Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) remains the fifth most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer death [
1]. However, despite various attempts to harmonise clinical pathways, there is substantial heterogeneity in surgical and oncological services provided to patients [
2‐
4]. Furthermore, several population databases demonstrated that some aspects of care for GC patients are suboptimal, including inadequate lymph node dissection or unexpectedly high morbidity and mortality rates [
5,
6].
The need for better quality indicators applicable to complex operative procedures started an increasing interest in composite measures of surgical performance [
7,
8]. A combination of several well-established parameters, usually including rates of mortality, morbidity, readmissions, or length of hospital stay, has been proposed as a more accurate approximation for the complexity of the surgical care than any individual parameter [
9,
10]. This is particularly important for oncological surgery, where quality refers not only to short term outcomes but also long-term survival. Textbook outcome (TO), incorporating several anticipated postoperative endpoints across all important domains of surgical performance, represents an ideal (so-called textbook) perioperative course. Its suitability to evaluate various aspects of surgical quality has been demonstrated for both oncological [
11‐
14] and general surgery [
15‐
17]. TO has also been investigated in few population-based cohort studies recruiting patients with gastric cancer [
18‐
20]. The data obtained corroborated the anticipated variability in quality of care and identified the limiting factors for achieving TO. Moreover, they suggested significant correlation between accomplishing TO and superior long-term survival.
Despite the overall optimism, there are still some important aspects related to the applicability of TO as a validated measure of clinical pathways for gastric cancer. Harmonisation is one of the unresolved issues as the previously proposed definitions showed marked variability across studies [
18‐
23]. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to evaluate candidate components of TO and identify those most relevant for patients’ prognosis. Subsequently, we developed and validated a nomogram predicting TO after curative-intent resection of gastric cancer.
Discussion
Textbook outcome (TO), representing an ideal hospitalization, has been proposed as a clinically relevant measure reflecting the complexity of perioperative care for various types of cancers. In the present study, we have verified validity of the current definitions of TO among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of gastric cancer. Moreover, we identified factors associated with the likelihood of achieving TO and developed a nine-item nomogram for precisely estimating the probability of completing TO.
The idea of TO meets the needs of patients and healthcare systems to develop an easy to interpret measure of complex cancer care combining parameters quantifying safety and quality of surgery [
31]. The proportion of patients completing the ideal hospitalization reported in previous studies on gastric cancer ranged from 22 to 51%, reaching in some Asian centres 72% [
18‐
21,
32‐
36]. Postoperative complications and the low number of evaluated lymph nodes were the most common limiting factors, but also those responsible for gradually increasing trends in TO [
18‐
20,
22,
33‐
37].
Though TO seems to be a potentially useful tool for communicating and comparing outcomes for complex oncologic procedures, there are challenges with the optimum construction of its elements. Previous reports regarding TO in abdominal surgery clearly suggested the existence of organ-specific or disease-specific factors associated with an ideal perioperative course. Its suitability to evaluate various aspects of surgical quality has been demonstrated for both oncological [
11‐
14] and general surgery [
15‐
17]. TO has also been investigated in few population-based cohort studies recruiting patients with gastric cancer [
18‐
20].
Initial components of TO for patients with gastric cancer were defined by expert opinion and included 10 measures related to safety (intraoperative and postoperative complications, reinterventions, mortality, ICU and hospital stay, readmission after discharge) and efficacy of treatment (resection margins, number of evaluated lymph nodes) [
19]. The criteria proposed by Busweiler et al. were subsequently used for oesophago-gastric surgery in other studies [
11,
32‐
35]. However, another definitions of TO or textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) were published including four [
22,
23], eight [
18,
20] or nine [
21] components. Moreover, the alterations included not only the number of individual indicators, but also their definitions like the minimum number of lymph nodes (15 [
19] or 16 [
22]), prolonged hospital stay (19 days, [
23] 21 days, [
19] or 75
th percentile of the cohort [
22]), and postoperative mortality (30 days [
19] or 90 days [
20]). Consequently, the prevalence of TO among patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer is markedly affected by the number of measures used to define this outcome [
38,
39].
To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the optimum definition of TO for gastric cancer that was subsequently used to develop and validate a nomogram tool predicting an ideal perioperative course. Using prospectively collected datasets we had the unique opportunity to evaluate all components of TO proposed in the literature, avoiding the risks of incomplete data or lack of standard definitions as previously encountered by some population-based registries [
18,
20,
37]. In order to evaluate the generalizability of results, the datasets covered broad time periods, potentially reflecting the evolving standards for patient care. A detailed comparison of six potential definitions found the 10-item TO proposed by Busweiler et al. as the most informative and most precisely reflecting the likelihood to achieve long-term survival. Moreover, there was a correlation between the number of achieved individual measures and patients’ prognosis. Therefore, the selected definition seems to be most appropriate for further studies evaluating clinical pathways for gastric cancer, even though it requires access to some data not routinely collected by administrative databases.
Essentially, all previous studies demonstrated impaired survival among patients with gastric cancer who failed to achieve TO [
18,
20,
22,
23,
32,
33,
35]. A Netherland national cohort study of 2,769 patients included in the DUCA registry between 2011 and 2016 reported significantly reduced hazard ratio (HR) of death associated with TO (10 measures) for both overall survival (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.71) and conditional survival (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.79) [
32]. Another cohort study recorded data of 1,836 patients from the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours in Ontario (PRESTO) between 2004 and 2015 [
18]. They found a 41% decrease in the relative risk of death (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.72) among patients achieving TO (8 measures). Similar findings were reported using data for 1,293 patients from the population-based Spanish EURECCA Registry recorded between 2014 and 2017. Using Cox regression modelling, the authors showed that TO (8 measures) caused a 33% reduction in the relative risk of death (HR 0.67, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.83) [
20]. Altogether, data from these three population-based registries and the current study demonstrated a clear correlation between TO and patients’ survival. The underlying mechanism for such an association is most likely multidimensional, as TO combines several factors that could influence prognosis, including resection margins, precise evaluation of lymph nodes, and postoperative complications.
Given the prognostic implications of TO, identification of factors associated with the likelihood of achieving the desired outcome could provide clinically relevant benefits. In the original study of Busweiler et al., ASA grade ≥ 3 (OR 0.74), Charlson co-morbidity index score ≥ 2 (OR 0.74), clinical tumour stage III (OR 0.61), no neoadjuvant therapy (OR 0.75), and resection of additional organs (OR 0.66) significantly decreased the likelihood of textbook outcome [
19]. Data from the Canadian PRESTO registry identified younger age, fewer concomitant disorders, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, distally located tumours, and lower T stage as factors increasing the odds for TO [
18]. In a Spanish population-based analysis, age > 64 years, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, multivisceral resection, and surgery performed in a community hospital were associated with the lower odds of achieving TO [
20]. Although data from these three population-based studies suggested the ability to predict TO using relatively simple criteria, no validated tools were available so far. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a nomogram allowing accurate prediction of TO. First, we screened potential variables associated with the likelihood of TO using a single centre dataset. Subsequently, we developed a 9-item nomogram using two independent and heterogenous datasets covering broad time periods with different standards for patient care, including perioperative treatment. The prepared nomogram showed acceptable performance, suggesting potential applicability for further clinical endorsement.
Our results provide a clinically relevant rationale for the use of carefully selected textbook outcome measures as a source of prognostic information. However, some important limitations of the current study should be considered. First, a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data cannot eliminate the risk of selection bias. Second, we used overall survival as the primary criterion to evaluate TO. Although a similar approach was used by previous studies, adoption of cancer-specific survival could provide some additional insight. Third, the overall proportion of patients given preoperative chemotherapy was 21%, and this was relatively low compared to the current guidelines. However, one of the aims of our study was to develop and evaluate a nomogram predicting TO applicable for different clinical situations, including various therapeutic regimens. Consequently, we were able to demonstrate the validity of the nomogram in two different populations with a low and high prevalence of neoadjuvant treatment.
In summary, this study identified the optimum component measures of Textbook Outcome associated with long-term survival of patients undergoing curative-intent resection of gastric cancer. Additionally, we developed a nomogram applicable for predicting the likelihood of achieving TO and validated it in multicenter settings. Further research is needed to assess if such tools could be used in quality improvement programs for gastric cancer patients.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.