Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
AIDS and Behavior
Erschienen in: AIDS and Behavior 7/2016

03.11.2015 | Original Paper

Early Adopters: Correlates of HIV Chemoprophylaxis Use in Recent Online Samples of US Men Who Have Sex with Men

verfasst von: Kenneth H. Mayer, Catherine E. Oldenburg, David S. Novak, Steven A. Elsesser, Douglas S. Krakower, Matthew J. Mimiaga

Erschienen in: AIDS and Behavior | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To date, little data on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users outside of the clinical trial setting are available. A repeated cross-sectional survey of one of the largest social and sexual networking websites for men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States was conducted in August 2013 (Wave 1) and January 2014 (Wave 2). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with having heard of and having taken post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and PrEP in Wave 1 (N = 4043) and Wave 2 (N = 2737) separately. In Wave 1, 147 (3.6 %) and 61 (1.5 %) reported using PEP and PrEP, respectively, compared to 119 (4.4 %) and 62 (2.3 %) in Wave 2. Higher-risk sexual behaviors were associated with having taken PEP and PrEP, and previous PEP use was associated with having taken PrEP. Understanding factors that are associated with early use of PrEP may help inform wider utilization of PrEP by at risk MSM.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Baral S, Logie CH, Grosso A, Wirtz AL, Beyrer C. Modified social ecological model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:482.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Mayer KH, Wheeler DP, Bekker LG, et al. Overcoming biological, behavioral, and structural vulnerabilities: new directions in research to decrease HIV transmission in men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:S161–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Logie CH, Newman PA, Chakrapani V, Shunmugam M. Adapting the minority stress model: associations between gender non-conformity stigma, HIV-related stigma and depression among men who have sex with men in South India. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1261–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Oldenburg C, Biello KB, Colby D, et al. Stigma related to sex work among men who engage in transactional sex with men in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Int J Public Health. 2014;59:833–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:423–34.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2013;381:2083–90.CrossRef
9.
Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:399–410.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Smith DK, Grohskopf LA, Black RJ, et al. Antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection-drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54:1–20.PubMed
11.
Schechter M, do Lago RF, Mendelson AB, et al. Behavioral impact, acceptability, and HIV incidence among homosexual men with access to postexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:519–25.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Oldenburg CE, Biello KB, Colby D, et al. Engagement with peer health educators is associated with willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis among male sex workers in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2014;28:109–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zhang Y, Peng B, She Y, et al. Attitudes toward HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Western China. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2013;27:137–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Yang D, Chariyalertsak C, Wongthanee A, et al. Acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Northern Thailand. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76650.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Aghaizu A, Mercey D, Copas A, Johnson AM, Hart G, Nardone A. Who would use PrEP? Factors associated with intention to use among MSM in London: a community survey. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;89:207–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Golub SA, Gamarel KE, Rendina HJ, Surace A, Lelutiu-Weinberger CL. From efficacy to effectiveness: facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2013;27:248–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Galea JT, Kinsler JJ, Salazar X, et al. Acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis as an HIV prevention strategy: barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among at-risk Peruvian populations. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22:256–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Saberi P, Gamarel KE, Neilands TB, et al. Ambiguity, ambivalence, and apprehensions of taking HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis among male couples in San Francisco: a mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50061.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Galindo GR, Walker JNJ, Hazelton P, et al. Community member perspectives from transgender women and men who have sex with men on pre-exposure prophylaxis as an HIV prevention strategy: implications for implementation. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Jain S, Oldenburg CE, Mimiaga MJ, Mayer KH. Longitudinal trends in HIV non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) use at a Boston community health center between 1997 and 2013. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68:97–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Krakower DS, Mimiaga MJ, Rosenberger JG, et al. Limited awareness and low immediate uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men using an internet social networking site. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Lorente N, Fugon L, Carrieri MP, et al. Acceptability of an “on-demand” pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis trial among men who have sex with men living in France. AIDS Care. 2012;24(4):468–77. doi:10.​1080/​09540121.​2011.​626394.
23.
Peinado J, Lama JR, Galea JT, et al. Acceptability of oral versus rectal HIV preexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Peru. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2013;12:278–83.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Young I, Li J, McDaid L. Awareness and willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis amongst gay and bisexual men in Scotland: implications for biomedical HIV prevention. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64038.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Young I, McDaid L. How acceptable are antiretrovirals for the prevention of sexually transmitted HIV?: a review of research on the acceptability of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment as prevention. AIDS Behav. 2013. doi:10.​1007/​s10461-013-0560-7.
26.
Van der Elst EM, Mbogua J, Operario D, et al. High acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis but challenges in adherence and use: qualitative insights from a phase I trial of intermittent and daily PrEP in at-risk populations in Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2012;17:2162–72.CrossRef
27.
Steyerberg EW. Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating. New York: Springer; 2009.CrossRef
28.
Oldenburg CE, Perez-Brumer AG, Hatzenbuehler ML, et al. State-level structural sexual stigma and HIV prevention in a national online sample of HIV-uninfected MSM in the United States. AIDS. 2015;29:837–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Oldenburg CE, Perez-Brumer AG, Reisner SL. Poverty matters: contextualizing the syndemic condition of psychological factors and newly diagnosed HIV infection in the United States. AIDS. 2014;28:2763–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
31.
Cahill S, Singal R, Grasso C, et al. Do ask, do tell: high levels of acceptability by patients of routine collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data in four diverse American Community Health Centers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Mayer KH. Do ask, do tell: clinicians and the U.S. National AIDS strategy. AIDS. 2014;28:1233–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
US Public Health Service. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2014: a clinical practice guideline. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
34.
van der Elst EM, Okuku HS, Nakamya P, et al. Is audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) useful in risk behaviour assessment of female and male sex workers, Mombasa, Kenya? PLoS One. 2009;4:e5340.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Beauclair R, Meng F, Deprez N, et al. Evaluating audio computer assisted self-interviews in urban south African communities: evidence for good suitability and reduced social desirability bias of a cross-sectional survey on sexual behaviour. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Early Adopters: Correlates of HIV Chemoprophylaxis Use in Recent Online Samples of US Men Who Have Sex with Men
verfasst von
Kenneth H. Mayer
Catherine E. Oldenburg
David S. Novak
Steven A. Elsesser
Douglas S. Krakower
Matthew J. Mimiaga
Publikationsdatum
03.11.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
AIDS and Behavior / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1090-7165
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1237-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

AIDS and Behavior 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Self-reported Recent PrEP Dosing and Drug Detection in an Open Label PrEP Study

Original Paper

The Effect of Depressive Symptoms on Adherence to Daily Oral PrEP in Men who have Sex with Men and Transgender Women: A Marginal Structural Model Analysis of The iPrEx OLE Study

Original Paper

Seasons of Risk: Anticipated Behavior on Vacation and Interest in Episodic Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among a Large National Sample of U.S. Men Who have Sex with Men (MSM)

Original Paper

Explaining the Efficacy of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention: A Qualitative Study of Message Framing and Messaging Preferences Among US Men Who have Sex with Men

Original Paper

Depression and Oral FTC/TDF Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex With Men (MSM/TGW)

Original Paper

Correlates of PrEP Indication in a Multi-Site Cohort of Young HIV-Uninfected Transgender Women

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 | NSCLC | Nachrichten

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC
weitere anzeigen

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise