Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2018

01.02.2018 | Cataract

Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems

verfasst von: Jorge A. Calvo-Sanz, Alejandro Portero-Benito, Alfonso Arias-Puente

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare and evaluate the agreement between the measurements obtained with a swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based biometer, the IOLMaster® 700 (IOLM), and those obtained by an optical biometer based on optical low-coherence interferometry (OLCI), the Aladdin (ALD); To evaluate the ability to perform biometric measurements in those eyes with transparency alterations.

Methods

Fifty-five eyes of 55 subjects were included in this study. Axial length (AL), corneal power (K, in diopters) and its astigmatism, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and lens thickness (LT) measures were obtained within both biometers, Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and Topcon Aladdin. Results were analyzed and compared using the Student’s paired samples t-test, Bland–Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Mean age was 73.12 ± 2.63 (62–89 years). The IOLM mean AL, K, and LT values did not show a statistically significant difference from ALD values and showed excellent agreement and correlation (ICC = 1.000, 0.970, 0.952). IOLM measured a lower mean ACD (−0.036 mm) and higher CCT measurements (9.296 μm). Those results were statistically different (p < 0.001 in both cases) but showed an excellent correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.994, 0.938). IOLM was able to obtain measures from all the eyes examined, while ALD did not measure in two cases with dense nuclear cataract. ALD showed spherical K measures in 7.27% of cases.

Conclusion

Overall a quite good agreement between IOLM and ALD was found. ALD showed spherical keratometry measures in 7.27% of cases. IOLMaster 700 was more effective in obtaining AL measurements in eyes with dense cataracts.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabsilber TM, Jepsen C, Auffarth GU et al (2010) Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(2):230–234CrossRefPubMed Rabsilber TM, Jepsen C, Auffarth GU et al (2010) Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(2):230–234CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaswin G, Rousseau A, Mgarrech M, Barreau E, Labetoulle M (2014) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(4):593–600CrossRefPubMed Kaswin G, Rousseau A, Mgarrech M, Barreau E, Labetoulle M (2014) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(4):593–600CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandal P, Berrow EJ, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS, Uthoff D, Holland D et al (2014) Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer. Br J Ophthalmol 98(2):256–258CrossRefPubMed Mandal P, Berrow EJ, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS, Uthoff D, Holland D et al (2014) Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer. Br J Ophthalmol 98(2):256–258CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang J, Savini G, Wu F, Yu X, Yang J, Yu A et al (2015) Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(10):2233–2241CrossRefPubMed Huang J, Savini G, Wu F, Yu X, Yang J, Yu A et al (2015) Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(10):2233–2241CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, Loket S (2015) Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(10):2224–2232CrossRefPubMed Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, Loket S (2015) Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(10):2224–2232CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J (2016) Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(1):62–67CrossRefPubMed Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J (2016) Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(1):62–67CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurian M, Negalur N, Das S, Puttaiah NK, Haria D, J TS et al (2016) Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(4):577–581CrossRefPubMed Kurian M, Negalur N, Das S, Puttaiah NK, Haria D, J TS et al (2016) Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(4):577–581CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Chen H, Savini G, Lu W, Yu X, Bao F et al (2016) Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(1):68–75CrossRefPubMed Li J, Chen H, Savini G, Lu W, Yu X, Bao F et al (2016) Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(1):68–75CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabatino F, Findl O, Maurino V (2016) Comparative analysis of optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(5):685–693CrossRefPubMed Sabatino F, Findl O, Maurino V (2016) Comparative analysis of optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(5):685–693CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Findl O (2005) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16(1):61–64CrossRefPubMed Findl O (2005) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16(1):61–64CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238(9):765–773CrossRefPubMed Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238(9):765–773CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL et al (1993) The lens opacities classification system III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 111(6):831–836CrossRefPubMed Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL et al (1993) The lens opacities classification system III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 111(6):831–836CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K (2011) Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31(4):330–338CrossRefPubMed McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K (2011) Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31(4):330–338CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen T (1992) Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 18(2):125–129CrossRefPubMed Olsen T (1992) Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 18(2):125–129CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanders DR, Retzlaff JA, Kraff MC, Gimbel HV, Raanan MG (1990) Comparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 16(3):341–346CrossRefPubMed Sanders DR, Retzlaff JA, Kraff MC, Gimbel HV, Raanan MG (1990) Comparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 16(3):341–346CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL (2011) Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(1):63–71CrossRefPubMed Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL (2011) Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(1):63–71CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Eom Y, Kang SY, Song JS, Kim YY, Kim HM (2014) Comparison of Hoffer Q and Haigis formulae for intraocular lens power calculation according to the anterior chamber depth in short eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 157(4):818.e2–824.e2CrossRef Eom Y, Kang SY, Song JS, Kim YY, Kim HM (2014) Comparison of Hoffer Q and Haigis formulae for intraocular lens power calculation according to the anterior chamber depth in short eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 157(4):818.e2–824.e2CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems
verfasst von
Jorge A. Calvo-Sanz
Alejandro Portero-Benito
Alfonso Arias-Puente
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3909-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Acknowledgement to referees

Thank you list 2017

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.