Introduction
Methods
Information sources
Search strategy
Eligibility assessment
Criterion | Inclusion | Exclusion |
---|---|---|
Population | • working population | • children and youth, students, non-working population(e.g., titles like “Life satisfaction and problematic Internet use: Evidence for gender specific effects”; “Technology-based interventions for preventing and treating substance use among youth”) |
Exposure | • digital technologies, work processes in a digital context • influence of technologies on employees | • use of technology for diagnostic purposes (e.g., the use of telemedicine for stroke patients like “Interactive computer-assisted program for cervical liquidbased cytology”) • use of technology for the purpose of teaching/training (e.g., introduction to new radiological technologies like “Integrating Artificial and Human Intelligence: A Partnership for Responsible Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Medicine” or “The stress and workload of virtual reality training: the effects of presence, immersion and flow”) • focus on the use of information and communication technologies (e.g., “Impact of BYOD on organizational commitment: An empirical investigation”) • focus on the concept of technostress |
Outcome | • all health/well-being outcomes in context of digital work factors | • health effects of the used technologies that do not affect the target population (e.g., improvement of schizophrenia patients through therapy applications with virtual reality like “Making monitoring ‘work’: human-machine interaction and patient safety in anesthesia” or “Optimal management of neonatal lung diseases using current technologies”) |
Study | • original articles • published in peer-reviewed journals • published in English or German • no limitation of publication date | • other publication types (e.g., conference paper, editorials, project reports, non-original research such as discussion papers/reviews) • other languages |
Data extraction and evaluation
Assessment of methodological quality
Results
Study characteristics
First author, publication year, country | Sample, Size | Research Question | Design | Method | QATSDD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[4], The Netherlands | employees of automation sector, n = 3233 | - analysis of working conditions and career prospects of 32 different occupational groups within automation personnel - identification of the risk factors for stress and strain within these occupational groups - activity group*: different occupational groups in the automation sector | - quantitative - cross-sectional | - questionnaire (adapted and extended NIPG-Questionnaire; [38]) | 20 |
[17], Sweden | “computerized” employees in administration, n = 42 | - evaluation of work efficiency, work environment, and psychological strain before and after office automation in a participatory project - activity group: pre- and post-automation | - mixed - longitudinal (5 separate measures over 1,5 years) | GRID-interview; [48] physiological measurement (blood cortisol, blood pressure) questionnaire (not described; according to the authors with questions about computerization, reorganization, attitudes towards computers, current tasks and beliefs about future tasks, work content, job satisfaction, health/well-being, different symptoms of strain) | 19 |
[19], New Zealand | employees of the service sector, n = 120 | - analysis of how employees perceive STARA (Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms)/job insecurity in relation to their own work and how they prepare for potential changes - analysis whether STARA-awareness/job insecurity is age dependent - analysis what possible effects STARA-awareness/job insecurity has on job and well-being outcomes (the feeling of STARA-Awareness, which “captures the extent to which employees views the likelihood of Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Algorithms impacting on their future career prospects” ([19]: p. 241)) | - quantitative (plus one open-ended question) - cross-sectional | 21 | |
[29], Germany (former GDR) | die-casting foundry, n = 25 | - evaluation of flexible automation solutions compared to conventional production processes with regard to job demands, working conditions, and personality development - analysis of effects on mental well-being and job satisfaction - activity group: workers at conventional and flexible automated die-casting machines | - mixed - cross-sectional | interview (self-developed) questionnaire (BMS; [95], questionnaire on satisfaction with work conditions; self-developed; SAA; [1]) work analysis (TBS-K, BPA; [57]) | 14 |
[30], UK | employees of computer manufacturing company, n = 31 | - definition and measurement of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT) in terms of the concept of coupling; coupling is a construct that describes the degree to which two parts are connected, four variables create this construct: synchronicity, workflow rigidity, method uniformity, and slack. - identification of differences in the working conditions of different AMT-jobs - exploration of the influence of coupling on psychological well-being | - quantitative - cross-sectional | - questionnaire (coupling: synchronicity [31, 32]; workflow rigidity, [61]; method uniformity, [118]; Slack, Hickson, [61]; intrinsic job satisfaction: “Job itself intrinsic satisfaction” scale, [121]; job complexity: Perceived Intrinsic Job Charcteristics Scale, [121]; mental health: version of General Health Questionnaire, [51, 52]; overall job satisfaction: Job satisfaction Scale, [121]; supervisory influence, self-developed; work role breadth, self-developed) | 25 |
office workers, n = 121 | - analysis of workers’ individual experiences with computers and their attitudes toward different aspects of computer work - identification of the relations of several aspects of work, in particular Video-Display-Terminal-time, and health complaints - activity group: employees using VDT (VDT = Video Display Terminal) to varying degrees | - mixed - longitudinal (repeated measurements on consecutive days and within one day) | - checklist (adapted and extended POMS; [80]) - physiological measurement (optometric screening procedure) - semi-structured interview following the “funnel” technique; [15] | 21 | |
[58], Germany (former GDR) | administration/Office, n = 240 | - assessment and evaluation of VDU (visual display unit) work differing in task-content/−structure and proportion of human-machine interaction - differentiation of effects on motivation and learning opportunities - identification of task characteristics changing due to computer technology and its implementation - identification of effects of these changes on employees - activity group: traditional and computer-aided data entry activities with varying degrees of task completeness; activities with human-computer interaction and varying degrees of autonomy | - mixed - cross-sectional | - work analysis (TBS-GA; [57]) | 12 |
[65], Germany (former GDR) | computer screen work activities, n = 25 | - examination of the relationship between current and long-term effects of stress caused by mental work demands - investigation whether the correlations found can be generalized and whether the consequences of stress are predictable - evaluation of influences beyond work demands (like factors outside the workplace or personal attitudes) - activity group: data entry via display terminal; computer-aided ticket sales; computer-aided activity for project planning of organizational processes (problem analysis) | - mixed - longitudinal (annual survey over a period of 3 years) | - physiological measurement (e.g., heart rate and blood pressure); occupational health check-up; [122] | 18 |
[70], Germany | employees in areas with a high level of automation, n = 36 | - identification of potential stressors occurring with the introduction and use of new technologies in the manufacturing industry | - qualitative - cross-sectional | - semi-structured interview (self-developed) | 31 |
[99], Germany | operators from electric power supply system, n = 50 | - evaluation of reliability of human operators in highly automated systems using intra- and interindividual differences in physiological and psychological data for the identification of unreliability and action failures - activity group: operators in the electroenergy network with the different sub-activities “planned intervention”, “monitoring”, “fault processing”. | - mixed - longitudinal (repeated measurements within one day of examination) | - physiological measures (heart rate, blood pressure) - work analysis (TBS-GA; [108]) | 23 |
[109], Germany (former GDR) | plant operators, n = 119 | - evaluation and comparison of physical and mental strain during activities in the automotive industry with different levels of automation - activity group plant operators in vehicle body construction; plant operators in automated final assembly; plant operators in driverless transport systems; assembly workers in body and vehicle final assembly | - mixed - cross-sectional (physiological measurements repeated in the course of a shift) | - physiological measurements (cardiopulmonary capacity, physical activity, oxygen expenditure, biochemical parameters (e.g., adrenalin), heart rate) - work analysis (occupational science survey procedure for activity analysis; [107]) | 18 |
[111], Germany (former GDR) | plant operators at a metal factory, n = 10 | - evaluation of psychophysical stress and resulting health risks through changes in work content and extended work shifts in automated production processes - activity group: early shift 8 h; early shift 12 h; late shift 8 h; late shift 12 h | - mixed - longitudinal (repeated in the course of a shift) | physiological measurements (heart rate) questionnaire/checklist (rating scale), EZ-Skala; [87]) | 12 |
[114], USA/Canada | female clerical workers, n = 1032 | - examination of the relationship between extent of video display terminal (VDT) use and employees’ perceptions of physical work environment, job characteristics and health/well-being - analysis of differences between health symptoms and job characteristics of supervisors and non-supervisors - activity group: part-day typist; all-day typist; clerical worker; part-day VDT user; all-day VDT user | - quantitative - cross-sectional | questionnaire (self-developed and according to the author with questions about physical environment, job characteristics, psychological/physical health, and job satisfaction) | 20 |
[117], Sweden | bank employees, n = 151 | - analysis of bank employees’ evaluation of the role of digitization in their daily work - analysis of bank employees’ evaluation of the role of digitization and its effects on well-being - exploration of the interaction between digitization and organizational culture (either individualistic or collectivistic) and its effects on well-being - examination of the influence of age, organizational tenure, and position | - quantitative - cross-sectional | 22 |
Quality assessment
Clustering of work factors, health effects and activity groups
First author, publication year, country | Main focus of the study | |
---|---|---|
work factors | health factors | |
Andries*, 1991 [4], The Netherlands | Focus: groups of different occupations in the automation sector - differentiation of risk factors for health | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: challenge of the job (e.g., engaging, offering pleasure), qualification (e.g., education, experience, training), autonomy (b) social factors: quality of leadership, contacts with colleagues (c) organizational factors: workload (e.g., working hours), hectic working conditions (time pressure, unexpected events), salary and prospects | (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: mental strain (e.g., feeling tense, nervous or agitated) (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: health complaints, headaches, sleep | |
Brenner*, 1995 [17], Sweden | Focus: participatory introduction of computerization - changes in working conditions and health effects | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: qualification, responsibility, task variety, reorganization (b) social factors: contacts with fellow-workers and supervisors (c) organizational factors: computerization, beliefs about how future tasks would appear, workload (d) environmental factors/working tools: computer disturbances | (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: mental strain, experience with and attitudes toward computers, nervousness (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: somatic symptoms (sleep, heart, fatigue, stomach, musculoskeletal), physiological measures (e.g., cortisol, blood pressure) | |
[19], New Zealand | Focus: STARA (Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms)-Awareness - impact on job and well-being outcomes | |
(c) organizational factors: job insecurity/STARA-Awareness | (i) motivation and satisfaction: career satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: depression, cynicism | |
Claussner*, 1989 [29], Germany (former GDR) | Focus: different degrees of automation - consequences for health-promoting work design | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: decision latitude, task variability, transparency, responsibility, cognitive demands (b) social factors: social structure (social support, feedback) (c) organizational factors: workload (quantitative and qualitative overload), human-machine-division of labor, workflow (d) environmental factors/working tools: environmental conditions, usability of technologies | (i) motivation and satisfaction: satisfaction with different working conditions (e.g., work design, technical equipment, skill use, division of labor) (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: strain, monotony, saturation | |
[30], UK | Focus: coupling in the context of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT) - effects on well-being and work demands | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: job complexity, work role breadth (b) social factors: supervisor influence (d) environmental factors/working tools: technological coupling (synchronicity, workflow rigidity, method uniformity, slack) | (i) motivation and satisfaction: intrinsic job satisfaction, overall job satisfaction (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: mental health (e.g., anxiety, depression, low self-esteem) | |
Dainoff*, 1981 [32], USA | Focus: physical/mental stress and other effects of computer work (e.g., job pressure) as a function of VDT time | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: task variability (b) social factors: quality of leadership, atmosphere with coworkers, customers and supervisors (c) organizational factors: pressure, pay, benefits, job insecurity (d) environmental factors/working tools: ergonomic comments (e.g., light, noise, temperature, workplace arrangement), interruptions, problems with computer system (e.g., slow response time) | (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: mental stress (tension, mental strain), general fatigue (very tired, exhausted, drained after work) (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: visual performance (measures of acuity, lateral phoria, and vertical phoria, visual strain (e.g. blurred vision)), physical stress (headaches) | |
Hacker*, 1985 [58], Germany (former GDR) | Focus: different task-content/−structure and proportion of human-machine interaction in different VDU work associations with task characteristics and strain | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: autonomy, task variability, transparency, qualification, excessive demands, learning requirements (c) organizational factors: cooperation requirements and opportunities, information on hardware/software | (i) motivation and satisfaction: job satisfaction, motivation (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: psychological complaints, experienced monotony, saturation, stress (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: physical complaints | |
Jackisch*, 1989 [65], Germany (former GDR) | Focus: mental demands during VDU-work - predictability of long-term health effects | |
a) cognitive demands/work content: cognitive demands | (i) motivation and satisfaction: job satisfaction, behavioral parameter (e.g., performance) (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: current well-being, experienced monotony, saturation, stress (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: physiological parameters (heart rate and blood pressure), complaints, sick leave | |
[70], Germany | Focus: human-machine-interaction - stress | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: deskilling, qualification requirements, situation awareness (c) organizational factors: general evaluation of human-machine interaction (d) environmental factors/working tools: technical problems (e.g., software/hardware problems) usability (e.g., self-descriptiveness) | (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: stress | |
Rau* (1996) [99], Germany | Focus: human reliability in complex automated systems and associated health effects | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: responsibility, cognitive demands | (i) motivation and satisfaction: motivation (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: mental tension, emotional state, locus of control, current intrinsic states (e.g., ready to exert, tensioned, self-assured) (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: heart rate, blood pressure | |
Rutenfranz*, 1989 [109], Germany (former GDR) | Focus: changes in physical, mental, and emotional strain through automation | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: complexity, responsibility, variability, cognitive demands (c) organizational factors: breaks (d) environmental factors/working tools: disruptions | (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: biochemical parameters (adrenalin/noradrenalin), heart rate, energy expenditure, cardiopulmonary performance (physical examination, bicycle ergometer) | |
Seibt*, 1988 [111], Germany (former GDR) | Focus: shift work - health effects | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: task content, action control (b) social factors: social integration (d) environmental factors/working tools: aggravating conditions (e.g., noise) | (i) motivation and satisfaction: readiness to make an effort (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: experienced strain (initiative, self-confidence, emotional tension, fatigue) (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: heart rate | |
Stellman*, 1987 [114], USA/Canada | Focus: extent of video display terminal usage - description of job characteristics with analyses of health effects | |
(a) cognitive demands/work content: task variability, decision latitude, repetitious work, understanding of work process, learning new things, work “makes sense”, cognitive demands (c) organizational factors: workload (d) environmental factors/working tools: physical characteristics of the office (e.g., ergonomic stressors, air quality stressors, privacy) | (i) motivation and satisfaction: job satisfaction, office satisfaction (ii) reduced well-being/affective symptoms: psychological symptoms (irritation, anxiety, depression, hopelessness) (iii) physiological parameters/somatic complaints: health symptoms (eye-, musculo-skeletal-, gastrointestinal-, respiratory- symptoms) | |
[117], Sweden | Focus: perception of digitalization - the effect on subjective well-being of bank employees | |
(b) social factors: organizational culture (d) environmental factors/working tools: digitalization (degree of use of digital tools, subjective experiences associated with the use of digital tools) | (i) motivation and satisfaction: job satisfaction, life balance, life satisfaction |
Study findings
Theoretical framework of identified studies
Associations between work factors and health factors
First Author | Work factor clusters (iv) | Health outcome cluster (dv) Number of reported associations in total* | Number of reported direct associations with statistical analysis | Number of reported associations without statistical analysis | Direction of effects** | Number of reported effects with work/health variables as moderator /mediator/ control |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[30]; | Cognitive demands / work content | Motivation and satisfaction (4) | 4 | 0 | inconclusive | |
[17]; | Reduced well-being / affective symptoms (5) | 3 | 2 | not significant | ||
[70] | Physiological parameters and somatic complaints (4) | 4 | 0 | significant positive | ||
[30]; | Social factors | Motivation and satisfaction (4) | 2 | 0 | not significant | 2 |
[117] | Reduced well-being / affective symptoms (1) | 1 | 0 | not significant | ||
Physiological parameters and somatic complaints (0) | 0 | 0 | ||||
[19], | Organizational factors | Motivation and satisfaction (3) | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
[32], | Reduced well-being / affective symptoms (4) | 2 | 0 | significant positive | 2 | |
[17] | Physiological parameters and somatic complaints (3) | 3 | 0 | significant positive | ||
[30]; | Environmental factors / working tools | Motivation and satisfaction (13) | 13 | 0 | inconclusive | |
[117]; | Reduced well-being / affective symptoms (11) | 3 | 8 | significant positive | ||
Physiological parameters and somatic complaints (0) | 0 | 0 |
Associations between activity groups and health factors
First author, publication year | Activity group cluster (iv) | Health outcome cluster (dv) Number of reported associations in total** | Number of reported direct associations with statistical analysis | Number of reported associations without statistical analysis | Direction of effects *** | Number of reported effects with work/health variables as moderator /mediator/ control |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
activity group 1 (extent of technology use) | Motivation and satisfaction (12) | 11 | 1 | inconclusive | 0 | |
Reduced well-being / affective symptoms (9) | 2 | 7 | not significant | 0 | ||
Physiological parameters and somatic complaints (43) | 34 | 9 | significant positive | 0 | ||
[17] | activity group 2 (before and after automation/computerization) | Motivation and satisfaction (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Reduced well-being / affective symptoms (1) | 1 | 0 | not significant | 0 | ||
Physiological parameters and somatic complaints (6) | 6 | 0 | significant positive | 0 | ||
activity group 3 (level and extent of mental tasks) | Motivation and satisfaction (7) | 3 | 4 | inconclusive | 0 | |
Reduced well-being / affective symptoms (11) | 8 | 3 | significant positive | 0 | ||
Physiological parameters and somatic complaints (8) | 4 | 4 | significant positive | 0 |