Zierhut
Publikationsdatum: 12.10.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0145-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

03.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Wenn bei Mammakarzinomen durch eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie ein Downstaging von nodal-positiv zu nodal-negativ gelingt, scheint es auch ohne Axilladissektion nur selten zu axillären Rezidiven zu kommen.

Rezidivierender Peritonsillarabszess nach Oralsex

02.05.2024 Peritonsillarabszess Kasuistik

Die erotischen Dimensionen von Peritonsillarabszessen scheinen eng begrenzt zu sein. Das heißt aber nicht, solche Abszesse und Erotik hätten nichts miteinander gemein, wie ein Fallbericht verdeutlicht.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Ambulantisierung: Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Hybrid-DRG

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Hybrid-DRG-Verordnung soll dazu führen, dass mehr chirurgische Eingriffe ambulant durchgeführt werden, wie es in anderen Ländern schon länger üblich ist. Die gleiche Vergütung im ambulanten und stationären Sektor hatten Niedergelassene schon lange gefordert. Aber die Umsetzung bereitet ihnen doch Kopfzerbrechen.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Development of FOCUS-GC: Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

Rezidivierender Peritonsillarabszess nach Oralsex

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Ambulantisierung: Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Hybrid-DRG

Update Gynäkologie

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

FDA Approval of PARP Inhibitors and the Impact on Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing Practices

National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics: Explication of 2017 Revisions

Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention

2018 National Society of Genetic Counselors Presidential Address

Variation among Consent Forms for Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing

Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

Rezidivierender Peritonsillarabszess nach Oralsex

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Ambulantisierung: Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Hybrid-DRG

Update Gynäkologie