Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2017

10.01.2017

ENABLE (Exportable Notation and Bookmark List Engine): an Interface to Manage Tumor Measurement Data from PACS to Cancer Databases

verfasst von: Nikhil Goyal, Andrea B. Apolo, Eliana D. Berman, Mohammad Hadi Bagheri, Jason E. Levine, John W. Glod, Rosandra N. Kaplan, Laura B. Machado, Les R. Folio

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Oncologists evaluate therapeutic response in cancer trials based on tumor quantification following selected “target” lesions over time. At our cancer center, a majority of oncologists use Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 quantifying tumor progression based on lesion measurements on imaging. Currently, our oncologists handwrite tumor measurements, followed by multiple manual data transfers; however, our Picture Archiving Communication System (PACS) (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY) has the ability to export tumor measurements, making it possible to manage tumor metadata digitally. We developed an interface, “Exportable Notation and Bookmark List Engine” (ENABLE), which produces prepopulated RECIST v1.1 worksheets and compiles cohort data and data models from PACS measurement data, thus eliminating handwriting and manual data transcription. We compared RECIST v1.1 data from eight patients (16 computed tomography exams) enrolled in an IRB-approved therapeutic trial with ENABLE outputs: 10 data fields with a total of 194 data points. All data in ENABLE’s output matched with the existing data. Seven staff were taught how to use the interface with a 5-min explanatory instructional video. All were able to use ENABLE successfully without additional guidance. We additionally assessed 42 metastatic genitourinary cancer patients with available RECIST data within PACS to produce a best response waterfall plot. ENABLE manages tumor measurements and associated metadata exported from PACS, producing forms and data models compatible with cancer databases, obviating handwriting and the manual re-entry of data. Automation should reduce transcription errors and improve efficiency and the auditing process.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Folio LR, Nelson CJ, Bluemke DA, et al.: Quantitative radiology reporting in oncology: Survey of Oncologists and Radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205(3):W233-W243, 2015.CrossRefPubMed Folio LR, Nelson CJ, Bluemke DA, et al.: Quantitative radiology reporting in oncology: Survey of Oncologists and Radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205(3):W233-W243, 2015.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Verweij J et al.: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–47, 2009.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Verweij J et al.: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–47, 2009.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chalian H, Tore HG, Yaghmai V, et al.: Radiologic assessment of response to therapy: comparison of RECIST Versions 1.1 and 1.0. Radiographics 31(7):2093–105, 2011.CrossRefPubMed Chalian H, Tore HG, Yaghmai V, et al.: Radiologic assessment of response to therapy: comparison of RECIST Versions 1.1 and 1.0. Radiographics 31(7):2093–105, 2011.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaffe TA, Wickersham NW, Sullivan DC: Quantitative imaging in oncology patients. Part 2. Oncologists’ opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):W19–W30, 2010.CrossRefPubMed Jaffe TA, Wickersham NW, Sullivan DC: Quantitative imaging in oncology patients. Part 2. Oncologists’ opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):W19–W30, 2010.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaffe TA, Wickersham NW, Sullivan DC: Quantitative imaging in oncology patients. Part 1. Radiology practice patterns at major U.S. cancer centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):101–106, 2010.CrossRefPubMed Jaffe TA, Wickersham NW, Sullivan DC: Quantitative imaging in oncology patients. Part 1. Radiology practice patterns at major U.S. cancer centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):101–106, 2010.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang J, Bluemke DA, Yao J, et al.: A cross-platform and distributive database system for cumulative tumor measurement. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1266–1269, San Diego, CA, 2012. Huang J, Bluemke DA, Yao J, et al.: A cross-platform and distributive database system for cumulative tumor measurement. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1266–1269, San Diego, CA, 2012.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Folio LR, Choi MM, Schaub NP, et al.: Automated registration, segmentation, and measurement of metastatic melanoma tumors in serial CT scans. Acad Radiol 20(5):604–613, 2013.CrossRefPubMed Folio LR, Choi MM, Schaub NP, et al.: Automated registration, segmentation, and measurement of metastatic melanoma tumors in serial CT scans. Acad Radiol 20(5):604–613, 2013.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadigh G, Hertweck T, Duszak R Jr et al.: Traditional text-only versus multimedia enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians’ perceptions of value. J Am Coll Radiol 12(5):519–24, 2015.CrossRefPubMed Sadigh G, Hertweck T, Duszak R Jr et al.: Traditional text-only versus multimedia enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians’ perceptions of value. J Am Coll Radiol 12(5):519–24, 2015.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Machado LB, Apolo AB, Folio LR, et al.: Radiology reports with hyperlinks improve target lesion selection and measurement concordance in cancer trials. AJR Am J Roentgenol, (2016). Machado LB, Apolo AB, Folio LR, et al.: Radiology reports with hyperlinks improve target lesion selection and measurement concordance in cancer trials. AJR Am J Roentgenol, (2016).
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Folio LR, Turkbey EB, Apolo AB, et al.: Viable tumor volume: volume of interest within segmented metastatic lesions, a pilot study of proposed computed tomography response criteria for urothelial cancer. Eur J Radiol 84(9):1708–14, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Folio LR, Turkbey EB, Apolo AB, et al.: Viable tumor volume: volume of interest within segmented metastatic lesions, a pilot study of proposed computed tomography response criteria for urothelial cancer. Eur J Radiol 84(9):1708–14, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy MA, Rubin DL: Tool support to enable evaluation of the clinical response to treatment. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 6:399–403, 2008. Levy MA, Rubin DL: Tool support to enable evaluation of the clinical response to treatment. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 6:399–403, 2008.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sevenster M, Travis AR, Chang PJ, et al.: Improved efficiency in clinical workflow of reporting measured oncology lesions via PACS-integrated lesion tracking tool. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(3):576–583, 2015.CrossRefPubMed Sevenster M, Travis AR, Chang PJ, et al.: Improved efficiency in clinical workflow of reporting measured oncology lesions via PACS-integrated lesion tracking tool. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(3):576–583, 2015.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmerman SL, Kim W, Boonn WW: Informatics in radiology: automated structured reporting of imaging findings using the AIM standard and XML. RadioGraphics 31(3):881–887, 2011.CrossRefPubMed Zimmerman SL, Kim W, Boonn WW: Informatics in radiology: automated structured reporting of imaging findings using the AIM standard and XML. RadioGraphics 31(3):881–887, 2011.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sevenster M, Buurman J, Chang PJ, et al.: Natural language processing techniques for extracting and categorizing finding measurements in narrative radiology reports. Appl Clin Inform 6(3):600–610, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sevenster M, Buurman J, Chang PJ, et al.: Natural language processing techniques for extracting and categorizing finding measurements in narrative radiology reports. Appl Clin Inform 6(3):600–610, 2015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
ENABLE (Exportable Notation and Bookmark List Engine): an Interface to Manage Tumor Measurement Data from PACS to Cancer Databases
verfasst von
Nikhil Goyal
Andrea B. Apolo
Eliana D. Berman
Mohammad Hadi Bagheri
Jason E. Levine
John W. Glod
Rosandra N. Kaplan
Laura B. Machado
Les R. Folio
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9938-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.