Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 8/2016

03.06.2016 | Invited article

Emerging stool-based and blood-based non-invasive DNA tests for colorectal cancer screening: the importance of cancer prevention in addition to cancer detection

verfasst von: Perry J. Pickhardt

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can be undertaken utilizing a variety of distinct approaches, which provides both opportunities and confusion. Traditionally, there has often been a trade-off between the degree of invasiveness of a screening test and its ability to prevent cancer, with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and optical colonoscopy (OC) at each end of the spectrum. CT colonography (CTC), although currently underutilized for CRC screening, represents an exception since it is only minimally invasive, yet provides accurate evaluation for advanced adenomas. More recently, the FDA approved a multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard) and a blood-based test (Epi proColon) for average-risk CRC screening. This commentary will provide an overview of these two new non-invasive tests, including the clinical indications, mechanism of action, and diagnostic performance. Relevance to radiology practice, including a comparison with CTC, will also be discussed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R, DeSantis C, Jemal A (2014) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:104–117CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, DeSantis C, Jemal A (2014) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:104–117CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRefPubMed Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130–160CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2009) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. Am J Roentgenol 193:40–46CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2009) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. Am J Roentgenol 193:40–46CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Meiners RJ, et al. (2010) Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10,286 asymptomatic adults. Radiology 255:83–88CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Meiners RJ, et al. (2010) Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10,286 asymptomatic adults. Radiology 255:83–88CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Young GP, Symonds EL, Allison JE, et al. (2015) Advances in fecal occult blood tests: the FIT revolution. Dig Dis Sci 60:609–622CrossRefPubMed Young GP, Symonds EL, Allison JE, et al. (2015) Advances in fecal occult blood tests: the FIT revolution. Dig Dis Sci 60:609–622CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahlquist DA (2015) Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening. Dig Dis Sci 60:623–633CrossRefPubMed Ahlquist DA (2015) Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening. Dig Dis Sci 60:623–633CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME (2004) Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med 351:2704–2714CrossRefPubMed Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME (2004) Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med 351:2704–2714CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. (2014) Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 370:1287–1297CrossRefPubMed Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. (2014) Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 370:1287–1297CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–1412CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. (2000) Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343:162–168CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. (2000) Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343:162–168CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. (2006) Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355:1863–1872CrossRefPubMed Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. (2006) Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355:1863–1872CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Church TR, Wandell M, Lofton-Day C, et al. (2014) Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectal cancer. Gut 63:317–325CrossRefPubMed Church TR, Wandell M, Lofton-Day C, et al. (2014) Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectal cancer. Gut 63:317–325CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruetzmann R, Molnar B, Pilarsky C, et al. (2008) Sensitive detection of colorectal cancer in peripheral blood by septin 9 DNA methylation assay. PLoS One 3:e3759CrossRef Gruetzmann R, Molnar B, Pilarsky C, et al. (2008) Sensitive detection of colorectal cancer in peripheral blood by septin 9 DNA methylation assay. PLoS One 3:e3759CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lofton-Day C, Model F, DeVos T, et al. (2008) DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem 54:414–423CrossRefPubMed Lofton-Day C, Model F, DeVos T, et al. (2008) DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem 54:414–423CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat deVos T, Tetzner R, Model F, et al. (2009) Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Chem 55:1337–1346CrossRefPubMed deVos T, Tetzner R, Model F, et al. (2009) Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Chem 55:1337–1346CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborn NK, Ahlquist DA (2005) Stool screening for colorectal cancer: molecular approaches. Gastroenterology 128:192–206CrossRefPubMed Osborn NK, Ahlquist DA (2005) Stool screening for colorectal cancer: molecular approaches. Gastroenterology 128:192–206CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranasinghe I, Parzynski CS, Searfoss R, et al. (2016) Differences in colonoscopy quality among facilities: development of a post-colonoscopy risk-standardized rate of unplanned hospital visits. Gastroenterology 150:103–113CrossRefPubMed Ranasinghe I, Parzynski CS, Searfoss R, et al. (2016) Differences in colonoscopy quality among facilities: development of a post-colonoscopy risk-standardized rate of unplanned hospital visits. Gastroenterology 150:103–113CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal E (2013) The $2.7 trillion medical bill: colonoscopies explain why U.S. leads the world in health expenditures. The New York Times. 1 Jun 2013 Rosenthal E (2013) The $2.7 trillion medical bill: colonoscopies explain why U.S. leads the world in health expenditures. The New York Times. 1 Jun 2013
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin GL, Fennimore B, Ahnen DJ (2013) Can colonoscopy remain cost-effective for colorectal cancer screening? The impact of practice patterns and the will Rogers phenomenon on costs. Am J Gastroenterol 108:296–301CrossRefPubMed Austin GL, Fennimore B, Ahnen DJ (2013) Can colonoscopy remain cost-effective for colorectal cancer screening? The impact of practice patterns and the will Rogers phenomenon on costs. Am J Gastroenterol 108:296–301CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, et al. (2013) Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 14:711–720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, et al. (2013) Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 14:711–720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Hain KS, Kim DH, Hassan C (2010) Low rates of cancer or high-grade dysplasia in colorectal polyps collected from computed tomography colonography screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:610–615CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Hain KS, Kim DH, Hassan C (2010) Low rates of cancer or high-grade dysplasia in colorectal polyps collected from computed tomography colonography screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:610–615CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ (2006) Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 239:313–316CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ (2006) Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 239:313–316CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A, et al. (2008) Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med 168:696–705CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A, et al. (2008) Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med 168:696–705CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Kim DH (2009) CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1332–1340CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Kim DH (2009) CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1332–1340CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Lee LJ, del Rio AM, et al. (2011) Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard. J Bone Miner Res 26:2194–2203CrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lee LJ, del Rio AM, et al. (2011) Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard. J Bone Miner Res 26:2194–2203CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ziemlewicz TJ, Binkley N, Pickhardt PJ (2015) Opportunistic osteoporosis screening: addition of quantitative CT bone mineral density evaluation to CT colonography. J Am Coll Radiol 12:1036–1041CrossRefPubMed Ziemlewicz TJ, Binkley N, Pickhardt PJ (2015) Opportunistic osteoporosis screening: addition of quantitative CT bone mineral density evaluation to CT colonography. J Am Coll Radiol 12:1036–1041CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Emerging stool-based and blood-based non-invasive DNA tests for colorectal cancer screening: the importance of cancer prevention in addition to cancer detection
verfasst von
Perry J. Pickhardt
Publikationsdatum
03.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0798-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Abdominal Radiology 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.