Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Esophagus 2/2022

12.10.2021 | Original Article

Esophageal wall thickness on CT scans: can it predict the T stage of primary thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

verfasst von: Yue Wang, Yong Huang, Qi-yu Zhao, Xiao-qin Li, Ling Wang, Ning-ning Wang, Jin-zhi Wang, Qing Wang

Erschienen in: Esophagus | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

CT is the most commonly used method to stage esophageal cancer (EC). However, the reported CT T-staging criteria for EC are controversial.

Purpose

To determine and validate the optimal esophageal wall thickness (EWT) threshold on CT to distinguish lesions with different T stages in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

Methods

One thousand, one hundred-two consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed ESCC between July 2014 and April 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent a preoperative CT examination and surgical treatment. The maximal EWT of the lesions on CT was measured. Patients were divided into pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 subgroups according to the pathologic stage. We employed the support vector machine, where linear kernels were leveraged to determine the optimal threshold to classify samples with different T stages. 90% of samples from each subgroup were randomly selected as the training set, while the remainder comprised the testing set.

Results

The mean EWTs of the pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 subgroups were 4.9 ± 2.6 mm, 8.1 ± 2.3 mm, 12.4 ± 3.6 mm, and 18.6 ± 4.4 mm, respectively. Differences in the EWT between the four subgroups or between adjacent subgroups were significant (p < 0.001), and esophageal wall became thicker with increasing pT stage. We utilized MATLAB 2020a to implement the SVM model and ran the code 10 times. The accuracy of the model was 60.29 ± 2.33%. The thresholds between samples from pT1/pT2, pT2/pT3 and pT3/pT4 lesions were 5.5 ± 0.3 mm, 10.8 ± 0.8 mm and 15.9 ± 0.5 mm, respectively.

Conclusions

Possibility of predicting T stage of ESCC by EWT on CT scans was limited to 60% by model examination with large sample size.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee H-S, Jung H-K, Tae CH, et al. Treatment pattern and overall survival in esophageal cancer during a 13-year period: a nationwide cohort study of 6,354 Korean patients. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0231456.CrossRefPubMed Lee H-S, Jung H-K, Tae CH, et al. Treatment pattern and overall survival in esophageal cancer during a 13-year period: a nationwide cohort study of 6,354 Korean patients. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0231456.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai Z, Liu Q. Understanding the Global Cancer Statistics 2018: implications for cancer control. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;64(6):1017–20.CrossRef Cai Z, Liu Q. Understanding the Global Cancer Statistics 2018: implications for cancer control. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;64(6):1017–20.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Li B, Li N, Liu S, et al. Does [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography/computed tomography have a role in cervical nodal staging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(2):544–50.CrossRef Li B, Li N, Liu S, et al. Does [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography/computed tomography have a role in cervical nodal staging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(2):544–50.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Krill T, Baliss M, Roark R, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in esophageal cancer staging. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(S12):S1602–9.CrossRefPubMed Krill T, Baliss M, Roark R, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in esophageal cancer staging. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(S12):S1602–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi J, Kim SG, Kim JS, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(6):1380–6.CrossRef Choi J, Kim SG, Kim JS, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(6):1380–6.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng J, Chu X, Ren Z, et al. Relationship between T stage and survival in distantly metastatic esophageal cancer: A STROBE-compliant study. Medicine. 2020;99(19):e20064.CrossRefPubMed Deng J, Chu X, Ren Z, et al. Relationship between T stage and survival in distantly metastatic esophageal cancer: A STROBE-compliant study. Medicine. 2020;99(19):e20064.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat He LJ, Xie C, Wang ZX, et al. Submucosal saline injection followed by endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic ultrasound only for distinguishing between T1a and T1b esophageal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(2):384–90.CrossRef He LJ, Xie C, Wang ZX, et al. Submucosal saline injection followed by endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic ultrasound only for distinguishing between T1a and T1b esophageal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(2):384–90.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee G, I H, Kim SJ, , et al. Clinical implication of PET/MR imaging in preoperative esophageal cancer staging: comparison with PET/CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and CT. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(8):1242–7.CrossRef Lee G, I H, Kim SJ, , et al. Clinical implication of PET/MR imaging in preoperative esophageal cancer staging: comparison with PET/CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and CT. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(8):1242–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandha GS, Severin D, Postema E, et al. Is positron emission tomography useful in locoregional staging of esophageal cancer? Results of a multidisciplinary initiative comparing CT, positron emission tomography, and EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(3):402–9.CrossRef Sandha GS, Severin D, Postema E, et al. Is positron emission tomography useful in locoregional staging of esophageal cancer? Results of a multidisciplinary initiative comparing CT, positron emission tomography, and EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(3):402–9.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfau PR, Perlman SB, Stanko P, et al. The role and clinical value of EUS in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging program with CT and positron emission tomography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(3):377–84.CrossRef Pfau PR, Perlman SB, Stanko P, et al. The role and clinical value of EUS in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging program with CT and positron emission tomography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(3):377–84.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyer RB, Silverman PM, Tamm EP, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of esophageal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(3):785–93.CrossRef Iyer RB, Silverman PM, Tamm EP, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of esophageal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(3):785–93.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu LF, Wang BZ, Feng JL, et al. Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(2):219–24.CrossRefPubMed Wu LF, Wang BZ, Feng JL, et al. Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(2):219–24.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen M, Li X, Chen Y, et al. Proposed revision of the 8th edition AJCC clinical staging system for esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with definitive chemo-IMRT based on CT imaging. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):54.CrossRefPubMed Chen M, Li X, Chen Y, et al. Proposed revision of the 8th edition AJCC clinical staging system for esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with definitive chemo-IMRT based on CT imaging. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):54.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng ZZ, Yang NJ, Xi XQ, et al. Diagnostic and application value of 64-slice spiral CT scanning in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011;33(12):929–32. Cheng ZZ, Yang NJ, Xi XQ, et al. Diagnostic and application value of 64-slice spiral CT scanning in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011;33(12):929–32.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moschetta M, Ianora AA, Marzullo A, et al. Vessel probe CT protocol in the study of esophageal carcinoma: can it improve preoperative T staging? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36(7):663–9.CrossRef Moschetta M, Ianora AA, Marzullo A, et al. Vessel probe CT protocol in the study of esophageal carcinoma: can it improve preoperative T staging? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36(7):663–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe VJ, Booya F, Fletcher JG, et al. Comparison of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;7(6):422–30.CrossRef Lowe VJ, Booya F, Fletcher JG, et al. Comparison of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;7(6):422–30.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, et al. Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology. 1991;181(2):419–25.CrossRefPubMed Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, et al. Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology. 1991;181(2):419–25.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Moss AA, Schnyder P, Thoeni RF, et al. Esophageal carcinoma: pretherapy staging by computed tomography. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136(6):1051–6.CrossRef Moss AA, Schnyder P, Thoeni RF, et al. Esophageal carcinoma: pretherapy staging by computed tomography. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136(6):1051–6.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):36–42.CrossRef Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):36–42.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu CY, Li YK, Li JB, et al. A comparative study of the normal oesophageal wall thickness based on 3-dimensional, 4-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography. Medicine. 2020;99(45):e22553.CrossRefPubMed Hu CY, Li YK, Li JB, et al. A comparative study of the normal oesophageal wall thickness based on 3-dimensional, 4-dimensional, and cone beam computed tomography. Medicine. 2020;99(45):e22553.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Panebianco V, Grazhdani H, Iafrate F, et al. 3D CT protocol in the assessment of the esophageal neoplastic lesions: can it improve TNM staging? Eur Radiol. 2006;16(2):414–21.CrossRef Panebianco V, Grazhdani H, Iafrate F, et al. 3D CT protocol in the assessment of the esophageal neoplastic lesions: can it improve TNM staging? Eur Radiol. 2006;16(2):414–21.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamabe Y, Kuroki Y, Ishikawa T, et al. Tumor staging of advanced esophageal cancer: combination of double-contrast esophagography and contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(3):753–7.CrossRef Yamabe Y, Kuroki Y, Ishikawa T, et al. Tumor staging of advanced esophageal cancer: combination of double-contrast esophagography and contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(3):753–7.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson WM, Halvorsen RA Jr. Staging esophageal carcinoma II: CT and MRI. Semin Oncol. 1994;21(4):447–52. Thompson WM, Halvorsen RA Jr. Staging esophageal carcinoma II: CT and MRI. Semin Oncol. 1994;21(4):447–52.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Picus D, Balfe DM, Koehler RE, et al. Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. Radiology. 1983;146(2):433–8.CrossRef Picus D, Balfe DM, Koehler RE, et al. Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. Radiology. 1983;146(2):433–8.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Umeoka S, Koyama T, Watanabe G, et al. Preoperative local staging of esophageal carcinoma using dual-phase contrast-enhanced imaging with multi-detector row computed tomography: value of the arterial phase images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34(3):406–12.CrossRef Umeoka S, Koyama T, Watanabe G, et al. Preoperative local staging of esophageal carcinoma using dual-phase contrast-enhanced imaging with multi-detector row computed tomography: value of the arterial phase images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34(3):406–12.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sultan R, Haider Z, Chawla TU. Diagnostic accuracy of CT scan in staging resectable esophageal cancer. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(1):90–2. Sultan R, Haider Z, Chawla TU. Diagnostic accuracy of CT scan in staging resectable esophageal cancer. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(1):90–2.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker AJ, Spier BJ, Perlman SB, et al. Integrated PET/CT fusion imaging and endoscopic ultrasound in the pre-operative staging and evaluation of esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13(1):166–71.CrossRef Walker AJ, Spier BJ, Perlman SB, et al. Integrated PET/CT fusion imaging and endoscopic ultrasound in the pre-operative staging and evaluation of esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13(1):166–71.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Esophageal wall thickness on CT scans: can it predict the T stage of primary thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?
verfasst von
Yue Wang
Yong Huang
Qi-yu Zhao
Xiao-qin Li
Ling Wang
Ning-ning Wang
Jin-zhi Wang
Qing Wang
Publikationsdatum
12.10.2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Esophagus / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-021-00886-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Esophagus 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Battle of Experts: Sport vs. Spritze bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes

11.05.2024 DDG-Jahrestagung 2024 Kongressbericht

Im Battle of Experts traten zwei Experten auf dem Diabeteskongress gegeneinander an: Die eine vertrat die Auffassung „Sport statt Spritze“ bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes, der andere forderte „Spritze statt Sport!“ Am Ende waren sie sich aber einig: Die Kombination aus beidem erzielt die besten Ergebnisse.

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

10.05.2024 Hypercholesterinämie Nachrichten

Patienten mit Arteriosklerose-bedingten kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, die trotz Statineinnahme zu hohe Triglyzeridspiegel haben, profitieren von einer Behandlung mit Icosapent-Ethyl, und zwar unabhängig vom individuellen Risikoprofil.

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

In den USA ist erstmals eine bioresorbierbare Gefäßstütze – auch Scaffold genannt – zur Rekanalisation infrapoplitealer Arterien bei schwerer PAVK zugelassen worden. Das markiert einen Wendepunkt in der Geschichte dieser speziellen Gefäßstützen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.