nach oben

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Erschienen in:

08.04.2023 | Systematic Review

Do Cash-For-Care Schemes Increase Care Users’ Experience of Empowerment? A Systematic Review

verfasst von: Eva Pattyn, Paul Gemmel, Sophie Vandepitte, Jeroen Trybou

Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In cash-for-care schemes, care users are granted a budget or given a voucher to purchase care services, under the assumption that this will enable them to become engaged and empowered customers, leading to more person-centered care. However, opponents of such schemes argue that the responsibility of organizing care is thereby shifted from governments to care users, thus reducing care users’ experience of empowerment. The tension between these opposing discourses supposes that other factors affect care users’ experience of empowerment.

Objective

This systematic review explores the experiences of empowerment and person-centered care of budget holders in cash-for-care schemes and the antecedents that can affect this experience.

Method

We screened seven databases up to October 10, 2022. To be included, articles needed to be peer-reviewed, written in English or French, and contain empirical evidence of the experience of empowerment of budget holders in the form of qualitative or quantitative data.

Results

The initial search identified 10,966 records of which 90 articles were retained for inclusion. The results show that several contextual and personal characteristics determine whether cash-for-care schemes increase empowerment. The identified contextual factors are establishing a culture of change, supportive financial climate, flexible regulatory framework, and access to support and information. The identified personal characteristics refer to the financial, social, and personal resources of the care user.

Conclusion

This review confirms that multiple factors can affect care users’ experience of empowerment. However, active cooperation and communication between care user and care provider are essential if policy makers wish to increase care users’ experience of empowerment.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Dent M, Pahor M. Patient involvement in Europe – a comparative framework. J Health Organ Manag. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-05-2015-0078.CrossRefPubMed

Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8.CrossRefPubMed

Da Roit B, Le Bihan B. Similar and yet so different: cash-for-care in six European countries’ long-term care policies. Milbank Q. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00601.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Timonen V, Convery J, Cahill S. Care revolutions in the making? A comparison of cash-for-care programmes in four European countries. Ageing Soc. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0600479X.CrossRef

Benjamin AE. Consumer-directed services at home: a new model for persons with disabilities. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.80.CrossRefPubMed

Crozier M, Muenchberger H, Colley J, Ehrlich C. The disability self-direction movement: Considering the benefits and challenges for an Australian response. Aust J Soc Issues. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2013.tb00293.x.CrossRef

Powers LE, Sowers J-A, Singer GHS. A cross-disability analysis of person-directed, long-term services. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060170020301.CrossRef

Kane RL, Kane RA. What older people want from long-term care, and how they can get it. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.114.CrossRefPubMed

Riedel M, Kraus M, Mayer S. Organization and supply of long-term care services for the elderly: a bird’s-eye view of old and new EU Member States. Soc Policy Adm. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12170.CrossRef

10.

Ferguson I. Increasing user choice or privatizing risk? the antinomies of personalization. Br J Soc Work. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm016.CrossRef

11.

Scourfield P. Implementing the Community Care (direct payments) Act: Will the supply of personal assistants meet the demand and at what price? J Soc Policy. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279405008871.CrossRef

12.

Prandini R. Themed section: the person-centred turn in welfare policies: bad wine in new bottles or a true social innovation? INTRODUCTION. Int Rev Sociol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2017.1422888.CrossRef

13.

Spandler H. Friend or Foe? Towards a Critical Assessment of Direct Payments. Crit Soc Policy. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018304041950.CrossRef

14.

Herbert RJ, Gagnon AJ, Rennick JE, O’Loughlin JL. A systematic review of questionnaires measuring health-related empowerment. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1891/1541-6577.23.2.107.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Zimmerman MA, Checkoway BN. Empowerment as a multi-level construct: perceived control at the individual, organizational and community levels. Health Educ Res. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/10.3.309.CrossRef

16.

Kodner DL. Consumer-directed services: lessons and implications for integrated systems of care. Int J Integr Care. 2003. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.80.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Webber M, Treacy S, Carr S, Clark M, Parker G. The effectiveness of personal budgets for people with mental health problems: a systematic review. J Ment Health. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2014.910642.CrossRefPubMed

18.

FitzGerald Murphy M, Kelly C. Questioning, “choice”: a multinational metasynthesis of research on directly funded home-care programs for older people. Health Soc Care Community. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12646.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Arksey H, Kemp PA. Dimensions of Choice: A narrative review of cash-for-care schemes. York: University of York, Social Policy Research Unit; 2008.

20.

Castro EM, Van Regenmortel T, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Van Hecke A. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Spreitzer GM. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Acad Manage J. 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/256789.CrossRef

22.

Zimmerman MA. Taking aim on empowerment research: on the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. Am J Community Psychol. 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922695.CrossRef

23.

Zimmerman MA. Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. Am J Community Psychol. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Woodward KF. Individual nurse empowerment: a concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12407.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Conger JA, Kanungo RN. The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev. 1988. https://doi.org/10.2307/258093.CrossRef

26.

Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Health literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: the importance of separating conjoined twins. Patient Educ Couns. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.006.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Seibert SE, Wang G, Courtright SH. Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022676.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Thomas KW, Velthouse BA. Cognitive elements of empowerment: an “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation. Acad Manage Rev. 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/258687.CrossRef

29.

Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manag J. 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865.CrossRef

30.

Maynard MT, Gilson LL, Mathieu JE. Empowerment—fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. J Manag. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312438773.CrossRef

31.

Higgins T, Larson E, Schnall R. Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.002.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Jagosh J, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Arksey H, Baxter K. Exploring the temporal aspects of direct payments. Br J Soc Work. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr039.CrossRef

36.

Aspinal F, Stevens M, Manthorpe J, Woolham J, Samsi K, Baxter K, et al. Safeguarding and personal budgets: the experiences of adults at risk. J Adult Prot. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-12-2018-0030.CrossRef

37.

Baxter K, Glendinning C. Making choices about support services: disabled adults’ and older people’s use of information. Health Soc Care Community. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00979.x.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Blyth C, Gardner A. ‘We’re not asking for anything special’: direct payments and the carers of disabled children. Disabil Soc. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701259427.CrossRef

39.

Coyle D. Impact of person-centred thinking and personal budgets in mental health services: reporting a UK pilot. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01728.x.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Daly G, Roebuck A, Dean J, Goff F, Bollard M, Taylor C. Gaining independence: an evaluation of service users’ accounts of the individual budgets pilot. J Integr Care (Brighton). 2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/14769018200800021.CrossRef

41.

Damant J, Williams L, Wittenberg R, Ettelt S, Perkins M, Lombard D, et al. Experience of choice and control for service users and families of direct payments in residential care trailblazers. J Longterm Care. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.27.CrossRef

42.

Davey V. Influences of service characteristics and older people’s attributes on outcomes from direct payments. BMC Geriatr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01943-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Davidson J, Baxter K, Glendinning C, Irvine A. Choosing health: Qualitative evidence from the experiences of personal health budget holders. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819613499747.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Doyle Y. Disability: use of an independent living fund in south east London and users’ views about the system of cash versus care provision. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.49.1.43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Glendinning C, Halliwell S, Jacobs S, Rummery K, Tyrer J. Bridging the gap: using direct payments to purchase integrated care. Health Soc Care Community. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00244.x.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Glendinning C, Halliwell S, Jacobs S, Rummery K, Tyrer J. New kinds of care, new kinds of relationships: how purchasing services affects relationships in giving and receiving personal assistance. Health Soc Care Community. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00242.x.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Glick P, Clarke RE, Crivellaro C. Exploring experiences of self-directed care budgets: design implications for socio-technical interventions. Chi '22. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517697.

48.

Griffiths CA, Ainsworth E. Personalisation: direct payments and mental illness. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2014. https://doi.org/10.37200/V18I1/8077.CrossRef

49.

Hamilton LG, Mesa S, Hayward E, Price R, Bright G. ‘There’s a lot of places I’d like to go and things I’d like to do’: the daily living experiences of adults with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities during a time of personalised social care reform in the United Kingdom. Disabil Soc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1294049.CrossRef

50.

Hamilton S, Tew J, Szymczynska P, Clewett N, Manthorpe J, Larsen J, et al. Power, choice and control: how do personal budgets affect the experiences of people with mental health problems and their relationships with social workers and other practitioners? Br J Soc Work. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv023.CrossRef

51.

Irvine F, Wah Yeung EY, Partridge M, Simcock P. The impact of personalisation on people from Chinese backgrounds: qualitative accounts of social care experience. Health Soc Care Community. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12374.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Larsen J, Tew J, Hamilton S, Manthorpe J, Pinfold V, Szymczynska P, et al. Outcomes from personal budgets in mental health: service users’ experiences in three English local authorities. J Ment Health. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2015.1036971.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Laybourne AH, Jepson MJ, Williamson T, Robotham D, Cyhlarova E, Williams V. Beginning to explore the experience of managing a direct payment for someone with dementia: the perspectives of suitable people and adult social care practitioners. Int J Soc Res Pract. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301214553037.CrossRef

54.

Leece J. It’s a matter of choice: making direct payments work in Staffordshire. Practice. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503150008415197.CrossRef

55.

Leece J. Paying the piper and calling the tune: power and the direct payment relationship. Br J Soc Work. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn085.CrossRef

56.

Leece J, Peace S. Developing new understandings of independence and autonomy in the personalised relationship. Br J Soc Work. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp105.CrossRef

57.

Maglajlic R, Brandon D, Given D. Making direct payments a choice: a report on the research findings. Disabil Soc. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590025793.CrossRef

58.

Manji K. ‘It was clear from the start that [SDS] was about a cost cutting agenda.’ Exploring disabled people’s early experiences of the introduction of Self-Directed Support in Scotland. Disabil Soc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1498767.CrossRef

59.

McGuigan K, McDermott L, Magowan C, McCorkell G, Witherow A, Coates V. The impact of direct payments on service users requiring care and support at home. Practice. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2015.1039973.CrossRef

60.

McNeill S, Wilson G. Use of direct payments in providing care and support to children with disabilities: opportunities and concerns. Br J Soc Work. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw159.CrossRef

61.

Mitchell F. Facilitators and barriers to informed choice in self-directed support for young people with disability in transition. Health Soc Care Community. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12137.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Mitchell W, Beresford B, Brooks J, Moran N, Glendinning C. Taking on choice and control in personal care and support: the experiences of physically disabled young adults. J Soc Work. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316644700.CrossRef

63.

Moran N, Glendinning C, Wilberforce M, Stevens M, Netten ANN, Jones K, et al. Older people’s experiences of cash-for-care schemes: evidence from the English Individual Budget pilot projects. Ageing Soc. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000244.CrossRef

64.

Neale J, Parkman T, Strang J. Challenges in delivering personalised support to people with multiple and complex needs: qualitative study. J Interprof Care. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1553869.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Netten A, Jones K, Knapp M, Fernandez JL, Challis D, Glendinning C, et al. Personalisation through individual budgets: does it work and for whom? Br J Soc Work. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr159.CrossRef

66.

O’Rourke G. Older people, personalisation and self: an alternative to the consumerist paradigm in social care. Ageing Soc. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15000124.CrossRef

67.

Pearson C. Money talks? Competing discourses in the implementation of direct payments. Crit Soc Policy. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830002000403.CrossRef

68.

Porter T, Shakespeare T, Stockl A. Trouble in direct payment personal assistance relationships. Work Employ Soc. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211016972.CrossRef

69.

Pozzoli F. Personalisation as vision and toolkit. A case study. Int Rev Sociol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2017.1422885.CrossRef

70.

Rabiee P, Glendinning C. Choice and control for older people using home care services: how far have council-managed personal budgets helped? Qual Ageing Older Adults. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-04-2014-0007.CrossRef

71.

Rabiee P, Moran N, Glendinning C. Individual budgets: lessons from early users’ experiences. Br J Soc Work. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm152.CrossRef

72.

Rodrigues R. Caring relationships and their role in users’ choices: a study of users of Direct Payments in England. Ageing Soc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19000035.CrossRef

73.

Rodrigues R, Glendinning C. Choice, competition and care—developments in English social care and the impacts on providers and older users of home care services. Soc Policy Adm. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12099.CrossRef

74.

Rummery K, Lawrence J, Russell S. Partnership and personalisation in personal care: conflicts and compromises. Soc Policy Soc. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000525.CrossRef

75.

Spandler H, Vick N. Opportunities for independent living using direct payments in mental health. Health Soc Care Community. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00598.x.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Stainton T, Boyce S. “I have got my life back”: users’ experience of direct payments. Disabil Soc. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000235299.CrossRef

77.

Stevens M, Glendinning C, Jacobs S, Moran N, Challis D, Manthorpe J, et al. Assessing the role of increasing choice in english social care services. J Soc Policy. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941000111X.CrossRef

78.

Turnpenny A, Rand S, Whelton B, Julie BB, Babaian J. Family carers managing personal budgets for adults with learning disabilities or autism. Br J Learn Disabil. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12348.CrossRef

79.

Welch E, Jones K, Fox D, Caiels J. Personal health budgets: a mechanism to encourage service integration? J Integr Care (Brighton). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-07-2021-0038.CrossRef

80.

Williams V, Porter S. The Meaning of “choice and control” for People with Intellectual Disabilities who are Planning their Social Care and Support. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil JARID. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12222.CrossRefPubMed

81.

Williams V, Simons K, Gramlich S, McBride G, Snelham N, Myers B. Paying the piper and calling the tune? The relationship between parents and direct payments for people with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil JARID. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00164.x.CrossRef

82.

Woolham J, Daly G, Sparks T, Ritters K, Steils N. Do direct payments improve outcomes for older people who receive social care? Differences in outcome between people aged 75+ who have a managed personal budget or a direct payment. Ageing Soc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001531.CrossRef

83.

Barr M, Duncan J, Dally K. Parent experience of the national disability insurance scheme (NDIS) for children with hearing loss in Australia. Disabil Soc. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1816906.CrossRef

84.

Day J, Thorington Taylor AC, Hunter S, Summons P, van der Riet P, Harris M, et al. Experiences of older people following the introduction of consumer-directed care to home care packages: a qualitative descriptive study. Aust J Ageing. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12553.CrossRef

85.

Devine A, Dickinson H, Rangi M, Huska M, Disney G, Yang Y, et al. “Nearly gave up on it to be honest”: utilisation of individualised budgets by people with psychosocial disability within Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Soc Policy Admin. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12838.CrossRef

86.

Dew A, Bulkeley K, Veitch C, Bundy A, Lincoln M, Brentnall J, et al. Carer and service providers’ experiences of individual funding models for children with a disability in rural and remote areas. Health Soc Care Community. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12032.CrossRefPubMed

87.

Fisher KR, Purcal C, Jones A, Lutz D, Robinson S, Kayess R. What place is there for shared housing with individualized disability support? Disabil Rehabil. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1615562.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Howard A, Blakemore T, Johnston L, Taylor D, Dibley R. “I’m not really sure but I hope it’s better”: early thoughts of parents and carers in a regional trial site for the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. Disabil Soc. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1093462.CrossRef

89.

Hurley J, Donelly M, Gaetano J, Bradhurst B. The National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013: experiences of family members in a regional community in New South Wales, Australia. Res Pract Intellect. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2022.2054045.CrossRef

90.

Laragy C, Fisher KR, Purcal C, Jenkinson S. Australia’s individualised disability funding packages: when do they provide greater choice and opportunity? Asian Soc Work Policy Rev. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12068.CrossRef

91.

Laragy C, Ottmann G. Towards a Framework for Implementing Individual Funding Based on an Australian Case Study. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00283.x.CrossRef

92.

Lloyd J, Moni K, Cuskelly M, Jobling A. National disability insurance scheme: is it creating an ordinary life for adults with intellectual disability? Disabil Soc. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1907548.CrossRef

93.

Loadsman JJ, Donelly M. Exploring the wellbeing of Australian families engaging with the National Disability Insurance Scheme in rural and regional areas. Disabil Soc. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1804327.CrossRef

94.

Moskos M, Isherwood L. Individualised funding and its implications for the skills and competencies required by disability support workers in Australia. Labour Ind. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2018.1534523.CrossRef

95.

Ottmann G, Laragy C, Haddon M. Experiences of disability consumer-directed care users in Australia: results from a longitudinal qualitative study. Health Soc Care Community. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00851.x.CrossRefPubMed

96.

Ottmann G, Mohebbi M. Self-directed community services for older Australians: a stepped capacity-building approach. Health Soc Care Community. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12111.CrossRefPubMed

97.

Spall P, McDonald C, Zetlin D. Fixing the system? The experience of service users of the quasi-market in disability services in Australia. Health Soc Care Community. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00529.x.CrossRefPubMed

98.

Stewart V, Slattery M, Roennfeldt H, Wheeler AJ. Partners in recovery: paving the way for the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Aust J Prim Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1071/py17136.CrossRefPubMed

99.

Tracey D, Johnston C, Papps FA, Mahmic S. How do parents acquire information to support their child with a disability and navigate individualised funding schemes? J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12390.CrossRef

100.

Wilson E, Campain R, Pollock S, Brophy L, Stratford A. Exploring the personal, programmatic and market barriers to choice in the NDIS for people with psychosocial disability. Aust J Soc Issues. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.154.CrossRef

101.

Yates S, Carey G, Malbon E, Hargrave J. “Faceless monster, secret society”: Women’s experiences navigating the administrative burden of Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Health Soc Care Community. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13669.CrossRefPubMed

102.

Benjamin AE, Matthias RE. Age, consumer direction, and outcomes of supportive services at home. Gerontologist. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.632.CrossRefPubMed

103.

Brown M, Harry M, Mahoney K. “It’s Like Two Roles We’re Playing”: parent perspectives on navigating self-directed service programs with adult children with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12270.CrossRef

104.

Caldwell J. Experiences of families with relatives with intellectual and developmental disabilities in a consumer-directed support program. Disabil Soc. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701560139.CrossRef

105.

Gross JMS, Wallace L, Blue-Banning M, Summers JA, Turnbull A. Examining the experiences and decisions of parents/guardians: participant directing the supports and services of adults with significant intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207312439102.CrossRef

106.

Hagglund KJ, Clark MJ, Farmer JE, Sherman AK. A comparison of consumer-directed and agency-directed personal assistance services programmes. Disabil Rehabil. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001672472.CrossRefPubMed

107.

Harry ML, MacDonald L, McLuckie A, Battista C, Mahoney EK, Mahoney KJ. Long-term experiences in cash and counseling for young adults with intellectual disabilities: familial programme representative descriptions. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil JARID. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12251.CrossRefPubMed

108.

Harry ML, Mahoney KJ, Mahoney EK, Shen C. The Cash and Counseling model of self-directed long-term care: Effectiveness with young adults with disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.03.001.CrossRefPubMed

109.

Keigher SM. The limits of consumer directed care as public policy in an aging society. Can J Aging. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980800009776.CrossRef

110.

Mattson Prince J, Manley MS, Whiteneck GG. Self-managed versus agency-provided personal assistance care for individuals with high level tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80067-0.CrossRef

111.

San Antonio P, Simon-Rusinowitz L, Loughlin D, Eckert JK, Mahoney KJ. Case histories of six consumers and their families in cash and counseling. Health Serv Res. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00674.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

112.

San Antonio P, Simon-Rusinowitz L, Loughlin D, Eckert JK, Mahoney KJ, Ruben KAD. Lessons from the Arkansas cash and counseling program: How the experiences of diverse older consumers and their caregivers address family policy concerns. J Aging Soc Policy. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420903385544.CrossRef

113.

Shen C, Smyer M, Mahoney KJ, Simon-Rusinowitz L, Shinogle J, Norstrand J, et al. Consumer-directed care for beneficiaries with mental illness: lessons from New Jersey’s Cash and Counseling program. Psychiatric Serv (Washington, DC). 2008. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2008.59.11.1299.CrossRef

114.

Schore J, Foster L, Phillips B. Consumer enrollment and experiences in the cash and counseling program. Health Serv Res. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00679.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

115.

Spaulding-Givens J, Hughes S, Lacasse JR. Money matters: participants’ purchasing experiences in a budget authority model of self-directed care. Soc Work Ment Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2018.1555105.CrossRef

116.

Junne J. Enabling accountability: an analysis of personal budgets for disabled people. Crit Perspect Accounting. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.01.001.CrossRef

117.

Junne J, Huber C. The risk of users’ choice: exploring the case of direct payments in German social care. Health Risk Soc. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2014.973836.CrossRef

118.

Schmidt AE. Older persons’ views on using cash-for-care allowances at the crossroads of gender, socio-economic status and care needs in Vienna. Soc Policy Adm. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12334.CrossRef

119.

Askheim OP. Personal assistance for people with intellectual impairments: experiences and dilemmas. Disabil Soc. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000052897.CrossRef

120.

Katzman E, Kinsella EA, Polzer J. ‘Everything is down to the minute’: clock time, crip time and the relational work of self-managing attendant services. Disabil Soc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1649126.CrossRef

121.

Katzman E, Mohler E, Durocher E, Kinsella EA. Occupational justice in direct-funded attendant services: Possibilities and constraints. J Occup Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2021.1942173.CrossRef

122.

Christensen K. In(ter)dependent lives. Scand J Disabil Res. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410902830553.CrossRef

123.

Christensen K. Towards sustainable hybrid relationships in cash-for-care systems. Disabil Soc. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.654990.CrossRef

124.

Ungerson C. Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on “cash for care” schemes. Ageing Soc. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001508.CrossRef

Titel: Do Cash-For-Care Schemes Increase Care Users’ Experience of Empowerment? A Systematic Review
verfasst von: Eva Pattyn
Paul Gemmel
Sophie Vandepitte
Jeroen Trybou
Publikationsdatum: 08.04.2023
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Elektronische ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-023-00624-z

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Do Cash-For-Care Schemes Increase Care Users’ Experience of Empowerment? A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Patient-Centered Clinical Trial Design for Heart Failure Devices via Bayesian Decision Analysis

Correction to: Do Cash-For-Care Schemes Increase Care Users’ Experience of Empowerment? A Systematic Review

Cancer Survivor Preferences for Models of Breast Cancer Follow-Up Care: Selecting Attributes for Inclusion in a Discrete Choice Experiment

A Foundation for Patient-Centered Core Impact Sets: Key Learnings from Past and Existing Approaches

Individual Differences in the Patient Experience of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS): A Multi-Country Qualitative Exploration of Drivers of Treatment Preferences Among People Living with RMS

Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments